Created bymario-alka.dePowered bygodcore.denoob2claw.detricoma.de
Contributed byMario AlkaQwen (Alibaba)

Qwen3.6-35B-A3B

Performance benchmark · measured on 02.09.2026 12:01

Benchmark-IDrun-20260902-102627-650b4d
Timebench 3 - Kombi (Prefill + Generation)MoE35BRuntime: vLLMQuantisierung: AWQ
Generation39,59tok/s
Prefill2.033,44tok/s
Time to First Token986,00ms
Total duration53,80s
Concurrency1parallel
Ranking in the field
40of 55 systems

Performance benchmark · Primary metric: Generation-Speed (tok/s) · 1× concurrent

This run is better than 28 % of all comparable systems.
Generation 39,6 tok/s
-33 % vs Ø 59,4
Prefill 2.033,4 tok/s
+6 % vs Ø 1.912,2
Time to First Token 986 ms
-40 % vs Ø 1.643
Distribution in the field7 – 138 tok/s
Ø 59 Median Dieser Lauf

Wie schlägt sich dieser Benchmark mit anderen Modellen?

How does this benchmark compare on other GPUs?

Same model on different hardware · 1× concurrent · Generation (tok/s)

Hardware

GPU: 2x AMD Radeon PRO W7800 48GB · 48 GB VRAM
CPU: AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 32-Cores
RAM: 62 GB
Mainboard: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI

Setup

Runtime: vLLM
Quantization: AWQ
Model: Qwen3.6-35B-A3B

Configuration

benchmark-konfiguration — run-20260902-102627-650b4d
# LLM-Benchmark Konfiguration # Modell : Qwen3.6-35B-A3B # Engine : vLLM # Run-ID : run-20260902-102627-650b4d # GPU : 2x AMD Radeon PRO W7800 48GB # CPU : AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 32-Cores # RAM : 62 GB bench@llm-benchmark:~$ vllm serve \ --tensor-parallel-size 2 \ --max-model-len 16384 '(ROCm' gfx1100, 2x AMD Radeon Pro W7800 '48GB)'
Engine?Die Inferenz-Software, die das Modell ausliefert (z.B. vLLM oder llama.cpp). Sie bestimmt Geschwindigkeit, unterstuetzte Modellformate und welche Parameter ueberhaupt verfuegbar sind.vllm
Kontextlaenge?Maximale Anzahl Tokens (Eingabe + erzeugte Ausgabe zusammen), die das Modell pro Anfrage verarbeiten kann.16384
Tensor-Parallel?Anzahl GPUs, auf die JEDER einzelne Modell-Layer aufgeteilt wird (Tensor-Parallelitaet). Mehr GPUs = mehr VRAM und meist mehr Speed, aber die Anzahl der Attention-Heads muss durch diesen Wert teilbar sein (z.B. 32 Heads -> nur 1, 2, 4, 8 ... moeglich, NICHT 3).2
Kontext?Groesse des Kontextfensters in Token. 0 = der beim Training verwendete Kontext des Modells.16384

All benchmarks of this model To leaderboard

Anzeige
Model comparison

Qwen3.6-35B-A3B on various hardware

All published performance runs of this model – each bubble a variant: position = prefill (X) × generation (Y), bubble size = number of runs. Closer to the top right = faster. ★ Marked gold = this benchmark.

GPUby graphics card

1.9351.4519674840,005.20710.41415.621Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition - 1.489,1 tok/s Generation, 12.607 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 2.168 ms (6 Laufe)NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 B...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 - 1.409,4 tok/s Generation, 4.912 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 4.113 ms (3 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 50...NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition - 1.367,3 tok/s Generation, 6.432 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 4.005 ms (9 Laufe)NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 B...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti - 852,0 tok/s Generation, 3.423 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 7.930 ms (9 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 30...NVIDIA RTX A6000 - 800,4 tok/s Generation, 11.326 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 2.649 ms (30 Laufe)NVIDIA RTX A6000AMD Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot - 296,2 tok/s Generation, 3.120 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 4.797 ms (18 Laufe)AMD Radeon PRO W7900 ...AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 - 271,4 tok/s Generation, 3.025 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 22.003 ms (32 Laufe)AMD Radeon AI PRO R97...NVIDIA GB10 (DGX Spark) - 167,1 tok/s Generation, 4.210 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 1.687 ms (8 Laufe)NVIDIA GB10 (DGX Spar...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti - 142,9 tok/s Generation, 499 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 32.007 ms (6 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 50...Intel Arc Pro B70 - 124,5 tok/s Generation, 578 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 5.272 ms (7 Laufe)Intel Arc Pro B70AMD Radeon 8060S Graphics - 98,3 tok/s Generation, 863 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 9.646 ms (13 Laufe)AMD Radeon 8060S Grap...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 - 4,3 tok/s Generation, 62 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 31.435 ms (1 Lauf)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 20...AMD Radeon PRO W7800 48GB - 235,5 tok/s Generation, 4.679 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.874 ms (9 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ AMD Radeon PRO W7800 ...
NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition 1.489,1 tok/sNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 1.409,4 tok/sNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition 1.367,3 tok/sNVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti 852,0 tok/sNVIDIA RTX A6000 800,4 tok/sAMD Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot 296,2 tok/sAMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 271,4 tok/s★ AMD Radeon PRO W7800 48GB 235,5 tok/s this runNVIDIA GB10 (DGX Spark) 167,1 tok/sNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti 142,9 tok/sIntel Arc Pro B70 124,5 tok/sAMD Radeon 8060S Graphics 98,3 tok/sNVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 4,3 tok/s

CPUby processor

1.9351.4519674840,005.20710.41415.621Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-Core Processor - 1.489,1 tok/s Generation, 12.607 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 2.168 ms (6 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-...AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8-Core Processor - 1.409,4 tok/s Generation, 4.912 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 4.113 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8...AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX 24-Cores - 1.367,3 tok/s Generation, 6.432 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 4.005 ms (9 Laufe)AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX with Radeon Graphics - 852,0 tok/s Generation, 3.431 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 6.717 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX wi...AMD Ryzen 5 5600X 6-Core Processor - 830,5 tok/s Generation, 3.419 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 8.537 ms (6 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 5 5600X 6-C...AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX 16-Cores - 800,4 tok/s Generation, 7.042 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 12.485 ms (62 Laufe)AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...NVIDIA Grace - 167,1 tok/s Generation, 4.210 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 1.687 ms (8 Laufe)NVIDIA GraceAMD Ryzen 9 7945HX with Radeon Graphics - 124,5 tok/s Generation, 578 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 5.272 ms (7 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX wi...AMD RYZEN AI MAX+ 395 w/ Radeon 8060S - 98,3 tok/s Generation, 863 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 9.646 ms (13 Laufe)AMD RYZEN AI MAX+ 395...Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-4620 v2 @ 2.60GHz - 4,3 tok/s Generation, 62 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 31.435 ms (1 Lauf)Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU ...AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 32-Cores - 296,2 tok/s Generation, 3.069 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 9.493 ms (33 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...
AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-Core Processor 1.489,1 tok/sAMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8-Core Processor 1.409,4 tok/sAMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX 24-Cores 1.367,3 tok/sAMD Ryzen 9 8945HX with Radeon Graphics 852,0 tok/sAMD Ryzen 5 5600X 6-Core Processor 830,5 tok/sAMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX 16-Cores 800,4 tok/s★ AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 32-Cores 296,2 tok/s this runNVIDIA Grace 167,1 tok/sAMD Ryzen 9 7945HX with Radeon Graphics 124,5 tok/sAMD RYZEN AI MAX+ 395 w/ Radeon 8060S 98,3 tok/sIntel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-4620 v2 @ 2.60GHz 4,3 tok/s

MBby mainboard

1.9351.4519674840,005.20710.41415.621Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ProArt X870E-CREATOR WIFI - 1.489,1 tok/s Generation, 12.607 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 2.168 ms (6 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ROG STRIX B550-A GAMING - 1.409,4 tok/s Generation, 4.912 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 4.113 ms (3 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX90E-SAGE SE - 1.367,3 tok/s Generation, 6.964 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 11.395 ms (71 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....Meigao Innovation Technology (Shen Zhen) Co., Ltd DRFXL (MotherBoard Series) - 852,0 tok/s Generation, 3.431 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 6.717 ms (3 Laufe)Meigao Innovation Tec...ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. PRIME A520M-K - 830,5 tok/s Generation, 3.419 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 8.537 ms (6 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. GX10 - 167,1 tok/s Generation, 4.210 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 1.687 ms (8 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....Shenzhen Meigao Electronic Equipment Co.,Ltd DRFXI (MotherBoard Series) - 124,5 tok/s Generation, 578 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 5.272 ms (7 Laufe)Shenzhen Meigao Elect...Bosgame AXB35-02 (BeyondMax Series) - 98,3 tok/s Generation, 863 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 9.646 ms (13 Laufe)Bosgame AXB35-02 (Bey...Dell Inc. PowerEdge R820 - 4,3 tok/s Generation, 62 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 31.435 ms (1 Lauf)Dell Inc. PowerEdge R...ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI - 296,2 tok/s Generation, 3.069 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 9.493 ms (33 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....
ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ProArt X870E-CREATOR WIFI 1.489,1 tok/sASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ROG STRIX B550-A GAMING 1.409,4 tok/sASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX90E-SAGE SE 1.367,3 tok/sMeigao Innovation Technology (Shen Zhen) Co., Ltd DRFXL (MotherBoard Series) 852,0 tok/sASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. PRIME A520M-K 830,5 tok/s★ ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI 296,2 tok/s this runASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. GX10 167,1 tok/sShenzhen Meigao Electronic Equipment Co.,Ltd DRFXI (MotherBoard Series) 124,5 tok/sBosgame AXB35-02 (BeyondMax Series) 98,3 tok/sDell Inc. PowerEdge R820 4,3 tok/s

ENGby engine

1.7701.4651.1608555501.4414.3787.31610.254Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)llama.cpp - 1.489,1 tok/s Generation, 3.422 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 12.456 ms (93 Laufe)llama.cppunbekannt - 830,5 tok/s Generation, 2.991 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 5.522 ms (10 Laufe)unbekanntvLLM - 952,8 tok/s Generation, 8.704 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 4.451 ms (48 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ vLLM
llama.cpp 1.489,1 tok/s★ vLLM 952,8 tok/s this rununbekannt 830,5 tok/s

DRVby driver

1.9201.4409604800,002.2164.4326.648Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)unbekannt - 1.489,1 tok/s Generation, 5.446 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 10.385 ms (132 Laufe)unbekanntNVIDIA 590.48.01 / CUDA 13.1 - 167,1 tok/s Generation, 4.210 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 1.687 ms (8 Laufe)NVIDIA 590.48.01 / CU...Intel 26.18.38308.4 - 124,5 tok/s Generation, 578 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 5.272 ms (7 Laufe)Intel 26.18.38308.4AMD 7.0.0-27-generic - 79,4 tok/s Generation, 2.349 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 1.000 ms (4 Laufe)AMD 7.0.0-27-generic
unbekannt 1.489,1 tok/sNVIDIA 590.48.01 / CUDA 13.1 167,1 tok/sIntel 26.18.38308.4 124,5 tok/sAMD 7.0.0-27-generic 79,4 tok/s
💰 Economics

Economics of this run

Operating cost, TCO and comparison with the next-best runs of the same model at identical concurrency (1× concurrent). Methodology →

⚙️ ConfigurationAll metrics and charts below follow these settings – based on a 24-month runtime.Save to URLReset
⚡ Electricity price EUR/kWh
⚙️ System utilization 100 %
🖥️ Acquisition EUR
🔌 Idle 10 W
⚡ TDP 530 W
☁️ External LLM (API)
Electricity0.30 EUR/kWh
Avg power (incl. idle)530 W estimated (TDP)GPU 520 + Board 10 W full load
Avg cost / hourEUR 0.16
Electricity / 1M tokensEUR 1.12
Token / kWh268.91K
Acquisition (system)EUR 8,172 partial priceGPU EUR 5,616 · CPU EUR 1,880 · RAM EUR 496 · PSU EUR 180
Electricity (2 years)
TCO (2 years)EUR 10,958
Output tokens (2 years)2.50B
☁️ External LLM (API) – comparison
External LLM cost (2 years)
Savings vs. external (2 years)

All values above and the charts below take the configured system utilization into account: at X% the system generates only X% of the time, the rest it idles (10 W). Cost per hour drops (more idle), cost per token rises.

Cost over 2 years – electricity only

Cost over 2 years – incl. acquisition (TCO)

Speed vs. tokens per euro

Euro per 1M tokens

Comparison vs. API – economics per benchmark

Qwen3.6-35B-A3B2x AMD Radeon PRO W7800 48GBQwen3.6-35B-A3BNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation EditionQwen3.6-35B-A3B3x NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation EditionQwen3.6-35B-A3B3x NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition
Electricity cost (24 mo.)
Acquisition cost
Total cost (TCO)
Generated tokens (24 mo.)
Token price via API
Break-even point (days)
Result (savings / extra cost)

Comparison with up to 3 next-best runs of this model at the same concurrency (at least one on different hardware). Power = GPU TDP + CPU (idle + 15 %) + board (estimated), acquisition = full system (GPU + CPU + board + RAM + PSU), prices = stored market prices.

Contributed by

Mario Alka Administrator

@marioalka

Ich bin Unternehmer, Softwareentwickler und KI-Enthusiast. Seit vielen Jahren entwickle ich Unternehmenssoftware und beschäftige mich inzwischen fast täglich mit lokalen LLMs, KI-Agenten und leistungsfähiger KI-Hardware.

Mit LLM-Benchmark.de möchte ich eine Plattform schaffen, auf der Modelle, GPUs und Agenten objektiv und reproduzierbar miteinander verglichen werden.