Created bymario-alka.dePowered bygodcore.denoob2claw.detricoma.de
Contributed byMario AlkaMeta

Meta-Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct

Performance benchmark · measured on 29.07.2026 04:59

Benchmark-IDrun-20260729-060803-bb7b94
Timebench 3 - Kombi (Prefill + Generation)Dense8BRuntime: llama.cppQuantisierung: Q4_K_M
Generation823,64tok/s
Prefill12.521,18tok/s
Time to First Token2.491,50ms
Total duration24,91s
Concurrency5parallel
Ranking in the field
55of 354 systems

Performance benchmark · Primary metric: Generation-Speed (tok/s) · 5× concurrent

This run is better than 85 % of all comparable systems.
Generation 823,6 tok/s
+122 % vs Ø 370,9
Prefill 12.521,2 tok/s
+131 % vs Ø 5.422,0
Time to First Token 2.492 ms
-90 % vs Ø 23.732
Distribution in the field0 – 1.349 tok/s
Ø 370 Median Dieser Lauf

Wie schlägt sich dieser Benchmark mit anderen Modellen?

gemma-4-E2B-itNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition · run-20260727-181606-0adf6d
1.349,3 tok/s
gemma-4-E2B-itNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 · run-20260728-184455-5b4937
1.301,9 tok/s
gemma-4-E2B-it3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260728-184456-4111a9
1.195,7 tok/s
NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-4BNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition · run-20260727-181607-30d864
1.188,7 tok/s
NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-4BNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 · run-20260728-194135-5432cd
1.164,8 tok/s
gpt-oss-20bNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition · run-20260728-140954-9e81f9
1.136,3 tok/s
gpt-oss-20bNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 · run-20260729-032121-058a31
1.113,5 tok/s
NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-4B3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260728-194136-836a91
1.090,6 tok/s
NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-4B3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260727-181606-8b381e
1.077,4 tok/s
NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-4B3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260728-194136-b8a818
1.071,0 tok/s
NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-4B3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260728-194136-038e92
1.051,1 tok/s
gpt-oss-20b3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260729-032121-ffb18a
1.015,5 tok/s
NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-30B-A3BNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition · run-20260729-032121-305ad6
1.007,8 tok/s
Nemotron-Cascade-2-30B-A3BNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition · run-20260729-032120-4b8514
1.007,3 tok/s
Meta-Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct this runNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 · run-20260729-060803-bb7b94
823,6 tok/s

How does this benchmark compare on other GPUs?

Same model on different hardware · 5× concurrent · Generation (tok/s)

Hardware

GPU: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 · 32 GB VRAM
CPU: AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8-Core Processor
RAM: 126 GB
Mainboard: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ROG STRIX B550-A GAMING

Setup

Runtime: llama.cpp
Quantization: Q4_K_M
Model: Meta-Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct

Configuration

benchmark-konfiguration — run-20260729-060803-bb7b94
# LLM-Benchmark Konfiguration # Modell : Meta-Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct # Engine : llama.cpp # Run-ID : run-20260729-060803-bb7b94 # GPU : NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 # CPU : AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8-Core Processor # RAM : 126 GB bench@llm-benchmark:~$ /root/llama.cpp/build/bin/llama-server \ -m /root/.cache/huggingface/hub/models--bartowski--Meta-Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct-GGUF/snapshots/bf5b95e96dac0462e2a09145ec66cae9a3f12067/Meta-Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct-Q4_K_M.gguf \ --alias Meta-Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct \ --host 0.0.0.0 \ --port 8000 \ -ngl 999 \ -c 16384 \ -np 4 \ --jinja
Engine?Die Inferenz-Software, die das Modell ausliefert (z.B. vLLM oder llama.cpp). Sie bestimmt Geschwindigkeit, unterstuetzte Modellformate und welche Parameter ueberhaupt verfuegbar sind.llamacpp
Modellalias?Der Name, unter dem das Modell ueber die API angesprochen wird. Genau dieser Wert muss im Request-Feld 'model' stehen.Meta-Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct
Kontextlaenge?Maximale Anzahl Tokens (Eingabe + erzeugte Ausgabe zusammen), die das Modell pro Anfrage verarbeiten kann.16384
Modellpfad?Pfad zur GGUF-Modelldatei, die geladen und ausgeliefert wird./root/.cache/huggingface/hub/models--bartowski--Meta-Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct-GGUF/snapshots/bf5b95e96dac0462e2a09145ec66cae9a3f12067/Meta-Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct-Q4_K_M.gguf
GPU-Layer?Anzahl der auf die GPU ausgelagerten Modell-Layer. Hoeher = mehr VRAM und schneller; der Rest laeuft auf der CPU. 999 = alles auf GPU.999
Kontext?Groesse des Kontextfensters in Token. 0 = der beim Training verwendete Kontext des Modells.16384
np4

All benchmarks of this model To leaderboard

Anzeige
Model comparison

Meta-Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct on various hardware

All published performance runs of this model – each bubble a variant: position = prefill (X) × generation (Y), bubble size = number of runs. Closer to the top right = faster. ★ Marked gold = this benchmark.

GPUby graphics card

2.0701.5531.0355180,005.87311.74617.619Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition - 1.533,0 tok/s Generation, 13.472 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 2.895 ms (3 Laufe)NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 B...NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition - 1.433,0 tok/s Generation, 14.214 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.334 ms (9 Laufe)NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 B...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti - 913,4 tok/s Generation, 6.511 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 5.168 ms (3 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 50...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti - 837,9 tok/s Generation, 8.047 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 5.721 ms (3 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 30...AMD Radeon 8060S Graphics - 83,4 tok/s Generation, 1.949 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 6.369 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Radeon 8060S Grap...CPU-only - 3,6 tok/s Generation, 36 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 59.044 ms (1 Lauf)CPU-onlyNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 - 1.593,1 tok/s Generation, 11.858 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.236 ms (3 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 50...
★ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 1.593,1 tok/s this runNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition 1.533,0 tok/sNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition 1.433,0 tok/sNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti 913,4 tok/sNVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti 837,9 tok/sAMD Radeon 8060S Graphics 83,4 tok/sCPU-only 3,6 tok/s

CPUby processor

2.0701.5531.0355180,005.87311.74617.619Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-Core Processor - 1.533,0 tok/s Generation, 13.472 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 2.895 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-...AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX 24-Cores - 1.433,0 tok/s Generation, 14.214 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.334 ms (9 Laufe)AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 32-Cores - 913,4 tok/s Generation, 6.511 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 5.168 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX with Radeon Graphics - 837,9 tok/s Generation, 8.047 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 5.721 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX wi...AMD RYZEN AI MAX+ 395 w/ Radeon 8060S - 83,4 tok/s Generation, 1.949 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 6.369 ms (3 Laufe)AMD RYZEN AI MAX+ 395...Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-4620 v2 @ 2.60GHz - 3,6 tok/s Generation, 36 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 59.044 ms (1 Lauf)Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU ...AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8-Core Processor - 1.593,1 tok/s Generation, 11.858 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.236 ms (3 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8...
★ AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8-Core Processor 1.593,1 tok/s this runAMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-Core Processor 1.533,0 tok/sAMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX 24-Cores 1.433,0 tok/sAMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 32-Cores 913,4 tok/sAMD Ryzen 9 8945HX with Radeon Graphics 837,9 tok/sAMD RYZEN AI MAX+ 395 w/ Radeon 8060S 83,4 tok/sIntel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-4620 v2 @ 2.60GHz 3,6 tok/s

MBby mainboard

2.0701.5531.0355180,005.87311.74617.619Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ProArt X870E-CREATOR WIFI - 1.533,0 tok/s Generation, 13.472 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 2.895 ms (3 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX90E-SAGE SE - 1.433,0 tok/s Generation, 14.214 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.334 ms (9 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI - 913,4 tok/s Generation, 6.511 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 5.168 ms (3 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....Meigao Innovation Technology (Shen Zhen) Co., Ltd DRFXL (MotherBoard Series) - 837,9 tok/s Generation, 8.047 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 5.721 ms (3 Laufe)Meigao Innovation Tec...Bosgame AXB35-02 (BeyondMax Series) - 83,4 tok/s Generation, 1.949 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 6.369 ms (3 Laufe)Bosgame AXB35-02 (Bey...Dell Inc. PowerEdge R820 - 3,6 tok/s Generation, 36 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 59.044 ms (1 Lauf)Dell Inc. PowerEdge R...ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ROG STRIX B550-A GAMING - 1.593,1 tok/s Generation, 11.858 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.236 ms (3 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....
★ ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ROG STRIX B550-A GAMING 1.593,1 tok/s this runASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ProArt X870E-CREATOR WIFI 1.533,0 tok/sASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX90E-SAGE SE 1.433,0 tok/sASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI 913,4 tok/sMeigao Innovation Technology (Shen Zhen) Co., Ltd DRFXL (MotherBoard Series) 837,9 tok/sBosgame AXB35-02 (BeyondMax Series) 83,4 tok/sDell Inc. PowerEdge R820 3,6 tok/s

ENGby engine

1.7521.6731.5931.5131.4349.5319.93610.34210.747Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)llama.cpp - 1.593,1 tok/s Generation, 10.139 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 6.369 ms (25 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ llama.cpp
★ llama.cpp 1.593,1 tok/s this run

DRVby driver

1.7521.6731.5931.5131.4349.5319.93610.34210.747Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)unbekannt - 1.593,1 tok/s Generation, 10.139 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 6.369 ms (25 Laufe)unbekannt
unbekannt 1.593,1 tok/s
💰 Economics

Economics of this run

Operating cost, TCO and comparison with the next-best runs of the same model at identical concurrency (5× concurrent). Methodology →

⚙️ ConfigurationAll metrics and charts below follow these settings – based on a 24-month runtime.Save to URLReset
⚡ Electricity price EUR/kWh
⚙️ System utilization 100 %
🖥️ Acquisition EUR
🔌 Idle 72 W
⚡ TDP 622 W
☁️ External LLM (API)
Electricity0.30 EUR/kWh
Avg power (incl. idle)622 W estimated (TDP)GPU 575 + CPU 35 + Board 12 W full load
Avg cost / hourEUR 0.19
Electricity / 1M tokensEUR 0.063
Token / kWh4.77M
Acquisition (system)EUR 4,986 full priceGPU EUR 3,300 · CPU EUR 349 · Board EUR 149 · RAM EUR 1,008 · PSU EUR 180
Electricity (2 years)
TCO (2 years)EUR 8,253
Output tokens (2 years)51.95B
☁️ External LLM (API) – comparison
External LLM cost (2 years)
Savings vs. external (2 years)

All values above and the charts below take the configured system utilization into account: at X% the system generates only X% of the time, the rest it idles (72 W). Cost per hour drops (more idle), cost per token rises.

Cost over 2 years – electricity only

Cost over 2 years – incl. acquisition (TCO)

Speed vs. tokens per euro

Euro per 1M tokens

Comparison vs. API – economics per benchmark

Meta-Llama-3.1-8B-InstructNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090Meta-Llama-3.1-8B-InstructNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation EditionMeta-Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct3x NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation EditionMeta-Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct3x NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition
Electricity cost (24 mo.)
Acquisition cost
Total cost (TCO)
Generated tokens (24 mo.)
Token price via API
Break-even point (days)
Result (savings / extra cost)

Comparison with up to 3 next-best runs of this model at the same concurrency (at least one on different hardware). Power = GPU TDP + CPU (idle + 15 %) + board (estimated), acquisition = full system (GPU + CPU + board + RAM + PSU), prices = stored market prices.

Contributed by

Mario Alka Administrator

@marioalka

Ich bin Unternehmer, Softwareentwickler und KI-Enthusiast. Seit vielen Jahren entwickle ich Unternehmenssoftware und beschäftige mich inzwischen fast täglich mit lokalen LLMs, KI-Agenten und leistungsfähiger KI-Hardware.

Mit LLM-Benchmark.de möchte ich eine Plattform schaffen, auf der Modelle, GPUs und Agenten objektiv und reproduzierbar miteinander verglichen werden.