Created bymario-alka.dePowered bygodcore.denoob2claw.detricoma.de
Contributed byMario AlkaMistral AI

Mistral-Small-3.1-24B-Instruct-2503

Performance benchmark · measured on 29.07.2026 02:21

Benchmark-IDrun-20260729-032130-7bf13f
Timebench 3 - Kombi (Prefill + Generation)Dense24BRuntime: llama.cppQuantisierung: Q4_K
Generation181,00tok/s
Prefill3.924,08tok/s
Time to First Token9.596,00ms
Total duration108,48s
Concurrency5parallel
Ranking in the field
25of 37 systems

Performance benchmark · Primary metric: Generation-Speed (tok/s) · 5× concurrent

This run is better than 33 % of all comparable systems.
Generation 181,0 tok/s
-47 % vs Ø 340,1
Prefill 3.924,1 tok/s
-17 % vs Ø 4.755,3
Time to First Token 9.596 ms
-59 % vs Ø 23.173
Distribution in the field4 – 827 tok/s
Ø 340 Median Dieser Lauf

Wie schlägt sich dieser Benchmark mit anderen Modellen?

How does this benchmark compare on other GPUs?

Same model on different hardware · 5× concurrent · Generation (tok/s)

Configuration

benchmark-konfiguration — run-20260729-032130-7bf13f
# LLM-Benchmark Konfiguration # Modell : Mistral-Small-3.1-24B-Instruct-2503 # Engine : llama.cpp # Run-ID : run-20260729-032130-7bf13f # GPU : NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti # CPU : AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX with Radeon Graphics # RAM : 92 GB bench@llm-benchmark:~$ /root/llama.cpp/build/bin/llama-server \ -m /root/.cache/huggingface/hub/models--mrfakename--mistral-small-3.1-24b-instruct-2503-gguf/snapshots/72af174a032b5788b9c88b3c8907ab1363ef7f69/ggml-model-Q4_K.gguf \ --alias Mistral-Small-3.1-24B-Instruct-2503 \ --host 0.0.0.0 \ --port 8000 \ -ngl 999 \ -c 16384 \ -np 4 \ --jinja
Engine?Die Inferenz-Software, die das Modell ausliefert (z.B. vLLM oder llama.cpp). Sie bestimmt Geschwindigkeit, unterstuetzte Modellformate und welche Parameter ueberhaupt verfuegbar sind.llamacpp
Modellalias?Der Name, unter dem das Modell ueber die API angesprochen wird. Genau dieser Wert muss im Request-Feld 'model' stehen.Mistral-Small-3.1-24B-Instruct-2503
Kontextlaenge?Maximale Anzahl Tokens (Eingabe + erzeugte Ausgabe zusammen), die das Modell pro Anfrage verarbeiten kann.16384
Modellpfad?Pfad zur GGUF-Modelldatei, die geladen und ausgeliefert wird./root/.cache/huggingface/hub/models--mrfakename--mistral-small-3.1-24b-instruct-2503-gguf/snapshots/72af174a032b5788b9c88b3c8907ab1363ef7f69/ggml-model-Q4_K.gguf
GPU-Layer?Anzahl der auf die GPU ausgelagerten Modell-Layer. Hoeher = mehr VRAM und schneller; der Rest laeuft auf der CPU. 999 = alles auf GPU.999
Kontext?Groesse des Kontextfensters in Token. 0 = der beim Training verwendete Kontext des Modells.16384
np4

All benchmarks of this model To leaderboard

Anzeige
Model comparison

Mistral-Small-3.1-24B-Instruct-2503 on various hardware

All published performance runs of this model – each bubble a variant: position = prefill (X) × generation (Y), bubble size = number of runs. Closer to the top right = faster. ★ Marked gold = this benchmark.

GPUby graphics card

4363272181090,003.4246.84710.271Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti - 117,6 tok/s Generation, 1.566 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 37.087 ms (3 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 50...NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition - 88,3 tok/s Generation, 8.343 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 1.652 ms (3 Laufe)NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 B...AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 - 73,6 tok/s Generation, 2.460 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.522 ms (5 Laufe)AMD Radeon AI PRO R97...AMD Radeon 8060S Graphics - 14,8 tok/s Generation, 410 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 5.067 ms (1 Lauf)AMD Radeon 8060S Grap...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti - 337,4 tok/s Generation, 3.405 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 14.083 ms (3 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 30...
★ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti 337,4 tok/s this runNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti 117,6 tok/sNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition 88,3 tok/sAMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 73,6 tok/sAMD Radeon 8060S Graphics 14,8 tok/s

CPUby processor

4363272181090,003.4246.84710.271Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 32-Cores - 117,6 tok/s Generation, 1.566 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 37.087 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-Core Processor - 88,3 tok/s Generation, 8.343 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 1.652 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-...AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX 16-Cores - 73,6 tok/s Generation, 2.460 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.522 ms (5 Laufe)AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...AMD RYZEN AI MAX+ 395 w/ Radeon 8060S - 14,8 tok/s Generation, 410 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 5.067 ms (1 Lauf)AMD RYZEN AI MAX+ 395...AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX with Radeon Graphics - 337,4 tok/s Generation, 3.405 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 14.083 ms (3 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX wi...
★ AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX with Radeon Graphics 337,4 tok/s this runAMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 32-Cores 117,6 tok/sAMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-Core Processor 88,3 tok/sAMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX 16-Cores 73,6 tok/sAMD RYZEN AI MAX+ 395 w/ Radeon 8060S 14,8 tok/s

MBby mainboard

4363272181090,003.4246.84710.271Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI - 117,6 tok/s Generation, 1.566 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 37.087 ms (3 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ProArt X870E-CREATOR WIFI - 88,3 tok/s Generation, 8.343 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 1.652 ms (3 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX90E-SAGE SE - 73,6 tok/s Generation, 2.460 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.522 ms (5 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....Bosgame AXB35-02 (BeyondMax Series) - 14,8 tok/s Generation, 410 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 5.067 ms (1 Lauf)Bosgame AXB35-02 (Bey...Meigao Innovation Technology (Shen Zhen) Co., Ltd DRFXL (MotherBoard Series) - 337,4 tok/s Generation, 3.405 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 14.083 ms (3 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ Meigao Innovation Tec...
★ Meigao Innovation Technology (Shen Zhen) Co., Ltd DRFXL (MotherBoard Series) 337,4 tok/s this runASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI 117,6 tok/sASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ProArt X870E-CREATOR WIFI 88,3 tok/sASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX90E-SAGE SE 73,6 tok/sBosgame AXB35-02 (BeyondMax Series) 14,8 tok/s

ENGby engine

4213172131094,77143.7866.8599.931Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)vLLM - 88,3 tok/s Generation, 8.343 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 1.652 ms (3 Laufe)vLLMllama.cpp - 337,4 tok/s Generation, 2.302 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 14.682 ms (12 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ llama.cpp
★ llama.cpp 337,4 tok/s this runvLLM 88,3 tok/s

DRVby driver

3713543373213043.3003.4403.5803.721Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)unbekannt - 337,4 tok/s Generation, 3.510 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 12.076 ms (15 Laufe)unbekannt
unbekannt 337,4 tok/s
💰 Economics

Economics of this run

Operating cost, TCO and comparison with the next-best runs of the same model at identical concurrency (5× concurrent). Methodology →

⚙️ ConfigurationAll metrics and charts below follow these settings – based on a 24-month runtime.Save to URLReset
⚡ Electricity price EUR/kWh
⚙️ System utilization 100 %
🖥️ Acquisition EUR
🔌 Idle 50 W
⚡ TDP 477 W
☁️ External LLM (API)
Electricity0.30 EUR/kWh
Avg power (incl. idle)477 W estimated (TDP)GPU 450 + CPU 17 + Board 10 W full load
Avg cost / hourEUR 0.14
Electricity / 1M tokensEUR 0.22
Token / kWh1.37M
Acquisition (system)EUR 2,986 partial priceGPU EUR 999 · CPU EUR 549 · RAM EUR 1,288 · PSU EUR 150
Electricity (2 years)
TCO (2 years)EUR 5,494
Output tokens (2 years)11.42B
☁️ External LLM (API) – comparison
External LLM cost (2 years)
Savings vs. external (2 years)

All values above and the charts below take the configured system utilization into account: at X% the system generates only X% of the time, the rest it idles (50 W). Cost per hour drops (more idle), cost per token rises.

Cost over 2 years – electricity only

Cost over 2 years – incl. acquisition (TCO)

Speed vs. tokens per euro

Euro per 1M tokens

Comparison vs. API – economics per benchmark

Mistral-Small-3.1-24B-Instruct-2503NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 TiMistral-Small-3.1-24B-Instruct-25033x AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700Mistral-Small-3.1-24B-Instruct-2503NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 TiMistral-Small-3.1-24B-Instruct-2503NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition
Electricity cost (24 mo.)
Acquisition cost
Total cost (TCO)
Generated tokens (24 mo.)
Token price via API
Break-even point (days)
Result (savings / extra cost)

Comparison with up to 3 next-best runs of this model at the same concurrency (at least one on different hardware). Power = GPU TDP + CPU (idle + 15 %) + board (estimated), acquisition = full system (GPU + CPU + board + RAM + PSU), prices = stored market prices.

Contributed by

Mario Alka Administrator

@marioalka

Ich bin Unternehmer, Softwareentwickler und KI-Enthusiast. Seit vielen Jahren entwickle ich Unternehmenssoftware und beschäftige mich inzwischen fast täglich mit lokalen LLMs, KI-Agenten und leistungsfähiger KI-Hardware.

Mit LLM-Benchmark.de möchte ich eine Plattform schaffen, auf der Modelle, GPUs und Agenten objektiv und reproduzierbar miteinander verglichen werden.