Created bymario-alka.dePowered bygodcore.denoob2claw.detricoma.de
Contributed byMario AlkaCohere

North-Mini-Code-1.0

Performance benchmark · measured on 31.08.2026 14:20

Benchmark-IDrun-20260831-124730-fa3b5f
Timebench 3 - Kombi (Prefill + Generation)Runtime: llama.cppQuantisierung: Q8_0
Generation162,37tok/s
Prefill2.994,64tok/s
Time to First Token7.467,00ms
Total duration10,65s
Concurrency10parallel
Ranking in the field
755of 1163 systems

Performance benchmark · Primary metric: Generation-Speed (tok/s) · 10× concurrent

This run is better than 35 % of all comparable systems.
Generation 162,4 tok/s
-65 % vs Ø 461,9
Prefill 2.994,6 tok/s
-55 % vs Ø 6.658,3
Time to First Token 7.467 ms
-84 % vs Ø 48.135
Distribution in the field0 – 2.491 tok/s
Ø 462 Median Dieser Lauf

Wie schlägt sich dieser Benchmark mit anderen Modellen?

gemma-4-E2B-itNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 · run-20260728-184455-e28775
2.491,2 tok/s
gemma-4-E2B-itNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition · run-20260727-181606-b37ed9
2.414,4 tok/s
Nemotron-3-Nano-4BNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition · run-20260727-181607-4cca42
2.182,7 tok/s
gemma-4-E2B-it3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260728-184456-d87c73
2.143,6 tok/s
gpt-oss-20bNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition · run-20260730-035052-9c966e
1.995,4 tok/s
gpt-oss-20bNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition · run-20260728-140954-8007c4
1.993,5 tok/s
Nemotron-3-Nano-4B3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260728-194136-0aed86
1.937,7 tok/s
Nemotron-3-Nano-4B3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260728-194136-8db0fa
1.911,6 tok/s
Nemotron-3-Nano-4B3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260727-181606-e0eafd
1.897,0 tok/s
gpt-oss-20bNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 · run-20260729-032121-7c961d
1.890,7 tok/s
Nemotron-3-Nano-4BNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 · run-20260728-194135-2ed9dd
1.878,7 tok/s
gpt-oss-20b3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260728-034052-26063b
1.835,7 tok/s
Nemotron-3-Nano-4B3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260728-194136-a77046
1.830,3 tok/s
gpt-oss-20b3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260729-032121-c6e7e0
1.819,5 tok/s
North-Mini-Code-1.0 this runAMD Radeon PRO W7800 48GB · run-20260831-124730-fa3b5f
162,4 tok/s

How does this benchmark compare on other GPUs?

Same model on different hardware · 10× concurrent · Generation (tok/s)

Hardware

GPU: AMD Radeon PRO W7800 48GB · 48 GB VRAM
CPU: AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 32-Cores
RAM: 62 GB
Mainboard: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI

Setup

Runtime: llama.cpp
Quantization: Q8_0
Model: North-Mini-Code-1.0

Configuration

benchmark-konfiguration — run-20260831-124730-fa3b5f
# LLM-Benchmark Konfiguration # Modell : North-Mini-Code-1.0 # Engine : llama.cpp # Run-ID : run-20260831-124730-fa3b5f # GPU : AMD Radeon PRO W7800 48GB # CPU : AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 32-Cores # RAM : 62 GB bench@llm-benchmark:~$ /home/godcore/llama.cpp/build_rocm/bin/llama-server \ -m North-Mini-Code-1.0-Q8_0.gguf \ -ngl 999 \ -fa on \ -c 16384 \ -np 12 '(AMD' Radeon Pro W7800 48GB 'ROCm)'
Engine?Die Inferenz-Software, die das Modell ausliefert (z.B. vLLM oder llama.cpp). Sie bestimmt Geschwindigkeit, unterstuetzte Modellformate und welche Parameter ueberhaupt verfuegbar sind.llamacpp
Kontextlaenge?Maximale Anzahl Tokens (Eingabe + erzeugte Ausgabe zusammen), die das Modell pro Anfrage verarbeiten kann.16384
Modellpfad?Pfad zur GGUF-Modelldatei, die geladen und ausgeliefert wird.North-Mini-Code-1.0-Q8_0.gguf
GPU-Layer?Anzahl der auf die GPU ausgelagerten Modell-Layer. Hoeher = mehr VRAM und schneller; der Rest laeuft auf der CPU. 999 = alles auf GPU.999
faon
Kontext?Groesse des Kontextfensters in Token. 0 = der beim Training verwendete Kontext des Modells.16384
np12

All benchmarks of this model To leaderboard

Anzeige
Model comparison

North-Mini-Code-1.0 on various hardware

All published performance runs of this model – each bubble a variant: position = prefill (X) × generation (Y), bubble size = number of runs. Closer to the top right = faster. ★ Marked gold = this benchmark.

GPUby graphics card

2.1061.5801.0535270,005.85511.71017.566Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition - 1.621,0 tok/s Generation, 6.099 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.593 ms (3 Laufe)NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 B...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 - 1.557,3 tok/s Generation, 5.892 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.954 ms (3 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 50...NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition - 1.492,4 tok/s Generation, 8.535 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.497 ms (12 Laufe)NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 B...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti - 939,5 tok/s Generation, 4.130 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 5.948 ms (3 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 30...NVIDIA RTX A6000 - 648,5 tok/s Generation, 14.179 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 1.659 ms (30 Laufe)NVIDIA RTX A6000NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti - 169,0 tok/s Generation, 890 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 31.856 ms (3 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 50...AMD Radeon 8060S Graphics - 131,9 tok/s Generation, 1.759 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 13.043 ms (1 Lauf)AMD Radeon 8060S Grap...AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 - 87,3 tok/s Generation, 502 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 82.917 ms (10 Laufe)AMD Radeon AI PRO R97...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 - 5,1 tok/s Generation, 89 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 113.797 ms (3 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 20...AMD Radeon PRO W7800 48GB - 162,4 tok/s Generation, 2.600 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 4.101 ms (3 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ AMD Radeon PRO W7800 ...
NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition 1.621,0 tok/sNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 1.557,3 tok/sNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition 1.492,4 tok/sNVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti 939,5 tok/sNVIDIA RTX A6000 648,5 tok/sNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti 169,0 tok/s★ AMD Radeon PRO W7800 48GB 162,4 tok/s this runAMD Radeon 8060S Graphics 131,9 tok/sAMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 87,3 tok/sNVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 5,1 tok/s

CPUby processor

2.1061.5801.0535270,004.4428.88413.326Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-Core Processor - 1.621,0 tok/s Generation, 6.099 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.593 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-...AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8-Core Processor - 1.557,3 tok/s Generation, 5.892 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.954 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8...AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX 24-Cores - 1.492,4 tok/s Generation, 8.535 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.497 ms (12 Laufe)AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX with Radeon Graphics - 939,5 tok/s Generation, 4.130 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 5.948 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX wi...AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX 16-Cores - 648,5 tok/s Generation, 10.760 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 21.973 ms (40 Laufe)AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...AMD RYZEN AI MAX+ 395 w/ Radeon 8060S - 131,9 tok/s Generation, 1.759 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 13.043 ms (1 Lauf)AMD RYZEN AI MAX+ 395...Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-4620 v2 @ 2.60GHz - 5,1 tok/s Generation, 89 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 113.797 ms (3 Laufe)Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU ...AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 32-Cores - 169,0 tok/s Generation, 1.745 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 17.979 ms (6 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...
AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-Core Processor 1.621,0 tok/sAMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8-Core Processor 1.557,3 tok/sAMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX 24-Cores 1.492,4 tok/sAMD Ryzen 9 8945HX with Radeon Graphics 939,5 tok/sAMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX 16-Cores 648,5 tok/s★ AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 32-Cores 169,0 tok/s this runAMD RYZEN AI MAX+ 395 w/ Radeon 8060S 131,9 tok/sIntel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-4620 v2 @ 2.60GHz 5,1 tok/s

MBby mainboard

2.1061.5801.0535270,004.2308.46012.689Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ProArt X870E-CREATOR WIFI - 1.621,0 tok/s Generation, 6.099 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.593 ms (3 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ROG STRIX B550-A GAMING - 1.557,3 tok/s Generation, 5.892 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.954 ms (3 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX90E-SAGE SE - 1.492,4 tok/s Generation, 10.246 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 17.709 ms (52 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....Meigao Innovation Technology (Shen Zhen) Co., Ltd DRFXL (MotherBoard Series) - 939,5 tok/s Generation, 4.130 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 5.948 ms (3 Laufe)Meigao Innovation Tec...Bosgame AXB35-02 (BeyondMax Series) - 131,9 tok/s Generation, 1.759 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 13.043 ms (1 Lauf)Bosgame AXB35-02 (Bey...Dell Inc. PowerEdge R820 - 5,1 tok/s Generation, 89 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 113.797 ms (3 Laufe)Dell Inc. PowerEdge R...ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI - 169,0 tok/s Generation, 1.745 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 17.979 ms (6 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....
ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ProArt X870E-CREATOR WIFI 1.621,0 tok/sASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ROG STRIX B550-A GAMING 1.557,3 tok/sASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX90E-SAGE SE 1.492,4 tok/sMeigao Innovation Technology (Shen Zhen) Co., Ltd DRFXL (MotherBoard Series) 939,5 tok/s★ ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI 169,0 tok/s this runBosgame AXB35-02 (BeyondMax Series) 131,9 tok/sDell Inc. PowerEdge R820 5,1 tok/s

ENGby engine

1.9781.5561.1357132927198.26715.81523.363Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)vLLM - 648,5 tok/s Generation, 19.505 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 642 ms (18 Laufe)vLLMllama.cpp - 1.621,0 tok/s Generation, 4.577 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 26.644 ms (53 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ llama.cpp
★ llama.cpp 1.621,0 tok/s this runvLLM 648,5 tok/s

DRVby driver

1.7831.7021.6211.5401.4597.8608.1948.5298.863Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)unbekannt - 1.621,0 tok/s Generation, 8.361 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 20.052 ms (71 Laufe)unbekannt
unbekannt 1.621,0 tok/s
💰 Economics

Economics of this run

Operating cost, TCO and comparison with the next-best runs of the same model at identical concurrency (10× concurrent). Methodology →

⚙️ ConfigurationAll metrics and charts below follow these settings – based on a 24-month runtime.Save to URLReset
⚡ Electricity price EUR/kWh
⚙️ System utilization 100 %
🖥️ Acquisition EUR
🔌 Idle 10 W
⚡ TDP 270 W
☁️ External LLM (API)
Electricity0.30 EUR/kWh
Avg power (incl. idle)270 W estimated (TDP)GPU 260 + Board 10 W full load
Avg cost / hourEUR 0.081
Electricity / 1M tokensEUR 0.14
Token / kWh2.16M
Acquisition (system)EUR 5,304 partial priceGPU EUR 2,808 · CPU EUR 1,880 · RAM EUR 496 · PSU EUR 120
Electricity (2 years)
TCO (2 years)EUR 6,723
Output tokens (2 years)10.24B
☁️ External LLM (API) – comparison
External LLM cost (2 years)
Savings vs. external (2 years)

All values above and the charts below take the configured system utilization into account: at X% the system generates only X% of the time, the rest it idles (10 W). Cost per hour drops (more idle), cost per token rises.

Cost over 2 years – electricity only

Cost over 2 years – incl. acquisition (TCO)

Speed vs. tokens per euro

Euro per 1M tokens

Comparison vs. API – economics per benchmark

North-Mini-Code-1.0AMD Radeon PRO W7800 48GBNorth-Mini-Code-1.0NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation EditionNorth-Mini-Code-1.0NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090North-Mini-Code-1.03x NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition
Electricity cost (24 mo.)
Acquisition cost
Total cost (TCO)
Generated tokens (24 mo.)
Token price via API
Break-even point (days)
Result (savings / extra cost)

Comparison with up to 3 next-best runs of this model at the same concurrency (at least one on different hardware). Power = GPU TDP + CPU (idle + 15 %) + board (estimated), acquisition = full system (GPU + CPU + board + RAM + PSU), prices = stored market prices.

Contributed by

Mario Alka Administrator

@marioalka

Ich bin Unternehmer, Softwareentwickler und KI-Enthusiast. Seit vielen Jahren entwickle ich Unternehmenssoftware und beschäftige mich inzwischen fast täglich mit lokalen LLMs, KI-Agenten und leistungsfähiger KI-Hardware.

Mit LLM-Benchmark.de möchte ich eine Plattform schaffen, auf der Modelle, GPUs und Agenten objektiv und reproduzierbar miteinander verglichen werden.