Created bymario-alka.dePowered bygodcore.denoob2claw.detricoma.de
Contributed byMario AlkaMistral AI

Magistral-Small-2509

Performance benchmark · measured on 21.08.2026 15:37

Benchmark-IDrun-20260821-155410-3c165c
Timebench 3 - Kombi (Prefill + Generation)Dense24BRuntime: llama.cppQuantisierung: Q4_K_M
Generation24,74tok/s
Prefill211,80tok/s
Time to First Token57.889,00ms
Total duration531,79s
Concurrency5parallel
Ranking in the field
7of 11 systems

Performance benchmark · Primary metric: Generation-Speed (tok/s) · 5× concurrent

This run is better than 40 % of all comparable systems.
Generation 24,7 tok/s
-50 % vs Ø 49,5
Prefill 211,8 tok/s
-53 % vs Ø 451,4
Time to First Token 57.889 ms
+58 % vs Ø 36.624
Distribution in the field22 – 111 tok/s
Ø 50 Median Dieser Lauf

Wie schlägt sich dieser Benchmark mit anderen Modellen?

How does this benchmark compare on other GPUs?

Same model on different hardware · 5× concurrent · Generation (tok/s)

Hardware

GPU: NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 16GB · 16 GB VRAM
CPU: AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX with Radeon Graphics
RAM: 60 GB
Mainboard: Shenzhen Meigao Electronic Equipment Co.,Ltd F1FXM (DeskMini Series)

Setup

Runtime: llama.cpp
Quantization: Q4_K_M
Model: Magistral-Small-2509

Configuration

benchmark-konfiguration — run-20260821-155410-3c165c
# LLM-Benchmark Konfiguration # Modell : Magistral-Small-2509 # Engine : llama.cpp # Run-ID : run-20260821-155410-3c165c # GPU : NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 16GB # CPU : AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX with Radeon Graphics # RAM : 60 GB bench@llm-benchmark:~$ /home/godcore/llama.cpp/build/bin/llama-server \ -m Magistral-Small-2509-Q4_K_M.gguf \ -ngl 999 \ -fa on \ -c 24000 \ -np 5
Engine?Die Inferenz-Software, die das Modell ausliefert (z.B. vLLM oder llama.cpp). Sie bestimmt Geschwindigkeit, unterstuetzte Modellformate und welche Parameter ueberhaupt verfuegbar sind.llamacpp
Kontextlaenge?Maximale Anzahl Tokens (Eingabe + erzeugte Ausgabe zusammen), die das Modell pro Anfrage verarbeiten kann.24000
Modellpfad?Pfad zur GGUF-Modelldatei, die geladen und ausgeliefert wird.Magistral-Small-2509-Q4_K_M.gguf
GPU-Layer?Anzahl der auf die GPU ausgelagerten Modell-Layer. Hoeher = mehr VRAM und schneller; der Rest laeuft auf der CPU. 999 = alles auf GPU.999
faon
Kontext?Groesse des Kontextfensters in Token. 0 = der beim Training verwendete Kontext des Modells.24000
np5

All benchmarks of this model To leaderboard

Anzeige
Model comparison

Magistral-Small-2509 on various hardware

All published performance runs of this model – each bubble a variant: position = prefill (X) × generation (Y), bubble size = number of runs. Closer to the top right = faster. ★ Marked gold = this benchmark.

GPUby graphics card

9537154772380,001.6063.2124.817Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 - 737,0 tok/s Generation, 128 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.689 ms (3 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 50...NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition - 726,9 tok/s Generation, 3.891 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 2.194 ms (6 Laufe)NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 B...NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition - 637,2 tok/s Generation, 149 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.798 ms (12 Laufe)NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 B...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti - 353,8 tok/s Generation, 1.856 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 4.508 ms (6 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 30...AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 - 230,0 tok/s Generation, 910 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 6.435 ms (15 Laufe)AMD Radeon AI PRO R97...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti - 159,0 tok/s Generation, 78 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 11.931 ms (3 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 50...AMD Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot - 141,7 tok/s Generation, 1.590 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 8.535 ms (12 Laufe)AMD Radeon PRO W7900 ...Intel Arc Pro B70 - 37,9 tok/s Generation, 43 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 65.064 ms (3 Laufe)Intel Arc Pro B70NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 16GB - 24,7 tok/s Generation, 189 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 35.758 ms (2 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCI...
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 737,0 tok/sNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition 726,9 tok/sNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition 637,2 tok/sNVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti 353,8 tok/sAMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 230,0 tok/sNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti 159,0 tok/sAMD Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot 141,7 tok/sIntel Arc Pro B70 37,9 tok/s★ NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 16GB 24,7 tok/s this run

CPUby processor

9507134752380,001.6023.2054.807Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8-Core Processor - 737,0 tok/s Generation, 128 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.689 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8...AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-Core Processor - 726,9 tok/s Generation, 3.891 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 2.194 ms (6 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-...AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX 24-Cores - 637,2 tok/s Generation, 149 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.798 ms (12 Laufe)AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX with Radeon Graphics - 353,8 tok/s Generation, 1.856 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 4.508 ms (6 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX wi...AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX 16-Cores - 230,0 tok/s Generation, 910 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 6.435 ms (15 Laufe)AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 32-Cores - 159,0 tok/s Generation, 1.288 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 9.214 ms (15 Laufe)AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX with Radeon Graphics - 37,9 tok/s Generation, 102 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 53.342 ms (5 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX wi...
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8-Core Processor 737,0 tok/sAMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-Core Processor 726,9 tok/sAMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX 24-Cores 637,2 tok/sAMD Ryzen 9 8945HX with Radeon Graphics 353,8 tok/sAMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX 16-Cores 230,0 tok/sAMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 32-Cores 159,0 tok/s★ AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX with Radeon Graphics 37,9 tok/s this run

MBby mainboard

9537154772380,001.6063.2124.817Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ROG STRIX B550-A GAMING - 737,0 tok/s Generation, 128 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.689 ms (3 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ProArt X870E-CREATOR WIFI - 726,9 tok/s Generation, 3.891 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 2.194 ms (6 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX90E-SAGE SE - 637,2 tok/s Generation, 572 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 5.263 ms (27 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....Meigao Innovation Technology (Shen Zhen) Co., Ltd DRFXL (MotherBoard Series) - 353,8 tok/s Generation, 1.856 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 4.508 ms (6 Laufe)Meigao Innovation Tec...ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI - 159,0 tok/s Generation, 1.288 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 9.214 ms (15 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....Shenzhen Meigao Electronic Equipment Co.,Ltd DRFXI (MotherBoard Series) - 37,9 tok/s Generation, 43 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 65.064 ms (3 Laufe)Shenzhen Meigao Elect...Shenzhen Meigao Electronic Equipment Co.,Ltd F1FXM (DeskMini Series) - 24,7 tok/s Generation, 189 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 35.758 ms (2 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ Shenzhen Meigao Elect...
ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ROG STRIX B550-A GAMING 737,0 tok/sASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ProArt X870E-CREATOR WIFI 726,9 tok/sASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX90E-SAGE SE 637,2 tok/sMeigao Innovation Technology (Shen Zhen) Co., Ltd DRFXL (MotherBoard Series) 353,8 tok/sASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI 159,0 tok/sShenzhen Meigao Electronic Equipment Co.,Ltd DRFXI (MotherBoard Series) 37,9 tok/s★ Shenzhen Meigao Electronic Equipment Co.,Ltd F1FXM (DeskMini Series) 24,7 tok/s this run

ENGby engine

9527144762380,002.1644.3276.491Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)vLLM - 726,9 tok/s Generation, 5.326 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 2.928 ms (6 Laufe)vLLMunbekannt - 28,9 tok/s Generation, 1.586 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 1.672 ms (3 Laufe)unbekanntllama.cpp - 737,0 tok/s Generation, 631 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 10.863 ms (53 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ llama.cpp
★ llama.cpp 737,0 tok/s this runvLLM 726,9 tok/sunbekannt 28,9 tok/s

DRVby driver

9527144762380,006531.3061.958Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)unbekannt - 737,0 tok/s Generation, 1.165 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 7.109 ms (56 Laufe)unbekanntIntel 26.18.38308.4 - 37,9 tok/s Generation, 43 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 65.064 ms (3 Laufe)Intel 26.18.38308.4AMD 7.0.0-27-generic - 28,9 tok/s Generation, 1.586 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 1.672 ms (3 Laufe)AMD 7.0.0-27-generic
unbekannt 737,0 tok/sIntel 26.18.38308.4 37,9 tok/sAMD 7.0.0-27-generic 28,9 tok/s
💰 Economics

Economics of this run

Operating cost, TCO and comparison with the next-best runs of the same model at identical concurrency (5× concurrent). Methodology →

⚙️ ConfigurationAll metrics and charts below follow these settings – based on a 24-month runtime.Save to URLReset
⚡ Electricity price EUR/kWh
⚙️ System utilization 100 %
🖥️ Acquisition EUR
🔌 Idle 0 W
⚡ TDP 250 W
☁️ External LLM (API)
Electricity0.30 EUR/kWh
Avg power (incl. idle)250 W estimated (TDP)GPU 250 W full load
Avg cost / hourEUR 0.075
Electricity / 1M tokensEUR 0.84
Token / kWh356.26K
Acquisition (system)EUR 120 missingPSU EUR 120
Electricity (2 years)
TCO (2 years)EUR 1,434
Output tokens (2 years)1.56B
☁️ External LLM (API) – comparison
External LLM cost (2 years)
Savings vs. external (2 years)

All values above and the charts below take the configured system utilization into account: at X% the system generates only X% of the time, the rest it idles (0 W). Cost per hour drops (more idle), cost per token rises.

Cost over 2 years – electricity only

Cost over 2 years – incl. acquisition (TCO)

Speed vs. tokens per euro

Euro per 1M tokens

Comparison vs. API – economics per benchmark

Magistral-Small-2509NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 16GBMagistral-Small-2509NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation EditionMagistral-Small-2509NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation EditionMagistral-Small-2509NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090
Electricity cost (24 mo.)
Acquisition cost
Total cost (TCO)
Generated tokens (24 mo.)
Token price via API
Break-even point (days)
Result (savings / extra cost)

Comparison with up to 3 next-best runs of this model at the same concurrency (at least one on different hardware). Power = GPU TDP + CPU (idle + 15 %) + board (estimated), acquisition = full system (GPU + CPU + board + RAM + PSU), prices = stored market prices.

Contributed by

Mario Alka Administrator

@marioalka

Ich bin Unternehmer, Softwareentwickler und KI-Enthusiast. Seit vielen Jahren entwickle ich Unternehmenssoftware und beschäftige mich inzwischen fast täglich mit lokalen LLMs, KI-Agenten und leistungsfähiger KI-Hardware.

Mit LLM-Benchmark.de möchte ich eine Plattform schaffen, auf der Modelle, GPUs und Agenten objektiv und reproduzierbar miteinander verglichen werden.