Created bymario-alka.dePowered bygodcore.denoob2claw.detricoma.de
Contributed byMario AlkaNVIDIA

Llama-3.3-Nemotron-Super-49B-v1.5

Performance benchmark · measured on 16.09.2026 20:24

Benchmark-IDrun-20260916-182929-5bdf16
Timebench 3 - Kombi (Prefill + Generation)Dense49BRuntime: llama.cppQuantisierung: Q4_K_M
Generation1,14tok/s
Prefill20,90tok/s
Time to First Token117.641,00ms
Total duration858,85s
Concurrency1parallel
Ranking in the field
1512of 1571 systems

Performance benchmark · Primary metric: Generation-Speed (tok/s) · 1× concurrent

This run is better than 4 % of all comparable systems.
Generation 1,1 tok/s
-99 % vs Ø 78,5
Prefill 20,9 tok/s
-99 % vs Ø 2.815,1
Time to First Token 117.641 ms
+331 % vs Ø 27.324
Distribution in the field0 – 405 tok/s
Ø 79 Median Dieser Lauf

Wie schlägt sich dieser Benchmark mit anderen Modellen?

How does this benchmark compare on other GPUs?

Same model on different hardware · 1× concurrent · Generation (tok/s)

Hardware

GPU: 2x NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 · 6 GB VRAM
CPU: 4x Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-4657L v2 @ 2.40GHz
RAM: 504 GB
Mainboard: Dell Inc. PowerEdge R820

Setup

Runtime: llama.cpp
Quantization: Q4_K_M
Model: Llama-3.3-Nemotron-Super-49B-v1.5

Configuration

benchmark-konfiguration — run-20260916-182929-5bdf16
# LLM-Benchmark Konfiguration # Modell : Llama-3.3-Nemotron-Super-49B-v1.5 # Engine : llama.cpp # Run-ID : run-20260916-182929-5bdf16 # GPU : 2x NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 # CPU : 4x Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-4657L v2 @ 2.40GHz # RAM : 504 GB bench@llm-benchmark:~$ llama-server \ -m nvidia_Llama-3_3-Nemotron-Super-49B-v1_5-Q4_K_M.gguf Q4_K_M RAM-Offload '(dense,' ngl=10, 503GB DDR3, 2x RTX '2060)'
Engine?Die Inferenz-Software, die das Modell ausliefert (z.B. vLLM oder llama.cpp). Sie bestimmt Geschwindigkeit, unterstuetzte Modellformate und welche Parameter ueberhaupt verfuegbar sind.llamacpp
Modellpfad?Pfad zur GGUF-Modelldatei, die geladen und ausgeliefert wird.nvidia_Llama-3_3-Nemotron-Super-49B-v1_5-Q4_K_M.gguf

All benchmarks of this model To leaderboard

Anzeige
Model comparison

Llama-3.3-Nemotron-Super-49B-v1.5 on various hardware

All published performance runs of this model – each bubble a variant: position = prefill (X) × generation (Y), bubble size = number of runs. Closer to the top right = faster. ★ Marked gold = this benchmark.

GPUby graphics card

4733552371180,001.0242.0473.071Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition - 364,1 tok/s Generation, 2.480 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 13.861 ms (3 Laufe)NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 B...NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition - 303,0 tok/s Generation, 2.253 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 17.522 ms (9 Laufe)NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 B...NVIDIA RTX A6000 - 197,3 tok/s Generation, 2.201 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 19.347 ms (12 Laufe)NVIDIA RTX A6000AMD Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot - 71,0 tok/s Generation, 517 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 24.661 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Radeon PRO W7900 ...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti - 25,2 tok/s Generation, 243 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 129.179 ms (3 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 50...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 - 20,2 tok/s Generation, 333 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 137.310 ms (3 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 50...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti - 19,6 tok/s Generation, 407 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 91.059 ms (3 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 30...AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 - 11,6 tok/s Generation, 23 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 293.489 ms (9 Laufe)AMD Radeon AI PRO R97...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 - 1,1 tok/s Generation, 21 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 117.641 ms (1 Lauf) | DIESER LAUF★ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 20...
NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition 364,1 tok/sNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition 303,0 tok/sNVIDIA RTX A6000 197,3 tok/sAMD Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot 71,0 tok/sNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti 25,2 tok/sNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 20,2 tok/sNVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti 19,6 tok/sAMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 11,6 tok/s★ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 1,1 tok/s this run

CPUby processor

4733552371180,001.0242.0473.071Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-Core Processor - 364,1 tok/s Generation, 2.480 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 13.861 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-...AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX 24-Cores - 303,0 tok/s Generation, 2.253 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 17.522 ms (9 Laufe)AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX 16-Cores - 197,3 tok/s Generation, 1.267 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 136.837 ms (21 Laufe)AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 32-Cores - 71,0 tok/s Generation, 380 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 76.920 ms (6 Laufe)AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8-Core Processor - 20,2 tok/s Generation, 333 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 137.310 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8...AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX with Radeon Graphics - 19,6 tok/s Generation, 407 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 91.059 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX wi...Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-4657L v2 @ 2.40GHz - 1,1 tok/s Generation, 21 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 117.641 ms (1 Lauf) | DIESER LAUF★ Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU ...
AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-Core Processor 364,1 tok/sAMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX 24-Cores 303,0 tok/sAMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX 16-Cores 197,3 tok/sAMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 32-Cores 71,0 tok/sAMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8-Core Processor 20,2 tok/sAMD Ryzen 9 8945HX with Radeon Graphics 19,6 tok/s★ Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-4657L v2 @ 2.40GHz 1,1 tok/s this run

MBby mainboard

4733552371180,001.0242.0473.071Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ProArt X870E-CREATOR WIFI - 364,1 tok/s Generation, 2.480 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 13.861 ms (3 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX90E-SAGE SE - 303,0 tok/s Generation, 1.563 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 101.042 ms (30 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI - 71,0 tok/s Generation, 380 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 76.920 ms (6 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ROG STRIX B550-A GAMING - 20,2 tok/s Generation, 333 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 137.310 ms (3 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....Meigao Innovation Technology (Shen Zhen) Co., Ltd DRFXL (MotherBoard Series) - 19,6 tok/s Generation, 407 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 91.059 ms (3 Laufe)Meigao Innovation Tec...Dell Inc. PowerEdge R820 - 1,1 tok/s Generation, 21 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 117.641 ms (1 Lauf) | DIESER LAUF★ Dell Inc. PowerEdge R...
ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ProArt X870E-CREATOR WIFI 364,1 tok/sASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX90E-SAGE SE 303,0 tok/sASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI 71,0 tok/sASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ROG STRIX B550-A GAMING 20,2 tok/sMeigao Innovation Technology (Shen Zhen) Co., Ltd DRFXL (MotherBoard Series) 19,6 tok/s★ Dell Inc. PowerEdge R820 1,1 tok/s this run

ENGby engine

4343572812041273011.5662.8314.096Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)vLLM - 197,3 tok/s Generation, 3.442 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 4.578 ms (6 Laufe)vLLMllama.cpp - 364,1 tok/s Generation, 955 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 107.741 ms (40 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ llama.cpp
★ llama.cpp 364,1 tok/s this runvLLM 197,3 tok/s

DRVby driver

4003823643463281.2031.2541.3051.356Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)unbekannt - 364,1 tok/s Generation, 1.279 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 94.285 ms (46 Laufe)unbekannt
unbekannt 364,1 tok/s
💰 Economics

Economics of this run

Operating cost, TCO and comparison with the next-best runs of the same model at identical concurrency (1× concurrent). Methodology →

⚙️ ConfigurationAll metrics and charts below follow these settings – based on a 24-month runtime.Save to URLReset
⚡ Electricity price EUR/kWh
⚙️ System utilization 100 %
🖥️ Acquisition EUR
🔌 Idle 55 W
⚡ TDP 359 W
☁️ External LLM (API)
Electricity0.30 EUR/kWh
Avg power (incl. idle)359 W estimated (TDP)GPU 320 + CPU 29 + Board 10 W full load
Avg cost / hourEUR 0.11
Electricity / 1M tokensEUR 26.22
Token / kWh11.44K
Acquisition (system)EUR 2,445 partial priceGPU EUR 220 · CPU EUR 59 · RAM EUR 2,016 · PSU EUR 150
Electricity (2 years)
TCO (2 years)EUR 4,331
Output tokens (2 years)71.90M
☁️ External LLM (API) – comparison
External LLM cost (2 years)
Savings vs. external (2 years)

All values above and the charts below take the configured system utilization into account: at X% the system generates only X% of the time, the rest it idles (55 W). Cost per hour drops (more idle), cost per token rises.

Cost over 2 years – electricity only

Cost over 2 years – incl. acquisition (TCO)

Speed vs. tokens per euro

Euro per 1M tokens

Comparison vs. API – economics per benchmark

Llama-3.3-Nemotron-Super-49B-v1.52x NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060Llama-3.3-Nemotron-Super-49B-v1.5NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation EditionLlama-3.3-Nemotron-Super-49B-v1.53x NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation EditionLlama-3.3-Nemotron-Super-49B-v1.53x NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition
Electricity cost (24 mo.)
Acquisition cost
Total cost (TCO)
Generated tokens (24 mo.)
Token price via API
Break-even point (days)
Result (savings / extra cost)

Comparison with up to 3 next-best runs of this model at the same concurrency (at least one on different hardware). Power = GPU TDP + CPU (idle + 15 %) + board (estimated), acquisition = full system (GPU + CPU + board + RAM + PSU), prices = stored market prices.

Contributed by

Mario Alka Administrator

@marioalka

Ich bin Unternehmer, Softwareentwickler und KI-Enthusiast. Seit vielen Jahren entwickle ich Unternehmenssoftware und beschäftige mich inzwischen fast täglich mit lokalen LLMs, KI-Agenten und leistungsfähiger KI-Hardware.

Mit LLM-Benchmark.de möchte ich eine Plattform schaffen, auf der Modelle, GPUs und Agenten objektiv und reproduzierbar miteinander verglichen werden.