Created bymario-alka.dePowered bygodcore.denoob2claw.detricoma.de
Contributed byMario AlkaMistral AI

Devstral-Small-2507

Performance benchmark · measured on 28.07.2026 10:43

Benchmark-IDrun-20260728-140953-bc61b8
Timebench 3 - Kombi (Prefill + Generation)Dense24BRuntime: llama.cppQuantisierung: Q4_K_M
Generation19,14tok/s
Prefill1.510,35tok/s
Time to First Token2.316,50ms
Total duration74,24s
Concurrency1parallel
Ranking in the field
11of 26 systems

Performance benchmark · Primary metric: Generation-Speed (tok/s) · 1× concurrent

This run is better than 60 % of all comparable systems.
Generation 19,1 tok/s
-70 % vs Ø 63,1
Prefill 1.510,4 tok/s
-24 % vs Ø 1.997,2
Time to First Token 2.317 ms
-79 % vs Ø 11.041
Distribution in the field2 – 276 tok/s
Ø 63 Median Dieser Lauf

Wie schlägt sich dieser Benchmark mit anderen Modellen?

How does this benchmark compare on other GPUs?

Same model on different hardware · 1× concurrent · Generation (tok/s)

Hardware

GPU: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti · 16 GB VRAM
CPU: AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 32-Cores
RAM: 247 GB
Mainboard: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI

Setup

Runtime: llama.cpp
Quantization: Q4_K_M
Model: Devstral-Small-2507

Configuration

benchmark-konfiguration — run-20260728-140953-bc61b8
# LLM-Benchmark Konfiguration # Modell : Devstral-Small-2507 # Engine : llama.cpp # Run-ID : run-20260728-140953-bc61b8 # GPU : NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti # CPU : AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 32-Cores # RAM : 247 GB bench@llm-benchmark:~$ /home/godcore/llama.cpp/build/bin/llama-server \ -m /home/godcore/.cache/huggingface/hub/models--mistralai--Devstral-Small-2507_gguf/snapshots/ee2f0c00c5c86862f471fbf533268cf01b80d4a6/Devstral-Small-2507-Q4_K_M.gguf \ --alias Devstral-Small-2507 \ --host 0.0.0.0 \ --port 8000 \ -ngl 30 \ -c 16384 \ -np 4 \ --jinja
Engine?Die Inferenz-Software, die das Modell ausliefert (z.B. vLLM oder llama.cpp). Sie bestimmt Geschwindigkeit, unterstuetzte Modellformate und welche Parameter ueberhaupt verfuegbar sind.llamacpp
Modellalias?Der Name, unter dem das Modell ueber die API angesprochen wird. Genau dieser Wert muss im Request-Feld 'model' stehen.Devstral-Small-2507
Kontextlaenge?Maximale Anzahl Tokens (Eingabe + erzeugte Ausgabe zusammen), die das Modell pro Anfrage verarbeiten kann.16384
Modellpfad?Pfad zur GGUF-Modelldatei, die geladen und ausgeliefert wird./home/godcore/.cache/huggingface/hub/models--mistralai--Devstral-Small-2507_gguf/snapshots/ee2f0c00c5c86862f471fbf533268cf01b80d4a6/Devstral-Small-2507-Q4_K_M.gguf
GPU-Layer?Anzahl der auf die GPU ausgelagerten Modell-Layer. Hoeher = mehr VRAM und schneller; der Rest laeuft auf der CPU. 999 = alles auf GPU.30
Kontext?Groesse des Kontextfensters in Token. 0 = der beim Training verwendete Kontext des Modells.16384
np4

All benchmarks of this model To leaderboard

Anzeige
Model comparison

Devstral-Small-2507 on various hardware

All published performance runs of this model – each bubble a variant: position = prefill (X) × generation (Y), bubble size = number of runs. Closer to the top right = faster. ★ Marked gold = this benchmark.

GPUby graphics card

8216164112050,005.48010.96016.440Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition - 647,6 tok/s Generation, 8.500 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 5.252 ms (3 Laufe)NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 B...NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition - 572,2 tok/s Generation, 13.619 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 5.186 ms (3 Laufe)NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 B...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti - 317,4 tok/s Generation, 4.619 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 10.835 ms (3 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 30...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti - 103,9 tok/s Generation, 2.486 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 34.598 ms (5 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 50...
NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition 647,6 tok/sNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition 572,2 tok/sNVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti 317,4 tok/s★ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti 103,9 tok/s this run

CPUby processor

8216164112050,005.48010.96016.440Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-Core Processor - 647,6 tok/s Generation, 8.500 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 5.252 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-...AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX 24-Cores - 572,2 tok/s Generation, 13.619 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 5.186 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX with Radeon Graphics - 317,4 tok/s Generation, 4.619 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 10.835 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX wi...AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 32-Cores - 103,9 tok/s Generation, 2.486 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 34.598 ms (5 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...
AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-Core Processor 647,6 tok/sAMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX 24-Cores 572,2 tok/sAMD Ryzen 9 8945HX with Radeon Graphics 317,4 tok/s★ AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 32-Cores 103,9 tok/s this run

MBby mainboard

8216164112050,005.48010.96016.440Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ProArt X870E-CREATOR WIFI - 647,6 tok/s Generation, 8.500 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 5.252 ms (3 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX90E-SAGE SE - 572,2 tok/s Generation, 13.619 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 5.186 ms (3 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....Meigao Innovation Technology (Shen Zhen) Co., Ltd DRFXL (MotherBoard Series) - 317,4 tok/s Generation, 4.619 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 10.835 ms (3 Laufe)Meigao Innovation Tec...ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI - 103,9 tok/s Generation, 2.486 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 34.598 ms (5 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....
ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ProArt X870E-CREATOR WIFI 647,6 tok/sASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX90E-SAGE SE 572,2 tok/sMeigao Innovation Technology (Shen Zhen) Co., Ltd DRFXL (MotherBoard Series) 317,4 tok/s★ ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI 103,9 tok/s this run

ENGby engine

7126806486155836.2206.4856.7497.014Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)llama.cpp - 647,6 tok/s Generation, 6.617 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 16.915 ms (14 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ llama.cpp
★ llama.cpp 647,6 tok/s this run

DRVby driver

7126806486155836.2206.4856.7497.014Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)unbekannt - 647,6 tok/s Generation, 6.617 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 16.915 ms (14 Laufe)unbekannt
unbekannt 647,6 tok/s
💰 Economics

Economics of this run

Operating cost, TCO and comparison with the next-best runs of the same model at identical concurrency (1× concurrent). Methodology →

⚙️ ConfigurationAll metrics and charts below follow these settings – based on a 24-month runtime.Save to URLReset
⚡ Electricity price EUR/kWh
⚙️ System utilization 100 %
🖥️ Acquisition EUR
🔌 Idle 10 W
⚡ TDP 310 W
☁️ External LLM (API)
Electricity0.30 EUR/kWh
Avg power (incl. idle)310 W estimated (TDP)GPU 300 + Board 10 W full load
Avg cost / hourEUR 0.093
Electricity / 1M tokensEUR 1.35
Token / kWh222.27K
Acquisition (system)EUR 2,126 missingRAM EUR 1,976 · PSU EUR 150
Electricity (2 years)
TCO (2 years)EUR 3,755
Output tokens (2 years)1.21B
☁️ External LLM (API) – comparison
External LLM cost (2 years)
Savings vs. external (2 years)

All values above and the charts below take the configured system utilization into account: at X% the system generates only X% of the time, the rest it idles (10 W). Cost per hour drops (more idle), cost per token rises.

Cost over 2 years – electricity only

Cost over 2 years – incl. acquisition (TCO)

Speed vs. tokens per euro

Euro per 1M tokens

Comparison vs. API – economics per benchmark

Devstral-Small-2507NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 TiDevstral-Small-2507NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation EditionDevstral-Small-25073x NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation EditionDevstral-Small-2507NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti
Electricity cost (24 mo.)
Acquisition cost
Total cost (TCO)
Generated tokens (24 mo.)
Token price via API
Break-even point (days)
Result (savings / extra cost)

Comparison with up to 3 next-best runs of this model at the same concurrency (at least one on different hardware). Power = GPU TDP + CPU (idle + 15 %) + board (estimated), acquisition = full system (GPU + CPU + board + RAM + PSU), prices = stored market prices.

Contributed by

Mario Alka Administrator

@marioalka

Ich bin Unternehmer, Softwareentwickler und KI-Enthusiast. Seit vielen Jahren entwickle ich Unternehmenssoftware und beschäftige mich inzwischen fast täglich mit lokalen LLMs, KI-Agenten und leistungsfähiger KI-Hardware.

Mit LLM-Benchmark.de möchte ich eine Plattform schaffen, auf der Modelle, GPUs und Agenten objektiv und reproduzierbar miteinander verglichen werden.