Created bymario-alka.dePowered bygodcore.denoob2claw.detricoma.de
Contributed byMario AlkaCohere

North-Mini-Code-1.0

Performance benchmark · measured on 27.08.2026 15:59

Benchmark-IDrun-20260827-140321-3dd508
Timebench 3 - Kombi (Prefill + Generation)Runtime: llama.cppQuantisierung: Q8_0
Generation449,22tok/s
Prefill7.134,01tok/s
Time to First Token8.416,50ms
Total duration89,39s
Concurrency10parallel
Ranking in the field
48of 164 systems

Performance benchmark · Primary metric: Generation-Speed (tok/s) · 10× concurrent

This run is better than 71 % of all comparable systems.
Generation 449,2 tok/s
+21 % vs Ø 371,7
Prefill 7.134,0 tok/s
-41 % vs Ø 12.028,5
Time to First Token 8.417 ms
+30 % vs Ø 6.451
Distribution in the field32 – 1.359 tok/s
Ø 372 Median Dieser Lauf

Wie schlägt sich dieser Benchmark mit anderen Modellen?

How does this benchmark compare on other GPUs?

Same model on different hardware · 10× concurrent · Generation (tok/s)

Hardware

GPU: 2x NVIDIA RTX A6000 · 48 GB VRAM
CPU: AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX 16-Cores
RAM: 184 GB
Mainboard: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX90E-SAGE SE

Setup

Runtime: llama.cpp
Quantization: Q8_0
Model: North-Mini-Code-1.0

Configuration

benchmark-konfiguration — run-20260827-140321-3dd508
# LLM-Benchmark Konfiguration # Modell : North-Mini-Code-1.0 # Engine : llama.cpp # Run-ID : run-20260827-140321-3dd508 # GPU : 2x NVIDIA RTX A6000 # CPU : AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX 16-Cores # RAM : 184 GB bench@llm-benchmark:~$ /home/godcore/llama.cpp/build/bin/llama-server \ -m North-Mini-Code-1.0-Q8_0.gguf \ -ngl 999 \ -fa on \ -c 32768 \ -np 8 \ -sm layer '(2x' RTX A6000 '48GB)'
Engine?Die Inferenz-Software, die das Modell ausliefert (z.B. vLLM oder llama.cpp). Sie bestimmt Geschwindigkeit, unterstuetzte Modellformate und welche Parameter ueberhaupt verfuegbar sind.llamacpp
Kontextlaenge?Maximale Anzahl Tokens (Eingabe + erzeugte Ausgabe zusammen), die das Modell pro Anfrage verarbeiten kann.32768
Modellpfad?Pfad zur GGUF-Modelldatei, die geladen und ausgeliefert wird.North-Mini-Code-1.0-Q8_0.gguf
GPU-Layer?Anzahl der auf die GPU ausgelagerten Modell-Layer. Hoeher = mehr VRAM und schneller; der Rest laeuft auf der CPU. 999 = alles auf GPU.999
faon
Kontext?Groesse des Kontextfensters in Token. 0 = der beim Training verwendete Kontext des Modells.32768
np8
Split-Mode?Verteilung ueber mehrere GPUs: none (nur eine GPU), layer (Layer aufteilen) oder row (Tensoren zeilenweise).layer

All benchmarks of this model To leaderboard

Anzeige
Model comparison

North-Mini-Code-1.0 on various hardware

All published performance runs of this model – each bubble a variant: position = prefill (X) × generation (Y), bubble size = number of runs. Closer to the top right = faster. ★ Marked gold = this benchmark.

GPUby graphics card

2.1061.5801.0535270,006.43212.86519.297Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition - 1.621,0 tok/s Generation, 6.099 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.593 ms (3 Laufe)NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 B...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 - 1.557,3 tok/s Generation, 5.892 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.954 ms (3 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 50...NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition - 1.492,4 tok/s Generation, 8.535 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.497 ms (12 Laufe)NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 B...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti - 939,5 tok/s Generation, 4.130 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 5.948 ms (3 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 30...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti - 169,0 tok/s Generation, 890 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 31.856 ms (3 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 50...AMD Radeon 8060S Graphics - 131,9 tok/s Generation, 1.759 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 13.043 ms (1 Lauf)AMD Radeon 8060S Grap...AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 - 87,3 tok/s Generation, 502 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 82.917 ms (10 Laufe)AMD Radeon AI PRO R97...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 - 5,1 tok/s Generation, 89 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 113.797 ms (3 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 20...NVIDIA RTX A6000 - 598,9 tok/s Generation, 15.575 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 1.221 ms (15 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ NVIDIA RTX A6000
NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition 1.621,0 tok/sNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 1.557,3 tok/sNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition 1.492,4 tok/sNVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti 939,5 tok/s★ NVIDIA RTX A6000 598,9 tok/s this runNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti 169,0 tok/sAMD Radeon 8060S Graphics 131,9 tok/sAMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 87,3 tok/sNVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 5,1 tok/s

CPUby processor

2.1061.5801.0535270,003.9407.88111.821Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-Core Processor - 1.621,0 tok/s Generation, 6.099 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.593 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-...AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8-Core Processor - 1.557,3 tok/s Generation, 5.892 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.954 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8...AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX 24-Cores - 1.492,4 tok/s Generation, 8.535 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.497 ms (12 Laufe)AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX with Radeon Graphics - 939,5 tok/s Generation, 4.130 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 5.948 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX wi...AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 32-Cores - 169,0 tok/s Generation, 890 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 31.856 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...AMD RYZEN AI MAX+ 395 w/ Radeon 8060S - 131,9 tok/s Generation, 1.759 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 13.043 ms (1 Lauf)AMD RYZEN AI MAX+ 395...Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-4620 v2 @ 2.60GHz - 5,1 tok/s Generation, 89 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 113.797 ms (3 Laufe)Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU ...AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX 16-Cores - 598,9 tok/s Generation, 9.546 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 33.899 ms (25 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...
AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-Core Processor 1.621,0 tok/sAMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8-Core Processor 1.557,3 tok/sAMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX 24-Cores 1.492,4 tok/sAMD Ryzen 9 8945HX with Radeon Graphics 939,5 tok/s★ AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX 16-Cores 598,9 tok/s this runAMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 32-Cores 169,0 tok/sAMD RYZEN AI MAX+ 395 w/ Radeon 8060S 131,9 tok/sIntel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-4620 v2 @ 2.60GHz 5,1 tok/s

MBby mainboard

2.1061.5801.0535270,003.8057.61011.414Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ProArt X870E-CREATOR WIFI - 1.621,0 tok/s Generation, 6.099 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.593 ms (3 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ROG STRIX B550-A GAMING - 1.557,3 tok/s Generation, 5.892 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.954 ms (3 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....Meigao Innovation Technology (Shen Zhen) Co., Ltd DRFXL (MotherBoard Series) - 939,5 tok/s Generation, 4.130 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 5.948 ms (3 Laufe)Meigao Innovation Tec...ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI - 169,0 tok/s Generation, 890 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 31.856 ms (3 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....Bosgame AXB35-02 (BeyondMax Series) - 131,9 tok/s Generation, 1.759 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 13.043 ms (1 Lauf)Bosgame AXB35-02 (Bey...Dell Inc. PowerEdge R820 - 5,1 tok/s Generation, 89 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 113.797 ms (3 Laufe)Dell Inc. PowerEdge R...ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX90E-SAGE SE - 1.492,4 tok/s Generation, 9.218 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 24.039 ms (37 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....
ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ProArt X870E-CREATOR WIFI 1.621,0 tok/sASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ROG STRIX B550-A GAMING 1.557,3 tok/s★ ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX90E-SAGE SE 1.492,4 tok/s this runMeigao Innovation Technology (Shen Zhen) Co., Ltd DRFXL (MotherBoard Series) 939,5 tok/sASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI 169,0 tok/sBosgame AXB35-02 (BeyondMax Series) 131,9 tok/sDell Inc. PowerEdge R820 5,1 tok/s

ENGby engine

1.9881.5491.1106712328587.71314.56921.424Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)vLLM - 598,9 tok/s Generation, 17.912 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 669 ms (12 Laufe)vLLMllama.cpp - 1.621,0 tok/s Generation, 4.370 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 33.461 ms (41 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ llama.cpp
★ llama.cpp 1.621,0 tok/s this runvLLM 598,9 tok/s

DRVby driver

1.7831.7021.6211.5401.4596.9907.2887.5857.882Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)unbekannt - 1.621,0 tok/s Generation, 7.436 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 26.037 ms (53 Laufe)unbekannt
unbekannt 1.621,0 tok/s
💰 Economics

Economics of this run

Operating cost, TCO and comparison with the next-best runs of the same model at identical concurrency (10× concurrent). Methodology →

⚙️ ConfigurationAll metrics and charts below follow these settings – based on a 24-month runtime.Save to URLReset
⚡ Electricity price EUR/kWh
⚙️ System utilization 100 %
🖥️ Acquisition EUR
🔌 Idle 95 W
⚡ TDP 671 W
☁️ External LLM (API)
Electricity0.30 EUR/kWh
Avg power (incl. idle)671 W estimated (TDP)GPU 600 + CPU 46 + Board 25 W full load
Avg cost / hourEUR 0.20
Electricity / 1M tokensEUR 0.12
Token / kWh2.41M
Acquisition (system)EUR 11,454 full priceGPU EUR 6,000 · CPU EUR 1,399 · Board EUR 1,299 · RAM EUR 2,576 · PSU EUR 180
Electricity (2 years)
TCO (2 years)EUR 14,981
Output tokens (2 years)28.33B
☁️ External LLM (API) – comparison
External LLM cost (2 years)
Savings vs. external (2 years)

All values above and the charts below take the configured system utilization into account: at X% the system generates only X% of the time, the rest it idles (95 W). Cost per hour drops (more idle), cost per token rises.

Cost over 2 years – electricity only

Cost over 2 years – incl. acquisition (TCO)

Speed vs. tokens per euro

Euro per 1M tokens

Comparison vs. API – economics per benchmark

North-Mini-Code-1.02x NVIDIA RTX A6000North-Mini-Code-1.0NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation EditionNorth-Mini-Code-1.0NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090North-Mini-Code-1.03x NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition
Electricity cost (24 mo.)
Acquisition cost
Total cost (TCO)
Generated tokens (24 mo.)
Token price via API
Break-even point (days)
Result (savings / extra cost)

Comparison with up to 3 next-best runs of this model at the same concurrency (at least one on different hardware). Power = GPU TDP + CPU (idle + 15 %) + board (estimated), acquisition = full system (GPU + CPU + board + RAM + PSU), prices = stored market prices.

Contributed by

Mario Alka Administrator

@marioalka

Ich bin Unternehmer, Softwareentwickler und KI-Enthusiast. Seit vielen Jahren entwickle ich Unternehmenssoftware und beschäftige mich inzwischen fast täglich mit lokalen LLMs, KI-Agenten und leistungsfähiger KI-Hardware.

Mit LLM-Benchmark.de möchte ich eine Plattform schaffen, auf der Modelle, GPUs und Agenten objektiv und reproduzierbar miteinander verglichen werden.