Created bymario-alka.dePowered bygodcore.denoob2claw.detricoma.de
Contributed byMario AlkaQwen (Alibaba)

Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Thinking

Performance benchmark · measured on 22.09.2026 15:59

Benchmark-IDrun-20260922-140931-ef1e6d
Timebench 3 - Kombi (Prefill + Generation)MoE30BRuntime: llama.cppQuantisierung: Q4_K_M
Generation216,88tok/s
Prefill3.835,57tok/s
Time to First Token3.240,50ms
Total duration54,74s
Concurrency5parallel
Ranking in the field
14of 31 systems

Performance benchmark · Primary metric: Generation-Speed (tok/s) · 5× concurrent

This run is better than 57 % of all comparable systems.
Generation 216,9 tok/s
+7 % vs Ø 201,9
Prefill 3.835,6 tok/s
-7 % vs Ø 4.132,6
Time to First Token 3.241 ms
-22 % vs Ø 4.159
Distribution in the field78 – 496 tok/s
Ø 202 Median Dieser Lauf

Wie schlägt sich dieser Benchmark mit anderen Modellen?

How does this benchmark compare on other GPUs?

Same model on different hardware · 5× concurrent · Generation (tok/s)

Hardware

GPU: AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX · 24 GB VRAM
CPU: AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX 16-Cores
RAM: 63 GB
Mainboard: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI

Setup

Runtime: llama.cpp
Quantization: Q4_K_M
Model: Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Thinking

Configuration

benchmark-konfiguration — run-20260922-140931-ef1e6d
# LLM-Benchmark Konfiguration # Modell : Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Thinking # Engine : llama.cpp # Run-ID : run-20260922-140931-ef1e6d # GPU : AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX # CPU : AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX 16-Cores # RAM : 63 GB bench@llm-benchmark:~$ llama-server \ -m /mnt/llmnas/gguf/Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Thinking-Q4_K_M/Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Thinking-Q4_K_M.gguf \ --alias Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Thinking \ -ngl 999 \ -fa on \ -c 40960 \ -np 10 '(AMD' Radeon RX 7900 XTX, ROCm '7.2.4)'
Engine?Die Inferenz-Software, die das Modell ausliefert (z.B. vLLM oder llama.cpp). Sie bestimmt Geschwindigkeit, unterstuetzte Modellformate und welche Parameter ueberhaupt verfuegbar sind.llamacpp
Modellalias?Der Name, unter dem das Modell ueber die API angesprochen wird. Genau dieser Wert muss im Request-Feld 'model' stehen.Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Thinking
Kontextlaenge?Maximale Anzahl Tokens (Eingabe + erzeugte Ausgabe zusammen), die das Modell pro Anfrage verarbeiten kann.40960
Modellpfad?Pfad zur GGUF-Modelldatei, die geladen und ausgeliefert wird./mnt/llmnas/gguf/Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Thinking-Q4_K_M/Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Thinking-Q4_K_M.gguf
GPU-Layer?Anzahl der auf die GPU ausgelagerten Modell-Layer. Hoeher = mehr VRAM und schneller; der Rest laeuft auf der CPU. 999 = alles auf GPU.999
faon
Kontext?Groesse des Kontextfensters in Token. 0 = der beim Training verwendete Kontext des Modells.40960
np10

All benchmarks of this model To leaderboard

Anzeige
Model comparison

Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Thinking on various hardware

All published performance runs of this model – each bubble a variant: position = prefill (X) × generation (Y), bubble size = number of runs. Closer to the top right = faster. ★ Marked gold = this benchmark.

GPUby graphics card

2.1441.6081.0725360,006.82413.64720.471Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 - 1.673,6 tok/s Generation, 8.080 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.494 ms (3 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 50...NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition - 1.653,3 tok/s Generation, 16.646 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 2.042 ms (6 Laufe)NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 B...NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition - 1.512,4 tok/s Generation, 9.978 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.553 ms (9 Laufe)NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 B...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti - 927,4 tok/s Generation, 4.493 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 6.216 ms (3 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 30...NVIDIA RTX A6000 - 560,9 tok/s Generation, 12.527 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 1.951 ms (27 Laufe)NVIDIA RTX A6000AMD Radeon PRO W7800 48GB - 205,1 tok/s Generation, 3.827 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 2.611 ms (4 Laufe)AMD Radeon PRO W7800 ...AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 - 160,6 tok/s Generation, 2.844 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 74.394 ms (13 Laufe)AMD Radeon AI PRO R97...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti - 155,9 tok/s Generation, 947 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 35.680 ms (3 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 50...AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX - 305,4 tok/s Generation, 3.988 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.124 ms (3 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 1.673,6 tok/sNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition 1.653,3 tok/sNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition 1.512,4 tok/sNVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti 927,4 tok/sNVIDIA RTX A6000 560,9 tok/s★ AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX 305,4 tok/s this runAMD Radeon PRO W7800 48GB 205,1 tok/sAMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 160,6 tok/sNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti 155,9 tok/s

CPUby processor

2.1351.6011.0675340,006.72513.45020.175Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8-Core Processor - 1.673,6 tok/s Generation, 8.080 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.494 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8...AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-Core Processor - 1.653,3 tok/s Generation, 16.646 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 2.042 ms (6 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-...AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX 24-Cores - 1.512,4 tok/s Generation, 9.978 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.553 ms (9 Laufe)AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX with Radeon Graphics - 927,4 tok/s Generation, 4.493 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 6.216 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX wi...AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX 16-Cores - 560,9 tok/s Generation, 9.380 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 25.495 ms (40 Laufe)AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 32-Cores - 205,1 tok/s Generation, 2.593 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 16.783 ms (7 Laufe)AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX 16-Cores - 305,4 tok/s Generation, 3.988 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.124 ms (3 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8-Core Processor 1.673,6 tok/sAMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-Core Processor 1.653,3 tok/sAMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX 24-Cores 1.512,4 tok/sAMD Ryzen 9 8945HX with Radeon Graphics 927,4 tok/sAMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX 16-Cores 560,9 tok/s★ AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX 16-Cores 305,4 tok/s this runAMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 32-Cores 205,1 tok/s

MBby mainboard

2.1151.5861.0575290,006.70013.40020.100Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ROG STRIX B550-A GAMING - 1.673,6 tok/s Generation, 8.080 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.494 ms (3 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ProArt X870E-CREATOR WIFI - 1.653,3 tok/s Generation, 16.646 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 2.042 ms (6 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX90E-SAGE SE - 1.512,4 tok/s Generation, 9.490 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 21.465 ms (49 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....Meigao Innovation Technology (Shen Zhen) Co., Ltd DRFXL (MotherBoard Series) - 927,4 tok/s Generation, 4.493 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 6.216 ms (3 Laufe)Meigao Innovation Tec...ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI - 305,4 tok/s Generation, 3.011 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 12.685 ms (10 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....
ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ROG STRIX B550-A GAMING 1.673,6 tok/sASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ProArt X870E-CREATOR WIFI 1.653,3 tok/sASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX90E-SAGE SE 1.512,4 tok/sMeigao Innovation Technology (Shen Zhen) Co., Ltd DRFXL (MotherBoard Series) 927,4 tok/s★ ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI 305,4 tok/s this run

ENGby engine

2.1691.6271.0845420,02.2258.55314.88221.210Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)vLLM - 910,7 tok/s Generation, 17.908 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 994 ms (15 Laufe)vLLMunbekannt - 34,8 tok/s Generation, 5.528 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 767 ms (1 Lauf)unbekanntllama.cpp - 1.673,6 tok/s Generation, 6.519 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 21.897 ms (55 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ llama.cpp
★ llama.cpp 1.673,6 tok/s this runvLLM 910,7 tok/sunbekannt 34,8 tok/s

DRVby driver

2.1691.6271.0845420,04.3726.2868.20110.115Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)unbekannt - 1.673,6 tok/s Generation, 8.960 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 17.418 ms (70 Laufe)unbekanntAMD 7.0.0-27-generic - 34,8 tok/s Generation, 5.528 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 767 ms (1 Lauf)AMD 7.0.0-27-generic
unbekannt 1.673,6 tok/sAMD 7.0.0-27-generic 34,8 tok/s
💰 Economics

Economics of this run

Operating cost, TCO and comparison with the next-best runs of the same model at identical concurrency (5× concurrent). Methodology →

⚙️ ConfigurationAll metrics and charts below follow these settings – based on a 24-month runtime.Save to URLReset
⚡ Electricity price EUR/kWh
⚙️ System utilization 100 %
🖥️ Acquisition EUR
🔌 Idle 10 W
⚡ TDP 365 W
☁️ External LLM (API)
Electricity0.30 EUR/kWh
Avg power (incl. idle)365 W estimated (TDP)GPU 355 + Board 10 W full load
Avg cost / hourEUR 0.11
Electricity / 1M tokensEUR 0.14
Token / kWh2.14M
Acquisition (system)EUR 1,703 partial priceGPU EUR 1,049 · RAM EUR 504 · PSU EUR 150
Electricity (2 years)
TCO (2 years)EUR 3,621
Output tokens (2 years)13.68B
☁️ External LLM (API) – comparison
External LLM cost (2 years)
Savings vs. external (2 years)

All values above and the charts below take the configured system utilization into account: at X% the system generates only X% of the time, the rest it idles (10 W). Cost per hour drops (more idle), cost per token rises.

Cost over 2 years – electricity only

Cost over 2 years – incl. acquisition (TCO)

Speed vs. tokens per euro

Euro per 1M tokens

Comparison vs. API – economics per benchmark

Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-ThinkingAMD Radeon RX 7900 XTXQwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-ThinkingNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-ThinkingNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation EditionQwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Thinking3x NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition
Electricity cost (24 mo.)
Acquisition cost
Total cost (TCO)
Generated tokens (24 mo.)
Token price via API
Break-even point (days)
Result (savings / extra cost)

Comparison with up to 3 next-best runs of this model at the same concurrency (at least one on different hardware). Power = GPU TDP + CPU (idle + 15 %) + board (estimated), acquisition = full system (GPU + CPU + board + RAM + PSU), prices = stored market prices.

Contributed by

Mario Alka Administrator

@marioalka

Ich bin Unternehmer, Softwareentwickler und KI-Enthusiast. Seit vielen Jahren entwickle ich Unternehmenssoftware und beschäftige mich inzwischen fast täglich mit lokalen LLMs, KI-Agenten und leistungsfähiger KI-Hardware.

Mit LLM-Benchmark.de möchte ich eine Plattform schaffen, auf der Modelle, GPUs und Agenten objektiv und reproduzierbar miteinander verglichen werden.