Created bymario-alka.dePowered bygodcore.denoob2claw.detricoma.de
Contributed byMario AlkaGoogle

gemma-4-E2B-it

Performance benchmark · measured on 26.08.2026 20:36

Benchmark-IDrun-20260826-190954-0177ec
Timebench 3 - Kombi (Prefill + Generation)Dense5BRuntime: vLLMQuantisierung: FP8
Generation631,69tok/s
Prefill29.258,61tok/s
Time to First Token405,00ms
Total duration17,05s
Concurrency5parallel
Ranking in the field
1of 82 systems

Performance benchmark · Primary metric: Generation-Speed (tok/s) · 5× concurrent

This run is better than 100 % of all comparable systems.
Generation 631,7 tok/s
+194 % vs Ø 214,9
Prefill 29.258,6 tok/s
+307 % vs Ø 7.186,3
Time to First Token 405 ms
-88 % vs Ø 3.321
Distribution in the field24 – 632 tok/s
Ø 215 Median Dieser Lauf

Wie schlägt sich dieser Benchmark mit anderen Modellen?

How does this benchmark compare on other GPUs?

Same model on different hardware · 5× concurrent · Generation (tok/s)

Hardware

GPU: NVIDIA RTX A6000 · 48 GB VRAM
CPU: AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX 16-Cores
RAM: 184 GB
Mainboard: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX90E-SAGE SE

Setup

Runtime: vLLM
Quantization: FP8
Model: gemma-4-E2B-it

Configuration

benchmark-konfiguration — run-20260826-190954-0177ec
# LLM-Benchmark Konfiguration # Modell : gemma-4-E2B-it # Engine : vLLM # Run-ID : run-20260826-190954-0177ec # GPU : NVIDIA RTX A6000 # CPU : AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX 16-Cores # RAM : 184 GB bench@llm-benchmark:~$ vllm serve \ --model gemma-4-E2B-it
Engine?Die Inferenz-Software, die das Modell ausliefert (z.B. vLLM oder llama.cpp). Sie bestimmt Geschwindigkeit, unterstuetzte Modellformate und welche Parameter ueberhaupt verfuegbar sind.vllm
Modellalias?Der Name, unter dem das Modell ueber die API angesprochen wird. Genau dieser Wert muss im Request-Feld 'model' stehen.gemma-4-E2B-it

All benchmarks of this model To leaderboard

Anzeige
Model comparison

gemma-4-E2B-it on various hardware

All published performance runs of this model – each bubble a variant: position = prefill (X) × generation (Y), bubble size = number of runs. Closer to the top right = faster. ★ Marked gold = this benchmark.

GPUby graphics card

3.2362.4271.6188090,006.65713.31519.972Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 - 2.491,2 tok/s Generation, 11.148 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 2.175 ms (3 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 50...NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition - 2.414,4 tok/s Generation, 16.315 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 1.871 ms (3 Laufe)NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 B...NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition - 2.143,6 tok/s Generation, 11.441 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 2.226 ms (3 Laufe)NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 B...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti - 1.744,0 tok/s Generation, 15.451 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 2.253 ms (8 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 50...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti - 1.492,8 tok/s Generation, 13.345 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 1.694 ms (8 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 30...NVIDIA GB10 (DGX Spark) - 903,3 tok/s Generation, 6.421 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 7.548 ms (4 Laufe)NVIDIA GB10 (DGX Spar...Intel Arc Pro B70 - 826,2 tok/s Generation, 2.623 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 7.541 ms (3 Laufe)Intel Arc Pro B70NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 - 15,3 tok/s Generation, 1.440 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 8.790 ms (6 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 20...NVIDIA RTX A6000 - 1.122,5 tok/s Generation, 15.752 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 792 ms (9 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ NVIDIA RTX A6000
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 2.491,2 tok/sNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition 2.414,4 tok/sNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition 2.143,6 tok/sNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti 1.744,0 tok/sNVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti 1.492,8 tok/s★ NVIDIA RTX A6000 1.122,5 tok/s this runNVIDIA GB10 (DGX Spark) 903,3 tok/sIntel Arc Pro B70 826,2 tok/sNVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 15,3 tok/s

CPUby processor

3.2362.4271.6188090,006.65713.31519.972Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8-Core Processor - 2.491,2 tok/s Generation, 11.148 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 2.175 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8...AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-Core Processor - 2.414,4 tok/s Generation, 16.315 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 1.871 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-...AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX 24-Cores - 2.143,6 tok/s Generation, 11.441 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 2.226 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 32-Cores - 1.744,0 tok/s Generation, 15.451 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 2.253 ms (8 Laufe)AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX with Radeon Graphics - 1.492,8 tok/s Generation, 9.978 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.182 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX wi...NVIDIA Grace - 903,3 tok/s Generation, 6.421 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 7.548 ms (4 Laufe)NVIDIA GraceAMD Ryzen 9 7945HX with Radeon Graphics - 826,2 tok/s Generation, 2.623 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 7.541 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX wi...AMD Ryzen 5 5600X 6-Core Processor - 451,1 tok/s Generation, 15.366 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 801 ms (5 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 5 5600X 6-C...Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-7400 CPU @ 3.00GHz - 15,3 tok/s Generation, 1.440 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 8.790 ms (6 Laufe)Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-...AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX 16-Cores - 1.122,5 tok/s Generation, 15.752 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 792 ms (9 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8-Core Processor 2.491,2 tok/sAMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-Core Processor 2.414,4 tok/sAMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX 24-Cores 2.143,6 tok/sAMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 32-Cores 1.744,0 tok/sAMD Ryzen 9 8945HX with Radeon Graphics 1.492,8 tok/s★ AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX 16-Cores 1.122,5 tok/s this runNVIDIA Grace 903,3 tok/sAMD Ryzen 9 7945HX with Radeon Graphics 826,2 tok/sAMD Ryzen 5 5600X 6-Core Processor 451,1 tok/sIntel(R) Core(TM) i5-7400 CPU @ 3.00GHz 15,3 tok/s

MBby mainboard

3.2362.4271.6188090,006.65713.31519.972Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ROG STRIX B550-A GAMING - 2.491,2 tok/s Generation, 11.148 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 2.175 ms (3 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ProArt X870E-CREATOR WIFI - 2.414,4 tok/s Generation, 16.315 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 1.871 ms (3 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI - 1.744,0 tok/s Generation, 15.451 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 2.253 ms (8 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....Meigao Innovation Technology (Shen Zhen) Co., Ltd DRFXL (MotherBoard Series) - 1.492,8 tok/s Generation, 9.978 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.182 ms (3 Laufe)Meigao Innovation Tec...ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. GX10 - 903,3 tok/s Generation, 6.421 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 7.548 ms (4 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....Shenzhen Meigao Electronic Equipment Co.,Ltd DRFXI (MotherBoard Series) - 826,2 tok/s Generation, 2.623 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 7.541 ms (3 Laufe)Shenzhen Meigao Elect...ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. PRIME A520M-K - 451,1 tok/s Generation, 15.366 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 801 ms (5 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....ASRock H110 Pro BTC+ - 15,3 tok/s Generation, 1.440 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 8.790 ms (6 Laufe)ASRock H110 Pro BTC+ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX90E-SAGE SE - 2.143,6 tok/s Generation, 14.674 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 1.150 ms (12 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....
ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ROG STRIX B550-A GAMING 2.491,2 tok/sASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ProArt X870E-CREATOR WIFI 2.414,4 tok/s★ ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX90E-SAGE SE 2.143,6 tok/s this runASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI 1.744,0 tok/sMeigao Innovation Technology (Shen Zhen) Co., Ltd DRFXL (MotherBoard Series) 1.492,8 tok/sASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. GX10 903,3 tok/sShenzhen Meigao Electronic Equipment Co.,Ltd DRFXI (MotherBoard Series) 826,2 tok/sASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. PRIME A520M-K 451,1 tok/sASRock H110 Pro BTC+ 15,3 tok/s

ENGby engine

2.9172.4832.0501.6161.1835.17011.35717.54423.731Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)llama.cpp - 2.491,2 tok/s Generation, 8.525 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 4.321 ms (36 Laufe)llama.cppvLLM - 1.608,5 tok/s Generation, 20.375 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 684 ms (11 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ vLLM
llama.cpp 2.491,2 tok/s★ vLLM 1.608,5 tok/s this run

DRVby driver

3.0732.3661.6599512441105.05710.00314.950Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)unbekannt - 2.491,2 tok/s Generation, 12.437 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 2.756 ms (40 Laufe)unbekanntNVIDIA 590.48.01 / CUDA 13.1 - 903,3 tok/s Generation, 6.421 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 7.548 ms (4 Laufe)NVIDIA 590.48.01 / CU...Intel 26.18.38308.4 - 826,2 tok/s Generation, 2.623 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 7.541 ms (3 Laufe)Intel 26.18.38308.4
unbekannt 2.491,2 tok/sNVIDIA 590.48.01 / CUDA 13.1 903,3 tok/sIntel 26.18.38308.4 826,2 tok/s
💰 Economics

Economics of this run

Operating cost, TCO and comparison with the next-best runs of the same model at identical concurrency (5× concurrent). Methodology →

⚙️ ConfigurationAll metrics and charts below follow these settings – based on a 24-month runtime.Save to URLReset
⚡ Electricity price EUR/kWh
⚙️ System utilization 100 %
🖥️ Acquisition EUR
🔌 Idle 65 W
⚡ TDP 71 W
☁️ External LLM (API)
Electricity0.30 EUR/kWh
Avg power (incl. idle)71 W missingCPU 46 + Board 25 W full load
Avg cost / hourEUR 0.021
Electricity / 1M tokensEUR 0.0094
Token / kWh32.03M
Acquisition (system)EUR 8,394 full priceGPU EUR 3,000 · CPU EUR 1,399 · Board EUR 1,299 · RAM EUR 2,576 · PSU EUR 120
Electricity (2 years)
TCO (2 years)EUR 8,767
Output tokens (2 years)39.84B
☁️ External LLM (API) – comparison
External LLM cost (2 years)
Savings vs. external (2 years)
No power draw measured – values estimated from GPU TDP + CPU (idle + 15 %) + board.

All values above and the charts below take the configured system utilization into account: at X% the system generates only X% of the time, the rest it idles (65 W). Cost per hour drops (more idle), cost per token rises.

Cost over 2 years – electricity only

Cost over 2 years – incl. acquisition (TCO)

Speed vs. tokens per euro

Euro per 1M tokens

Comparison vs. API – economics per benchmark

gemma-4-E2B-itNVIDIA RTX A6000gemma-4-E2B-itNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Editiongemma-4-E2B-itNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090gemma-4-E2B-it3x NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition
Electricity cost (24 mo.)
Acquisition cost
Total cost (TCO)
Generated tokens (24 mo.)
Token price via API
Break-even point (days)
Result (savings / extra cost)

Comparison with up to 3 next-best runs of this model at the same concurrency (at least one on different hardware). Power = GPU TDP + CPU (idle + 15 %) + board (estimated), acquisition = full system (GPU + CPU + board + RAM + PSU), prices = stored market prices.

Contributed by

Mario Alka Administrator

@marioalka

Ich bin Unternehmer, Softwareentwickler und KI-Enthusiast. Seit vielen Jahren entwickle ich Unternehmenssoftware und beschäftige mich inzwischen fast täglich mit lokalen LLMs, KI-Agenten und leistungsfähiger KI-Hardware.

Mit LLM-Benchmark.de möchte ich eine Plattform schaffen, auf der Modelle, GPUs und Agenten objektiv und reproduzierbar miteinander verglichen werden.