Created bymario-alka.dePowered bygodcore.denoob2claw.detricoma.de
Contributed byMario AlkaByteDance Seed

Seed-OSS-36B-Instruct

Performance benchmark · measured on 26.08.2026 17:40

Benchmark-IDrun-20260826-155752-bfd6b0
Timebench 3 - Kombi (Prefill + Generation)36BRuntime: llama.cppQuantisierung: Q4_K_M
Generation117,30tok/s
Prefill902,13tok/s
Time to First Token24.398,50ms
Total duration235,16s
Concurrency10parallel
Ranking in the field
1053of 1427 systems

Performance benchmark · Primary metric: Generation-Speed (tok/s) · 10× concurrent

This run is better than 26 % of all comparable systems.
Generation 117,3 tok/s
-72 % vs Ø 425,3
Prefill 902,1 tok/s
-86 % vs Ø 6.659,3
Time to First Token 24.399 ms
-47 % vs Ø 45.848
Distribution in the field0 – 2.491 tok/s
Ø 425 Median Dieser Lauf

Wie schlägt sich dieser Benchmark mit anderen Modellen?

gemma-4-E2B-itNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 · run-20260728-184455-e28775
2.491,2 tok/s
gemma-4-E2B-itNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition · run-20260727-181606-b37ed9
2.414,4 tok/s
Nemotron-3.5-Lightning-30B-A3BNVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti · run-20261021-093815-dce558
2.263,7 tok/s
Nemotron-3-Nano-4BNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition · run-20260727-181607-4cca42
2.182,7 tok/s
gemma-4-E2B-it3× 3x NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260728-184456-d87c73
2.143,6 tok/s
gpt-oss-20bNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition · run-20260730-035052-9c966e
1.995,4 tok/s
gpt-oss-20bNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition · run-20260728-140954-8007c4
1.993,5 tok/s
Nemotron-3-Nano-4B3× 3x NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260728-194136-0aed86
1.937,7 tok/s
Nemotron-3-Nano-4B3× 3x NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260728-194136-8db0fa
1.911,6 tok/s
Nemotron-3-Nano-4B3× 3x NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260727-181606-e0eafd
1.897,0 tok/s
gpt-oss-20bNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 · run-20260729-032121-7c961d
1.890,7 tok/s
Nemotron-3-Nano-4BNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 · run-20260728-194135-2ed9dd
1.878,7 tok/s
gpt-oss-20b3× 3x NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260728-034052-26063b
1.835,7 tok/s
Nemotron-3-Nano-4B3× 3x NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260728-194136-a77046
1.830,3 tok/s
Seed-OSS-36B-Instruct this runNVIDIA RTX A6000 · run-20260826-155752-bfd6b0
117,3 tok/s

How does this benchmark compare on other GPUs?

Same model on different hardware · 10× concurrent · Generation (tok/s)

Hardware

GPU: NVIDIA RTX A6000 · 48 GB VRAM
CPU: AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX 16-Cores
RAM: 184 GB
Mainboard: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX90E-SAGE SE

Setup

Runtime: llama.cpp
Quantization: Q4_K_M
Model: Seed-OSS-36B-Instruct

Configuration

benchmark-konfiguration — run-20260826-155752-bfd6b0
# LLM-Benchmark Konfiguration # Modell : Seed-OSS-36B-Instruct # Engine : llama.cpp # Run-ID : run-20260826-155752-bfd6b0 # GPU : NVIDIA RTX A6000 # CPU : AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX 16-Cores # RAM : 184 GB bench@llm-benchmark:~$ /home/godcore/llama.cpp/build/bin/llama-server \ -m ByteDance-Seed_Seed-OSS-36B-Instruct-Q4_K_M.gguf \ -ngl 999 \ -fa on \ -c 49152 \ -np 12
Engine?Die Inferenz-Software, die das Modell ausliefert (z.B. vLLM oder llama.cpp). Sie bestimmt Geschwindigkeit, unterstuetzte Modellformate und welche Parameter ueberhaupt verfuegbar sind.llamacpp
Kontextlaenge?Maximale Anzahl Tokens (Eingabe + erzeugte Ausgabe zusammen), die das Modell pro Anfrage verarbeiten kann.49152
Modellpfad?Pfad zur GGUF-Modelldatei, die geladen und ausgeliefert wird.ByteDance-Seed_Seed-OSS-36B-Instruct-Q4_K_M.gguf
GPU-Layer?Anzahl der auf die GPU ausgelagerten Modell-Layer. Hoeher = mehr VRAM und schneller; der Rest laeuft auf der CPU. 999 = alles auf GPU.999
faon
Kontext?Groesse des Kontextfensters in Token. 0 = der beim Training verwendete Kontext des Modells.49152
np12
execution_typelocal

All benchmarks of this model To leaderboard

Anzeige
Model comparison

Seed-OSS-36B-Instruct on various hardware

All published performance runs of this model – each bubble a variant: position = prefill (X) × generation (Y), bubble size = number of runs. Closer to the top right = faster. ★ Marked gold = this benchmark.

GPUby graphics card

1.0918195462730,001.3192.6393.958Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 - 839,7 tok/s Generation, 2.664 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 12.384 ms (3 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 50...NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition - 460,0 tok/s Generation, 3.141 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 10.624 ms (3 Laufe)NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 B...NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition - 383,9 tok/s Generation, 3.193 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 13.087 ms (9 Laufe)NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 B...AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX - 117,5 tok/s Generation, 1.363 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 8.549 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTXAMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 - 115,7 tok/s Generation, 736 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 98.106 ms (19 Laufe)AMD Radeon AI PRO R97...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti - 111,6 tok/s Generation, 992 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 41.392 ms (3 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 30...AMD Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot - 88,6 tok/s Generation, 680 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 17.557 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Radeon PRO W7900 ...AMD Radeon PRO W7800 48GB - 57,7 tok/s Generation, 1.052 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 14.384 ms (6 Laufe)AMD Radeon PRO W7800 ...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti - 39,2 tok/s Generation, 423 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 95.542 ms (3 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 50...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 - 3,4 tok/s Generation, 43 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 181.856 ms (2 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 20...CPU-only - 1,0 tok/s Generation, 8 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 240.790 ms (1 Lauf)CPU-onlyNVIDIA RTX A6000 - 349,2 tok/s Generation, 2.724 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 10.630 ms (30 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ NVIDIA RTX A6000
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 839,7 tok/sNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition 460,0 tok/sNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition 383,9 tok/s★ NVIDIA RTX A6000 349,2 tok/s this runAMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX 117,5 tok/sAMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 115,7 tok/sNVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti 111,6 tok/sAMD Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot 88,6 tok/sAMD Radeon PRO W7800 48GB 57,7 tok/sNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti 39,2 tok/sNVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 3,4 tok/sCPU-only 1,0 tok/s

CPUby processor

1.0918195462730,001.3192.6393.958Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8-Core Processor - 839,7 tok/s Generation, 2.664 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 12.384 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8...AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-Core Processor - 460,0 tok/s Generation, 3.141 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 10.624 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-...AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX 24-Cores - 383,9 tok/s Generation, 3.193 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 13.087 ms (9 Laufe)AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-4657L v2 @ 2.40GHz - 117,5 tok/s Generation, 835 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 77.872 ms (5 Laufe)Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU ...AMD Ryzen 3 3100 4-Core Processor - 115,7 tok/s Generation, 966 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 12.053 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 3 3100 4-Co...AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX with Radeon Graphics - 111,6 tok/s Generation, 992 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 41.392 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX wi...AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 32-Cores - 88,6 tok/s Generation, 802 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 35.467 ms (12 Laufe)AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-4620 v2 @ 2.60GHz - 1,0 tok/s Generation, 8 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 240.790 ms (1 Lauf)Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU ...AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX 16-Cores - 349,2 tok/s Generation, 2.017 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 46.669 ms (46 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8-Core Processor 839,7 tok/sAMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-Core Processor 460,0 tok/sAMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX 24-Cores 383,9 tok/s★ AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX 16-Cores 349,2 tok/s this runIntel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-4657L v2 @ 2.40GHz 117,5 tok/sAMD Ryzen 3 3100 4-Core Processor 115,7 tok/sAMD Ryzen 9 8945HX with Radeon Graphics 111,6 tok/sAMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 32-Cores 88,6 tok/sIntel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-4620 v2 @ 2.60GHz 1,0 tok/s

MBby mainboard

1.0748055372680,0691.3022.5363.769Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ROG STRIX B550-A GAMING - 839,7 tok/s Generation, 2.664 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 12.384 ms (3 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ProArt X870E-CREATOR WIFI - 460,0 tok/s Generation, 3.141 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 10.624 ms (3 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....Dell Inc. PowerEdge R820 - 117,5 tok/s Generation, 697 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 105.025 ms (6 Laufe)Dell Inc. PowerEdge R...ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ROG STRIX X570-F GAMING - 115,7 tok/s Generation, 966 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 12.053 ms (3 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....Meigao Innovation Technology (Shen Zhen) Co., Ltd DRFXL (MotherBoard Series) - 111,6 tok/s Generation, 992 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 41.392 ms (3 Laufe)Meigao Innovation Tec...ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI - 88,6 tok/s Generation, 802 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 35.467 ms (12 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX90E-SAGE SE - 383,9 tok/s Generation, 2.210 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 41.174 ms (55 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....
ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ROG STRIX B550-A GAMING 839,7 tok/sASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ProArt X870E-CREATOR WIFI 460,0 tok/s★ ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX90E-SAGE SE 383,9 tok/s this runDell Inc. PowerEdge R820 117,5 tok/sASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ROG STRIX X570-F GAMING 115,7 tok/sMeigao Innovation Technology (Shen Zhen) Co., Ltd DRFXL (MotherBoard Series) 111,6 tok/sASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI 88,6 tok/s

ENGby engine

1.0228085943811678491.8502.8523.853Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)vLLM - 349,2 tok/s Generation, 3.309 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 6.652 ms (21 Laufe)vLLMllama.cpp - 839,7 tok/s Generation, 1.393 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 53.281 ms (64 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ llama.cpp
★ llama.cpp 839,7 tok/s this runvLLM 349,2 tok/s

DRVby driver

9248828407987561.7541.8291.9041.978Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)unbekannt - 839,7 tok/s Generation, 1.866 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 41.761 ms (85 Laufe)unbekannt
unbekannt 839,7 tok/s
💰 Economics

Economics of this run

Operating cost, TCO and comparison with the next-best runs of the same model at identical concurrency (10× concurrent). Methodology →

⚙️ ConfigurationAll metrics and charts below follow these settings – based on a 24-month runtime.Save to URLReset
⚡ Electricity price EUR/kWh
⚙️ System utilization 100 %
🖥️ Acquisition EUR
🔌 Idle 80 W
⚡ TDP 371 W
☁️ External LLM (API)
Electricity0.30 EUR/kWh
Avg power (incl. idle)371 W estimated (TDP)GPU 300 + CPU 46 + Board 25 W full load
Avg cost / hourEUR 0.11
Electricity / 1M tokensEUR 0.26
Token / kWh1.14M
Acquisition (system)EUR 8,424 full priceGPU EUR 3,000 · CPU EUR 1,399 · Board EUR 1,299 · RAM EUR 2,576 · PSU EUR 150
Electricity (2 years)–
TCO (2 years)EUR 10,374
Output tokens (2 years)7.40B
☁️ External LLM (API) – comparison
External LLM cost (2 years)–
Savings vs. external (2 years)–

All values above and the charts below take the configured system utilization into account: at X% the system generates only X% of the time, the rest it idles (80 W). Cost per hour drops (more idle), cost per token rises.

Cost over 2 years – electricity only

Cost over 2 years – incl. acquisition (TCO)

Speed vs. tokens per euro

Euro per 1M tokens

Comparison vs. API – economics per benchmark

Seed-OSS-36B-InstructNVIDIA RTX A6000Seed-OSS-36B-InstructNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090Seed-OSS-36B-InstructNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation EditionSeed-OSS-36B-Instruct3x NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition
Electricity cost (24 mo.)––––
Acquisition cost––––
Total cost (TCO)––––
Generated tokens (24 mo.)––––
Token price via API––––
Break-even point (days)––––
Result (savings / extra cost)––––

Comparison with up to 3 next-best runs of this model at the same concurrency (at least one on different hardware). Power = GPU TDP + CPU (idle + 15 %) + board (estimated), acquisition = full system (GPU + CPU + board + RAM + PSU), prices = stored market prices.

Contributed by

Mario Alka Administrator

@marioalka

Ich bin Unternehmer, Softwareentwickler und KI-Enthusiast. Seit vielen Jahren entwickle ich Unternehmenssoftware und beschäftige mich inzwischen fast täglich mit lokalen LLMs, KI-Agenten und leistungsfähiger KI-Hardware.

Mit LLM-Benchmark.de möchte ich eine Plattform schaffen, auf der Modelle, GPUs und Agenten objektiv und reproduzierbar miteinander verglichen werden.