Created bymario-alka.dePowered bygodcore.denoob2claw.detricoma.de
Contributed byMario AlkaQwen (Alibaba)

Qwen3-30B-A3B-Thinking-2507

Performance benchmark · measured on 24.10.2026 10:37

Benchmark-IDrun-20261024-084507-0f8d84
Timebench 3 - Kombi (Prefill + Generation)MoE30BRuntime: llama.cppQuantisierung: Q4_K_M
ℹ
Public note: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 24GB . Qwen3-30B-A3B-Thinking-2507 Q4_K_M . llama.cpp server-cuda (b11804), -ngl 999, -np 12, -c 49152 (4096 Tok/Slot)
Generation371,66tok/s
Prefill8.744,79tok/s
Time to First Token3.710,00ms
Total duration64,57s
Concurrency10parallel
Ranking in the field
4of 6 systems

Performance benchmark · Primary metric: Generation-Speed (tok/s) · 10× concurrent

This run is better than 40 % of all comparable systems.
Generation 371,7 tok/s
-27 % vs Ø 512,1
Prefill 8.744,8 tok/s
+126 % vs Ø 3.865,8
Time to First Token 3.710 ms
-90 % vs Ø 36.661
Distribution in the field140 – 1.133 tok/s
Ø 512 Median Dieser Lauf

Wie schlägt sich dieser Benchmark mit anderen Modellen?

How does this benchmark compare on other GPUs?

Same model on different hardware · 10× concurrent · Generation (tok/s)

Hardware

GPU: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 · 24 GB VRAM
CPU: AMD Ryzen 5 5600X 6-Core Processor
RAM: 31 GB
Mainboard: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ROG STRIX B550-A GAMING

Setup

Runtime: llama.cpp
Quantization: Q4_K_M
Model: Qwen3-30B-A3B-Thinking-2507

Configuration

benchmark-konfiguration — run-20261024-084507-0f8d84
# LLM-Benchmark Konfiguration # Modell : Qwen3-30B-A3B-Thinking-2507 # Engine : llama.cpp # Run-ID : run-20261024-084507-0f8d84 # GPU : NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 # CPU : AMD Ryzen 5 5600X 6-Core Processor # RAM : 31 GB bench@llm-benchmark:~$ llama-server \ -m /models/Qwen_Qwen3-30B-A3B-Thinking-2507-Q4_K_M.gguf \ -ngl 999 \ -np 12 \ -c 49152
Engine?Die Inferenz-Software, die das Modell ausliefert (z.B. vLLM oder llama.cpp). Sie bestimmt Geschwindigkeit, unterstuetzte Modellformate und welche Parameter ueberhaupt verfuegbar sind.llamacpp
Modellalias?Der Name, unter dem das Modell ueber die API angesprochen wird. Genau dieser Wert muss im Request-Feld 'model' stehen.Qwen3-30B-A3B-Thinking-2507
Kontextlaenge?Maximale Anzahl Tokens (Eingabe + erzeugte Ausgabe zusammen), die das Modell pro Anfrage verarbeiten kann.49152
Modellpfad?Pfad zur GGUF-Modelldatei, die geladen und ausgeliefert wird./models/Qwen_Qwen3-30B-A3B-Thinking-2507-Q4_K_M.gguf
GPU-Layer?Anzahl der auf die GPU ausgelagerten Modell-Layer. Hoeher = mehr VRAM und schneller; der Rest laeuft auf der CPU. 999 = alles auf GPU.999
np12
Kontext?Groesse des Kontextfensters in Token. 0 = der beim Training verwendete Kontext des Modells.49152
execution_typelocal

All benchmarks of this model To leaderboard

Anzeige
Model comparison

Qwen3-30B-A3B-Thinking-2507 on various hardware

All published performance runs of this model – each bubble a variant: position = prefill (X) × generation (Y), bubble size = number of runs. Closer to the top right = faster. ★ Marked gold = this benchmark.

GPUby graphics card

2.1871.6401.0945470,007.75315.50623.259Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 - 1.683,8 tok/s Generation, 14.349 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 2.214 ms (6 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 50...NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition - 1.670,5 tok/s Generation, 18.768 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 2.486 ms (9 Laufe)NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 B...NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition - 1.521,4 tok/s Generation, 10.574 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.521 ms (9 Laufe)NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 B...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti - 930,6 tok/s Generation, 7.726 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 5.880 ms (6 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 30...NVIDIA RTX A6000 - 751,7 tok/s Generation, 14.399 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 1.684 ms (36 Laufe)NVIDIA RTX A6000AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX - 303,1 tok/s Generation, 5.014 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 2.567 ms (6 Laufe)AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTXAMD Radeon PRO W7800 48GB - 258,3 tok/s Generation, 4.982 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 2.607 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Radeon PRO W7800 ...AMD Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot - 254,6 tok/s Generation, 4.711 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 2.915 ms (6 Laufe)AMD Radeon PRO W7900 ...AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 - 238,8 tok/s Generation, 2.839 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 35.298 ms (28 Laufe)AMD Radeon AI PRO R97...NVIDIA DGX SPARK (GB10) - 161,1 tok/s Generation, 3.723 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.655 ms (3 Laufe)NVIDIA DGX SPARK (GB1...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti - 155,8 tok/s Generation, 1.078 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 23.667 ms (6 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 50...NVIDIA RTX SPARK (N1X) - 107,0 tok/s Generation, 2.977 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 7.500 ms (4 Laufe)NVIDIA RTX SPARK (N1X)CPU-only - 8,5 tok/s Generation, 74 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 134.321 ms (3 Laufe)CPU-onlyNVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 - 371,7 tok/s Generation, 6.276 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 2.183 ms (3 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 30...
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 1.683,8 tok/sNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition 1.670,5 tok/sNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition 1.521,4 tok/sNVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti 930,6 tok/sNVIDIA RTX A6000 751,7 tok/s★ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 371,7 tok/s this runAMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX 303,1 tok/sAMD Radeon PRO W7800 48GB 258,3 tok/sAMD Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot 254,6 tok/sAMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 238,8 tok/sNVIDIA DGX SPARK (GB10) 161,1 tok/sNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti 155,8 tok/sNVIDIA RTX SPARK (N1X) 107,0 tok/sCPU-only 8,5 tok/s

CPUby processor

2.1871.6401.0945470,007.58515.17022.756Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8-Core Processor - 1.683,8 tok/s Generation, 14.349 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 2.214 ms (6 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8...AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-Core Processor - 1.670,5 tok/s Generation, 18.362 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 1.942 ms (6 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-...AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX 24-Cores - 1.521,4 tok/s Generation, 10.574 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.521 ms (9 Laufe)AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX with Radeon Graphics - 930,6 tok/s Generation, 7.726 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 5.880 ms (6 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX wi...AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX 16-Cores - 751,7 tok/s Generation, 9.595 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 17.048 ms (61 Laufe)AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX 16-Cores - 303,1 tok/s Generation, 5.495 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 2.415 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 32-Cores - 258,3 tok/s Generation, 3.312 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 11.154 ms (15 Laufe)AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...AMD Ryzen 3 3100 4-Core Processor - 238,8 tok/s Generation, 4.195 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.022 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 3 3100 4-Co...Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-4657L v2 @ 2.40GHz - 223,3 tok/s Generation, 4.533 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 2.718 ms (3 Laufe)Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU ...NVIDIA Grace - 161,1 tok/s Generation, 3.723 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.655 ms (3 Laufe)NVIDIA GraceNVIDIA RTX Spark N1X (6144-core GPU, 20-core CPU) - 107,0 tok/s Generation, 2.977 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 7.500 ms (4 Laufe)NVIDIA RTX Spark N1X ...Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-4620 v2 @ 2.60GHz - 8,5 tok/s Generation, 74 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 134.321 ms (3 Laufe)Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU ...AMD Ryzen 5 5600X 6-Core Processor - 1.623,2 tok/s Generation, 12.928 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 2.878 ms (6 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ AMD Ryzen 5 5600X 6-C...
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8-Core Processor 1.683,8 tok/sAMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-Core Processor 1.670,5 tok/s★ AMD Ryzen 5 5600X 6-Core Processor 1.623,2 tok/s this runAMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX 24-Cores 1.521,4 tok/sAMD Ryzen 9 8945HX with Radeon Graphics 930,6 tok/sAMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX 16-Cores 751,7 tok/sAMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX 16-Cores 303,1 tok/sAMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 32-Cores 258,3 tok/sAMD Ryzen 3 3100 4-Core Processor 238,8 tok/sIntel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-4657L v2 @ 2.40GHz 223,3 tok/sNVIDIA Grace 161,1 tok/sNVIDIA RTX Spark N1X (6144-core GPU, 20-core CPU) 107,0 tok/sIntel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-4620 v2 @ 2.60GHz 8,5 tok/s

MBby mainboard

2.1681.6261.0845420,007.45114.90322.354Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ProArt X870E-CREATOR WIFI - 1.670,5 tok/s Generation, 18.362 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 1.942 ms (6 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX90E-SAGE SE - 1.521,4 tok/s Generation, 9.721 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 15.308 ms (70 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....Meigao Innovation Technology (Shen Zhen) Co., Ltd DRFXL (MotherBoard Series) - 930,6 tok/s Generation, 7.726 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 5.880 ms (6 Laufe)Meigao Innovation Tec...ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI - 303,1 tok/s Generation, 3.676 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 9.698 ms (18 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ROG STRIX X570-F GAMING - 238,8 tok/s Generation, 4.195 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.022 ms (3 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....Dell Inc. PowerEdge R820 - 223,3 tok/s Generation, 2.303 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 68.519 ms (6 Laufe)Dell Inc. PowerEdge R...ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. GX10 - 161,1 tok/s Generation, 3.723 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.655 ms (3 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....ASUS H7607BA - 107,0 tok/s Generation, 2.977 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 7.500 ms (4 Laufe)ASUS H7607BAASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ROG STRIX B550-A GAMING - 1.683,8 tok/s Generation, 13.639 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 2.546 ms (12 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....
★ ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ROG STRIX B550-A GAMING 1.683,8 tok/s this runASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ProArt X870E-CREATOR WIFI 1.670,5 tok/sASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX90E-SAGE SE 1.521,4 tok/sMeigao Innovation Technology (Shen Zhen) Co., Ltd DRFXL (MotherBoard Series) 930,6 tok/sASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI 303,1 tok/sASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ROG STRIX X570-F GAMING 238,8 tok/sDell Inc. PowerEdge R820 223,3 tok/sASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. GX10 161,1 tok/sASUS H7607BA 107,0 tok/s

ENGby engine

2.1711.6281.0855430,09127.06013.20819.357Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)vLLM - 913,3 tok/s Generation, 16.201 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 2.324 ms (36 Laufe)vLLMunbekannt - 91,4 tok/s Generation, 4.068 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 1.364 ms (8 Laufe)unbekanntllama.cpp - 1.683,8 tok/s Generation, 5.959 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 20.122 ms (84 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ llama.cpp
★ llama.cpp 1.683,8 tok/s this runvLLM 913,3 tok/sunbekannt 91,4 tok/s

DRVby driver

2.1711.6281.0855430,02.1945.0287.86310.697Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)unbekannt - 1.683,8 tok/s Generation, 9.167 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 15.068 ms (117 Laufe)unbekanntNVIDIA 590.48.01 / CUDA 13.1 - 161,1 tok/s Generation, 3.723 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.655 ms (3 Laufe)NVIDIA 590.48.01 / CU...AMD 7.0.0-27-generic - 91,4 tok/s Generation, 4.068 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 1.364 ms (8 Laufe)AMD 7.0.0-27-generic
unbekannt 1.683,8 tok/sNVIDIA 590.48.01 / CUDA 13.1 161,1 tok/sAMD 7.0.0-27-generic 91,4 tok/s
💰 Economics

Economics of this run

Operating cost, TCO and comparison with the next-best runs of the same model at identical concurrency (10× concurrent). Methodology →

⚙️ ConfigurationAll metrics and charts below follow these settings – based on a 24-month runtime.Save to URLReset
⚡ Electricity price EUR/kWh
⚙️ System utilization 100 %
🖥️ Acquisition EUR
🔌 Idle 12 W
⚡ TDP 362 W
☁️ External LLM (API)
Electricity0.30 EUR/kWh
Avg power (incl. idle)362 W estimated (TDP)GPU 350 + Board 12 W full load
Avg cost / hourEUR 0.11
Electricity / 1M tokensEUR 0.081
Token / kWh3.70M
Acquisition (system)EUR 1,518 full priceGPU EUR 850 · CPU EUR 121 · Board EUR 149 · RAM EUR 248 · PSU EUR 150
Electricity (2 years)–
TCO (2 years)EUR 3,421
Output tokens (2 years)23.44B
☁️ External LLM (API) – comparison
External LLM cost (2 years)–
Savings vs. external (2 years)–

All values above and the charts below take the configured system utilization into account: at X% the system generates only X% of the time, the rest it idles (12 W). Cost per hour drops (more idle), cost per token rises.

Cost over 2 years – electricity only

Cost over 2 years – incl. acquisition (TCO)

Speed vs. tokens per euro

Euro per 1M tokens

Comparison vs. API – economics per benchmark

Qwen3-30B-A3B-Thinking-2507NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090Qwen3-30B-A3B-Thinking-2507NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090Qwen3-30B-A3B-Thinking-2507NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation EditionQwen3-30B-A3B-Thinking-2507NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition
Electricity cost (24 mo.)––––
Acquisition cost––––
Total cost (TCO)––––
Generated tokens (24 mo.)––––
Token price via API––––
Break-even point (days)––––
Result (savings / extra cost)––––

Comparison with up to 3 next-best runs of this model at the same concurrency (at least one on different hardware). Power = GPU TDP + CPU (idle + 15 %) + board (estimated), acquisition = full system (GPU + CPU + board + RAM + PSU), prices = stored market prices.

Contributed by

Mario Alka Administrator

@marioalka

Ich bin Unternehmer, Softwareentwickler und KI-Enthusiast. Seit vielen Jahren entwickle ich Unternehmenssoftware und beschäftige mich inzwischen fast täglich mit lokalen LLMs, KI-Agenten und leistungsfähiger KI-Hardware.

Mit LLM-Benchmark.de möchte ich eine Plattform schaffen, auf der Modelle, GPUs und Agenten objektiv und reproduzierbar miteinander verglichen werden.