Created bymario-alka.dePowered bygodcore.denoob2claw.detricoma.de
Contributed byMario AlkaMistral AI

Ministral-3-14B-Reasoning-2512

Performance benchmark · measured on 26.08.2026 23:58

Benchmark-IDrun-20260826-222254-e07fb9
Timebench 3 - Kombi (Prefill + Generation)Dense14BRuntime: vLLMQuantisierung: AWQ
Generation63,44tok/s
Prefill3.610,58tok/s
Time to First Token594,00ms
Total duration33,47s
Concurrency1parallel
Ranking in the field
64of 97 systems

Performance benchmark · Primary metric: Generation-Speed (tok/s) · 1× concurrent

This run is better than 34 % of all comparable systems.
Generation 63,4 tok/s
-32 % vs Ø 93,2
Prefill 3.610,6 tok/s
-21 % vs Ø 4.570,0
Time to First Token 594 ms
-17 % vs Ø 715
Distribution in the field5 – 194 tok/s
Ø 93 Median Dieser Lauf

Wie schlägt sich dieser Benchmark mit anderen Modellen?

How does this benchmark compare on other GPUs?

Same model on different hardware · 1× concurrent · Generation (tok/s)

Hardware

GPU: NVIDIA RTX A6000 · 48 GB VRAM
CPU: AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX 16-Cores
RAM: 184 GB
Mainboard: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX90E-SAGE SE

Setup

Runtime: vLLM
Quantization: AWQ
Model: Ministral-3-14B-Reasoning-2512

Configuration

benchmark-konfiguration — run-20260826-222254-e07fb9
# LLM-Benchmark Konfiguration # Modell : Ministral-3-14B-Reasoning-2512 # Engine : vLLM # Run-ID : run-20260826-222254-e07fb9 # GPU : NVIDIA RTX A6000 # CPU : AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX 16-Cores # RAM : 184 GB bench@llm-benchmark:~$ vllm serve \ --model Ministral-3-14B-Reasoning-2512
Engine?Die Inferenz-Software, die das Modell ausliefert (z.B. vLLM oder llama.cpp). Sie bestimmt Geschwindigkeit, unterstuetzte Modellformate und welche Parameter ueberhaupt verfuegbar sind.vllm
Modellalias?Der Name, unter dem das Modell ueber die API angesprochen wird. Genau dieser Wert muss im Request-Feld 'model' stehen.Ministral-3-14B-Reasoning-2512

All benchmarks of this model To leaderboard

Anzeige
Model comparison

Ministral-3-14B-Reasoning-2512 on various hardware

All published performance runs of this model – each bubble a variant: position = prefill (X) × generation (Y), bubble size = number of runs. Closer to the top right = faster. ★ Marked gold = this benchmark.

GPUby graphics card

1.3701.0276853420,004.2228.44512.667Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition - 1.060,0 tok/s Generation, 10.288 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.218 ms (9 Laufe)NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 B...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 - 1.028,1 tok/s Generation, 7.724 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 4.732 ms (3 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 50...NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition - 911,6 tok/s Generation, 8.521 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 5.238 ms (9 Laufe)NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 B...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti - 590,0 tok/s Generation, 5.214 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 5.398 ms (6 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 50...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti - 543,1 tok/s Generation, 4.926 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 5.681 ms (6 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 30...AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 - 329,9 tok/s Generation, 3.853 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 8.485 ms (15 Laufe)AMD Radeon AI PRO R97...AMD Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot - 226,7 tok/s Generation, 2.572 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 5.319 ms (12 Laufe)AMD Radeon PRO W7900 ...AMD Radeon 8060S Graphics - 66,3 tok/s Generation, 1.318 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 13.659 ms (2 Laufe)AMD Radeon 8060S Grap...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 - 60,4 tok/s Generation, 1.290 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 5.121 ms (2 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 20...NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 16GB - 41,5 tok/s Generation, 501 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 25.353 ms (3 Laufe)NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCI...NVIDIA RTX A6000 - 401,4 tok/s Generation, 4.433 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.030 ms (9 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ NVIDIA RTX A6000
NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition 1.060,0 tok/sNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 1.028,1 tok/sNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition 911,6 tok/sNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti 590,0 tok/sNVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti 543,1 tok/s★ NVIDIA RTX A6000 401,4 tok/s this runAMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 329,9 tok/sAMD Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot 226,7 tok/sAMD Radeon 8060S Graphics 66,3 tok/sNVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 60,4 tok/sNVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 16GB 41,5 tok/s

CPUby processor

1.3701.0276853420,004.2228.44512.667Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-Core Processor - 1.060,0 tok/s Generation, 10.288 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.218 ms (9 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-...AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8-Core Processor - 1.028,1 tok/s Generation, 7.724 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 4.732 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8...AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX 24-Cores - 911,6 tok/s Generation, 8.521 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 5.238 ms (9 Laufe)AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 32-Cores - 590,0 tok/s Generation, 3.452 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 5.346 ms (18 Laufe)AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX with Radeon Graphics - 543,1 tok/s Generation, 4.926 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 5.681 ms (6 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX wi...AMD RYZEN AI MAX+ 395 w/ Radeon 8060S - 66,3 tok/s Generation, 1.318 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 13.659 ms (2 Laufe)AMD RYZEN AI MAX+ 395...Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-7400 CPU @ 3.00GHz - 60,4 tok/s Generation, 1.290 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 5.121 ms (2 Laufe)Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-...AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX with Radeon Graphics - 41,5 tok/s Generation, 501 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 25.353 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX wi...AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX 16-Cores - 401,4 tok/s Generation, 4.071 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 6.440 ms (24 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...
AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-Core Processor 1.060,0 tok/sAMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8-Core Processor 1.028,1 tok/sAMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX 24-Cores 911,6 tok/sAMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 32-Cores 590,0 tok/sAMD Ryzen 9 8945HX with Radeon Graphics 543,1 tok/s★ AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX 16-Cores 401,4 tok/s this runAMD RYZEN AI MAX+ 395 w/ Radeon 8060S 66,3 tok/sIntel(R) Core(TM) i5-7400 CPU @ 3.00GHz 60,4 tok/sAMD Ryzen 9 7945HX with Radeon Graphics 41,5 tok/s

MBby mainboard

1.3701.0276853420,004.2228.44512.667Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ProArt X870E-CREATOR WIFI - 1.060,0 tok/s Generation, 10.288 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.218 ms (9 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ROG STRIX B550-A GAMING - 1.028,1 tok/s Generation, 7.724 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 4.732 ms (3 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI - 590,0 tok/s Generation, 3.452 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 5.346 ms (18 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....Meigao Innovation Technology (Shen Zhen) Co., Ltd DRFXL (MotherBoard Series) - 543,1 tok/s Generation, 4.926 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 5.681 ms (6 Laufe)Meigao Innovation Tec...Bosgame AXB35-02 (BeyondMax Series) - 66,3 tok/s Generation, 1.318 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 13.659 ms (2 Laufe)Bosgame AXB35-02 (Bey...ASRock H110 Pro BTC+ - 60,4 tok/s Generation, 1.290 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 5.121 ms (2 Laufe)ASRock H110 Pro BTC+Shenzhen Meigao Electronic Equipment Co.,Ltd F1FXM (DeskMini Series) - 41,5 tok/s Generation, 501 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 25.353 ms (3 Laufe)Shenzhen Meigao Elect...ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX90E-SAGE SE - 911,6 tok/s Generation, 5.284 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 6.112 ms (33 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....
ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ProArt X870E-CREATOR WIFI 1.060,0 tok/sASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ROG STRIX B550-A GAMING 1.028,1 tok/s★ ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX90E-SAGE SE 911,6 tok/s this runASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI 590,0 tok/sMeigao Innovation Technology (Shen Zhen) Co., Ltd DRFXL (MotherBoard Series) 543,1 tok/sBosgame AXB35-02 (BeyondMax Series) 66,3 tok/sASRock H110 Pro BTC+ 60,4 tok/sShenzhen Meigao Electronic Equipment Co.,Ltd F1FXM (DeskMini Series) 41,5 tok/s

ENGby engine

1.3681.0266843420,01.6864.3196.9529.585Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)llama.cpp - 1.060,0 tok/s Generation, 4.609 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 7.591 ms (61 Laufe)llama.cppunbekannt - 51,0 tok/s Generation, 3.092 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 775 ms (3 Laufe)unbekanntvLLM - 1.015,7 tok/s Generation, 8.178 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 1.950 ms (12 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ vLLM
llama.cpp 1.060,0 tok/s★ vLLM 1.015,7 tok/s this rununbekannt 51,0 tok/s

DRVby driver

1.3681.0266843420,02.4023.5634.7255.886Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)unbekannt - 1.060,0 tok/s Generation, 5.196 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 6.664 ms (73 Laufe)unbekanntAMD 7.0.0-27-generic - 51,0 tok/s Generation, 3.092 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 775 ms (3 Laufe)AMD 7.0.0-27-generic
unbekannt 1.060,0 tok/sAMD 7.0.0-27-generic 51,0 tok/s
💰 Economics

Economics of this run

Operating cost, TCO and comparison with the next-best runs of the same model at identical concurrency (1× concurrent). Methodology →

⚙️ ConfigurationAll metrics and charts below follow these settings – based on a 24-month runtime.Save to URLReset
⚡ Electricity price EUR/kWh
⚙️ System utilization 100 %
🖥️ Acquisition EUR
🔌 Idle 65 W
⚡ TDP 71 W
☁️ External LLM (API)
Electricity0.30 EUR/kWh
Avg power (incl. idle)71 W missingCPU 46 + Board 25 W full load
Avg cost / hourEUR 0.021
Electricity / 1M tokensEUR 0.093
Token / kWh3.22M
Acquisition (system)EUR 8,394 full priceGPU EUR 3,000 · CPU EUR 1,399 · Board EUR 1,299 · RAM EUR 2,576 · PSU EUR 120
Electricity (2 years)
TCO (2 years)EUR 8,767
Output tokens (2 years)4.00B
☁️ External LLM (API) – comparison
External LLM cost (2 years)
Savings vs. external (2 years)
No power draw measured – values estimated from GPU TDP + CPU (idle + 15 %) + board.

All values above and the charts below take the configured system utilization into account: at X% the system generates only X% of the time, the rest it idles (65 W). Cost per hour drops (more idle), cost per token rises.

Cost over 2 years – electricity only

Cost over 2 years – incl. acquisition (TCO)

Speed vs. tokens per euro

Euro per 1M tokens

Comparison vs. API – economics per benchmark

Ministral-3-14B-Reasoning-2512NVIDIA RTX A6000Ministral-3-14B-Reasoning-2512NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation EditionMinistral-3-14B-Reasoning-2512NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation EditionMinistral-3-14B-Reasoning-2512NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090
Electricity cost (24 mo.)
Acquisition cost
Total cost (TCO)
Generated tokens (24 mo.)
Token price via API
Break-even point (days)
Result (savings / extra cost)

Comparison with up to 3 next-best runs of this model at the same concurrency (at least one on different hardware). Power = GPU TDP + CPU (idle + 15 %) + board (estimated), acquisition = full system (GPU + CPU + board + RAM + PSU), prices = stored market prices.

Contributed by

Mario Alka Administrator

@marioalka

Ich bin Unternehmer, Softwareentwickler und KI-Enthusiast. Seit vielen Jahren entwickle ich Unternehmenssoftware und beschäftige mich inzwischen fast täglich mit lokalen LLMs, KI-Agenten und leistungsfähiger KI-Hardware.

Mit LLM-Benchmark.de möchte ich eine Plattform schaffen, auf der Modelle, GPUs und Agenten objektiv und reproduzierbar miteinander verglichen werden.