Created bymario-alka.dePowered bygodcore.denoob2claw.detricoma.de
Contributed byMario AlkaQwen (Alibaba)

Qwen3.8-Flash-Next

Performance benchmark · measured on 13.10.2026 17:05

Benchmark-IDrun-20261013-151009-529362
Timebench 3 - Kombi (Prefill + Generation)MoE180BRuntime: llama.cppQuantisierung: IQ3_XXS
ℹ
Public note: NVIDIA DGX Spark GB10 (Grace-Blackwell, 120 GB unified, ARM64) . Qwen3.8-Flash-Next . vLLM(NVFP4, NVMe/PLE-Offload) + llama.cpp(IQ3_XXS)
ℹ
For context: Diese Plattform nutzt Unified Memory – die "VRAM" ist gemeinsamer System-RAM (APU/Superchip); das Modell teilt sich den Speicher mit dem System.
Generation36,38tok/s
Prefill714,11tok/s
Time to First Token2.759,50ms
Total duration61,82s
Concurrency1parallel
Ranking in the field
26of 38 systems

Performance benchmark · Primary metric: Generation-Speed (tok/s) · 1× concurrent

This run is better than 32 % of all comparable systems.
Generation 36,4 tok/s
-30 % vs Ø 52,3
Prefill 714,1 tok/s
-72 % vs Ø 2.556,0
Time to First Token 2.760 ms
+115 % vs Ø 1.286
Distribution in the field11 – 101 tok/s
Ø 52 Median Dieser Lauf

Wie schlägt sich dieser Benchmark mit anderen Modellen?

How does this benchmark compare on other GPUs?

Same model on different hardware · 1× concurrent · Generation (tok/s)

Hardware

GPU: NVIDIA GB10 · 128 GB VRAM
CPU: NVIDIA Grace
RAM: 120 GB
Mainboard: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. GX10

Setup

Runtime: llama.cpp
Quantization: IQ3_XXS
Driver: NVIDIA 590.48.01 / CUDA 13.1
Model: Qwen3.8-Flash-Next

Configuration

benchmark-konfiguration — run-20261013-151009-529362
# LLM-Benchmark Konfiguration # Modell : Qwen3.8-Flash-Next # Engine : llama.cpp # Run-ID : run-20261013-151009-529362 # GPU : NVIDIA GB10 # CPU : NVIDIA Grace # RAM : 120 GB bench@llm-benchmark:~$ llama-server \ -m Qwen3.8-Flash-Next-IQ3_XXS \ --alias Qwen3.8-Flash-Next \ -ngl 999 \ -c 32768 \ -np 10 \ -fa on '(DGX' Spark GB10, ARM+CUDA, frischer 'Build)'
Engine?Die Inferenz-Software, die das Modell ausliefert (z.B. vLLM oder llama.cpp). Sie bestimmt Geschwindigkeit, unterstuetzte Modellformate und welche Parameter ueberhaupt verfuegbar sind.llamacpp
Modellalias?Der Name, unter dem das Modell ueber die API angesprochen wird. Genau dieser Wert muss im Request-Feld 'model' stehen.Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
Kontextlaenge?Maximale Anzahl Tokens (Eingabe + erzeugte Ausgabe zusammen), die das Modell pro Anfrage verarbeiten kann.32768
Modellpfad?Pfad zur GGUF-Modelldatei, die geladen und ausgeliefert wird.Qwen3.8-Flash-Next-IQ3_XXS
GPU-Layer?Anzahl der auf die GPU ausgelagerten Modell-Layer. Hoeher = mehr VRAM und schneller; der Rest laeuft auf der CPU. 999 = alles auf GPU.999
Kontext?Groesse des Kontextfensters in Token. 0 = der beim Training verwendete Kontext des Modells.32768
np10
faon
execution_typelocal

All benchmarks of this model To leaderboard

Anzeige
Model comparison

Qwen3.8-Flash-Next on various hardware

All published performance runs of this model – each bubble a variant: position = prefill (X) × generation (Y), bubble size = number of runs. Closer to the top right = faster. ★ Marked gold = this benchmark.

GPUby graphics card

2.0301.5231.0155080,009451.8902.835Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition - 1.564,6 tok/s Generation, 2.312 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 17.248 ms (6 Laufe)NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 B...NVIDIA RTX A6000 - 1.171,8 tok/s Generation, 963 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 32.556 ms (21 Laufe)NVIDIA RTX A6000NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 - 1.132,7 tok/s Generation, 968 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 51.682 ms (6 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 30...NVIDIA Tesla V100 PCIe 32GB - 196,2 tok/s Generation, 775 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 30.834 ms (8 Laufe)NVIDIA Tesla V100 PCI...AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX - 18,7 tok/s Generation, 180 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 55.956 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTXNVIDIA GB10 (DGX Spark) - 492,8 tok/s Generation, 1.262 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 33.373 ms (12 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ NVIDIA GB10 (DGX Spar...
NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition 1.564,6 tok/sNVIDIA RTX A6000 1.171,8 tok/sNVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 1.132,7 tok/s★ NVIDIA GB10 (DGX Spark) 492,8 tok/s this runNVIDIA Tesla V100 PCIe 32GB 196,2 tok/sAMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX 18,7 tok/s

CPUby processor

2.0301.5231.0155080,001.0512.1023.153Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX with Radeon Graphics - 1.564,6 tok/s Generation, 2.312 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 17.248 ms (6 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX wi...AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX 12-Cores - 1.171,8 tok/s Generation, 2.569 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 15.123 ms (6 Laufe)AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...AMD Ryzen 5 5600X 6-Core Processor - 1.132,7 tok/s Generation, 968 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 51.682 ms (6 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 5 5600X 6-C...AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE w/ Radeon Vega Graphics - 196,2 tok/s Generation, 757 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 36.737 ms (5 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G...AMD EPYC 7203P 8-Core Processor - 79,2 tok/s Generation, 320 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 39.530 ms (15 Laufe)AMD EPYC 7203P 8-Core...Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-4657L v2 @ 2.40GHz - 63,2 tok/s Generation, 803 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 20.996 ms (3 Laufe)Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU ...AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX 16-Cores - 18,7 tok/s Generation, 180 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 55.956 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...NVIDIA Grace - 492,8 tok/s Generation, 1.262 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 33.373 ms (12 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ NVIDIA Grace
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX with Radeon Graphics 1.564,6 tok/sAMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX 12-Cores 1.171,8 tok/sAMD Ryzen 5 5600X 6-Core Processor 1.132,7 tok/s★ NVIDIA Grace 492,8 tok/s this runAMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE w/ Radeon Vega Graphics 196,2 tok/sAMD EPYC 7203P 8-Core Processor 79,2 tok/sIntel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-4657L v2 @ 2.40GHz 63,2 tok/sAMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX 16-Cores 18,7 tok/s

MBby mainboard

2.0271.5201.0135070,001.0522.1043.155Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)Shenzhen Meigao Electronic Equipment Co.,Ltd DRFXI (MotherBoard Series) - 1.564,6 tok/s Generation, 2.312 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 17.248 ms (6 Laufe)Shenzhen Meigao Elect...unbekannt - 1.171,8 tok/s Generation, 2.569 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 15.123 ms (6 Laufe)unbekanntASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ROG STRIX B550-A GAMING - 1.132,7 tok/s Generation, 968 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 51.682 ms (6 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ROG STRIX X570-F GAMING - 196,2 tok/s Generation, 757 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 36.737 ms (5 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....ASRockRack ROMED8-2T/BCM - 79,2 tok/s Generation, 423 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 24.603 ms (9 Laufe)ASRockRack ROMED8-2T/...Dell Inc. PowerEdge R820 - 63,2 tok/s Generation, 803 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 20.996 ms (3 Laufe)Dell Inc. PowerEdge R...ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI - 35,4 tok/s Generation, 170 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 59.933 ms (9 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. GX10 - 492,8 tok/s Generation, 1.262 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 33.373 ms (12 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....
Shenzhen Meigao Electronic Equipment Co.,Ltd DRFXI (MotherBoard Series) 1.564,6 tok/sunbekannt 1.171,8 tok/sASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ROG STRIX B550-A GAMING 1.132,7 tok/s★ ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. GX10 492,8 tok/s this runASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ROG STRIX X570-F GAMING 196,2 tok/sASRockRack ROMED8-2T/BCM 79,2 tok/sDell Inc. PowerEdge R820 63,2 tok/sASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI 35,4 tok/s

ENGby engine

2.0101.5071.0055020,01311.0992.0663.034Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)strata - 1.564,6 tok/s Generation, 1.064 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 44.996 ms (20 Laufe)strataunbekannt - 1.171,8 tok/s Generation, 1.981 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 17.080 ms (9 Laufe)unbekanntvLLM - 122,4 tok/s Generation, 2.538 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.634 ms (3 Laufe)vLLMllama.cpp - 1.555,3 tok/s Generation, 627 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 35.323 ms (24 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ llama.cpp
strata 1.564,6 tok/s★ llama.cpp 1.555,3 tok/s this rununbekannt 1.171,8 tok/svLLM 122,4 tok/s

DRVby driver

1.9351.4821.0295751229481.0901.2321.374Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)unbekannt - 1.564,6 tok/s Generation, 1.060 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 34.359 ms (44 Laufe)unbekanntNVIDIA 590.48.01 / CUDA 13.1 - 492,8 tok/s Generation, 1.262 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 33.373 ms (12 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ NVIDIA 590.48.01 / CU...
unbekannt 1.564,6 tok/s★ NVIDIA 590.48.01 / CUDA 13.1 492,8 tok/s this run
💰 Economics

Economics of this run

Operating cost, TCO and comparison with the next-best runs of the same model at identical concurrency (1× concurrent). Methodology →

⚙️ ConfigurationAll metrics and charts below follow these settings – based on a 24-month runtime.Save to URLReset
⚡ Electricity price EUR/kWh
⚙️ System utilization 100 %
🖥️ Acquisition EUR
🔌 Idle 15 W
⚡ TDP 140 W
☁️ External LLM (API)
Electricity0.30 EUR/kWh
Avg power (incl. idle)140 W estimated (TDP)GPU 140 W full load
Avg cost / hourEUR 0.042
Electricity / 1M tokensEUR 0.32
Token / kWh935.49K
Acquisition (system)EUR 5,800 partial priceGPU EUR 4,000 · RAM EUR 1,680 · PSU EUR 120
Electricity (2 years)–
TCO (2 years)EUR 6,536
Output tokens (2 years)2.29B
☁️ External LLM (API) – comparison
External LLM cost (2 years)–
Savings vs. external (2 years)–

All values above and the charts below take the configured system utilization into account: at X% the system generates only X% of the time, the rest it idles (15 W). Cost per hour drops (more idle), cost per token rises.

Cost over 2 years – electricity only

Cost over 2 years – incl. acquisition (TCO)

Speed vs. tokens per euro

Euro per 1M tokens

Comparison vs. API – economics per benchmark

Qwen3.8-Flash-NextNVIDIA GB10 (DGX Spark)Qwen3.8-Flash-NextNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation EditionQwen3.8-Flash-NextNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation EditionQwen3.8-Flash-NextNVIDIA RTX A6000
Electricity cost (24 mo.)––––
Acquisition cost––––
Total cost (TCO)––––
Generated tokens (24 mo.)––––
Token price via API––––
Break-even point (days)––––
Result (savings / extra cost)––––

Comparison with up to 3 next-best runs of this model at the same concurrency (at least one on different hardware). Power = GPU TDP + CPU (idle + 15 %) + board (estimated), acquisition = full system (GPU + CPU + board + RAM + PSU), prices = stored market prices.

Contributed by

Mario Alka Administrator

@marioalka

Ich bin Unternehmer, Softwareentwickler und KI-Enthusiast. Seit vielen Jahren entwickle ich Unternehmenssoftware und beschäftige mich inzwischen fast täglich mit lokalen LLMs, KI-Agenten und leistungsfähiger KI-Hardware.

Mit LLM-Benchmark.de möchte ich eine Plattform schaffen, auf der Modelle, GPUs und Agenten objektiv und reproduzierbar miteinander verglichen werden.