# LLM-Benchmark Konfiguration # Modell : Qwen3-30B-A3B-Thinking-2507 # Engine : llama.cpp # Run-ID : run-20260922-133638-ad3b8d # GPU : AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX # CPU : AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX 16-Cores # RAM : 63 GB bench@llm-benchmark:~$ llama-server \ -m /mnt/llmnas/gguf/Qwen3-30B-A3B-Thinking-2507-Q4_K_M/Qwen_Qwen3-30B-A3B-Thinking-2507-Q4_K_M.gguf \ --alias Qwen3-30B-A3B-Thinking-2507 \ -ngl 999 \ -fa on \ -c 40960 \ -np 10 '(AMD' Radeon RX 7900 XTX, ROCm '7.2.4)'

Engine?Die Inferenz-Software, die das Modell ausliefert (z.B. vLLM oder llama.cpp). Sie bestimmt Geschwindigkeit, unterstuetzte Modellformate und welche Parameter ueberhaupt verfuegbar sind.	llamacpp
Modellalias?Der Name, unter dem das Modell ueber die API angesprochen wird. Genau dieser Wert muss im Request-Feld 'model' stehen.	Qwen3-30B-A3B-Thinking-2507
Kontextlaenge?Maximale Anzahl Tokens (Eingabe + erzeugte Ausgabe zusammen), die das Modell pro Anfrage verarbeiten kann.	40960
Modellpfad?Pfad zur GGUF-Modelldatei, die geladen und ausgeliefert wird.	/mnt/llmnas/gguf/Qwen3-30B-A3B-Thinking-2507-Q4_K_M/Qwen_Qwen3-30B-A3B-Thinking-2507-Q4_K_M.gguf
GPU-Layer?Anzahl der auf die GPU ausgelagerten Modell-Layer. Hoeher = mehr VRAM und schneller; der Rest laeuft auf der CPU. 999 = alles auf GPU.	999
fa	on
Kontext?Groesse des Kontextfensters in Token. 0 = der beim Training verwendete Kontext des Modells.	40960
np	10

All benchmarks of this model To leaderboard

Model comparison

Qwen3-30B-A3B-Thinking-2507 on various hardware

All published performance runs of this model – each bubble a variant: position = prefill (X) × generation (Y), bubble size = number of runs. Closer to the top right = faster. ★ Marked gold = this benchmark.

GPUby graphics card

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 1.683,8 tok/sNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition 1.670,5 tok/sNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition 1.521,4 tok/sNVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti 930,6 tok/sNVIDIA RTX A6000 751,7 tok/s★ AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX 303,1 tok/s this runAMD Radeon PRO W7800 48GB 258,3 tok/sAMD Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot 254,6 tok/sAMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 238,8 tok/sNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti 155,8 tok/sCPU-only 8,5 tok/s

CPUby processor

AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8-Core Processor 1.683,8 tok/sAMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-Core Processor 1.670,5 tok/sAMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX 24-Cores 1.521,4 tok/sAMD Ryzen 9 8945HX with Radeon Graphics 930,6 tok/sAMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX 16-Cores 751,7 tok/s★ AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX 16-Cores 303,1 tok/s this runAMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 32-Cores 258,3 tok/sAMD Ryzen 3 3100 4-Core Processor 238,8 tok/sIntel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-4620 v2 @ 2.60GHz 8,5 tok/s

MBby mainboard

ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ROG STRIX B550-A GAMING 1.683,8 tok/sASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ProArt X870E-CREATOR WIFI 1.670,5 tok/sASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX90E-SAGE SE 1.521,4 tok/sMeigao Innovation Technology (Shen Zhen) Co., Ltd DRFXL (MotherBoard Series) 930,6 tok/s★ ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI 303,1 tok/s this runASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ROG STRIX X570-F GAMING 238,8 tok/sDell Inc. PowerEdge R820 8,5 tok/s

ENGby engine

★ llama.cpp 1.683,8 tok/s this runvLLM 906,0 tok/sunbekannt 91,4 tok/s

DRVby driver

unbekannt 1.683,8 tok/sAMD 7.0.0-27-generic 91,4 tok/s

💰 Economics

Economics of this run

Operating cost, TCO and comparison with the next-best runs of the same model at identical concurrency (10× concurrent). Methodology →

⚙️ ConfigurationAll metrics and charts below follow these settings – based on a 24-month runtime.Save to URL Reset

⚡ Electricity price EUR/kWh

⚙️ System utilization 100 %

🖥️ Acquisition EUR

🔌 Idle 10 W

⚡ TDP 365 W

☁️ External LLM (API) show

Input €/1M Output €/1M Input per output token

Electricity0.30 EUR/kWh

Avg power (incl. idle)365 W estimated (TDP)GPU 355 + Board 10 W full load

Avg cost / hourEUR 0.11

Electricity / 1M tokensEUR 0.10

Token / kWh2.99M

Acquisition (system)EUR 1,703 partial priceGPU EUR 1,049 · RAM EUR 504 · PSU EUR 150

Electricity (2 years)–

TCO (2 years)EUR 3,621

Output tokens (2 years)19.12B

☁️ External LLM (API) – comparison

External LLM cost (2 years)–

Savings vs. external (2 years)–

All values above and the charts below take the configured system utilization into account: at X% the system generates only X% of the time, the rest it idles (10 W). Cost per hour drops (more idle), cost per token rises.

Cost over 2 years – electricity only

Cost over 2 years – incl. acquisition (TCO)

Speed vs. tokens per euro

Euro per 1M tokens

Comparison vs. API – economics per benchmark

	Qwen3-30B-A3B-Thinking-2507AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX	Qwen3-30B-A3B-Thinking-2507NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090	Qwen3-30B-A3B-Thinking-2507NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition	Qwen3-30B-A3B-Thinking-25073x NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition
Electricity cost (24 mo.)	–	–	–	–
Acquisition cost	–	–	–	–
Total cost (TCO)	–	–	–	–
Generated tokens (24 mo.)	–	–	–	–
Token price via API	–	–	–	–
Break-even point (days)	–	–	–	–
Result (savings / extra cost)	–	–	–	–

AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX · this run 303 tok/s NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 1,684 tok/s NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition 1,670 tok/s 3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition 1,521 tok/s

Comparison with up to 3 next-best runs of this model at the same concurrency (at least one on different hardware). Power = GPU TDP + CPU (idle + 15 %) + board (estimated), acquisition = full system (GPU + CPU + board + RAM + PSU), prices = stored market prices.

Contributed by

Mario Alka Administrator

@marioalka

Ich bin Unternehmer, Softwareentwickler und KI-Enthusiast. Seit vielen Jahren entwickle ich Unternehmenssoftware und beschäftige mich inzwischen fast täglich mit lokalen LLMs, KI-Agenten und leistungsfähiger KI-Hardware.

Mit LLM-Benchmark.de möchte ich eine Plattform schaffen, auf der Modelle, GPUs und Agenten objektiv und reproduzierbar miteinander verglichen werden.