Created bymario-alka.dePowered bygodcore.denoob2claw.detricoma.de
Contributed byMario AlkaNVIDIA

Nemotron-3-Nano-Omni-30B-A3B-Reasoning

Performance benchmark · measured on 29.07.2026 03:35

Benchmark-IDrun-20260729-035835-01ffd0
Timebench 3 - Kombi (Prefill + Generation)MoE30BRuntime: llama.cppQuantisierung: Q4_K_M
Generation547,85tok/s
Prefill3.914,42tok/s
Time to First Token4.883,00ms
Total duration39,44s
Concurrency5parallel
Ranking in the field
12of 43 systems

Performance benchmark · Primary metric: Generation-Speed (tok/s) · 5× concurrent

This run is better than 74 % of all comparable systems.
Generation 547,9 tok/s
+48 % vs Ø 369,7
Prefill 3.914,4 tok/s
-19 % vs Ø 4.813,3
Time to First Token 4.883 ms
-76 % vs Ø 20.563
Distribution in the field4 – 827 tok/s
Ø 370 Median Dieser Lauf

Wie schlägt sich dieser Benchmark mit anderen Modellen?

How does this benchmark compare on other GPUs?

Same model on different hardware · 5× concurrent · Generation (tok/s)

Configuration

benchmark-konfiguration — run-20260729-035835-01ffd0
# LLM-Benchmark Konfiguration # Modell : Nemotron-3-Nano-Omni-30B-A3B-Reasoning # Engine : llama.cpp # Run-ID : run-20260729-035835-01ffd0 # GPU : NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti # CPU : AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX with Radeon Graphics # RAM : 92 GB bench@llm-benchmark:~$ /root/llama.cpp/build/bin/llama-server \ -m /root/.cache/huggingface/hub/models--DevQuasar--nvidia.Nemotron-3-Nano-Omni-30B-A3B-Reasoning-BF16-GGUF/snapshots/7131823f6f6ffda04b65763677f2f1dbe15eb3c5/nvidia.Nemotron-3-Nano-Omni-30B-A3B-Reasoning-BF16.f16.gguf.Q4_K_M.gguf \ --alias Nemotron-3-Nano-Omni-30B-A3B-Reasoning \ --host 0.0.0.0 \ --port 8000 \ -ngl 999 \ -c 16384 \ -np 4 \ --jinja
Engine?Die Inferenz-Software, die das Modell ausliefert (z.B. vLLM oder llama.cpp). Sie bestimmt Geschwindigkeit, unterstuetzte Modellformate und welche Parameter ueberhaupt verfuegbar sind.llamacpp
Modellalias?Der Name, unter dem das Modell ueber die API angesprochen wird. Genau dieser Wert muss im Request-Feld 'model' stehen.Nemotron-3-Nano-Omni-30B-A3B-Reasoning
Kontextlaenge?Maximale Anzahl Tokens (Eingabe + erzeugte Ausgabe zusammen), die das Modell pro Anfrage verarbeiten kann.16384
Modellpfad?Pfad zur GGUF-Modelldatei, die geladen und ausgeliefert wird./root/.cache/huggingface/hub/models--DevQuasar--nvidia.Nemotron-3-Nano-Omni-30B-A3B-Reasoning-BF16-GGUF/snapshots/7131823f6f6ffda04b65763677f2f1dbe15eb3c5/nvidia.Nemotron-3-Nano-Omni-30B-A3B-Reasoning-BF16.f16.gguf.Q4_K_M.gguf
GPU-Layer?Anzahl der auf die GPU ausgelagerten Modell-Layer. Hoeher = mehr VRAM und schneller; der Rest laeuft auf der CPU. 999 = alles auf GPU.999
Kontext?Groesse des Kontextfensters in Token. 0 = der beim Training verwendete Kontext des Modells.16384
np4

All benchmarks of this model To leaderboard

Anzeige
Model comparison

Nemotron-3-Nano-Omni-30B-A3B-Reasoning on various hardware

All published performance runs of this model – each bubble a variant: position = prefill (X) × generation (Y), bubble size = number of runs. Closer to the top right = faster. ★ Marked gold = this benchmark.

GPUby graphics card

2.3061.7301.1535770,002.4604.9207.380Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition - 1.791,5 tok/s Generation, 6.053 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.537 ms (3 Laufe)NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 B...AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 - 268,7 tok/s Generation, 4.498 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.412 ms (2 Laufe)AMD Radeon AI PRO R97...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti - 262,5 tok/s Generation, 700 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 27.130 ms (3 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 50...AMD Radeon 8060S Graphics - 112,4 tok/s Generation, 1.115 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 9.469 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Radeon 8060S Grap...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti - 896,6 tok/s Generation, 3.860 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 6.490 ms (3 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 30...
NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition 1.791,5 tok/s★ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti 896,6 tok/s this runAMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 268,7 tok/sNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti 262,5 tok/sAMD Radeon 8060S Graphics 112,4 tok/s

CPUby processor

2.3061.7301.1535770,002.4604.9207.380Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-Core Processor - 1.791,5 tok/s Generation, 6.053 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.537 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-...AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX 16-Cores - 268,7 tok/s Generation, 4.498 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.412 ms (2 Laufe)AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 32-Cores - 262,5 tok/s Generation, 700 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 27.130 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...AMD RYZEN AI MAX+ 395 w/ Radeon 8060S - 112,4 tok/s Generation, 1.115 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 9.469 ms (3 Laufe)AMD RYZEN AI MAX+ 395...AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX with Radeon Graphics - 896,6 tok/s Generation, 3.860 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 6.490 ms (3 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX wi...
AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-Core Processor 1.791,5 tok/s★ AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX with Radeon Graphics 896,6 tok/s this runAMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX 16-Cores 268,7 tok/sAMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 32-Cores 262,5 tok/sAMD RYZEN AI MAX+ 395 w/ Radeon 8060S 112,4 tok/s

MBby mainboard

2.3061.7301.1535770,002.4604.9207.380Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ProArt X870E-CREATOR WIFI - 1.791,5 tok/s Generation, 6.053 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.537 ms (3 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX90E-SAGE SE - 268,7 tok/s Generation, 4.498 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.412 ms (2 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI - 262,5 tok/s Generation, 700 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 27.130 ms (3 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....Bosgame AXB35-02 (BeyondMax Series) - 112,4 tok/s Generation, 1.115 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 9.469 ms (3 Laufe)Bosgame AXB35-02 (Bey...Meigao Innovation Technology (Shen Zhen) Co., Ltd DRFXL (MotherBoard Series) - 896,6 tok/s Generation, 3.860 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 6.490 ms (3 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ Meigao Innovation Tec...
ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ProArt X870E-CREATOR WIFI 1.791,5 tok/s★ Meigao Innovation Technology (Shen Zhen) Co., Ltd DRFXL (MotherBoard Series) 896,6 tok/s this runASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX90E-SAGE SE 268,7 tok/sASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI 262,5 tok/sBosgame AXB35-02 (BeyondMax Series) 112,4 tok/s

ENGby engine

1.9711.8811.7911.7021.6122.9663.0923.2193.345Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)llama.cpp - 1.791,5 tok/s Generation, 3.156 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 10.479 ms (14 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ llama.cpp
★ llama.cpp 1.791,5 tok/s this run

DRVby driver

1.9711.8811.7911.7021.6122.9663.0923.2193.345Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)unbekannt - 1.791,5 tok/s Generation, 3.156 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 10.479 ms (14 Laufe)unbekannt
unbekannt 1.791,5 tok/s
💰 Economics

Economics of this run

Operating cost, TCO and comparison with the next-best runs of the same model at identical concurrency (5× concurrent). Methodology →

⚙️ ConfigurationAll metrics and charts below follow these settings – based on a 24-month runtime.Save to URLReset
⚡ Electricity price EUR/kWh
⚙️ System utilization 100 %
🖥️ Acquisition EUR
🔌 Idle 50 W
⚡ TDP 477 W
☁️ External LLM (API)
Electricity0.30 EUR/kWh
Avg power (incl. idle)477 W estimated (TDP)GPU 450 + CPU 17 + Board 10 W full load
Avg cost / hourEUR 0.14
Electricity / 1M tokensEUR 0.073
Token / kWh4.13M
Acquisition (system)EUR 2,986 partial priceGPU EUR 999 · CPU EUR 549 · RAM EUR 1,288 · PSU EUR 150
Electricity (2 years)
TCO (2 years)EUR 5,494
Output tokens (2 years)34.55B
☁️ External LLM (API) – comparison
External LLM cost (2 years)
Savings vs. external (2 years)

All values above and the charts below take the configured system utilization into account: at X% the system generates only X% of the time, the rest it idles (50 W). Cost per hour drops (more idle), cost per token rises.

Cost over 2 years – electricity only

Cost over 2 years – incl. acquisition (TCO)

Speed vs. tokens per euro

Euro per 1M tokens

Comparison vs. API – economics per benchmark

Nemotron-3-Nano-Omni-30B-A3B-ReasoningNVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 TiNemotron-3-Nano-Omni-30B-A3B-ReasoningNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation EditionNemotron-3-Nano-Omni-30B-A3B-Reasoning3x AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700Nemotron-3-Nano-Omni-30B-A3B-ReasoningNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti
Electricity cost (24 mo.)
Acquisition cost
Total cost (TCO)
Generated tokens (24 mo.)
Token price via API
Break-even point (days)
Result (savings / extra cost)

Comparison with up to 3 next-best runs of this model at the same concurrency (at least one on different hardware). Power = GPU TDP + CPU (idle + 15 %) + board (estimated), acquisition = full system (GPU + CPU + board + RAM + PSU), prices = stored market prices.

Contributed by

Mario Alka Administrator

@marioalka

Ich bin Unternehmer, Softwareentwickler und KI-Enthusiast. Seit vielen Jahren entwickle ich Unternehmenssoftware und beschäftige mich inzwischen fast täglich mit lokalen LLMs, KI-Agenten und leistungsfähiger KI-Hardware.

Mit LLM-Benchmark.de möchte ich eine Plattform schaffen, auf der Modelle, GPUs und Agenten objektiv und reproduzierbar miteinander verglichen werden.