Created bymario-alka.dePowered bygodcore.denoob2claw.detricoma.de
Contributed byMario AlkaQwen (Alibaba)

Qwen3-Coder-Next

Performance benchmark · measured on 28.07.2026 17:23

Benchmark-IDrun-20260728-184455-c4c304
Timebench 3 - Kombi (Prefill + Generation)MoERuntime: llama.cppQuantisierung: Q4_K_M
Generation24,83tok/s
Prefill267,37tok/s
Time to First Token9.107,50ms
Total duration100,70s
Concurrency1parallel
Ranking in the field
1105of 1559 systems

Performance benchmark · Primary metric: Generation-Speed (tok/s) · 1× concurrent

This run is better than 29 % of all comparable systems.
Generation 24,8 tok/s
-69 % vs Ø 79,0
Prefill 267,4 tok/s
-91 % vs Ø 2.834,3
Time to First Token 9.108 ms
-66 % vs Ø 26.805
Distribution in the field0 – 405 tok/s
Ø 79 Median Dieser Lauf

Wie schlägt sich dieser Benchmark mit anderen Modellen?

How does this benchmark compare on other GPUs?

Same model on different hardware · 1× concurrent · Generation (tok/s)

Hardware

GPU: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti · 16 GB VRAM
CPU: AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 32-Cores
RAM: 247 GB
Mainboard: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI

Setup

Runtime: llama.cpp
Quantization: Q4_K_M
Model: Qwen3-Coder-Next

Configuration

benchmark-konfiguration — run-20260728-184455-c4c304
# LLM-Benchmark Konfiguration # Modell : Qwen3-Coder-Next # Engine : llama.cpp # Run-ID : run-20260728-184455-c4c304 # GPU : NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti # CPU : AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 32-Cores # RAM : 247 GB bench@llm-benchmark:~$ /home/godcore/llama.cpp/build/bin/llama-server \ -m /home/godcore/.cache/huggingface/hub/models--unsloth--Qwen3-Coder-Next-GGUF/snapshots/ce09c67b53bc8739eef83fe67b2f5d293c270632/Qwen3-Coder-Next-Q4_K_M.gguf \ --alias Qwen3-Coder-Next \ --host 0.0.0.0 \ --port 8000 \ -ngl 12 \ -c 16384 \ -np 4 \ --jinja
Engine?Die Inferenz-Software, die das Modell ausliefert (z.B. vLLM oder llama.cpp). Sie bestimmt Geschwindigkeit, unterstuetzte Modellformate und welche Parameter ueberhaupt verfuegbar sind.llamacpp
Modellalias?Der Name, unter dem das Modell ueber die API angesprochen wird. Genau dieser Wert muss im Request-Feld 'model' stehen.Qwen3-Coder-Next
Kontextlaenge?Maximale Anzahl Tokens (Eingabe + erzeugte Ausgabe zusammen), die das Modell pro Anfrage verarbeiten kann.16384
Modellpfad?Pfad zur GGUF-Modelldatei, die geladen und ausgeliefert wird./home/godcore/.cache/huggingface/hub/models--unsloth--Qwen3-Coder-Next-GGUF/snapshots/ce09c67b53bc8739eef83fe67b2f5d293c270632/Qwen3-Coder-Next-Q4_K_M.gguf
GPU-Layer?Anzahl der auf die GPU ausgelagerten Modell-Layer. Hoeher = mehr VRAM und schneller; der Rest laeuft auf der CPU. 999 = alles auf GPU.12
Kontext?Groesse des Kontextfensters in Token. 0 = der beim Training verwendete Kontext des Modells.16384
np4

All benchmarks of this model To leaderboard

Anzeige
Model comparison

Qwen3-Coder-Next on various hardware

All published performance runs of this model – each bubble a variant: position = prefill (X) × generation (Y), bubble size = number of runs. Closer to the top right = faster. ★ Marked gold = this benchmark.

GPUby graphics card

1.6221.2168114050,006.50613.01219.518Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition - 1.253,3 tok/s Generation, 3.996 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 5.229 ms (3 Laufe)NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 B...NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition - 1.147,5 tok/s Generation, 4.654 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 5.337 ms (12 Laufe)NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 B...NVIDIA RTX A6000 - 629,8 tok/s Generation, 15.785 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 924 ms (12 Laufe)NVIDIA RTX A6000NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 - 107,0 tok/s Generation, 398 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 60.296 ms (3 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 50...AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 - 78,7 tok/s Generation, 1.145 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 60.618 ms (17 Laufe)AMD Radeon AI PRO R97...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti - 78,2 tok/s Generation, 310 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 81.109 ms (3 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 30...NVIDIA GB10 (DGX Spark) - 38,5 tok/s Generation, 2.124 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 1.146 ms (1 Lauf)NVIDIA GB10 (DGX Spar...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti - 106,1 tok/s Generation, 309 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 67.849 ms (3 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 50...
NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition 1.253,3 tok/sNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition 1.147,5 tok/sNVIDIA RTX A6000 629,8 tok/sNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 107,0 tok/s★ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti 106,1 tok/s this runAMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 78,7 tok/sNVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti 78,2 tok/sNVIDIA GB10 (DGX Spark) 38,5 tok/s

CPUby processor

1.6221.2168114050,002.9595.9178.876Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-Core Processor - 1.253,3 tok/s Generation, 3.996 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 5.229 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-...AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX 24-Cores - 1.147,5 tok/s Generation, 4.654 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 5.337 ms (12 Laufe)AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX 16-Cores - 629,8 tok/s Generation, 7.203 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 35.917 ms (29 Laufe)AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8-Core Processor - 107,0 tok/s Generation, 398 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 60.296 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8...AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX with Radeon Graphics - 78,2 tok/s Generation, 310 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 81.109 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX wi...NVIDIA Grace - 38,5 tok/s Generation, 2.124 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 1.146 ms (1 Lauf)NVIDIA GraceAMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 32-Cores - 106,1 tok/s Generation, 309 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 67.849 ms (3 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...
AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-Core Processor 1.253,3 tok/sAMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX 24-Cores 1.147,5 tok/sAMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX 16-Cores 629,8 tok/sAMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8-Core Processor 107,0 tok/s★ AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 32-Cores 106,1 tok/s this runAMD Ryzen 9 8945HX with Radeon Graphics 78,2 tok/sNVIDIA Grace 38,5 tok/s

MBby mainboard

1.6221.2168114050,002.6505.3017.951Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ProArt X870E-CREATOR WIFI - 1.253,3 tok/s Generation, 3.996 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 5.229 ms (3 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX90E-SAGE SE - 1.147,5 tok/s Generation, 6.457 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 26.967 ms (41 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ROG STRIX B550-A GAMING - 107,0 tok/s Generation, 398 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 60.296 ms (3 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....Meigao Innovation Technology (Shen Zhen) Co., Ltd DRFXL (MotherBoard Series) - 78,2 tok/s Generation, 310 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 81.109 ms (3 Laufe)Meigao Innovation Tec...ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. GX10 - 38,5 tok/s Generation, 2.124 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 1.146 ms (1 Lauf)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI - 106,1 tok/s Generation, 309 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 67.849 ms (3 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....
ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ProArt X870E-CREATOR WIFI 1.253,3 tok/sASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX90E-SAGE SE 1.147,5 tok/sASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ROG STRIX B550-A GAMING 107,0 tok/s★ ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI 106,1 tok/s this runMeigao Innovation Technology (Shen Zhen) Co., Ltd DRFXL (MotherBoard Series) 78,2 tok/sASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. GX10 38,5 tok/s

ENGby engine

1.6171.2138084040,005.26910.53915.808Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)vLLM - 629,8 tok/s Generation, 13.068 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 965 ms (15 Laufe)vLLMunbekannt - 62,4 tok/s Generation, 2.254 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 1.092 ms (4 Laufe)unbekanntllama.cpp - 1.253,3 tok/s Generation, 2.197 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 49.468 ms (35 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ llama.cpp
★ llama.cpp 1.253,3 tok/s this runvLLM 629,8 tok/sunbekannt 62,4 tok/s

DRVby driver

1.6221.2168114050,01.1802.9434.7076.470Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)unbekannt - 1.253,3 tok/s Generation, 5.526 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 35.607 ms (49 Laufe)unbekanntAMD 7.0.0-27-generic - 62,4 tok/s Generation, 2.254 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 1.092 ms (4 Laufe)AMD 7.0.0-27-genericNVIDIA 590.48.01 / CUDA 13.1 - 38,5 tok/s Generation, 2.124 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 1.146 ms (1 Lauf)NVIDIA 590.48.01 / CU...
unbekannt 1.253,3 tok/sAMD 7.0.0-27-generic 62,4 tok/sNVIDIA 590.48.01 / CUDA 13.1 38,5 tok/s
💰 Economics

Economics of this run

Operating cost, TCO and comparison with the next-best runs of the same model at identical concurrency (1× concurrent). Methodology →

⚙️ ConfigurationAll metrics and charts below follow these settings – based on a 24-month runtime.Save to URLReset
⚡ Electricity price EUR/kWh
⚙️ System utilization 100 %
🖥️ Acquisition EUR
🔌 Idle 10 W
⚡ TDP 310 W
☁️ External LLM (API)
Electricity0.30 EUR/kWh
Avg power (incl. idle)310 W estimated (TDP)GPU 300 + Board 10 W full load
Avg cost / hourEUR 0.093
Electricity / 1M tokensEUR 1.04
Token / kWh288.35K
Acquisition (system)EUR 5,000 partial priceGPU EUR 994 · CPU EUR 1,880 · RAM EUR 1,976 · PSU EUR 150
Electricity (2 years)
TCO (2 years)EUR 6,629
Output tokens (2 years)1.57B
☁️ External LLM (API) – comparison
External LLM cost (2 years)
Savings vs. external (2 years)

All values above and the charts below take the configured system utilization into account: at X% the system generates only X% of the time, the rest it idles (10 W). Cost per hour drops (more idle), cost per token rises.

Cost over 2 years – electricity only

Cost over 2 years – incl. acquisition (TCO)

Speed vs. tokens per euro

Euro per 1M tokens

Comparison vs. API – economics per benchmark

Qwen3-Coder-NextNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 TiQwen3-Coder-NextNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation EditionQwen3-Coder-Next3x NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation EditionQwen3-Coder-Next3x NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition
Electricity cost (24 mo.)
Acquisition cost
Total cost (TCO)
Generated tokens (24 mo.)
Token price via API
Break-even point (days)
Result (savings / extra cost)

Comparison with up to 3 next-best runs of this model at the same concurrency (at least one on different hardware). Power = GPU TDP + CPU (idle + 15 %) + board (estimated), acquisition = full system (GPU + CPU + board + RAM + PSU), prices = stored market prices.

Contributed by

Mario Alka Administrator

@marioalka

Ich bin Unternehmer, Softwareentwickler und KI-Enthusiast. Seit vielen Jahren entwickle ich Unternehmenssoftware und beschäftige mich inzwischen fast täglich mit lokalen LLMs, KI-Agenten und leistungsfähiger KI-Hardware.

Mit LLM-Benchmark.de möchte ich eine Plattform schaffen, auf der Modelle, GPUs und Agenten objektiv und reproduzierbar miteinander verglichen werden.