Created bymario-alka.dePowered bygodcore.denoob2claw.detricoma.de
Contributed byMario AlkaByteDance Seed

Seed-OSS-36B-Instruct

Performance benchmark · measured on 26.08.2026 17:33

Benchmark-IDrun-20260826-155752-3aa0f7
Timebench 3 - Kombi (Prefill + Generation)36BRuntime: llama.cppQuantisierung: Q4_K_M
Generation25,12tok/s
Prefill1.012,61tok/s
Time to First Token2.179,50ms
Total duration85,91s
Concurrency1parallel
Ranking in the field
798of 1225 systems

Performance benchmark · Primary metric: Generation-Speed (tok/s) · 1× concurrent

This run is better than 35 % of all comparable systems.
Generation 25,1 tok/s
-67 % vs Ø 75,3
Prefill 1.012,6 tok/s
-58 % vs Ø 2.413,7
Time to First Token 2.180 ms
-94 % vs Ø 33.858
Distribution in the field0 – 405 tok/s
Ø 75 Median Dieser Lauf

Wie schlägt sich dieser Benchmark mit anderen Modellen?

How does this benchmark compare on other GPUs?

Same model on different hardware · 1× concurrent · Generation (tok/s)

Hardware

GPU: NVIDIA RTX A6000 · 48 GB VRAM
CPU: AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX 16-Cores
RAM: 184 GB
Mainboard: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX90E-SAGE SE

Setup

Runtime: llama.cpp
Quantization: Q4_K_M
Model: Seed-OSS-36B-Instruct

Configuration

benchmark-konfiguration — run-20260826-155752-3aa0f7
# LLM-Benchmark Konfiguration # Modell : Seed-OSS-36B-Instruct # Engine : llama.cpp # Run-ID : run-20260826-155752-3aa0f7 # GPU : NVIDIA RTX A6000 # CPU : AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX 16-Cores # RAM : 184 GB bench@llm-benchmark:~$ /home/godcore/llama.cpp/build/bin/llama-server \ -m ByteDance-Seed_Seed-OSS-36B-Instruct-Q4_K_M.gguf \ -ngl 999 \ -fa on \ -c 49152 \ -np 12
Engine?Die Inferenz-Software, die das Modell ausliefert (z.B. vLLM oder llama.cpp). Sie bestimmt Geschwindigkeit, unterstuetzte Modellformate und welche Parameter ueberhaupt verfuegbar sind.llamacpp
Kontextlaenge?Maximale Anzahl Tokens (Eingabe + erzeugte Ausgabe zusammen), die das Modell pro Anfrage verarbeiten kann.49152
Modellpfad?Pfad zur GGUF-Modelldatei, die geladen und ausgeliefert wird.ByteDance-Seed_Seed-OSS-36B-Instruct-Q4_K_M.gguf
GPU-Layer?Anzahl der auf die GPU ausgelagerten Modell-Layer. Hoeher = mehr VRAM und schneller; der Rest laeuft auf der CPU. 999 = alles auf GPU.999
faon
Kontext?Groesse des Kontextfensters in Token. 0 = der beim Training verwendete Kontext des Modells.49152
np12

All benchmarks of this model To leaderboard

Anzeige
Model comparison

Seed-OSS-36B-Instruct on various hardware

All published performance runs of this model – each bubble a variant: position = prefill (X) × generation (Y), bubble size = number of runs. Closer to the top right = faster. ★ Marked gold = this benchmark.

GPUby graphics card

1.0918195462730,001.3192.6393.958Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 - 839,7 tok/s Generation, 2.664 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 12.384 ms (3 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 50...NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition - 460,0 tok/s Generation, 3.141 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 10.624 ms (3 Laufe)NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 B...NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition - 383,9 tok/s Generation, 3.193 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 13.087 ms (9 Laufe)NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 B...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti - 111,6 tok/s Generation, 992 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 41.392 ms (3 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 30...AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 - 107,3 tok/s Generation, 693 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 114.241 ms (16 Laufe)AMD Radeon AI PRO R97...AMD Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot - 88,6 tok/s Generation, 680 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 17.557 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Radeon PRO W7900 ...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti - 39,2 tok/s Generation, 423 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 95.542 ms (3 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 50...CPU-only - 1,0 tok/s Generation, 8 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 240.790 ms (1 Lauf)CPU-onlyNVIDIA RTX A6000 - 117,3 tok/s Generation, 983 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 12.415 ms (3 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ NVIDIA RTX A6000
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 839,7 tok/sNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition 460,0 tok/sNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition 383,9 tok/s★ NVIDIA RTX A6000 117,3 tok/s this runNVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti 111,6 tok/sAMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 107,3 tok/sAMD Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot 88,6 tok/sNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti 39,2 tok/sCPU-only 1,0 tok/s

CPUby processor

1.0918195462730,001.3192.6393.958Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8-Core Processor - 839,7 tok/s Generation, 2.664 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 12.384 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8...AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-Core Processor - 460,0 tok/s Generation, 3.141 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 10.624 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-...AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX 24-Cores - 383,9 tok/s Generation, 3.193 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 13.087 ms (9 Laufe)AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX with Radeon Graphics - 111,6 tok/s Generation, 992 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 41.392 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX wi...AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 32-Cores - 88,6 tok/s Generation, 551 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 56.550 ms (6 Laufe)AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-4620 v2 @ 2.60GHz - 1,0 tok/s Generation, 8 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 240.790 ms (1 Lauf)Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU ...AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX 16-Cores - 117,3 tok/s Generation, 739 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 98.164 ms (19 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8-Core Processor 839,7 tok/sAMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-Core Processor 460,0 tok/sAMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX 24-Cores 383,9 tok/s★ AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX 16-Cores 117,3 tok/s this runAMD Ryzen 9 8945HX with Radeon Graphics 111,6 tok/sAMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 32-Cores 88,6 tok/sIntel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-4620 v2 @ 2.60GHz 1,0 tok/s

MBby mainboard

1.0918195462730,001.2982.5953.893Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ROG STRIX B550-A GAMING - 839,7 tok/s Generation, 2.664 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 12.384 ms (3 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ProArt X870E-CREATOR WIFI - 460,0 tok/s Generation, 3.141 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 10.624 ms (3 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....Meigao Innovation Technology (Shen Zhen) Co., Ltd DRFXL (MotherBoard Series) - 111,6 tok/s Generation, 992 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 41.392 ms (3 Laufe)Meigao Innovation Tec...ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI - 88,6 tok/s Generation, 551 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 56.550 ms (6 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....Dell Inc. PowerEdge R820 - 1,0 tok/s Generation, 8 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 240.790 ms (1 Lauf)Dell Inc. PowerEdge R...ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX90E-SAGE SE - 383,9 tok/s Generation, 1.528 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 70.817 ms (28 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....
ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ROG STRIX B550-A GAMING 839,7 tok/sASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ProArt X870E-CREATOR WIFI 460,0 tok/s★ ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX90E-SAGE SE 383,9 tok/s this runMeigao Innovation Technology (Shen Zhen) Co., Ltd DRFXL (MotherBoard Series) 111,6 tok/sASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI 88,6 tok/sDell Inc. PowerEdge R820 1,0 tok/s

ENGby engine

9248828407987561.4201.4811.5411.602Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)llama.cpp - 839,7 tok/s Generation, 1.511 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 62.640 ms (44 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ llama.cpp
★ llama.cpp 839,7 tok/s this run

DRVby driver

9248828407987561.4201.4811.5411.602Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)unbekannt - 839,7 tok/s Generation, 1.511 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 62.640 ms (44 Laufe)unbekannt
unbekannt 839,7 tok/s
💰 Economics

Economics of this run

Operating cost, TCO and comparison with the next-best runs of the same model at identical concurrency (1× concurrent). Methodology →

⚙️ ConfigurationAll metrics and charts below follow these settings – based on a 24-month runtime.Save to URLReset
⚡ Electricity price EUR/kWh
⚙️ System utilization 100 %
🖥️ Acquisition EUR
🔌 Idle 65 W
⚡ TDP 71 W
☁️ External LLM (API)
Electricity0.30 EUR/kWh
Avg power (incl. idle)71 W missingCPU 46 + Board 25 W full load
Avg cost / hourEUR 0.021
Electricity / 1M tokensEUR 0.24
Token / kWh1.27M
Acquisition (system)EUR 8,394 full priceGPU EUR 3,000 · CPU EUR 1,399 · Board EUR 1,299 · RAM EUR 2,576 · PSU EUR 120
Electricity (2 years)
TCO (2 years)EUR 8,767
Output tokens (2 years)1.58B
☁️ External LLM (API) – comparison
External LLM cost (2 years)
Savings vs. external (2 years)
No power draw measured – values estimated from GPU TDP + CPU (idle + 15 %) + board.

All values above and the charts below take the configured system utilization into account: at X% the system generates only X% of the time, the rest it idles (65 W). Cost per hour drops (more idle), cost per token rises.

Cost over 2 years – electricity only

Cost over 2 years – incl. acquisition (TCO)

Speed vs. tokens per euro

Euro per 1M tokens

Comparison vs. API – economics per benchmark

Seed-OSS-36B-InstructNVIDIA RTX A6000Seed-OSS-36B-InstructNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation EditionSeed-OSS-36B-InstructNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090Seed-OSS-36B-Instruct3x NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition
Electricity cost (24 mo.)
Acquisition cost
Total cost (TCO)
Generated tokens (24 mo.)
Token price via API
Break-even point (days)
Result (savings / extra cost)

Comparison with up to 3 next-best runs of this model at the same concurrency (at least one on different hardware). Power = GPU TDP + CPU (idle + 15 %) + board (estimated), acquisition = full system (GPU + CPU + board + RAM + PSU), prices = stored market prices.

Contributed by

Mario Alka Administrator

@marioalka

Ich bin Unternehmer, Softwareentwickler und KI-Enthusiast. Seit vielen Jahren entwickle ich Unternehmenssoftware und beschäftige mich inzwischen fast täglich mit lokalen LLMs, KI-Agenten und leistungsfähiger KI-Hardware.

Mit LLM-Benchmark.de möchte ich eine Plattform schaffen, auf der Modelle, GPUs und Agenten objektiv und reproduzierbar miteinander verglichen werden.