Created bymario-alka.dePowered bygodcore.denoob2claw.detricoma.de
Contributed byMario AlkaGoogle

Gemma-4-26B-A4B-it

Performance benchmark · measured on 23.07.2026 02:19

Benchmark-IDrun-20260723-023424-7d69dd
Timebench 3 - Kombi (Prefill + Generation)MoE26BRuntime: llama.cppQuantisierung: Q8_0
For context: Diese Plattform nutzt Unified Memory – die "VRAM" ist gemeinsamer System-RAM (APU/Superchip); das Modell teilt sich den Speicher mit dem System.
Generation39,53tok/s
Prefill282,02tok/s
Time to First Token6.993,50ms
Total duration65,80s
Concurrency1parallel
Ranking in the field
4of 19 systems

Performance benchmark · Primary metric: Generation-Speed (tok/s) · 1× concurrent

This run is better than 83 % of all comparable systems.
Generation 39,5 tok/s
+44 % vs Ø 27,5
Prefill 282,0 tok/s
-35 % vs Ø 433,4
Time to First Token 6.994 ms
+241 % vs Ø 2.049
Distribution in the field7 – 54 tok/s
Ø 27 Median Dieser Lauf

Wie schlägt sich dieser Benchmark mit anderen Modellen?

How does this benchmark compare on other GPUs?

Same model on different hardware · 1× concurrent · Generation (tok/s)

Hardware

GPU: AMD Radeon 8060S Graphics
CPU: AMD RYZEN AI MAX+ 395 w/ Radeon 8060S
RAM: 31 GB
Mainboard: Bosgame AXB35-02 (BeyondMax Series)

Setup

Runtime: llama.cpp
Quantization: Q8_0
Model: Gemma-4-26B-A4B-it

Configuration

benchmark-konfiguration — run-20260723-023424-7d69dd
# LLM-Benchmark Konfiguration # Modell : Gemma-4-26B-A4B-it # Engine : llama.cpp # Run-ID : run-20260723-023424-7d69dd # GPU : AMD Radeon 8060S Graphics # CPU : AMD RYZEN AI MAX+ 395 w/ Radeon 8060S # RAM : 31 GB bench@llm-benchmark:~$ /home/godcore/llama.cpp/build-rocm/bin/llama-server \ --model /home/godcore/models/gemma4/gemma-4-26B-A4B-it-Q8_0.gguf \ --alias google/gemma-4-26B-A4B-it \ --host 0.0.0.0 \ --port 8000 \ --ctx-size 65536 \ --parallel 2 \ --gpu-layers 999 \ --flash-attn auto \ --cache-type-k q8_0 \ --cache-type-v q8_0 \ --reasoning off \ --jinja
Engine?Die Inferenz-Software, die das Modell ausliefert (z.B. vLLM oder llama.cpp). Sie bestimmt Geschwindigkeit, unterstuetzte Modellformate und welche Parameter ueberhaupt verfuegbar sind.llamacpp
Modellalias?Der Name, unter dem das Modell ueber die API angesprochen wird. Genau dieser Wert muss im Request-Feld 'model' stehen.google/gemma-4-26B-A4B-it
Kontextlaenge?Maximale Anzahl Tokens (Eingabe + erzeugte Ausgabe zusammen), die das Modell pro Anfrage verarbeiten kann.65536
Modellpfad?Pfad zur GGUF-Modelldatei, die geladen und ausgeliefert wird./home/godcore/models/gemma4/gemma-4-26B-A4B-it-Q8_0.gguf
Parallel?Anzahl paralleler Slots/Sequenzen, die der Server gleichzeitig bedient. Der Kontext wird auf die Slots aufgeteilt.2
GPU-Layer?Anzahl der auf die GPU ausgelagerten Modell-Layer. Hoeher = mehr VRAM und schneller; der Rest laeuft auf der CPU. 999 = alles auf GPU.999
Flash Attention?FlashAttention fuer schnellere und speichersparende Attention. Wert on/off/auto je nach Build.auto
K-Cache-Typ?Datentyp des K-Anteils im KV-Cache (f16/q8_0/q4_0 ...). Quantisiert senkt den VRAM-Bedarf bei leichtem Qualitaetsverlust.q8_0
V-Cache-Typ?Datentyp des V-Anteils im KV-Cache (f16/q8_0/q4_0 ...). Quantisierung braucht meist aktiviertes flash-attn.q8_0
Reasoning?Steuert die Ausgabe bzw. das Parsing von Reasoning-/Thinking-Inhalten (z.B. --reasoning-format deepseek/none).off
Jinja?Nutzt die im Modell eingebettete Jinja-Chat-Vorlage fuer korrekte Rollen-, Tool- und Reasoning-Formatierung.aktiv

All benchmarks of this model To leaderboard

Anzeige
Model comparison

Gemma-4-26B-A4B-it on various hardware

All published performance runs of this model – each bubble a variant: position = prefill (X) × generation (Y), bubble size = number of runs. Closer to the top right = faster. ★ Marked gold = this benchmark.

GPUby graphics card

2.0501.5371.0255120,004.7339.46614.199Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition - 1.589,1 tok/s Generation, 6.148 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.731 ms (3 Laufe)NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 B...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 - 1.540,5 tok/s Generation, 4.006 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 4.749 ms (3 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 50...NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition - 1.479,9 tok/s Generation, 7.172 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.769 ms (9 Laufe)NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 B...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti - 1.009,0 tok/s Generation, 3.578 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 5.953 ms (3 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 50...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti - 926,2 tok/s Generation, 3.438 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 4.863 ms (6 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 30...NVIDIA RTX A6000 - 841,8 tok/s Generation, 11.528 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 1.992 ms (36 Laufe)NVIDIA RTX A6000AMD Radeon PRO W7800 48GB - 247,3 tok/s Generation, 2.619 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.357 ms (8 Laufe)AMD Radeon PRO W7800 ...AMD Radeon 8060S Graphics - 79,5 tok/s Generation, 533 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 9.976 ms (9 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ AMD Radeon 8060S Grap...
NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition 1.589,1 tok/sNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 1.540,5 tok/sNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition 1.479,9 tok/sNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti 1.009,0 tok/sNVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti 926,2 tok/sNVIDIA RTX A6000 841,8 tok/sAMD Radeon PRO W7800 48GB 247,3 tok/s★ AMD Radeon 8060S Graphics 79,5 tok/s this run

CPUby processor

2.0501.5371.0255120,004.7339.46614.199Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-Core Processor - 1.589,1 tok/s Generation, 6.148 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.731 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-...AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8-Core Processor - 1.540,5 tok/s Generation, 4.006 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 4.749 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8...AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX 24-Cores - 1.479,9 tok/s Generation, 7.172 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.769 ms (9 Laufe)AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 32-Cores - 1.009,0 tok/s Generation, 2.880 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 4.065 ms (11 Laufe)AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX with Radeon Graphics - 926,2 tok/s Generation, 3.620 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 6.478 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX wi...AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX 16-Cores - 841,8 tok/s Generation, 11.528 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 1.992 ms (36 Laufe)AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...AMD Ryzen 5 5600X 6-Core Processor - 397,2 tok/s Generation, 3.255 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.248 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 5 5600X 6-C...AMD RYZEN AI MAX+ 395 w/ Radeon 8060S - 79,5 tok/s Generation, 533 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 9.976 ms (9 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ AMD RYZEN AI MAX+ 395...
AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-Core Processor 1.589,1 tok/sAMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8-Core Processor 1.540,5 tok/sAMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX 24-Cores 1.479,9 tok/sAMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 32-Cores 1.009,0 tok/sAMD Ryzen 9 8945HX with Radeon Graphics 926,2 tok/sAMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX 16-Cores 841,8 tok/sAMD Ryzen 5 5600X 6-Core Processor 397,2 tok/s★ AMD RYZEN AI MAX+ 395 w/ Radeon 8060S 79,5 tok/s this run

MBby mainboard

2.0571.5431.0295140,004.4018.80113.202Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ProArt X870E-CREATOR WIFI - 1.589,1 tok/s Generation, 6.148 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.731 ms (3 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ROG STRIX B550-A GAMING - 1.540,5 tok/s Generation, 4.006 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 4.749 ms (3 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX90E-SAGE SE - 1.479,9 tok/s Generation, 10.657 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 2.347 ms (45 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI - 1.009,0 tok/s Generation, 2.880 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 4.065 ms (11 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....Meigao Innovation Technology (Shen Zhen) Co., Ltd DRFXL (MotherBoard Series) - 926,2 tok/s Generation, 3.620 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 6.478 ms (3 Laufe)Meigao Innovation Tec...ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. PRIME A520M-K - 397,2 tok/s Generation, 3.255 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.248 ms (3 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....Meigao Innovation Technology (Shen Zhen) Co., Ltd SHWSA (MS-S1 MAX) - 42,2 tok/s Generation, 71 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 609 ms (1 Lauf)Meigao Innovation Tec...Bosgame AXB35-02 (BeyondMax Series) - 79,5 tok/s Generation, 591 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 11.147 ms (8 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ Bosgame AXB35-02 (Bey...
ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ProArt X870E-CREATOR WIFI 1.589,1 tok/sASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ROG STRIX B550-A GAMING 1.540,5 tok/sASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX90E-SAGE SE 1.479,9 tok/sASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI 1.009,0 tok/sMeigao Innovation Technology (Shen Zhen) Co., Ltd DRFXL (MotherBoard Series) 926,2 tok/sASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. PRIME A520M-K 397,2 tok/s★ Bosgame AXB35-02 (BeyondMax Series) 79,5 tok/s this runMeigao Innovation Technology (Shen Zhen) Co., Ltd SHWSA (MS-S1 MAX) 42,2 tok/s

ENGby engine

1.9861.4909934970,007.33614.67222.007Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)vLLM - 841,8 tok/s Generation, 18.105 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 695 ms (18 Laufe)vLLMunbekannt - 397,2 tok/s Generation, 2.459 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 2.588 ms (4 Laufe)unbekanntllama.cpp - 1.589,1 tok/s Generation, 4.207 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 4.943 ms (55 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ llama.cpp
★ llama.cpp 1.589,1 tok/s this runvLLM 841,8 tok/sunbekannt 397,2 tok/s

DRVby driver

2.0571.5431.0295140,003.0806.1599.239Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)unbekannt - 1.589,1 tok/s Generation, 7.461 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.870 ms (76 Laufe)unbekanntROCm 7.2.0 - 42,2 tok/s Generation, 71 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 609 ms (1 Lauf)ROCm 7.2.0
unbekannt 1.589,1 tok/sROCm 7.2.0 42,2 tok/s
💰 Economics

Economics of this run

Operating cost, TCO and comparison with the next-best runs of the same model at identical concurrency (1× concurrent). Methodology →

⚙️ ConfigurationAll metrics and charts below follow these settings – based on a 24-month runtime.Save to URLReset
⚡ Electricity price EUR/kWh
⚙️ System utilization 100 %
🖥️ Acquisition EUR
🔌 Idle 18 W
⚡ TDP 120 W
☁️ External LLM (API)
Electricity0.30 EUR/kWh
Avg power (incl. idle)120 W estimated (TDP)GPU 120 W full load
Avg cost / hourEUR 0.036
Electricity / 1M tokensEUR 0.25
Token / kWh1.19M
Acquisition (system)EUR 7,054 partial priceGPU EUR 3,000 · Board EUR 3,500 · RAM EUR 434 · PSU EUR 120
Electricity (2 years)
TCO (2 years)EUR 7,685
Output tokens (2 years)2.49B
☁️ External LLM (API) – comparison
External LLM cost (2 years)
Savings vs. external (2 years)

All values above and the charts below take the configured system utilization into account: at X% the system generates only X% of the time, the rest it idles (18 W). Cost per hour drops (more idle), cost per token rises.

Cost over 2 years – electricity only

Cost over 2 years – incl. acquisition (TCO)

Speed vs. tokens per euro

Euro per 1M tokens

Comparison vs. API – economics per benchmark

Gemma-4-26B-A4B-itAMD Radeon 8060S GraphicsGemma-4-26B-A4B-itNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090Gemma-4-26B-A4B-itNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation EditionGemma-4-26B-A4B-it3x NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition
Electricity cost (24 mo.)
Acquisition cost
Total cost (TCO)
Generated tokens (24 mo.)
Token price via API
Break-even point (days)
Result (savings / extra cost)

Comparison with up to 3 next-best runs of this model at the same concurrency (at least one on different hardware). Power = GPU TDP + CPU (idle + 15 %) + board (estimated), acquisition = full system (GPU + CPU + board + RAM + PSU), prices = stored market prices.

Contributed by

Mario Alka Administrator

@marioalka

Ich bin Unternehmer, Softwareentwickler und KI-Enthusiast. Seit vielen Jahren entwickle ich Unternehmenssoftware und beschäftige mich inzwischen fast täglich mit lokalen LLMs, KI-Agenten und leistungsfähiger KI-Hardware.

Mit LLM-Benchmark.de möchte ich eine Plattform schaffen, auf der Modelle, GPUs und Agenten objektiv und reproduzierbar miteinander verglichen werden.