Created bymario-alka.dePowered bygodcore.denoob2claw.detricoma.de
Contributed byMario AlkaPoolside

Laguna-S-2.1-INT4

Performance benchmark · measured on 28.07.2026 00:39

Benchmark-IDrun-20260728-034053-e9eb4c
Timebench 3 - Kombi (Prefill + Generation)Runtime: llama.cppQuantisierung: UD-Q4_K_M
Generation32,70tok/s
Prefill133,60tok/s
Time to First Token130.995,00ms
Total duration761,56s
Concurrency5parallel
Ranking in the field
44of 76 systems

Performance benchmark · Primary metric: Generation-Speed (tok/s) · 5× concurrent

This run is better than 43 % of all comparable systems.
Generation 32,7 tok/s
-80 % vs Ø 164,9
Prefill 133,6 tok/s
-93 % vs Ø 2.052,4
Time to First Token 130.995 ms
+133 % vs Ø 56.332
Distribution in the field2 – 974 tok/s
Ø 165 Median Dieser Lauf

Wie schlägt sich dieser Benchmark mit anderen Modellen?

How does this benchmark compare on other GPUs?

Same model on different hardware · 5× concurrent · Generation (tok/s)

Hardware

GPU: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti · 16 GB VRAM
CPU: AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 32-Cores
RAM: 247 GB
Mainboard: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI

Setup

Runtime: llama.cpp
Quantization: UD-Q4_K_M
Model: Laguna-S-2.1-INT4

Configuration

benchmark-konfiguration — run-20260728-034053-e9eb4c
# LLM-Benchmark Konfiguration # Modell : Laguna-S-2.1-INT4 # Engine : llama.cpp # Run-ID : run-20260728-034053-e9eb4c # GPU : NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti # CPU : AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 32-Cores # RAM : 247 GB bench@llm-benchmark:~$ /home/godcore/llama.cpp/build/bin/llama-server \ -m /home/godcore/.cache/huggingface/hub/models--unsloth--Laguna-S-2.1-GGUF/snapshots/750f92f90cf54159c4d7a610cb7b3e74498e75c6/UD-Q4_K_M/Laguna-S-2.1-UD-Q4_K_M-00001-of-00003.gguf \ --alias Laguna-S-2.1-INT4 \ --host 0.0.0.0 \ --port 8000 \ -ngl 0 \ -c 16384 \ -np 4 \ --jinja
Engine?Die Inferenz-Software, die das Modell ausliefert (z.B. vLLM oder llama.cpp). Sie bestimmt Geschwindigkeit, unterstuetzte Modellformate und welche Parameter ueberhaupt verfuegbar sind.llamacpp
Modellalias?Der Name, unter dem das Modell ueber die API angesprochen wird. Genau dieser Wert muss im Request-Feld 'model' stehen.Laguna-S-2.1-INT4
Kontextlaenge?Maximale Anzahl Tokens (Eingabe + erzeugte Ausgabe zusammen), die das Modell pro Anfrage verarbeiten kann.16384
Modellpfad?Pfad zur GGUF-Modelldatei, die geladen und ausgeliefert wird./home/godcore/.cache/huggingface/hub/models--unsloth--Laguna-S-2.1-GGUF/snapshots/750f92f90cf54159c4d7a610cb7b3e74498e75c6/UD-Q4_K_M/Laguna-S-2.1-UD-Q4_K_M-00001-of-00003.gguf
GPU-Layer?Anzahl der auf die GPU ausgelagerten Modell-Layer. Hoeher = mehr VRAM und schneller; der Rest laeuft auf der CPU. 999 = alles auf GPU.0
Kontext?Groesse des Kontextfensters in Token. 0 = der beim Training verwendete Kontext des Modells.16384
np4

All benchmarks of this model To leaderboard

Anzeige
Model comparison

Laguna-S-2.1-INT4 on various hardware

All published performance runs of this model – each bubble a variant: position = prefill (X) × generation (Y), bubble size = number of runs. Closer to the top right = faster. ★ Marked gold = this benchmark.

GPUby graphics card

1.0838125422710,004.6149.22713.841Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition - 835,1 tok/s Generation, 3.224 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 9.299 ms (10 Laufe)NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 B...NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition - 779,8 tok/s Generation, 3.230 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 9.207 ms (24 Laufe)NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 B...NVIDIA RTX A6000 - 356,4 tok/s Generation, 11.176 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 1.536 ms (6 Laufe)NVIDIA RTX A6000AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 - 70,5 tok/s Generation, 2.223 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 122.760 ms (13 Laufe)AMD Radeon AI PRO R97...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti - 32,8 tok/s Generation, 163 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 131.427 ms (6 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 30...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 - 13,3 tok/s Generation, 95 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 143.534 ms (3 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 50...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti - 42,3 tok/s Generation, 139 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 136.435 ms (3 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 50...
NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition 835,1 tok/sNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition 779,8 tok/sNVIDIA RTX A6000 356,4 tok/sAMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 70,5 tok/s★ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti 42,3 tok/s this runNVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti 32,8 tok/sNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 13,3 tok/s

CPUby processor

1.0838125422710,002.0824.1646.246Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-Core Processor - 835,1 tok/s Generation, 3.224 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 9.299 ms (10 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-...AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX 24-Cores - 779,8 tok/s Generation, 3.230 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 9.207 ms (24 Laufe)AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX 16-Cores - 356,4 tok/s Generation, 5.051 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 84.479 ms (19 Laufe)AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX with Radeon Graphics - 32,8 tok/s Generation, 163 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 131.427 ms (6 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX wi...AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8-Core Processor - 13,3 tok/s Generation, 95 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 143.534 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8...AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 32-Cores - 42,3 tok/s Generation, 139 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 136.435 ms (3 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...
AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-Core Processor 835,1 tok/sAMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX 24-Cores 779,8 tok/sAMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX 16-Cores 356,4 tok/s★ AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 32-Cores 42,3 tok/s this runAMD Ryzen 9 8945HX with Radeon Graphics 32,8 tok/sAMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8-Core Processor 13,3 tok/s

MBby mainboard

1.0838125422710,001.6623.3244.985Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ProArt X870E-CREATOR WIFI - 835,1 tok/s Generation, 3.224 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 9.299 ms (10 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX90E-SAGE SE - 779,8 tok/s Generation, 4.034 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 42.467 ms (43 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....Meigao Innovation Technology (Shen Zhen) Co., Ltd DRFXL (MotherBoard Series) - 32,8 tok/s Generation, 163 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 131.427 ms (6 Laufe)Meigao Innovation Tec...ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ROG STRIX B550-A GAMING - 13,3 tok/s Generation, 95 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 143.534 ms (3 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI - 42,3 tok/s Generation, 139 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 136.435 ms (3 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....
ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ProArt X870E-CREATOR WIFI 835,1 tok/sASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX90E-SAGE SE 779,8 tok/s★ ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI 42,3 tok/s this runMeigao Innovation Technology (Shen Zhen) Co., Ltd DRFXL (MotherBoard Series) 32,8 tok/sASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ROG STRIX B550-A GAMING 13,3 tok/s

ENGby engine

1.0838125412710,01003.9197.73811.557Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)vLLM - 356,4 tok/s Generation, 9.616 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 2.334 ms (9 Laufe)vLLMunbekannt - 13,4 tok/s Generation, 8.629 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 305 ms (1 Lauf)unbekanntllama.cpp - 835,1 tok/s Generation, 2.040 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 64.113 ms (55 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ llama.cpp
★ llama.cpp 835,1 tok/s this runvLLM 356,4 tok/sunbekannt 13,4 tok/s

DRVby driver

1.0838125412710,01.5944.4437.29210.141Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)unbekannt - 835,1 tok/s Generation, 3.106 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 55.425 ms (64 Laufe)unbekanntAMD 7.0.0-27-generic - 13,4 tok/s Generation, 8.629 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 305 ms (1 Lauf)AMD 7.0.0-27-generic
unbekannt 835,1 tok/sAMD 7.0.0-27-generic 13,4 tok/s
💰 Economics

Economics of this run

Operating cost, TCO and comparison with the next-best runs of the same model at identical concurrency (5× concurrent). Methodology →

⚙️ ConfigurationAll metrics and charts below follow these settings – based on a 24-month runtime.Save to URLReset
⚡ Electricity price EUR/kWh
⚙️ System utilization 100 %
🖥️ Acquisition EUR
🔌 Idle 10 W
⚡ TDP 310 W
☁️ External LLM (API)
Electricity0.30 EUR/kWh
Avg power (incl. idle)310 W estimated (TDP)GPU 300 + Board 10 W full load
Avg cost / hourEUR 0.093
Electricity / 1M tokensEUR 0.79
Token / kWh379.74K
Acquisition (system)EUR 5,000 partial priceGPU EUR 994 · CPU EUR 1,880 · RAM EUR 1,976 · PSU EUR 150
Electricity (2 years)
TCO (2 years)EUR 6,629
Output tokens (2 years)2.06B
☁️ External LLM (API) – comparison
External LLM cost (2 years)
Savings vs. external (2 years)

All values above and the charts below take the configured system utilization into account: at X% the system generates only X% of the time, the rest it idles (10 W). Cost per hour drops (more idle), cost per token rises.

Cost over 2 years – electricity only

Cost over 2 years – incl. acquisition (TCO)

Speed vs. tokens per euro

Euro per 1M tokens

Comparison vs. API – economics per benchmark

Laguna-S-2.1-INT4NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 TiLaguna-S-2.1-INT4NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation EditionLaguna-S-2.1-INT4NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation EditionLaguna-S-2.1-INT4NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition
Electricity cost (24 mo.)
Acquisition cost
Total cost (TCO)
Generated tokens (24 mo.)
Token price via API
Break-even point (days)
Result (savings / extra cost)

Comparison with up to 3 next-best runs of this model at the same concurrency (at least one on different hardware). Power = GPU TDP + CPU (idle + 15 %) + board (estimated), acquisition = full system (GPU + CPU + board + RAM + PSU), prices = stored market prices.

Contributed by

Mario Alka Administrator

@marioalka

Ich bin Unternehmer, Softwareentwickler und KI-Enthusiast. Seit vielen Jahren entwickle ich Unternehmenssoftware und beschäftige mich inzwischen fast täglich mit lokalen LLMs, KI-Agenten und leistungsfähiger KI-Hardware.

Mit LLM-Benchmark.de möchte ich eine Plattform schaffen, auf der Modelle, GPUs und Agenten objektiv und reproduzierbar miteinander verglichen werden.