# LLM-Benchmark Konfiguration # Modell : Qwen3-30B-A3B-Thinking-2507 # Engine : llama.cpp # Run-ID : run-20260729-032123-b33938 # GPU : NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition # CPU : AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-Core Processor # RAM : 92 GB bench@llm-benchmark:~$ /home/godcore/llama.cpp/build/bin/llama-server \ -m /home/godcore/.cache/huggingface/hub/models--unsloth--Qwen3-30B-A3B-Thinking-2507-GGUF/snapshots/a9b37aaac12b2bd0098783a443429543dd76a14d/Qwen3-30B-A3B-Thinking-2507-Q4_K_M.gguf \ --alias Qwen3-30B-A3B-Thinking-2507 \ --host 0.0.0.0 \ --port 8000 \ -ngl 999 \ -c 16384 \ -np 4 \ --jinja

Engine?Die Inferenz-Software, die das Modell ausliefert (z.B. vLLM oder llama.cpp). Sie bestimmt Geschwindigkeit, unterstuetzte Modellformate und welche Parameter ueberhaupt verfuegbar sind.	llamacpp
Modellalias?Der Name, unter dem das Modell ueber die API angesprochen wird. Genau dieser Wert muss im Request-Feld 'model' stehen.	Qwen3-30B-A3B-Thinking-2507
Kontextlaenge?Maximale Anzahl Tokens (Eingabe + erzeugte Ausgabe zusammen), die das Modell pro Anfrage verarbeiten kann.	16384
Modellpfad?Pfad zur GGUF-Modelldatei, die geladen und ausgeliefert wird.	/home/godcore/.cache/huggingface/hub/models--unsloth--Qwen3-30B-A3B-Thinking-2507-GGUF/snapshots/a9b37aaac12b2bd0098783a443429543dd76a14d/Qwen3-30B-A3B-Thinking-2507-Q4_K_M.gguf
GPU-Layer?Anzahl der auf die GPU ausgelagerten Modell-Layer. Hoeher = mehr VRAM und schneller; der Rest laeuft auf der CPU. 999 = alles auf GPU.	999
Kontext?Groesse des Kontextfensters in Token. 0 = der beim Training verwendete Kontext des Modells.	16384
np	4
execution_type	local

All benchmarks of this model To leaderboard

Model comparison

Qwen3-30B-A3B-Thinking-2507 on various hardware

All published performance runs of this model – each bubble a variant: position = prefill (X) × generation (Y), bubble size = number of runs. Closer to the top right = faster. ★ Marked gold = this benchmark.

GPUby graphics card

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 1.683,8 tok/s★ NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition 1.670,5 tok/s this runNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition 1.521,4 tok/sNVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti 930,6 tok/sNVIDIA RTX A6000 751,7 tok/sNVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 371,7 tok/sAMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX 303,1 tok/sAMD Radeon PRO W7800 48GB 258,3 tok/sAMD Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot 254,6 tok/sAMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 238,8 tok/sNVIDIA DGX SPARK (GB10) 161,1 tok/sNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti 155,8 tok/sNVIDIA RTX SPARK (N1X) 107,0 tok/sCPU-only 8,5 tok/s

CPUby processor

AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8-Core Processor 1.683,8 tok/s★ AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-Core Processor 1.670,5 tok/s this runAMD Ryzen 5 5600X 6-Core Processor 1.623,2 tok/sAMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX 24-Cores 1.521,4 tok/sAMD Ryzen 9 8945HX with Radeon Graphics 930,6 tok/sAMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX 16-Cores 751,7 tok/sAMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX 16-Cores 303,1 tok/sAMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 32-Cores 258,3 tok/sAMD Ryzen 3 3100 4-Core Processor 238,8 tok/sIntel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-4657L v2 @ 2.40GHz 223,3 tok/sNVIDIA Grace 161,1 tok/sNVIDIA RTX Spark N1X (6144-core GPU, 20-core CPU) 107,0 tok/sIntel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-4620 v2 @ 2.60GHz 8,5 tok/s

MBby mainboard

ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ROG STRIX B550-A GAMING 1.683,8 tok/s★ ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ProArt X870E-CREATOR WIFI 1.670,5 tok/s this runASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX90E-SAGE SE 1.521,4 tok/sMeigao Innovation Technology (Shen Zhen) Co., Ltd DRFXL (MotherBoard Series) 930,6 tok/sASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI 303,1 tok/sASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ROG STRIX X570-F GAMING 238,8 tok/sDell Inc. PowerEdge R820 223,3 tok/sASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. GX10 161,1 tok/sASUS H7607BA 107,0 tok/s

ENGby engine

★ llama.cpp 1.683,8 tok/s this runvLLM 913,3 tok/sunbekannt 91,4 tok/s

DRVby driver

unbekannt 1.683,8 tok/sNVIDIA 590.48.01 / CUDA 13.1 161,1 tok/sAMD 7.0.0-27-generic 91,4 tok/s

💰 Economics

Economics of this run

Operating cost, TCO and comparison with the next-best runs of the same model at identical concurrency (1× concurrent). Methodology →

⚙️ ConfigurationAll metrics and charts below follow these settings – based on a 24-month runtime.Save to URL Reset

⚡ Electricity price EUR/kWh

⚙️ System utilization 100 %

🖥️ Acquisition EUR

🔌 Idle 70 W

⚡ TDP 644 W

☁️ External LLM (API) show

Input €/1M Output €/1M Input per output token

Electricity0.30 EUR/kWh

Avg power (incl. idle)644 W estimated (TDP)GPU 600 + CPU 29 + Board 15 W full load

Avg cost / hourEUR 0.19

Electricity / 1M tokensEUR 0.17

Token / kWh1.75M

Acquisition (system)EUR 15,248 full priceGPU EUR 13,000 · CPU EUR 649 · Board EUR 499 · RAM EUR 920 · PSU EUR 180

Electricity (2 years)–

TCO (2 years)EUR 18,632

Output tokens (2 years)19.68B

☁️ External LLM (API) – comparison

External LLM cost (2 years)–

Savings vs. external (2 years)–

All values above and the charts below take the configured system utilization into account: at X% the system generates only X% of the time, the rest it idles (70 W). Cost per hour drops (more idle), cost per token rises.

Cost over 2 years – electricity only

Cost over 2 years – incl. acquisition (TCO)

Speed vs. tokens per euro

Euro per 1M tokens

Comparison vs. API – economics per benchmark

	Qwen3-30B-A3B-Thinking-2507NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition	Qwen3-30B-A3B-Thinking-2507NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090	Qwen3-30B-A3B-Thinking-25073x NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition	Qwen3-30B-A3B-Thinking-25073x NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition
Electricity cost (24 mo.)	–	–	–	–
Acquisition cost	–	–	–	–
Total cost (TCO)	–	–	–	–
Generated tokens (24 mo.)	–	–	–	–
Token price via API	–	–	–	–
Break-even point (days)	–	–	–	–
Result (savings / extra cost)	–	–	–	–

NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition · this run 312 tok/s NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 310 tok/s 3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition 273 tok/s 3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition 273 tok/s

Comparison with up to 3 next-best runs of this model at the same concurrency (at least one on different hardware). Power = GPU TDP + CPU (idle + 15 %) + board (estimated), acquisition = full system (GPU + CPU + board + RAM + PSU), prices = stored market prices.

Contributed by

Mario Alka Administrator

@marioalka

Ich bin Unternehmer, Softwareentwickler und KI-Enthusiast. Seit vielen Jahren entwickle ich Unternehmenssoftware und beschäftige mich inzwischen fast täglich mit lokalen LLMs, KI-Agenten und leistungsfähiger KI-Hardware.

Mit LLM-Benchmark.de möchte ich eine Plattform schaffen, auf der Modelle, GPUs und Agenten objektiv und reproduzierbar miteinander verglichen werden.