# LLM-Benchmark Konfiguration # Modell : Qwen3.5-35B-A3B # Engine : llama.cpp # Run-ID : run-20260922-133638-2aaab2 # GPU : AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX # CPU : AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX 16-Cores # RAM : 63 GB bench@llm-benchmark:~$ llama-server \ -m /mnt/llmnas/gguf/Qwen3.5-35B-A3B-Q4_K_M/Qwen_Qwen3.5-35B-A3B-Q4_K_M.gguf \ --alias Qwen3.5-35B-A3B \ -ngl 999 \ -fa on \ -c 24576 \ -np 6 '(AMD' Radeon RX 7900 XTX, ROCm '7.2.4)'

Engine?Die Inferenz-Software, die das Modell ausliefert (z.B. vLLM oder llama.cpp). Sie bestimmt Geschwindigkeit, unterstuetzte Modellformate und welche Parameter ueberhaupt verfuegbar sind.	llamacpp
Modellalias?Der Name, unter dem das Modell ueber die API angesprochen wird. Genau dieser Wert muss im Request-Feld 'model' stehen.	Qwen3.5-35B-A3B
Kontextlaenge?Maximale Anzahl Tokens (Eingabe + erzeugte Ausgabe zusammen), die das Modell pro Anfrage verarbeiten kann.	24576
Modellpfad?Pfad zur GGUF-Modelldatei, die geladen und ausgeliefert wird.	/mnt/llmnas/gguf/Qwen3.5-35B-A3B-Q4_K_M/Qwen_Qwen3.5-35B-A3B-Q4_K_M.gguf
GPU-Layer?Anzahl der auf die GPU ausgelagerten Modell-Layer. Hoeher = mehr VRAM und schneller; der Rest laeuft auf der CPU. 999 = alles auf GPU.	999
fa	on
Kontext?Groesse des Kontextfensters in Token. 0 = der beim Training verwendete Kontext des Modells.	24576
np	6

All benchmarks of this model To leaderboard

Model comparison

Qwen3.5-35B-A3B on various hardware

All published performance runs of this model – each bubble a variant: position = prefill (X) × generation (Y), bubble size = number of runs. Closer to the top right = faster. ★ Marked gold = this benchmark.

GPUby graphics card

NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition 1.520,4 tok/sNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 1.416,7 tok/sNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition 1.398,4 tok/sNVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti 866,1 tok/sNVIDIA RTX A6000 842,1 tok/s★ AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX 447,0 tok/s this runAMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 220,5 tok/sAMD Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot 212,5 tok/sAMD Radeon PRO W7800 48GB 204,6 tok/sNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti 142,2 tok/sNVIDIA GB10 (DGX Spark) 46,9 tok/s

CPUby processor

AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-Core Processor 1.520,4 tok/sAMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8-Core Processor 1.416,7 tok/sAMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX 24-Cores 1.398,4 tok/sAMD Ryzen 9 8945HX with Radeon Graphics 866,1 tok/sAMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX 16-Cores 842,1 tok/s★ AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX 16-Cores 447,0 tok/s this runAMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 32-Cores 212,5 tok/sAMD Ryzen 3 3100 4-Core Processor 210,1 tok/sNVIDIA Grace 46,9 tok/s

MBby mainboard

ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ProArt X870E-CREATOR WIFI 1.520,4 tok/sASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ROG STRIX B550-A GAMING 1.416,7 tok/sASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX90E-SAGE SE 1.398,4 tok/sMeigao Innovation Technology (Shen Zhen) Co., Ltd DRFXL (MotherBoard Series) 866,1 tok/s★ ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI 447,0 tok/s this runASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ROG STRIX X570-F GAMING 210,1 tok/sASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. GX10 46,9 tok/s

ENGby engine

★ llama.cpp 1.520,4 tok/s this runvLLM 1.028,6 tok/sunbekannt 78,5 tok/s

DRVby driver

unbekannt 1.520,4 tok/sAMD 7.0.0-27-generic 78,5 tok/sNVIDIA 590.48.01 / CUDA 13.1 46,9 tok/s

💰 Economics

Economics of this run

Operating cost, TCO and comparison with the next-best runs of the same model at identical concurrency (10× concurrent). Methodology →

⚙️ ConfigurationAll metrics and charts below follow these settings – based on a 24-month runtime.Save to URL Reset

⚡ Electricity price EUR/kWh

⚙️ System utilization 100 %

🖥️ Acquisition EUR

🔌 Idle 10 W

⚡ TDP 365 W

☁️ External LLM (API) show

Input €/1M Output €/1M Input per output token

Electricity0.30 EUR/kWh

Avg power (incl. idle)365 W estimated (TDP)GPU 355 + Board 10 W full load

Avg cost / hourEUR 0.11

Electricity / 1M tokensEUR 0.068

Token / kWh4.41M

Acquisition (system)EUR 1,703 partial priceGPU EUR 1,049 · RAM EUR 504 · PSU EUR 150

Electricity (2 years)–

TCO (2 years)EUR 3,621

Output tokens (2 years)28.19B

☁️ External LLM (API) – comparison

External LLM cost (2 years)–

Savings vs. external (2 years)–

All values above and the charts below take the configured system utilization into account: at X% the system generates only X% of the time, the rest it idles (10 W). Cost per hour drops (more idle), cost per token rises.

Cost over 2 years – electricity only

Cost over 2 years – incl. acquisition (TCO)

Speed vs. tokens per euro

Euro per 1M tokens

Comparison vs. API – economics per benchmark

	Qwen3.5-35B-A3BAMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX	Qwen3.5-35B-A3BNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition	Qwen3.5-35B-A3BNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090	Qwen3.5-35B-A3B3x NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition
Electricity cost (24 mo.)	–	–	–	–
Acquisition cost	–	–	–	–
Total cost (TCO)	–	–	–	–
Generated tokens (24 mo.)	–	–	–	–
Token price via API	–	–	–	–
Break-even point (days)	–	–	–	–
Result (savings / extra cost)	–	–	–	–

AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX · this run 447 tok/s NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition 1,520 tok/s NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 1,417 tok/s 3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition 1,398 tok/s

Comparison with up to 3 next-best runs of this model at the same concurrency (at least one on different hardware). Power = GPU TDP + CPU (idle + 15 %) + board (estimated), acquisition = full system (GPU + CPU + board + RAM + PSU), prices = stored market prices.

Contributed by

Mario Alka Administrator

@marioalka

Ich bin Unternehmer, Softwareentwickler und KI-Enthusiast. Seit vielen Jahren entwickle ich Unternehmenssoftware und beschäftige mich inzwischen fast täglich mit lokalen LLMs, KI-Agenten und leistungsfähiger KI-Hardware.

Mit LLM-Benchmark.de möchte ich eine Plattform schaffen, auf der Modelle, GPUs und Agenten objektiv und reproduzierbar miteinander verglichen werden.