Created bymario-alka.dePowered bygodcore.denoob2claw.detricoma.de
Contributed byMario AlkaMistral AI

Devstral-Small-2507

Performance benchmark · measured on 21.08.2026 15:59

Benchmark-IDrun-20260821-162702-adf9ac
Timebench 3 - Kombi (Prefill + Generation)Dense24BRuntime: llama.cppQuantisierung: Q4_K_M
Generation23,15tok/s
Prefill307,65tok/s
Time to First Token64.768,00ms
Total duration576,00s
Concurrency5parallel
Ranking in the field
683of 841 systems

Performance benchmark · Primary metric: Generation-Speed (tok/s) · 5× concurrent

This run is better than 19 % of all comparable systems.
Generation 23,2 tok/s
-92 % vs Ø 274,3
Prefill 307,7 tok/s
-92 % vs Ø 3.891,1
Time to First Token 64.768 ms
+55 % vs Ø 41.842
Distribution in the field0 – 1.349 tok/s
Ø 274 Median Dieser Lauf

Wie schlägt sich dieser Benchmark mit anderen Modellen?

gemma-4-E2B-itNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition · run-20260727-181606-0adf6d
1.349,3 tok/s
gemma-4-E2B-itNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 · run-20260728-184455-5b4937
1.301,9 tok/s
gemma-4-E2B-it3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260728-184456-4111a9
1.195,7 tok/s
Nemotron-3-Nano-4BNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition · run-20260727-181607-30d864
1.188,7 tok/s
Nemotron-3-Nano-4BNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 · run-20260728-194135-5432cd
1.164,8 tok/s
gpt-oss-20bNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition · run-20260728-140954-9e81f9
1.136,3 tok/s
gpt-oss-20bNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition · run-20260730-035052-09627f
1.135,0 tok/s
gpt-oss-20bNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 · run-20260729-032121-058a31
1.113,5 tok/s
Nemotron-3-Nano-4B3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260728-194136-836a91
1.090,6 tok/s
Nemotron-3-Nano-4B3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260727-181606-8b381e
1.077,4 tok/s
Nemotron-3-Nano-4B3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260728-194136-b8a818
1.071,0 tok/s
Nemotron-3-Nano-4B3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260728-194136-038e92
1.051,1 tok/s
gpt-oss-20b3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260729-032121-ffb18a
1.015,5 tok/s
Nemotron-3-Nano-30B-A3BNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition · run-20260729-032121-305ad6
1.007,8 tok/s
Devstral-Small-2507 this runNVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 16GB · run-20260821-162702-adf9ac
23,2 tok/s

How does this benchmark compare on other GPUs?

Same model on different hardware · 5× concurrent · Generation (tok/s)

Hardware

GPU: NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 16GB · 16 GB VRAM
CPU: AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX with Radeon Graphics
RAM: 60 GB
Mainboard: Shenzhen Meigao Electronic Equipment Co.,Ltd F1FXM (DeskMini Series)

Setup

Runtime: llama.cpp
Quantization: Q4_K_M
Model: Devstral-Small-2507

Configuration

benchmark-konfiguration — run-20260821-162702-adf9ac
# LLM-Benchmark Konfiguration # Modell : Devstral-Small-2507 # Engine : llama.cpp # Run-ID : run-20260821-162702-adf9ac # GPU : NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 16GB # CPU : AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX with Radeon Graphics # RAM : 60 GB bench@llm-benchmark:~$ /home/godcore/llama.cpp/build/bin/llama-server \ -m Devstral-Small-2507-Q4_K_M.gguf \ -ngl 999 \ -fa on \ -c 24000 \ -np 5
Engine?Die Inferenz-Software, die das Modell ausliefert (z.B. vLLM oder llama.cpp). Sie bestimmt Geschwindigkeit, unterstuetzte Modellformate und welche Parameter ueberhaupt verfuegbar sind.llamacpp
Kontextlaenge?Maximale Anzahl Tokens (Eingabe + erzeugte Ausgabe zusammen), die das Modell pro Anfrage verarbeiten kann.24000
Modellpfad?Pfad zur GGUF-Modelldatei, die geladen und ausgeliefert wird.Devstral-Small-2507-Q4_K_M.gguf
GPU-Layer?Anzahl der auf die GPU ausgelagerten Modell-Layer. Hoeher = mehr VRAM und schneller; der Rest laeuft auf der CPU. 999 = alles auf GPU.999
faon
Kontext?Groesse des Kontextfensters in Token. 0 = der beim Training verwendete Kontext des Modells.24000
np5

All benchmarks of this model To leaderboard

Anzeige
Model comparison

Devstral-Small-2507 on various hardware

All published performance runs of this model – each bubble a variant: position = prefill (X) × generation (Y), bubble size = number of runs. Closer to the top right = faster. ★ Marked gold = this benchmark.

GPUby graphics card

8376284192090,004.5969.19313.789Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition - 647,6 tok/s Generation, 8.500 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 5.252 ms (3 Laufe)NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 B...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 - 625,1 tok/s Generation, 7.381 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 5.802 ms (3 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 50...NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition - 572,2 tok/s Generation, 11.160 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 5.760 ms (12 Laufe)NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 B...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti - 317,4 tok/s Generation, 4.312 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 8.357 ms (4 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 30...AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 - 205,8 tok/s Generation, 3.255 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 10.145 ms (15 Laufe)AMD Radeon AI PRO R97...AMD Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot - 137,5 tok/s Generation, 2.767 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 8.193 ms (12 Laufe)AMD Radeon PRO W7900 ...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti - 103,9 tok/s Generation, 2.486 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 34.598 ms (5 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 50...NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 16GB - 23,2 tok/s Generation, 276 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 39.340 ms (2 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCI...
NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition 647,6 tok/sNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 625,1 tok/sNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition 572,2 tok/sNVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti 317,4 tok/sAMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 205,8 tok/sAMD Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot 137,5 tok/sNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti 103,9 tok/s★ NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 16GB 23,2 tok/s this run

CPUby processor

8376284192090,004.5969.19313.789Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-Core Processor - 647,6 tok/s Generation, 8.500 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 5.252 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-...AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8-Core Processor - 625,1 tok/s Generation, 7.381 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 5.802 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8...AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX 24-Cores - 572,2 tok/s Generation, 11.160 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 5.760 ms (12 Laufe)AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX with Radeon Graphics - 317,4 tok/s Generation, 4.619 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 10.835 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX wi...AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX 16-Cores - 205,8 tok/s Generation, 3.255 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 10.145 ms (15 Laufe)AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 32-Cores - 137,5 tok/s Generation, 2.684 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 15.959 ms (17 Laufe)AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...AMD Ryzen 5 5600X 6-Core Processor - 57,1 tok/s Generation, 3.392 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 922 ms (1 Lauf)AMD Ryzen 5 5600X 6-C...AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX with Radeon Graphics - 23,2 tok/s Generation, 276 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 39.340 ms (2 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX wi...
AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-Core Processor 647,6 tok/sAMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8-Core Processor 625,1 tok/sAMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX 24-Cores 572,2 tok/sAMD Ryzen 9 8945HX with Radeon Graphics 317,4 tok/sAMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX 16-Cores 205,8 tok/sAMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 32-Cores 137,5 tok/sAMD Ryzen 5 5600X 6-Core Processor 57,1 tok/s★ AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX with Radeon Graphics 23,2 tok/s this run

MBby mainboard

8376284192090,003.4976.99310.490Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ProArt X870E-CREATOR WIFI - 647,6 tok/s Generation, 8.500 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 5.252 ms (3 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ROG STRIX B550-A GAMING - 625,1 tok/s Generation, 7.381 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 5.802 ms (3 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX90E-SAGE SE - 572,2 tok/s Generation, 6.768 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 8.196 ms (27 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....Meigao Innovation Technology (Shen Zhen) Co., Ltd DRFXL (MotherBoard Series) - 317,4 tok/s Generation, 4.619 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 10.835 ms (3 Laufe)Meigao Innovation Tec...ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI - 137,5 tok/s Generation, 2.684 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 15.959 ms (17 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. PRIME A520M-K - 57,1 tok/s Generation, 3.392 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 922 ms (1 Lauf)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....Shenzhen Meigao Electronic Equipment Co.,Ltd F1FXM (DeskMini Series) - 23,2 tok/s Generation, 276 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 39.340 ms (2 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ Shenzhen Meigao Elect...
ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ProArt X870E-CREATOR WIFI 647,6 tok/sASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ROG STRIX B550-A GAMING 625,1 tok/sASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX90E-SAGE SE 572,2 tok/sMeigao Innovation Technology (Shen Zhen) Co., Ltd DRFXL (MotherBoard Series) 317,4 tok/sASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI 137,5 tok/sASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. PRIME A520M-K 57,1 tok/s★ Shenzhen Meigao Electronic Equipment Co.,Ltd F1FXM (DeskMini Series) 23,2 tok/s this run

ENGby engine

8306234152080,08642.7414.6196.496Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)unbekannt - 57,1 tok/s Generation, 1.852 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 1.946 ms (4 Laufe)unbekanntllama.cpp - 647,6 tok/s Generation, 5.508 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 12.117 ms (52 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ llama.cpp
★ llama.cpp 647,6 tok/s this rununbekannt 57,1 tok/s

DRVby driver

8366274182090,02682.3584.4496.539Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)unbekannt - 647,6 tok/s Generation, 5.468 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 11.906 ms (53 Laufe)unbekanntAMD 7.0.0-27-generic - 31,4 tok/s Generation, 1.339 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 2.288 ms (3 Laufe)AMD 7.0.0-27-generic
unbekannt 647,6 tok/sAMD 7.0.0-27-generic 31,4 tok/s
💰 Economics

Economics of this run

Operating cost, TCO and comparison with the next-best runs of the same model at identical concurrency (5× concurrent). Methodology →

⚙️ ConfigurationAll metrics and charts below follow these settings – based on a 24-month runtime.Save to URLReset
⚡ Electricity price EUR/kWh
⚙️ System utilization 100 %
🖥️ Acquisition EUR
🔌 Idle 0 W
⚡ TDP 250 W
☁️ External LLM (API)
Electricity0.30 EUR/kWh
Avg power (incl. idle)250 W estimated (TDP)GPU 250 W full load
Avg cost / hourEUR 0.075
Electricity / 1M tokensEUR 0.90
Token / kWh333.36K
Acquisition (system)EUR 120 missingPSU EUR 120
Electricity (2 years)
TCO (2 years)EUR 1,434
Output tokens (2 years)1.46B
☁️ External LLM (API) – comparison
External LLM cost (2 years)
Savings vs. external (2 years)

All values above and the charts below take the configured system utilization into account: at X% the system generates only X% of the time, the rest it idles (0 W). Cost per hour drops (more idle), cost per token rises.

Cost over 2 years – electricity only

Cost over 2 years – incl. acquisition (TCO)

Speed vs. tokens per euro

Euro per 1M tokens

Comparison vs. API – economics per benchmark

Devstral-Small-2507NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 16GBDevstral-Small-2507NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation EditionDevstral-Small-2507NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090Devstral-Small-25073x NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition
Electricity cost (24 mo.)
Acquisition cost
Total cost (TCO)
Generated tokens (24 mo.)
Token price via API
Break-even point (days)
Result (savings / extra cost)

Comparison with up to 3 next-best runs of this model at the same concurrency (at least one on different hardware). Power = GPU TDP + CPU (idle + 15 %) + board (estimated), acquisition = full system (GPU + CPU + board + RAM + PSU), prices = stored market prices.

Contributed by

Mario Alka Administrator

@marioalka

Ich bin Unternehmer, Softwareentwickler und KI-Enthusiast. Seit vielen Jahren entwickle ich Unternehmenssoftware und beschäftige mich inzwischen fast täglich mit lokalen LLMs, KI-Agenten und leistungsfähiger KI-Hardware.

Mit LLM-Benchmark.de möchte ich eine Plattform schaffen, auf der Modelle, GPUs und Agenten objektiv und reproduzierbar miteinander verglichen werden.