Created bymario-alka.dePowered bygodcore.denoob2claw.detricoma.de
Contributed byMario AlkaByteDance Seed

Seed-OSS-36B-Instruct

Performance benchmark · measured on 08.10.2026 13:17

Benchmark-IDrun-20261009-081232-c2e152
Timebench 3 - Kombi (Prefill + Generation)36BRuntime: llama.cppQuantisierung: Q4_K_M
ℹ
Public note: Dell PowerEdge R820 . 2x AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX (48 GB VRAM gesamt, ROCm/HIP) . RAM: 32x 16 GB SK Hynix DDR3-1600 ECC RDIMM (HMT42GR7AFR4A-PB) = 512 GB @ 1600 MT/s
Generation117,48tok/s
Prefill1.714,90tok/s
Time to First Token15.024,00ms
Total duration205,79s
Concurrency10parallel
Ranking in the field
99of 119 systems

Performance benchmark · Primary metric: Generation-Speed (tok/s) · 10× concurrent

This run is better than 17 % of all comparable systems.
Generation 117,5 tok/s
-52 % vs Ø 246,2
Prefill 1.714,9 tok/s
-78 % vs Ø 7.915,5
Time to First Token 15.024 ms
-55 % vs Ø 33.707
Distribution in the field0 – 718 tok/s
Ø 246 Median Dieser Lauf

Wie schlägt sich dieser Benchmark mit anderen Modellen?

How does this benchmark compare on other GPUs?

Same model on different hardware · 10× concurrent · Generation (tok/s)

Hardware

GPU: 2x AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX · 24 GB VRAM
CPU: 4x Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-4657L v2 @ 2.40GHz
RAM: 504 GB
Mainboard: Dell Inc. PowerEdge R820

Setup

Runtime: llama.cpp
Quantization: Q4_K_M
Model: Seed-OSS-36B-Instruct

Configuration

benchmark-konfiguration — run-20261009-081232-c2e152
# LLM-Benchmark Konfiguration # Modell : Seed-OSS-36B-Instruct # Engine : llama.cpp # Run-ID : run-20261009-081232-c2e152 # GPU : 2x AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX # CPU : 4x Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-4657L v2 @ 2.40GHz # RAM : 504 GB bench@llm-benchmark:~$ llama-server \ -m ByteDance-Seed_Seed-OSS-36B-Instruct-IQ4_XS.gguf \ --alias Seed-OSS-36B-Instruct \ -ngl 999 \ -sm layer \ -fa on \ -c 40960 \ -np 10 '(2x' RX 7900 XTX ROCm/HIP, 'gpu)'
Engine?Die Inferenz-Software, die das Modell ausliefert (z.B. vLLM oder llama.cpp). Sie bestimmt Geschwindigkeit, unterstuetzte Modellformate und welche Parameter ueberhaupt verfuegbar sind.llamacpp
Modellalias?Der Name, unter dem das Modell ueber die API angesprochen wird. Genau dieser Wert muss im Request-Feld 'model' stehen.Seed-OSS-36B-Instruct
Kontextlaenge?Maximale Anzahl Tokens (Eingabe + erzeugte Ausgabe zusammen), die das Modell pro Anfrage verarbeiten kann.40960
Modellpfad?Pfad zur GGUF-Modelldatei, die geladen und ausgeliefert wird.ByteDance-Seed_Seed-OSS-36B-Instruct-IQ4_XS.gguf
GPU-Layer?Anzahl der auf die GPU ausgelagerten Modell-Layer. Hoeher = mehr VRAM und schneller; der Rest laeuft auf der CPU. 999 = alles auf GPU.999
Split-Mode?Verteilung ueber mehrere GPUs: none (nur eine GPU), layer (Layer aufteilen) oder row (Tensoren zeilenweise).layer
faon
Kontext?Groesse des Kontextfensters in Token. 0 = der beim Training verwendete Kontext des Modells.40960
np10
execution_typelocal

All benchmarks of this model To leaderboard

Anzeige
Model comparison

Seed-OSS-36B-Instruct on various hardware

All published performance runs of this model – each bubble a variant: position = prefill (X) × generation (Y), bubble size = number of runs. Closer to the top right = faster. ★ Marked gold = this benchmark.

GPUby graphics card

1.0918195462730,001.3192.6393.958Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 - 839,7 tok/s Generation, 2.664 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 12.384 ms (3 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 50...NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition - 460,0 tok/s Generation, 3.141 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 10.624 ms (3 Laufe)NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 B...NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition - 383,9 tok/s Generation, 3.193 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 13.087 ms (9 Laufe)NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 B...NVIDIA RTX A6000 - 349,2 tok/s Generation, 2.724 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 10.630 ms (30 Laufe)NVIDIA RTX A6000AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 - 115,7 tok/s Generation, 736 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 98.106 ms (19 Laufe)AMD Radeon AI PRO R97...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti - 111,6 tok/s Generation, 992 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 41.392 ms (3 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 30...AMD Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot - 88,6 tok/s Generation, 680 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 17.557 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Radeon PRO W7900 ...AMD Radeon PRO W7800 48GB - 57,7 tok/s Generation, 1.052 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 14.384 ms (6 Laufe)AMD Radeon PRO W7800 ...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti - 39,2 tok/s Generation, 423 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 95.542 ms (3 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 50...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 - 3,4 tok/s Generation, 43 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 181.856 ms (2 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 20...CPU-only - 1,0 tok/s Generation, 8 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 240.790 ms (1 Lauf)CPU-onlyAMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX - 117,5 tok/s Generation, 1.363 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 8.549 ms (3 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 839,7 tok/sNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition 460,0 tok/sNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition 383,9 tok/sNVIDIA RTX A6000 349,2 tok/s★ AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX 117,5 tok/s this runAMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 115,7 tok/sNVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti 111,6 tok/sAMD Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot 88,6 tok/sAMD Radeon PRO W7800 48GB 57,7 tok/sNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti 39,2 tok/sNVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 3,4 tok/sCPU-only 1,0 tok/s

CPUby processor

1.0918195462730,001.3192.6393.958Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8-Core Processor - 839,7 tok/s Generation, 2.664 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 12.384 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8...AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-Core Processor - 460,0 tok/s Generation, 3.141 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 10.624 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-...AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX 24-Cores - 383,9 tok/s Generation, 3.193 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 13.087 ms (9 Laufe)AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX 16-Cores - 349,2 tok/s Generation, 2.017 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 46.669 ms (46 Laufe)AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...AMD Ryzen 3 3100 4-Core Processor - 115,7 tok/s Generation, 966 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 12.053 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 3 3100 4-Co...AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX with Radeon Graphics - 111,6 tok/s Generation, 992 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 41.392 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX wi...AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 32-Cores - 88,6 tok/s Generation, 802 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 35.467 ms (12 Laufe)AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-4620 v2 @ 2.60GHz - 1,0 tok/s Generation, 8 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 240.790 ms (1 Lauf)Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU ...Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-4657L v2 @ 2.40GHz - 117,5 tok/s Generation, 835 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 77.872 ms (5 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU ...
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8-Core Processor 839,7 tok/sAMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-Core Processor 460,0 tok/sAMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX 24-Cores 383,9 tok/sAMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX 16-Cores 349,2 tok/s★ Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-4657L v2 @ 2.40GHz 117,5 tok/s this runAMD Ryzen 3 3100 4-Core Processor 115,7 tok/sAMD Ryzen 9 8945HX with Radeon Graphics 111,6 tok/sAMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 32-Cores 88,6 tok/sIntel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-4620 v2 @ 2.60GHz 1,0 tok/s

MBby mainboard

1.0748055372680,0691.3022.5363.769Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ROG STRIX B550-A GAMING - 839,7 tok/s Generation, 2.664 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 12.384 ms (3 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ProArt X870E-CREATOR WIFI - 460,0 tok/s Generation, 3.141 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 10.624 ms (3 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX90E-SAGE SE - 383,9 tok/s Generation, 2.210 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 41.174 ms (55 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ROG STRIX X570-F GAMING - 115,7 tok/s Generation, 966 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 12.053 ms (3 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....Meigao Innovation Technology (Shen Zhen) Co., Ltd DRFXL (MotherBoard Series) - 111,6 tok/s Generation, 992 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 41.392 ms (3 Laufe)Meigao Innovation Tec...ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI - 88,6 tok/s Generation, 802 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 35.467 ms (12 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....Dell Inc. PowerEdge R820 - 117,5 tok/s Generation, 697 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 105.025 ms (6 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ Dell Inc. PowerEdge R...
ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ROG STRIX B550-A GAMING 839,7 tok/sASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ProArt X870E-CREATOR WIFI 460,0 tok/sASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX90E-SAGE SE 383,9 tok/s★ Dell Inc. PowerEdge R820 117,5 tok/s this runASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ROG STRIX X570-F GAMING 115,7 tok/sMeigao Innovation Technology (Shen Zhen) Co., Ltd DRFXL (MotherBoard Series) 111,6 tok/sASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI 88,6 tok/s

ENGby engine

1.0228085943811678491.8502.8523.853Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)vLLM - 349,2 tok/s Generation, 3.309 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 6.652 ms (21 Laufe)vLLMllama.cpp - 839,7 tok/s Generation, 1.393 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 53.281 ms (64 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ llama.cpp
★ llama.cpp 839,7 tok/s this runvLLM 349,2 tok/s

DRVby driver

9248828407987561.7541.8291.9041.978Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)unbekannt - 839,7 tok/s Generation, 1.866 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 41.761 ms (85 Laufe)unbekannt
unbekannt 839,7 tok/s
💰 Economics

Economics of this run

Operating cost, TCO and comparison with the next-best runs of the same model at identical concurrency (10× concurrent). Methodology →

⚙️ ConfigurationAll metrics and charts below follow these settings – based on a 24-month runtime.Save to URLReset
⚡ Electricity price EUR/kWh
⚙️ System utilization 100 %
🖥️ Acquisition EUR
🔌 Idle 35 W
⚡ TDP 749 W
☁️ External LLM (API)
Electricity0.30 EUR/kWh
Avg power (incl. idle)749 W estimated (TDP)GPU 710 + CPU 29 + Board 10 W full load
Avg cost / hourEUR 0.22
Electricity / 1M tokensEUR 0.53
Token / kWh564.85K
Acquisition (system)EUR 4,353 partial priceGPU EUR 2,098 · CPU EUR 59 · RAM EUR 2,016 · PSU EUR 180
Electricity (2 years)–
TCO (2 years)EUR 8,288
Output tokens (2 years)7.41B
☁️ External LLM (API) – comparison
External LLM cost (2 years)–
Savings vs. external (2 years)–

All values above and the charts below take the configured system utilization into account: at X% the system generates only X% of the time, the rest it idles (35 W). Cost per hour drops (more idle), cost per token rises.

Cost over 2 years – electricity only

Cost over 2 years – incl. acquisition (TCO)

Speed vs. tokens per euro

Euro per 1M tokens

Comparison vs. API – economics per benchmark

Seed-OSS-36B-Instruct2x AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTXSeed-OSS-36B-InstructNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090Seed-OSS-36B-InstructNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation EditionSeed-OSS-36B-Instruct3x NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition
Electricity cost (24 mo.)––––
Acquisition cost––––
Total cost (TCO)––––
Generated tokens (24 mo.)––––
Token price via API––––
Break-even point (days)––––
Result (savings / extra cost)––––

Comparison with up to 3 next-best runs of this model at the same concurrency (at least one on different hardware). Power = GPU TDP + CPU (idle + 15 %) + board (estimated), acquisition = full system (GPU + CPU + board + RAM + PSU), prices = stored market prices.

Contributed by

Mario Alka Administrator

@marioalka

Ich bin Unternehmer, Softwareentwickler und KI-Enthusiast. Seit vielen Jahren entwickle ich Unternehmenssoftware und beschäftige mich inzwischen fast täglich mit lokalen LLMs, KI-Agenten und leistungsfähiger KI-Hardware.

Mit LLM-Benchmark.de möchte ich eine Plattform schaffen, auf der Modelle, GPUs und Agenten objektiv und reproduzierbar miteinander verglichen werden.