Created bymario-alka.dePowered bygodcore.denoob2claw.detricoma.de
Contributed byMario AlkaQwen (Alibaba)

Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct

Performance benchmark · measured on 26.08.2026 16:21

Benchmark-IDrun-20260826-145351-5a8761
Timebench 3 - Kombi (Prefill + Generation)MoE30BRuntime: llama.cppQuantisierung: Q4_K_M
Generation157,64tok/s
Prefill5.525,67tok/s
Time to First Token441,00ms
Total duration13,88s
Concurrency1parallel
Ranking in the field
11of 56 systems

Performance benchmark · Primary metric: Generation-Speed (tok/s) · 1× concurrent

This run is better than 82 % of all comparable systems.
Generation 157,6 tok/s
+64 % vs Ø 96,0
Prefill 5.525,7 tok/s
+44 % vs Ø 3.839,3
Time to First Token 441 ms
-46 % vs Ø 819
Distribution in the field18 – 194 tok/s
Ø 96 Median Dieser Lauf

Wie schlägt sich dieser Benchmark mit anderen Modellen?

How does this benchmark compare on other GPUs?

Same model on different hardware · 1× concurrent · Generation (tok/s)

Hardware

GPU: NVIDIA RTX A6000 · 48 GB VRAM
CPU: AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX 16-Cores
RAM: 184 GB
Mainboard: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX90E-SAGE SE

Setup

Runtime: llama.cpp
Quantization: Q4_K_M
Model: Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct

Configuration

benchmark-konfiguration — run-20260826-145351-5a8761
# LLM-Benchmark Konfiguration # Modell : Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct # Engine : llama.cpp # Run-ID : run-20260826-145351-5a8761 # GPU : NVIDIA RTX A6000 # CPU : AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX 16-Cores # RAM : 184 GB bench@llm-benchmark:~$ /home/godcore/llama.cpp/build/bin/llama-server \ -m Qwen_Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct-Q4_K_M.gguf \ -ngl 999 \ -fa on \ -c 49152 \ -np 12
Engine?Die Inferenz-Software, die das Modell ausliefert (z.B. vLLM oder llama.cpp). Sie bestimmt Geschwindigkeit, unterstuetzte Modellformate und welche Parameter ueberhaupt verfuegbar sind.llamacpp
Kontextlaenge?Maximale Anzahl Tokens (Eingabe + erzeugte Ausgabe zusammen), die das Modell pro Anfrage verarbeiten kann.49152
Modellpfad?Pfad zur GGUF-Modelldatei, die geladen und ausgeliefert wird.Qwen_Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct-Q4_K_M.gguf
GPU-Layer?Anzahl der auf die GPU ausgelagerten Modell-Layer. Hoeher = mehr VRAM und schneller; der Rest laeuft auf der CPU. 999 = alles auf GPU.999
faon
Kontext?Groesse des Kontextfensters in Token. 0 = der beim Training verwendete Kontext des Modells.49152
np12

All benchmarks of this model To leaderboard

Anzeige
Model comparison

Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct on various hardware

All published performance runs of this model – each bubble a variant: position = prefill (X) × generation (Y), bubble size = number of runs. Closer to the top right = faster. ★ Marked gold = this benchmark.

GPUby graphics card

2.1351.6011.0675340,006.96613.93220.898Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 - 1.655,9 tok/s Generation, 9.318 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.329 ms (3 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 50...NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition - 1.639,0 tok/s Generation, 17.025 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 1.966 ms (6 Laufe)NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 B...NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition - 1.505,0 tok/s Generation, 12.905 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.350 ms (9 Laufe)NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 B...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti - 903,5 tok/s Generation, 5.934 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 5.817 ms (3 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 30...AMD Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot - 245,1 tok/s Generation, 4.091 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.139 ms (6 Laufe)AMD Radeon PRO W7900 ...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti - 154,0 tok/s Generation, 1.182 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 22.532 ms (6 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 50...AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 - 89,8 tok/s Generation, 3.530 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 44.809 ms (20 Laufe)AMD Radeon AI PRO R97...NVIDIA RTX A6000 - 320,2 tok/s Generation, 8.364 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 1.603 ms (6 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ NVIDIA RTX A6000
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 1.655,9 tok/sNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition 1.639,0 tok/sNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition 1.505,0 tok/sNVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti 903,5 tok/s★ NVIDIA RTX A6000 320,2 tok/s this runAMD Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot 245,1 tok/sNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti 154,0 tok/sAMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 89,8 tok/s

CPUby processor

2.1041.5781.0525260,006.87913.75720.636Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8-Core Processor - 1.655,9 tok/s Generation, 9.318 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.329 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8...AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-Core Processor - 1.639,0 tok/s Generation, 17.025 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 1.966 ms (6 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-...AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX 24-Cores - 1.505,0 tok/s Generation, 12.905 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.350 ms (9 Laufe)AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX with Radeon Graphics - 903,5 tok/s Generation, 5.934 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 5.817 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX wi...AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 32-Cores - 245,1 tok/s Generation, 2.636 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 12.836 ms (12 Laufe)AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX 16-Cores - 320,2 tok/s Generation, 4.646 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 34.838 ms (26 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8-Core Processor 1.655,9 tok/sAMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-Core Processor 1.639,0 tok/sAMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX 24-Cores 1.505,0 tok/sAMD Ryzen 9 8945HX with Radeon Graphics 903,5 tok/s★ AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX 16-Cores 320,2 tok/s this runAMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 32-Cores 245,1 tok/s

MBby mainboard

2.1041.5781.0525260,006.87913.75720.636Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ROG STRIX B550-A GAMING - 1.655,9 tok/s Generation, 9.318 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.329 ms (3 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ProArt X870E-CREATOR WIFI - 1.639,0 tok/s Generation, 17.025 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 1.966 ms (6 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....Meigao Innovation Technology (Shen Zhen) Co., Ltd DRFXL (MotherBoard Series) - 903,5 tok/s Generation, 5.934 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 5.817 ms (3 Laufe)Meigao Innovation Tec...ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI - 245,1 tok/s Generation, 2.636 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 12.836 ms (12 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX90E-SAGE SE - 1.505,0 tok/s Generation, 6.770 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 26.741 ms (35 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....
ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ROG STRIX B550-A GAMING 1.655,9 tok/sASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ProArt X870E-CREATOR WIFI 1.639,0 tok/s★ ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX90E-SAGE SE 1.505,0 tok/s this runMeigao Innovation Technology (Shen Zhen) Co., Ltd DRFXL (MotherBoard Series) 903,5 tok/sASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI 245,1 tok/s

ENGby engine

2.1351.6011.0675340,04.3596.6518.94211.233Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)vLLM - 1.028,5 tok/s Generation, 9.887 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.807 ms (10 Laufe)vLLMunbekannt - 89,8 tok/s Generation, 5.705 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 549 ms (7 Laufe)unbekanntllama.cpp - 1.655,9 tok/s Generation, 6.611 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 25.888 ms (42 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ llama.cpp
★ llama.cpp 1.655,9 tok/s this runvLLM 1.028,5 tok/sunbekannt 89,8 tok/s

DRVby driver

2.1351.6011.0675340,04.9945.9806.9667.952Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)unbekannt - 1.655,9 tok/s Generation, 7.241 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 21.641 ms (52 Laufe)unbekanntAMD 7.0.0-27-generic - 89,8 tok/s Generation, 5.705 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 549 ms (7 Laufe)AMD 7.0.0-27-generic
unbekannt 1.655,9 tok/sAMD 7.0.0-27-generic 89,8 tok/s
💰 Economics

Economics of this run

Operating cost, TCO and comparison with the next-best runs of the same model at identical concurrency (1× concurrent). Methodology →

⚙️ ConfigurationAll metrics and charts below follow these settings – based on a 24-month runtime.Save to URLReset
⚡ Electricity price EUR/kWh
⚙️ System utilization 100 %
🖥️ Acquisition EUR
🔌 Idle 65 W
⚡ TDP 71 W
☁️ External LLM (API)
Electricity0.30 EUR/kWh
Avg power (incl. idle)71 W missingCPU 46 + Board 25 W full load
Avg cost / hourEUR 0.021
Electricity / 1M tokensEUR 0.038
Token / kWh7.99M
Acquisition (system)EUR 8,394 full priceGPU EUR 3,000 · CPU EUR 1,399 · Board EUR 1,299 · RAM EUR 2,576 · PSU EUR 120
Electricity (2 years)
TCO (2 years)EUR 8,767
Output tokens (2 years)9.94B
☁️ External LLM (API) – comparison
External LLM cost (2 years)
Savings vs. external (2 years)
No power draw measured – values estimated from GPU TDP + CPU (idle + 15 %) + board.

All values above and the charts below take the configured system utilization into account: at X% the system generates only X% of the time, the rest it idles (65 W). Cost per hour drops (more idle), cost per token rises.

Cost over 2 years – electricity only

Cost over 2 years – incl. acquisition (TCO)

Speed vs. tokens per euro

Euro per 1M tokens

Comparison vs. API – economics per benchmark

Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-InstructNVIDIA RTX A6000Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-InstructNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-InstructNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation EditionQwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct3x NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition
Electricity cost (24 mo.)
Acquisition cost
Total cost (TCO)
Generated tokens (24 mo.)
Token price via API
Break-even point (days)
Result (savings / extra cost)

Comparison with up to 3 next-best runs of this model at the same concurrency (at least one on different hardware). Power = GPU TDP + CPU (idle + 15 %) + board (estimated), acquisition = full system (GPU + CPU + board + RAM + PSU), prices = stored market prices.

Contributed by

Mario Alka Administrator

@marioalka

Ich bin Unternehmer, Softwareentwickler und KI-Enthusiast. Seit vielen Jahren entwickle ich Unternehmenssoftware und beschäftige mich inzwischen fast täglich mit lokalen LLMs, KI-Agenten und leistungsfähiger KI-Hardware.

Mit LLM-Benchmark.de möchte ich eine Plattform schaffen, auf der Modelle, GPUs und Agenten objektiv und reproduzierbar miteinander verglichen werden.