Created bymario-alka.dePowered bygodcore.denoob2claw.detricoma.de
Contributed byMario AlkaZ.ai (Zhipu)

GLM-4.5-Air

Performance benchmark · measured on 23.07.2026 05:13

Benchmark-IDrun-20260723-055734-adc759
Timebench 3 - Kombi (Prefill + Generation)MoE106BRuntime: llama.cppQuantisierung: Q4_K_M
Generation2,13tok/s
Prefill17,96tok/s
Time to First Token117.963,00ms
Total duration600,00s
Concurrency1parallel
Ranking in the field
29of 33 systems

Performance benchmark · Primary metric: Generation-Speed (tok/s) · 1× concurrent

This run is better than 13 % of all comparable systems.
Generation 2,1 tok/s
-90 % vs Ø 21,9
Prefill 18,0 tok/s
-97 % vs Ø 605,3
Time to First Token 117.963 ms
+164 % vs Ø 44.665
Distribution in the field1 – 81 tok/s
Ø 22 Median Dieser Lauf

Wie schlägt sich dieser Benchmark mit anderen Modellen?

How does this benchmark compare on other GPUs?

Same model on different hardware · 1× concurrent · Generation (tok/s)

Hardware

GPU: 2x NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 · 6 GB VRAM
CPU: 4x Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-4620 v2 @ 2.60GHz
RAM: 504 GB
Mainboard: Dell Inc. PowerEdge R820

Setup

Runtime: llama.cpp
Quantization: Q4_K_M
Model: GLM-4.5-Air

Configuration

benchmark-konfiguration — run-20260723-055734-adc759
# LLM-Benchmark Konfiguration # Modell : GLM-4.5-Air # Engine : llama.cpp # Run-ID : run-20260723-055734-adc759 # GPU : 2x NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 # CPU : 4x Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-4620 v2 @ 2.60GHz # RAM : 504 GB bench@llm-benchmark:~$ /opt/llama.cpp/build/bin/llama-server \ -m /opt/models/GLM-4.5-Air-Q4_K_M.gguf \ -a GLM-4.5-Air \ --host 0.0.0.0 \ --port 8080 \ --numa distribute \ -t 64 \ -tb 64 \ -c 8192 \ --parallel 4
Engine?Die Inferenz-Software, die das Modell ausliefert (z.B. vLLM oder llama.cpp). Sie bestimmt Geschwindigkeit, unterstuetzte Modellformate und welche Parameter ueberhaupt verfuegbar sind.llamacpp
Modellalias?Der Name, unter dem das Modell ueber die API angesprochen wird. Genau dieser Wert muss im Request-Feld 'model' stehen.GLM-4.5-Air
Kontextlaenge?Maximale Anzahl Tokens (Eingabe + erzeugte Ausgabe zusammen), die das Modell pro Anfrage verarbeiten kann.8192
Modellpfad?Pfad zur GGUF-Modelldatei, die geladen und ausgeliefert wird./opt/models/GLM-4.5-Air-Q4_K_M.gguf
Alias?Anzeigename des Modells nach aussen (served model name), unabhaengig vom Dateinamen.GLM-4.5-Air
NUMA?NUMA-Optimierung fuer Multi-Socket-CPUs: distribute/isolate/numactl. Verbessert die Speicherlokalitaet.distribute
Threads?Anzahl CPU-Threads fuer die Token-Generierung (Decode).64
Batch-Threads?Anzahl CPU-Threads fuer Prompt-Verarbeitung und Batch (Prefill).64
Kontext?Groesse des Kontextfensters in Token. 0 = der beim Training verwendete Kontext des Modells.8192
Parallel?Anzahl paralleler Slots/Sequenzen, die der Server gleichzeitig bedient. Der Kontext wird auf die Slots aufgeteilt.4

All benchmarks of this model To leaderboard

Anzeige
Model comparison

GLM-4.5-Air on various hardware

All published performance runs of this model – each bubble a variant: position = prefill (X) × generation (Y), bubble size = number of runs. Closer to the top right = faster. ★ Marked gold = this benchmark.

GPUby graphics card

8606454302150,003.2576.5159.772Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition - 661,8 tok/s Generation, 3.117 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 8.401 ms (3 Laufe)NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 B...NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition - 615,3 tok/s Generation, 3.448 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 9.105 ms (12 Laufe)NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 B...NVIDIA RTX A6000 - 276,5 tok/s Generation, 7.883 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 1.739 ms (6 Laufe)NVIDIA RTX A6000AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 - 104,1 tok/s Generation, 1.403 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 67.488 ms (11 Laufe)AMD Radeon AI PRO R97...AMD Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot - 99,5 tok/s Generation, 461 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 57.896 ms (9 Laufe)AMD Radeon PRO W7900 ...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti - 20,8 tok/s Generation, 137 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 156.298 ms (3 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 30...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti - 9,9 tok/s Generation, 109 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 59.573 ms (3 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 50...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 - 6,2 tok/s Generation, 161 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 57.809 ms (5 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 50...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 - 2,1 tok/s Generation, 18 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 117.963 ms (1 Lauf) | DIESER LAUF★ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 20...
NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition 661,8 tok/sNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition 615,3 tok/sNVIDIA RTX A6000 276,5 tok/sAMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 104,1 tok/sAMD Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot 99,5 tok/sNVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti 20,8 tok/sNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti 9,9 tok/sNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 6,2 tok/s★ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 2,1 tok/s this run

CPUby processor

8606454302150,001.5243.0484.573Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-Core Processor - 661,8 tok/s Generation, 3.117 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 8.401 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-...AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX 24-Cores - 615,3 tok/s Generation, 3.448 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 9.105 ms (12 Laufe)AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX 16-Cores - 276,5 tok/s Generation, 3.690 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 44.283 ms (17 Laufe)AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 32-Cores - 99,5 tok/s Generation, 373 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 58.315 ms (12 Laufe)AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX with Radeon Graphics - 20,8 tok/s Generation, 137 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 156.298 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX wi...AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8-Core Processor - 6,2 tok/s Generation, 161 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 57.809 ms (5 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8...Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-4620 v2 @ 2.60GHz - 2,1 tok/s Generation, 18 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 117.963 ms (1 Lauf) | DIESER LAUF★ Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU ...
AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-Core Processor 661,8 tok/sAMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX 24-Cores 615,3 tok/sAMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX 16-Cores 276,5 tok/sAMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 32-Cores 99,5 tok/sAMD Ryzen 9 8945HX with Radeon Graphics 20,8 tok/sAMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8-Core Processor 6,2 tok/s★ Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-4620 v2 @ 2.60GHz 2,1 tok/s this run

MBby mainboard

8606454302150,001.4832.9664.448Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ProArt X870E-CREATOR WIFI - 661,8 tok/s Generation, 3.117 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 8.401 ms (3 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX90E-SAGE SE - 615,3 tok/s Generation, 3.590 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 29.727 ms (29 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI - 99,5 tok/s Generation, 373 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 58.315 ms (12 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....Meigao Innovation Technology (Shen Zhen) Co., Ltd DRFXL (MotherBoard Series) - 20,8 tok/s Generation, 137 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 156.298 ms (3 Laufe)Meigao Innovation Tec...ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ROG STRIX B550-A GAMING - 6,2 tok/s Generation, 161 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 57.809 ms (5 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....Dell Inc. PowerEdge R820 - 2,1 tok/s Generation, 18 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 117.963 ms (1 Lauf) | DIESER LAUF★ Dell Inc. PowerEdge R...
ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ProArt X870E-CREATOR WIFI 661,8 tok/sASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX90E-SAGE SE 615,3 tok/sASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI 99,5 tok/sMeigao Innovation Technology (Shen Zhen) Co., Ltd DRFXL (MotherBoard Series) 20,8 tok/sASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ROG STRIX B550-A GAMING 6,2 tok/s★ Dell Inc. PowerEdge R820 2,1 tok/s this run

ENGby engine

8546404272130,02652.5304.7957.060Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)vLLM - 276,5 tok/s Generation, 5.900 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 6.467 ms (9 Laufe)vLLMunbekannt - 32,9 tok/s Generation, 3.110 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 1.893 ms (2 Laufe)unbekanntllama.cpp - 661,8 tok/s Generation, 1.425 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 57.166 ms (42 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ llama.cpp
★ llama.cpp 661,8 tok/s this runvLLM 276,5 tok/sunbekannt 32,9 tok/s

DRVby driver

8546404272130,01.8672.3972.9273.457Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)unbekannt - 661,8 tok/s Generation, 2.215 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 48.219 ms (51 Laufe)unbekanntAMD 7.0.0-27-generic - 32,9 tok/s Generation, 3.110 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 1.893 ms (2 Laufe)AMD 7.0.0-27-generic
unbekannt 661,8 tok/sAMD 7.0.0-27-generic 32,9 tok/s
💰 Economics

Economics of this run

Operating cost, TCO and comparison with the next-best runs of the same model at identical concurrency (1× concurrent). Methodology →

⚙️ ConfigurationAll metrics and charts below follow these settings – based on a 24-month runtime.Save to URLReset
⚡ Electricity price EUR/kWh
⚙️ System utilization 100 %
🖥️ Acquisition EUR
🔌 Idle 55 W
⚡ TDP 359 W
☁️ External LLM (API)
Electricity0.30 EUR/kWh
Avg power (incl. idle)359 W estimated (TDP)GPU 320 + CPU 29 + Board 10 W full load
Avg cost / hourEUR 0.11
Electricity / 1M tokensEUR 14.04
Token / kWh21.37K
Acquisition (system)EUR 2,425 partial priceGPU EUR 220 · CPU EUR 39 · RAM EUR 2,016 · PSU EUR 150
Electricity (2 years)
TCO (2 years)EUR 4,311
Output tokens (2 years)134.34M
☁️ External LLM (API) – comparison
External LLM cost (2 years)
Savings vs. external (2 years)

All values above and the charts below take the configured system utilization into account: at X% the system generates only X% of the time, the rest it idles (55 W). Cost per hour drops (more idle), cost per token rises.

Cost over 2 years – electricity only

Cost over 2 years – incl. acquisition (TCO)

Speed vs. tokens per euro

Euro per 1M tokens

Comparison vs. API – economics per benchmark

GLM-4.5-Air2x NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060GLM-4.5-AirNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation EditionGLM-4.5-Air3x NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation EditionGLM-4.5-Air3x NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition
Electricity cost (24 mo.)
Acquisition cost
Total cost (TCO)
Generated tokens (24 mo.)
Token price via API
Break-even point (days)
Result (savings / extra cost)

Comparison with up to 3 next-best runs of this model at the same concurrency (at least one on different hardware). Power = GPU TDP + CPU (idle + 15 %) + board (estimated), acquisition = full system (GPU + CPU + board + RAM + PSU), prices = stored market prices.

Contributed by

Mario Alka Administrator

@marioalka

Ich bin Unternehmer, Softwareentwickler und KI-Enthusiast. Seit vielen Jahren entwickle ich Unternehmenssoftware und beschäftige mich inzwischen fast täglich mit lokalen LLMs, KI-Agenten und leistungsfähiger KI-Hardware.

Mit LLM-Benchmark.de möchte ich eine Plattform schaffen, auf der Modelle, GPUs und Agenten objektiv und reproduzierbar miteinander verglichen werden.