# LLM-Benchmark Konfiguration # Modell : MiniMax-M2.5 # Engine : llama.cpp # Run-ID : run-20260728-184454-eb370a # GPU : NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti # CPU : AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 32-Cores # RAM : 247 GB bench@llm-benchmark:~$ /home/godcore/llama.cpp/build/bin/llama-server \ -m /home/godcore/.cache/huggingface/hub/models--exdysa--MiniMax-M2.5-REAP-172B-A10B-GGUF-Q4_K_M/snapshots/c5518e6b02673458388328830793414ef5bfba5c/MiniMax-M2.5-REAP-172B-A10B-Q4_K_M.gguf \ --alias MiniMax-M2.5-BF16-INT4-AWQ \ --host 0.0.0.0 \ --port 8000 \ -ngl 0 \ -c 16384 \ -np 4 \ --jinja

Engine?Die Inferenz-Software, die das Modell ausliefert (z.B. vLLM oder llama.cpp). Sie bestimmt Geschwindigkeit, unterstuetzte Modellformate und welche Parameter ueberhaupt verfuegbar sind.	llamacpp
Modellalias?Der Name, unter dem das Modell ueber die API angesprochen wird. Genau dieser Wert muss im Request-Feld 'model' stehen.	MiniMax-M2.5-BF16-INT4-AWQ
Kontextlaenge?Maximale Anzahl Tokens (Eingabe + erzeugte Ausgabe zusammen), die das Modell pro Anfrage verarbeiten kann.	16384
Modellpfad?Pfad zur GGUF-Modelldatei, die geladen und ausgeliefert wird.	/home/godcore/.cache/huggingface/hub/models--exdysa--MiniMax-M2.5-REAP-172B-A10B-GGUF-Q4_K_M/snapshots/c5518e6b02673458388328830793414ef5bfba5c/MiniMax-M2.5-REAP-172B-A10B-Q4_K_M.gguf
GPU-Layer?Anzahl der auf die GPU ausgelagerten Modell-Layer. Hoeher = mehr VRAM und schneller; der Rest laeuft auf der CPU. 999 = alles auf GPU.	0
Kontext?Groesse des Kontextfensters in Token. 0 = der beim Training verwendete Kontext des Modells.	16384
np	4

All benchmarks of this model To leaderboard

Model comparison

MiniMax-M2.5 on various hardware

All published performance runs of this model – each bubble a variant: position = prefill (X) × generation (Y), bubble size = number of runs. Closer to the top right = faster. ★ Marked gold = this benchmark.

GPUby graphics card

NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition 551,0 tok/sNVIDIA GB10 (DGX Spark) 103,5 tok/s★ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti 22,5 tok/s this runNVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti 15,9 tok/sAMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 7,0 tok/sNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition 7,0 tok/sCPU-only 0,8 tok/s

CPUby processor

AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX 24-Cores 551,0 tok/sNVIDIA Grace 103,5 tok/s★ AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 32-Cores 22,5 tok/s this runAMD Ryzen 9 8945HX with Radeon Graphics 15,9 tok/sAMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX 16-Cores 7,0 tok/sAMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-Core Processor 7,0 tok/sIntel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-4620 v2 @ 2.60GHz 0,8 tok/s

MBby mainboard

ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX90E-SAGE SE 551,0 tok/sASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. GX10 103,5 tok/s★ ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI 22,5 tok/s this runMeigao Innovation Technology (Shen Zhen) Co., Ltd DRFXL (MotherBoard Series) 15,9 tok/sASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ProArt X870E-CREATOR WIFI 7,0 tok/sDell Inc. PowerEdge R820 0,8 tok/s

ENGby engine

★ llama.cpp 551,0 tok/s this runvLLM 103,5 tok/s

DRVby driver

unbekannt 551,0 tok/sNVIDIA 590.48.01 / CUDA 13.1 103,5 tok/s

💰 Economics

Economics of this run

Operating cost, TCO and comparison with the next-best runs of the same model at identical concurrency (10× concurrent). Methodology →

⚙️ ConfigurationAll metrics and charts below follow these settings – based on a 24-month runtime.Save to URL Reset

⚡ Electricity price EUR/kWh

⚙️ System utilization 100 %

🖥️ Acquisition EUR

🔌 Idle 10 W

⚡ TDP 310 W

☁️ External LLM (API) show

Input €/1M Output €/1M Input per output token

Electricity0.30 EUR/kWh

Avg power (incl. idle)310 W estimated (TDP)GPU 300 + Board 10 W full load

Avg cost / hourEUR 0.093

Electricity / 1M tokensEUR 1.70

Token / kWh176.05K

Acquisition (system)EUR 2,126 missingRAM EUR 1,976 · PSU EUR 150

Electricity (2 years)–

TCO (2 years)EUR 3,755

Output tokens (2 years)956.17M

☁️ External LLM (API) – comparison

External LLM cost (2 years)–

Savings vs. external (2 years)–

All values above and the charts below take the configured system utilization into account: at X% the system generates only X% of the time, the rest it idles (10 W). Cost per hour drops (more idle), cost per token rises.

Cost over 2 years – electricity only

Cost over 2 years – incl. acquisition (TCO)

Speed vs. tokens per euro

Euro per 1M tokens

Comparison vs. API – economics per benchmark

	MiniMax-M2.5NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti	MiniMax-M2.53x NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition	MiniMax-M2.53x NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition	MiniMax-M2.5NVIDIA GB10 (DGX Spark)
Electricity cost (24 mo.)	–	–	–	–
Acquisition cost	–	–	–	–
Total cost (TCO)	–	–	–	–
Generated tokens (24 mo.)	–	–	–	–
Token price via API	–	–	–	–
Break-even point (days)	–	–	–	–
Result (savings / extra cost)	–	–	–	–

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti · this run 15 tok/s 3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition 551 tok/s 3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition 549 tok/s NVIDIA GB10 (DGX Spark) 103 tok/s

Comparison with up to 3 next-best runs of this model at the same concurrency (at least one on different hardware). Power = GPU TDP + CPU (idle + 15 %) + board (estimated), acquisition = full system (GPU + CPU + board + RAM + PSU), prices = stored market prices.

Contributed by

Mario Alka Administrator

@marioalka

Ich bin Unternehmer, Softwareentwickler und KI-Enthusiast. Seit vielen Jahren entwickle ich Unternehmenssoftware und beschäftige mich inzwischen fast täglich mit lokalen LLMs, KI-Agenten und leistungsfähiger KI-Hardware.

Mit LLM-Benchmark.de möchte ich eine Plattform schaffen, auf der Modelle, GPUs und Agenten objektiv und reproduzierbar miteinander verglichen werden.