Generation80,00tok/s

Prefill1.200,00tok/s

Time to First Token150,00ms

Total duration60,00s

Concurrency8parallel

Ranking in the field

This GPU All GPUs

1of 1 systems

Performance benchmark · Primary metric: Generation-Speed (tok/s) · 8× concurrent

This run is better than 100 % of all comparable systems.

Generation 80,0 tok/s

+0 % vs Ø 80,0

Prefill 1.200,0 tok/s

+0 % vs Ø 1.200,0

Time to First Token 150 ms

+0 % vs Ø 150

Wie schlägt sich dieser Benchmark mit anderen Modellen?

Codestral-22B-v0.1 this runNVIDIA GB10 · run-20260722-162021-24c74a

80,0 tok/s

Hardware

GPU: NVIDIA GB10
CPU: AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-Core Processor
RAM: 128 GB

Setup

Runtime: vLLM
Quantization: -
Driver: NVIDIA 580.159.03 / CUDA 13.0
Model: Codestral-22B-v0.1

All benchmarks of this model To leaderboard

Model comparison

Codestral-22B-v0.1 on various hardware

All published performance runs of this model – each bubble a variant: position = prefill (X) × generation (Y), bubble size = number of runs. Closer to the top right = faster. ★ Marked gold = this benchmark.

GPUby graphics card

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 641,4 tok/sNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition 629,5 tok/sNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition 559,4 tok/sNVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti 325,2 tok/sAMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 201,5 tok/sAMD Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot 147,5 tok/s★ NVIDIA GB10 (DGX Spark) 80,0 tok/s this runNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti 62,9 tok/sIntel Arc Pro B70 23,6 tok/sNVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 16GB 22,2 tok/s

CPUby processor

AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8-Core Processor 641,4 tok/s★ AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-Core Processor 629,5 tok/s this runAMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX 24-Cores 559,4 tok/sAMD Ryzen 9 8945HX with Radeon Graphics 325,2 tok/sAMD Ryzen 5 5600X 6-Core Processor 277,9 tok/sAMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX 16-Cores 201,5 tok/sAMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 32-Cores 147,5 tok/sAMD Ryzen 9 7945HX with Radeon Graphics 23,6 tok/s

MBby mainboard

ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ROG STRIX B550-A GAMING 641,4 tok/sASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ProArt X870E-CREATOR WIFI 629,5 tok/sASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX90E-SAGE SE 559,4 tok/sMeigao Innovation Technology (Shen Zhen) Co., Ltd DRFXL (MotherBoard Series) 325,2 tok/sASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. PRIME A520M-K 277,9 tok/sASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI 147,5 tok/sunbekannt 80,0 tok/sShenzhen Meigao Electronic Equipment Co.,Ltd DRFXI (MotherBoard Series) 23,6 tok/sShenzhen Meigao Electronic Equipment Co.,Ltd F1FXM (DeskMini Series) 22,2 tok/s

ENGby engine

llama.cpp 641,4 tok/s★ vLLM 277,9 tok/s this rununbekannt 214,1 tok/s

DRVby driver

unbekannt 641,4 tok/s★ NVIDIA 580.159.03 / CUDA 13.0 80,0 tok/s this runAMD 7.0.0-27-generic 33,5 tok/sIntel 26.18.38308.4 23,6 tok/s

💰 Economics

Economics of this run

Operating cost, TCO and comparison with the next-best runs of the same model at identical concurrency (8× concurrent). Methodology →

⚙️ ConfigurationAll metrics and charts below follow these settings – based on a 24-month runtime.Save to URL Reset

⚡ Electricity price EUR/kWh

⚙️ System utilization 100 %

🖥️ Acquisition EUR

🔌 Idle 15 W

⚡ TDP 140 W

☁️ External LLM (API) show

Input €/1M Output €/1M Input per output token

Electricity0.30 EUR/kWh

Avg power (incl. idle)140 W estimated (TDP)GPU 140 W full load

Avg cost / hourEUR 0.042

Electricity / 1M tokensEUR 0.15

Token / kWh2.06M

Acquisition (system)EUR 4,769 partial priceGPU EUR 4,000 · CPU EUR 649 · PSU EUR 120

Electricity (2 years)–

TCO (2 years)EUR 5,505

Output tokens (2 years)5.05B

☁️ External LLM (API) – comparison

External LLM cost (2 years)–

Savings vs. external (2 years)–

All values above and the charts below take the configured system utilization into account: at X% the system generates only X% of the time, the rest it idles (15 W). Cost per hour drops (more idle), cost per token rises.

Cost over 2 years – electricity only

Cost over 2 years – incl. acquisition (TCO)

Speed vs. tokens per euro

Euro per 1M tokens

Comparison vs. API – economics per benchmark

	Codestral-22B-v0.1NVIDIA GB10 (DGX Spark)
Electricity cost (24 mo.)	–
Acquisition cost	–
Total cost (TCO)	–
Generated tokens (24 mo.)	–
Token price via API	–
Break-even point (days)	–
Result (savings / extra cost)	–

NVIDIA GB10 (DGX Spark) · this run 80 tok/s

Comparison with up to 3 next-best runs of this model at the same concurrency (at least one on different hardware). Power = GPU TDP + CPU (idle + 15 %) + board (estimated), acquisition = full system (GPU + CPU + board + RAM + PSU), prices = stored market prices.

Contributed by

Mario Alka Administrator

@marioalka

Ich bin Unternehmer, Softwareentwickler und KI-Enthusiast. Seit vielen Jahren entwickle ich Unternehmenssoftware und beschäftige mich inzwischen fast täglich mit lokalen LLMs, KI-Agenten und leistungsfähiger KI-Hardware.

Mit LLM-Benchmark.de möchte ich eine Plattform schaffen, auf der Modelle, GPUs und Agenten objektiv und reproduzierbar miteinander verglichen werden.