Created bymario-alka.dePowered bygodcore.denoob2claw.detricoma.de
Contributed byMario AlkaMistral AI

Devstral-Small-2-24B-Instruct-2512

Performance benchmark · measured on 28.07.2026 21:01

Benchmark-IDrun-20260729-032119-829110
Timebench 3 - Kombi (Prefill + Generation)Dense24BRuntime: llama.cppQuantisierung: Q4_K_M
Generation59,83tok/s
Prefill1.470,25tok/s
Time to First Token24.543,50ms
Total duration299,05s
Concurrency5parallel
Ranking in the field
266of 354 systems

Performance benchmark · Primary metric: Generation-Speed (tok/s) · 5× concurrent

This run is better than 25 % of all comparable systems.
Generation 59,8 tok/s
-84 % vs Ø 370,9
Prefill 1.470,3 tok/s
-73 % vs Ø 5.422,0
Time to First Token 24.544 ms
+3 % vs Ø 23.732
Distribution in the field0 – 1.349 tok/s
Ø 370 Median Dieser Lauf

Wie schlägt sich dieser Benchmark mit anderen Modellen?

gemma-4-E2B-itNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition · run-20260727-181606-0adf6d
1.349,3 tok/s
gemma-4-E2B-itNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 · run-20260728-184455-5b4937
1.301,9 tok/s
gemma-4-E2B-it3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260728-184456-4111a9
1.195,7 tok/s
NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-4BNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition · run-20260727-181607-30d864
1.188,7 tok/s
NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-4BNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 · run-20260728-194135-5432cd
1.164,8 tok/s
gpt-oss-20bNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition · run-20260728-140954-9e81f9
1.136,3 tok/s
gpt-oss-20bNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 · run-20260729-032121-058a31
1.113,5 tok/s
NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-4B3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260728-194136-836a91
1.090,6 tok/s
NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-4B3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260727-181606-8b381e
1.077,4 tok/s
NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-4B3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260728-194136-b8a818
1.071,0 tok/s
NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-4B3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260728-194136-038e92
1.051,1 tok/s
gpt-oss-20b3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260729-032121-ffb18a
1.015,5 tok/s
NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-30B-A3BNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition · run-20260729-032121-305ad6
1.007,8 tok/s
Nemotron-Cascade-2-30B-A3BNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition · run-20260729-032120-4b8514
1.007,3 tok/s
Devstral-Small-2-24B-Instruct-2512 this runNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti · run-20260729-032119-829110
59,8 tok/s

How does this benchmark compare on other GPUs?

Same model on different hardware · 5× concurrent · Generation (tok/s)

Hardware

GPU: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti · 16 GB VRAM
CPU: AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 32-Cores
RAM: 247 GB
Mainboard: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI

Setup

Runtime: llama.cpp
Quantization: Q4_K_M
Model: Devstral-Small-2-24B-Instruct-2512

Configuration

benchmark-konfiguration — run-20260729-032119-829110
# LLM-Benchmark Konfiguration # Modell : Devstral-Small-2-24B-Instruct-2512 # Engine : llama.cpp # Run-ID : run-20260729-032119-829110 # GPU : NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti # CPU : AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 32-Cores # RAM : 247 GB bench@llm-benchmark:~$ /home/godcore/llama.cpp/build/bin/llama-server \ -m /home/godcore/.cache/huggingface/hub/models--unsloth--Devstral-Small-2-24B-Instruct-2512-GGUF/snapshots/6e458b8add42681bfd023de5eab93637694aaf82/Devstral-Small-2-24B-Instruct-2512-Q4_K_M.gguf \ --alias Devstral-Small-2-24B-Instruct-2512 \ --host 0.0.0.0 \ --port 8000 \ -ngl 30 \ -c 16384 \ -np 4 \ --jinja
Engine?Die Inferenz-Software, die das Modell ausliefert (z.B. vLLM oder llama.cpp). Sie bestimmt Geschwindigkeit, unterstuetzte Modellformate und welche Parameter ueberhaupt verfuegbar sind.llamacpp
Modellalias?Der Name, unter dem das Modell ueber die API angesprochen wird. Genau dieser Wert muss im Request-Feld 'model' stehen.Devstral-Small-2-24B-Instruct-2512
Kontextlaenge?Maximale Anzahl Tokens (Eingabe + erzeugte Ausgabe zusammen), die das Modell pro Anfrage verarbeiten kann.16384
Modellpfad?Pfad zur GGUF-Modelldatei, die geladen und ausgeliefert wird./home/godcore/.cache/huggingface/hub/models--unsloth--Devstral-Small-2-24B-Instruct-2512-GGUF/snapshots/6e458b8add42681bfd023de5eab93637694aaf82/Devstral-Small-2-24B-Instruct-2512-Q4_K_M.gguf
GPU-Layer?Anzahl der auf die GPU ausgelagerten Modell-Layer. Hoeher = mehr VRAM und schneller; der Rest laeuft auf der CPU. 999 = alles auf GPU.30
Kontext?Groesse des Kontextfensters in Token. 0 = der beim Training verwendete Kontext des Modells.16384
np4

All benchmarks of this model To leaderboard

Anzeige
Model comparison

Devstral-Small-2-24B-Instruct-2512 on various hardware

All published performance runs of this model – each bubble a variant: position = prefill (X) × generation (Y), bubble size = number of runs. Closer to the top right = faster. ★ Marked gold = this benchmark.

GPUby graphics card

9226914612300,003.2386.4779.715Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition - 725,6 tok/s Generation, 8.070 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.939 ms (6 Laufe)NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 B...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti - 331,6 tok/s Generation, 3.668 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 14.010 ms (3 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 30...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti - 108,5 tok/s Generation, 1.619 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 37.385 ms (3 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 50...
NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition 725,6 tok/sNVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti 331,6 tok/s★ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti 108,5 tok/s this run

CPUby processor

9226914612300,003.2386.4779.715Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-Core Processor - 725,6 tok/s Generation, 8.070 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.939 ms (6 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-...AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX with Radeon Graphics - 331,6 tok/s Generation, 3.668 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 14.010 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX wi...AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 32-Cores - 108,5 tok/s Generation, 1.619 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 37.385 ms (3 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...
AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-Core Processor 725,6 tok/sAMD Ryzen 9 8945HX with Radeon Graphics 331,6 tok/s★ AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 32-Cores 108,5 tok/s this run

MBby mainboard

9226914612300,003.2386.4779.715Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ProArt X870E-CREATOR WIFI - 725,6 tok/s Generation, 8.070 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.939 ms (6 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....Meigao Innovation Technology (Shen Zhen) Co., Ltd DRFXL (MotherBoard Series) - 331,6 tok/s Generation, 3.668 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 14.010 ms (3 Laufe)Meigao Innovation Tec...ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI - 108,5 tok/s Generation, 1.619 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 37.385 ms (3 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....
ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ProArt X870E-CREATOR WIFI 725,6 tok/sMeigao Innovation Technology (Shen Zhen) Co., Ltd DRFXL (MotherBoard Series) 331,6 tok/s★ ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI 108,5 tok/s this run

ENGby engine

8147506856215563.4475.2777.1088.938Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)vLLM - 725,6 tok/s Generation, 7.865 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 1.602 ms (3 Laufe)vLLMllama.cpp - 645,1 tok/s Generation, 4.521 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 19.223 ms (9 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ llama.cpp
vLLM 725,6 tok/s★ llama.cpp 645,1 tok/s this run

DRVby driver

7987627266896535.0355.2505.4645.678Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)unbekannt - 725,6 tok/s Generation, 5.357 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 14.818 ms (12 Laufe)unbekannt
unbekannt 725,6 tok/s
💰 Economics

Economics of this run

Operating cost, TCO and comparison with the next-best runs of the same model at identical concurrency (5× concurrent). Methodology →

⚙️ ConfigurationAll metrics and charts below follow these settings – based on a 24-month runtime.Save to URLReset
⚡ Electricity price EUR/kWh
⚙️ System utilization 100 %
🖥️ Acquisition EUR
🔌 Idle 10 W
⚡ TDP 310 W
☁️ External LLM (API)
Electricity0.30 EUR/kWh
Avg power (incl. idle)310 W estimated (TDP)GPU 300 + Board 10 W full load
Avg cost / hourEUR 0.093
Electricity / 1M tokensEUR 0.43
Token / kWh694.80K
Acquisition (system)EUR 2,126 missingRAM EUR 1,976 · PSU EUR 150
Electricity (2 years)
TCO (2 years)EUR 3,755
Output tokens (2 years)3.77B
☁️ External LLM (API) – comparison
External LLM cost (2 years)
Savings vs. external (2 years)

All values above and the charts below take the configured system utilization into account: at X% the system generates only X% of the time, the rest it idles (10 W). Cost per hour drops (more idle), cost per token rises.

Cost over 2 years – electricity only

Cost over 2 years – incl. acquisition (TCO)

Speed vs. tokens per euro

Euro per 1M tokens

Comparison vs. API – economics per benchmark

Devstral-Small-2-24B-Instruct-2512NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 TiDevstral-Small-2-24B-Instruct-2512NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation EditionDevstral-Small-2-24B-Instruct-2512NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation EditionDevstral-Small-2-24B-Instruct-2512NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti
Electricity cost (24 mo.)
Acquisition cost
Total cost (TCO)
Generated tokens (24 mo.)
Token price via API
Break-even point (days)
Result (savings / extra cost)

Comparison with up to 3 next-best runs of this model at the same concurrency (at least one on different hardware). Power = GPU TDP + CPU (idle + 15 %) + board (estimated), acquisition = full system (GPU + CPU + board + RAM + PSU), prices = stored market prices.

Contributed by

Mario Alka Administrator

@marioalka

Ich bin Unternehmer, Softwareentwickler und KI-Enthusiast. Seit vielen Jahren entwickle ich Unternehmenssoftware und beschäftige mich inzwischen fast täglich mit lokalen LLMs, KI-Agenten und leistungsfähiger KI-Hardware.

Mit LLM-Benchmark.de möchte ich eine Plattform schaffen, auf der Modelle, GPUs und Agenten objektiv und reproduzierbar miteinander verglichen werden.