# LLM-Benchmark Konfiguration # Modell : Nemotron-3-Nano-4B # Engine : llama.cpp # Run-ID : run-20260826-072502-e2fbb9 # GPU : NVIDIA RTX A6000 # CPU : AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX 16-Cores # RAM : 184 GB bench@llm-benchmark:~$ /home/godcore/llama.cpp/build/bin/llama-server \ -m NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-4B-Q8_0.gguf \ -ngl 999 \ -fa on \ -c 49152 \ -np 12

Engine?Die Inferenz-Software, die das Modell ausliefert (z.B. vLLM oder llama.cpp). Sie bestimmt Geschwindigkeit, unterstuetzte Modellformate und welche Parameter ueberhaupt verfuegbar sind.	llamacpp
Kontextlaenge?Maximale Anzahl Tokens (Eingabe + erzeugte Ausgabe zusammen), die das Modell pro Anfrage verarbeiten kann.	49152
Modellpfad?Pfad zur GGUF-Modelldatei, die geladen und ausgeliefert wird.	NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-4B-Q8_0.gguf
GPU-Layer?Anzahl der auf die GPU ausgelagerten Modell-Layer. Hoeher = mehr VRAM und schneller; der Rest laeuft auf der CPU. 999 = alles auf GPU.	999
fa	on
Kontext?Groesse des Kontextfensters in Token. 0 = der beim Training verwendete Kontext des Modells.	49152
np	12

All benchmarks of this model To leaderboard

Model comparison

Nemotron-3-Nano-4B on various hardware

All published performance runs of this model – each bubble a variant: position = prefill (X) × generation (Y), bubble size = number of runs. Closer to the top right = faster. ★ Marked gold = this benchmark.

GPUby graphics card

NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition 2.182,7 tok/sNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition 1.937,7 tok/sNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 1.878,7 tok/sNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti 1.197,0 tok/sNVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti 992,1 tok/sAMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 667,0 tok/sNVIDIA GB10 (DGX Spark) 367,8 tok/s★ NVIDIA RTX A6000 277,4 tok/s this runNVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 125,7 tok/sCPU-only 8,0 tok/s

CPUby processor

AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-Core Processor 2.182,7 tok/sAMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX 24-Cores 1.937,7 tok/sAMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8-Core Processor 1.878,7 tok/sAMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 32-Cores 1.197,0 tok/sAMD Ryzen 9 8945HX with Radeon Graphics 992,1 tok/s★ AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX 16-Cores 667,0 tok/s this runNVIDIA Grace 367,8 tok/sIntel(R) Core(TM) i5-7400 CPU @ 3.00GHz 125,7 tok/sIntel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-4620 v2 @ 2.60GHz 8,0 tok/s

MBby mainboard

ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ProArt X870E-CREATOR WIFI 2.182,7 tok/s★ ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX90E-SAGE SE 1.937,7 tok/s this runASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ROG STRIX B550-A GAMING 1.878,7 tok/sASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI 1.197,0 tok/sMeigao Innovation Technology (Shen Zhen) Co., Ltd DRFXL (MotherBoard Series) 992,1 tok/sASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. GX10 367,8 tok/sASRock H110 Pro BTC+ 125,7 tok/sDell Inc. PowerEdge R820 8,0 tok/s

ENGby engine

★ llama.cpp 2.182,7 tok/s this run

DRVby driver

unbekannt 2.182,7 tok/sNVIDIA 590.48.01 / CUDA 13.1 367,8 tok/s

💰 Economics

Economics of this run

Operating cost, TCO and comparison with the next-best runs of the same model at identical concurrency (1× concurrent). Methodology →

⚙️ ConfigurationAll metrics and charts below follow these settings – based on a 24-month runtime.Save to URL Reset

⚡ Electricity price EUR/kWh

⚙️ System utilization 100 %

🖥️ Acquisition EUR

🔌 Idle 65 W

⚡ TDP 71 W

☁️ External LLM (API) show

Input €/1M Output €/1M Input per output token

Electricity0.30 EUR/kWh

Avg power (incl. idle)71 W missingCPU 46 + Board 25 W full load

Avg cost / hourEUR 0.021

Electricity / 1M tokensEUR 0.047

Token / kWh6.32M

Acquisition (system)EUR 5,394 missingCPU EUR 1,399 · Board EUR 1,299 · RAM EUR 2,576 · PSU EUR 120

Electricity (2 years)–

TCO (2 years)EUR 5,767

Output tokens (2 years)7.86B

☁️ External LLM (API) – comparison

External LLM cost (2 years)–

Savings vs. external (2 years)–

No power draw measured – values estimated from GPU TDP + CPU (idle + 15 %) + board.

All values above and the charts below take the configured system utilization into account: at X% the system generates only X% of the time, the rest it idles (65 W). Cost per hour drops (more idle), cost per token rises.

Cost over 2 years – electricity only

Cost over 2 years – incl. acquisition (TCO)

Speed vs. tokens per euro

Euro per 1M tokens

Comparison vs. API – economics per benchmark

	Nemotron-3-Nano-4BNVIDIA RTX A6000	Nemotron-3-Nano-4BNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090	Nemotron-3-Nano-4BNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition	Nemotron-3-Nano-4B3x NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition
Electricity cost (24 mo.)	–	–	–	–
Acquisition cost	–	–	–	–
Total cost (TCO)	–	–	–	–
Generated tokens (24 mo.)	–	–	–	–
Token price via API	–	–	–	–
Break-even point (days)	–	–	–	–
Result (savings / extra cost)	–	–	–	–

NVIDIA RTX A6000 · this run 125 tok/s NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 394 tok/s NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition 393 tok/s 3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition 362 tok/s

Comparison with up to 3 next-best runs of this model at the same concurrency (at least one on different hardware). Power = GPU TDP + CPU (idle + 15 %) + board (estimated), acquisition = full system (GPU + CPU + board + RAM + PSU), prices = stored market prices.

Contributed by

Mario Alka Administrator

@marioalka

Ich bin Unternehmer, Softwareentwickler und KI-Enthusiast. Seit vielen Jahren entwickle ich Unternehmenssoftware und beschäftige mich inzwischen fast täglich mit lokalen LLMs, KI-Agenten und leistungsfähiger KI-Hardware.

Mit LLM-Benchmark.de möchte ich eine Plattform schaffen, auf der Modelle, GPUs und Agenten objektiv und reproduzierbar miteinander verglichen werden.