Created bymario-alka.dePowered bygodcore.denoob2claw.detricoma.de
Contributed byMario AlkaCohere

North-Mini-Code-1.0

Performance benchmark · measured on 28.07.2026 19:46

Benchmark-IDrun-20260728-195915-2918de
Timebench 3 - Kombi (Prefill + Generation)Runtime: llama.cppQuantisierung: UD-Q4_K_M
Generation542,97tok/s
Prefill4.226,41tok/s
Time to First Token4.293,50ms
Total duration38,84s
Concurrency5parallel
Ranking in the field
61of 232 systems

Performance benchmark · Primary metric: Generation-Speed (tok/s) · 5× concurrent

This run is better than 74 % of all comparable systems.
Generation 543,0 tok/s
+69 % vs Ø 321,3
Prefill 4.226,4 tok/s
-22 % vs Ø 5.406,3
Time to First Token 4.294 ms
-84 % vs Ø 26.557
Distribution in the field0 – 1.349 tok/s
Ø 320 Median Dieser Lauf

Wie schlägt sich dieser Benchmark mit anderen Modellen?

gemma-4-E2B-itNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition · run-20260727-181606-0adf6d
1.349,3 tok/s
gemma-4-E2B-itNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 · run-20260728-184455-5b4937
1.301,9 tok/s
gemma-4-E2B-it3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260728-184456-4111a9
1.195,7 tok/s
NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-4BNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition · run-20260727-181607-30d864
1.188,7 tok/s
NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-4BNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 · run-20260728-194135-5432cd
1.164,8 tok/s
gpt-oss-20bNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition · run-20260728-140954-9e81f9
1.136,3 tok/s
NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-4B3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260728-194136-836a91
1.090,6 tok/s
NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-4B3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260727-181606-8b381e
1.077,4 tok/s
NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-4B3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260728-194136-b8a818
1.071,0 tok/s
NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-4B3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260728-194136-038e92
1.051,1 tok/s
gpt-oss-20b3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260728-034052-437388
989,7 tok/s
Laguna-XS-2.1NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition · run-20260728-140955-17e7b6
975,1 tok/s
gemma-4-E2B-itNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti · run-20260727-032758-a7d32d
973,5 tok/s
gemma-4-E2B-itNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti · run-20260727-090152-b472f0
971,4 tok/s
North-Mini-Code-1.0 this runNVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti · run-20260728-195915-2918de
543,0 tok/s

How does this benchmark compare on other GPUs?

Same model on different hardware · 5× concurrent · Generation (tok/s)

Hardware

GPU: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti · 24 GB VRAM
CPU: AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX with Radeon Graphics
RAM: 92 GB
Mainboard: Meigao Innovation Technology (Shen Zhen) Co., Ltd DRFXL (MotherBoard Series)

Setup

Runtime: llama.cpp
Quantization: UD-Q4_K_M
Model: North-Mini-Code-1.0

Configuration

benchmark-konfiguration — run-20260728-195915-2918de
# LLM-Benchmark Konfiguration # Modell : North-Mini-Code-1.0 # Engine : llama.cpp # Run-ID : run-20260728-195915-2918de # GPU : NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti # CPU : AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX with Radeon Graphics # RAM : 92 GB bench@llm-benchmark:~$ /root/llama.cpp/build/bin/llama-server \ -m /root/.cache/huggingface/hub/models--unsloth--North-Mini-Code-1.0-GGUF/snapshots/e306bb4bf0df610f5471d97a01de2b6e0b24d356/North-Mini-Code-1.0-UD-Q4_K_M.gguf \ --alias North-Mini-Code-1.0 \ --host 0.0.0.0 \ --port 8000 \ -ngl 999 \ -c 16384 \ -np 4 \ --jinja
Engine?Die Inferenz-Software, die das Modell ausliefert (z.B. vLLM oder llama.cpp). Sie bestimmt Geschwindigkeit, unterstuetzte Modellformate und welche Parameter ueberhaupt verfuegbar sind.llamacpp
Modellalias?Der Name, unter dem das Modell ueber die API angesprochen wird. Genau dieser Wert muss im Request-Feld 'model' stehen.North-Mini-Code-1.0
Kontextlaenge?Maximale Anzahl Tokens (Eingabe + erzeugte Ausgabe zusammen), die das Modell pro Anfrage verarbeiten kann.16384
Modellpfad?Pfad zur GGUF-Modelldatei, die geladen und ausgeliefert wird./root/.cache/huggingface/hub/models--unsloth--North-Mini-Code-1.0-GGUF/snapshots/e306bb4bf0df610f5471d97a01de2b6e0b24d356/North-Mini-Code-1.0-UD-Q4_K_M.gguf
GPU-Layer?Anzahl der auf die GPU ausgelagerten Modell-Layer. Hoeher = mehr VRAM und schneller; der Rest laeuft auf der CPU. 999 = alles auf GPU.999
Kontext?Groesse des Kontextfensters in Token. 0 = der beim Training verwendete Kontext des Modells.16384
np4

All benchmarks of this model To leaderboard

Anzeige
Model comparison

North-Mini-Code-1.0 on various hardware

All published performance runs of this model – each bubble a variant: position = prefill (X) × generation (Y), bubble size = number of runs. Closer to the top right = faster. ★ Marked gold = this benchmark.

GPUby graphics card

2.1061.5801.0535270,003.8667.73311.599Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition - 1.621,0 tok/s Generation, 6.099 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.593 ms (3 Laufe)NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 B...NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition - 1.490,7 tok/s Generation, 9.367 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.375 ms (3 Laufe)NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 B...AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 - 279,0 tok/s Generation, 6.228 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 2.601 ms (2 Laufe)AMD Radeon AI PRO R97...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti - 169,0 tok/s Generation, 890 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 31.856 ms (3 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 50...AMD Radeon 8060S Graphics - 109,9 tok/s Generation, 1.260 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 4.635 ms (2 Laufe)AMD Radeon 8060S Grap...CPU-only - 5,1 tok/s Generation, 89 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 113.797 ms (3 Laufe)CPU-onlyNVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti - 939,5 tok/s Generation, 4.130 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 5.948 ms (3 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 30...
NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition 1.621,0 tok/sNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition 1.490,7 tok/s★ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti 939,5 tok/s this runAMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 279,0 tok/sNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti 169,0 tok/sAMD Radeon 8060S Graphics 109,9 tok/sCPU-only 5,1 tok/s

CPUby processor

2.1061.5801.0535270,003.8667.73311.599Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-Core Processor - 1.621,0 tok/s Generation, 6.099 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.593 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-...AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX 24-Cores - 1.490,7 tok/s Generation, 9.367 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.375 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX 16-Cores - 279,0 tok/s Generation, 6.228 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 2.601 ms (2 Laufe)AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 32-Cores - 169,0 tok/s Generation, 890 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 31.856 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...AMD RYZEN AI MAX+ 395 w/ Radeon 8060S - 109,9 tok/s Generation, 1.260 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 4.635 ms (2 Laufe)AMD RYZEN AI MAX+ 395...Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-4620 v2 @ 2.60GHz - 5,1 tok/s Generation, 89 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 113.797 ms (3 Laufe)Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU ...AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX with Radeon Graphics - 939,5 tok/s Generation, 4.130 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 5.948 ms (3 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX wi...
AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-Core Processor 1.621,0 tok/sAMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX 24-Cores 1.490,7 tok/s★ AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX with Radeon Graphics 939,5 tok/s this runAMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX 16-Cores 279,0 tok/sAMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 32-Cores 169,0 tok/sAMD RYZEN AI MAX+ 395 w/ Radeon 8060S 109,9 tok/sIntel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-4620 v2 @ 2.60GHz 5,1 tok/s

MBby mainboard

2.1061.5801.0535270,003.3476.69510.042Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ProArt X870E-CREATOR WIFI - 1.621,0 tok/s Generation, 6.099 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.593 ms (3 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX90E-SAGE SE - 1.490,7 tok/s Generation, 8.112 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.066 ms (5 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI - 169,0 tok/s Generation, 890 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 31.856 ms (3 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....Bosgame AXB35-02 (BeyondMax Series) - 109,9 tok/s Generation, 1.260 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 4.635 ms (2 Laufe)Bosgame AXB35-02 (Bey...Dell Inc. PowerEdge R820 - 5,1 tok/s Generation, 89 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 113.797 ms (3 Laufe)Dell Inc. PowerEdge R...Meigao Innovation Technology (Shen Zhen) Co., Ltd DRFXL (MotherBoard Series) - 939,5 tok/s Generation, 4.130 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 5.948 ms (3 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ Meigao Innovation Tec...
ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ProArt X870E-CREATOR WIFI 1.621,0 tok/sASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX90E-SAGE SE 1.490,7 tok/s★ Meigao Innovation Technology (Shen Zhen) Co., Ltd DRFXL (MotherBoard Series) 939,5 tok/s this runASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI 169,0 tok/sBosgame AXB35-02 (BeyondMax Series) 109,9 tok/sDell Inc. PowerEdge R820 5,1 tok/s

ENGby engine

1.7831.7021.6211.5401.4593.7953.9564.1174.279Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)llama.cpp - 1.621,0 tok/s Generation, 4.037 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 25.799 ms (19 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ llama.cpp
★ llama.cpp 1.621,0 tok/s this run

DRVby driver

1.7831.7021.6211.5401.4593.7953.9564.1174.279Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)unbekannt - 1.621,0 tok/s Generation, 4.037 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 25.799 ms (19 Laufe)unbekannt
unbekannt 1.621,0 tok/s
💰 Economics

Economics of this run

Operating cost, TCO and comparison with the next-best runs of the same model at identical concurrency (5× concurrent). Methodology →

⚙️ ConfigurationAll metrics and charts below follow these settings – based on a 24-month runtime.Save to URLReset
⚡ Electricity price EUR/kWh
⚙️ System utilization 100 %
🖥️ Acquisition EUR
🔌 Idle 50 W
⚡ TDP 477 W
☁️ External LLM (API)
Electricity0.30 EUR/kWh
Avg power (incl. idle)477 W estimated (TDP)GPU 450 + CPU 17 + Board 10 W full load
Avg cost / hourEUR 0.14
Electricity / 1M tokensEUR 0.073
Token / kWh4.10M
Acquisition (system)EUR 2,986 partial priceGPU EUR 999 · CPU EUR 549 · RAM EUR 1,288 · PSU EUR 150
Electricity (2 years)
TCO (2 years)EUR 5,494
Output tokens (2 years)34.25B
☁️ External LLM (API) – comparison
External LLM cost (2 years)
Savings vs. external (2 years)

All values above and the charts below take the configured system utilization into account: at X% the system generates only X% of the time, the rest it idles (50 W). Cost per hour drops (more idle), cost per token rises.

Cost over 2 years – electricity only

Cost over 2 years – incl. acquisition (TCO)

Speed vs. tokens per euro

Euro per 1M tokens

Comparison vs. API – economics per benchmark

North-Mini-Code-1.0NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 TiNorth-Mini-Code-1.0NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation EditionNorth-Mini-Code-1.03x NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation EditionNorth-Mini-Code-1.03x AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700
Electricity cost (24 mo.)
Acquisition cost
Total cost (TCO)
Generated tokens (24 mo.)
Token price via API
Break-even point (days)
Result (savings / extra cost)

Comparison with up to 3 next-best runs of this model at the same concurrency (at least one on different hardware). Power = GPU TDP + CPU (idle + 15 %) + board (estimated), acquisition = full system (GPU + CPU + board + RAM + PSU), prices = stored market prices.

Contributed by

Mario Alka Administrator

@marioalka

Ich bin Unternehmer, Softwareentwickler und KI-Enthusiast. Seit vielen Jahren entwickle ich Unternehmenssoftware und beschäftige mich inzwischen fast täglich mit lokalen LLMs, KI-Agenten und leistungsfähiger KI-Hardware.

Mit LLM-Benchmark.de möchte ich eine Plattform schaffen, auf der Modelle, GPUs und Agenten objektiv und reproduzierbar miteinander verglichen werden.