Created bymario-alka.dePowered bygodcore.denoob2claw.detricoma.de
Contributed byMario AlkaGoogle

gemma-4-12B-it

Performance benchmark · measured on 21.08.2026 13:35

Benchmark-IDrun-20260821-134358-bd58de
Timebench 3 - Kombi (Prefill + Generation)Dense12BRuntime: llama.cppQuantisierung: Q4_K_M
Generation22,30tok/s
Prefill298,00tok/s
Time to First Token6.720,50ms
Total duration105,34s
Concurrency1parallel
Ranking in the field
771of 1161 systems

Performance benchmark · Primary metric: Generation-Speed (tok/s) · 1× concurrent

This run is better than 34 % of all comparable systems.
Generation 22,3 tok/s
-70 % vs Ø 74,3
Prefill 298,0 tok/s
-87 % vs Ø 2.324,7
Time to First Token 6.721 ms
-81 % vs Ø 35.657
Distribution in the field0 – 405 tok/s
Ø 74 Median Dieser Lauf

Wie schlägt sich dieser Benchmark mit anderen Modellen?

How does this benchmark compare on other GPUs?

Same model on different hardware · 1× concurrent · Generation (tok/s)

Hardware

GPU: NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 16GB · 16 GB VRAM
CPU: AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX with Radeon Graphics
RAM: 60 GB
Mainboard: Shenzhen Meigao Electronic Equipment Co.,Ltd F1FXM (DeskMini Series)

Setup

Runtime: llama.cpp
Quantization: Q4_K_M
Model: gemma-4-12B-it

Configuration

benchmark-konfiguration — run-20260821-134358-bd58de
# LLM-Benchmark Konfiguration # Modell : gemma-4-12B-it # Engine : llama.cpp # Run-ID : run-20260821-134358-bd58de # GPU : NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 16GB # CPU : AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX with Radeon Graphics # RAM : 60 GB bench@llm-benchmark:~$ /home/godcore/llama.cpp/build/bin/llama-server \ -m gemma-4-12b-it-Q4_K_M.gguf \ -ngl 999 \ -fa on \ -c 4800 \ -np 1
Engine?Die Inferenz-Software, die das Modell ausliefert (z.B. vLLM oder llama.cpp). Sie bestimmt Geschwindigkeit, unterstuetzte Modellformate und welche Parameter ueberhaupt verfuegbar sind.llamacpp
Kontextlaenge?Maximale Anzahl Tokens (Eingabe + erzeugte Ausgabe zusammen), die das Modell pro Anfrage verarbeiten kann.4800
Modellpfad?Pfad zur GGUF-Modelldatei, die geladen und ausgeliefert wird.gemma-4-12b-it-Q4_K_M.gguf
GPU-Layer?Anzahl der auf die GPU ausgelagerten Modell-Layer. Hoeher = mehr VRAM und schneller; der Rest laeuft auf der CPU. 999 = alles auf GPU.999
faon
Kontext?Groesse des Kontextfensters in Token. 0 = der beim Training verwendete Kontext des Modells.4800
np1

All benchmarks of this model To leaderboard

Anzeige
Model comparison

gemma-4-12B-it on various hardware

All published performance runs of this model – each bubble a variant: position = prefill (X) × generation (Y), bubble size = number of runs. Closer to the top right = faster. ★ Marked gold = this benchmark.

GPUby graphics card

1.4261.0707133570,002.1104.2206.330Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition - 1.104,3 tok/s Generation, 4.570 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 5.144 ms (3 Laufe)NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 B...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 - 1.058,9 tok/s Generation, 3.140 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 6.383 ms (3 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 50...NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition - 1.041,8 tok/s Generation, 5.150 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 5.222 ms (9 Laufe)NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 B...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti - 677,5 tok/s Generation, 3.217 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 5.812 ms (6 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 50...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti - 654,9 tok/s Generation, 2.298 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 7.684 ms (6 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 30...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 - 89,8 tok/s Generation, 779 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 13.058 ms (3 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 20...NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 16GB - 45,8 tok/s Generation, 312 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 33.496 ms (3 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCI...
NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition 1.104,3 tok/sNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 1.058,9 tok/sNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition 1.041,8 tok/sNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti 677,5 tok/sNVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti 654,9 tok/sNVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 89,8 tok/s★ NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 16GB 45,8 tok/s this run

CPUby processor

1.4261.0707133570,002.1104.2206.330Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-Core Processor - 1.104,3 tok/s Generation, 4.570 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 5.144 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-...AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8-Core Processor - 1.058,9 tok/s Generation, 3.140 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 6.383 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8...AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX 24-Cores - 1.041,8 tok/s Generation, 5.150 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 5.222 ms (9 Laufe)AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 32-Cores - 677,5 tok/s Generation, 3.217 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 5.812 ms (6 Laufe)AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX with Radeon Graphics - 654,9 tok/s Generation, 2.617 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 8.920 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX wi...AMD Ryzen 5 5600X 6-Core Processor - 372,4 tok/s Generation, 1.979 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 6.448 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 5 5600X 6-C...Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-7400 CPU @ 3.00GHz - 89,8 tok/s Generation, 779 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 13.058 ms (3 Laufe)Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-...AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX with Radeon Graphics - 45,8 tok/s Generation, 312 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 33.496 ms (3 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX wi...
AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-Core Processor 1.104,3 tok/sAMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8-Core Processor 1.058,9 tok/sAMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX 24-Cores 1.041,8 tok/sAMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 32-Cores 677,5 tok/sAMD Ryzen 9 8945HX with Radeon Graphics 654,9 tok/sAMD Ryzen 5 5600X 6-Core Processor 372,4 tok/sIntel(R) Core(TM) i5-7400 CPU @ 3.00GHz 89,8 tok/s★ AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX with Radeon Graphics 45,8 tok/s this run

MBby mainboard

1.4261.0707133570,002.1104.2206.330Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ProArt X870E-CREATOR WIFI - 1.104,3 tok/s Generation, 4.570 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 5.144 ms (3 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ROG STRIX B550-A GAMING - 1.058,9 tok/s Generation, 3.140 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 6.383 ms (3 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX90E-SAGE SE - 1.041,8 tok/s Generation, 5.150 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 5.222 ms (9 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI - 677,5 tok/s Generation, 3.217 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 5.812 ms (6 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....Meigao Innovation Technology (Shen Zhen) Co., Ltd DRFXL (MotherBoard Series) - 654,9 tok/s Generation, 2.617 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 8.920 ms (3 Laufe)Meigao Innovation Tec...ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. PRIME A520M-K - 372,4 tok/s Generation, 1.979 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 6.448 ms (3 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....ASRock H110 Pro BTC+ - 89,8 tok/s Generation, 779 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 13.058 ms (3 Laufe)ASRock H110 Pro BTC+Shenzhen Meigao Electronic Equipment Co.,Ltd F1FXM (DeskMini Series) - 45,8 tok/s Generation, 312 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 33.496 ms (3 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ Shenzhen Meigao Elect...
ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ProArt X870E-CREATOR WIFI 1.104,3 tok/sASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ROG STRIX B550-A GAMING 1.058,9 tok/sASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX90E-SAGE SE 1.041,8 tok/sASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI 677,5 tok/sMeigao Innovation Technology (Shen Zhen) Co., Ltd DRFXL (MotherBoard Series) 654,9 tok/sASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. PRIME A520M-K 372,4 tok/sASRock H110 Pro BTC+ 89,8 tok/s★ Shenzhen Meigao Electronic Equipment Co.,Ltd F1FXM (DeskMini Series) 45,8 tok/s this run

ENGby engine

1.3381.0677955242522.5602.8963.2323.568Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)vLLM - 486,2 tok/s Generation, 2.838 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 4.765 ms (6 Laufe)vLLMllama.cpp - 1.104,3 tok/s Generation, 3.289 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 10.134 ms (27 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ llama.cpp
★ llama.cpp 1.104,3 tok/s this runvLLM 486,2 tok/s

DRVby driver

1.2151.1601.1041.0499943.0153.1433.2713.400Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)unbekannt - 1.104,3 tok/s Generation, 3.207 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 9.158 ms (33 Laufe)unbekannt
unbekannt 1.104,3 tok/s
💰 Economics

Economics of this run

Operating cost, TCO and comparison with the next-best runs of the same model at identical concurrency (1× concurrent). Methodology →

⚙️ ConfigurationAll metrics and charts below follow these settings – based on a 24-month runtime.Save to URLReset
⚡ Electricity price EUR/kWh
⚙️ System utilization 100 %
🖥️ Acquisition EUR
🔌 Idle 0 W
⚡ TDP 250 W
☁️ External LLM (API)
Electricity0.30 EUR/kWh
Avg power (incl. idle)250 W estimated (TDP)GPU 250 W full load
Avg cost / hourEUR 0.075
Electricity / 1M tokensEUR 0.93
Token / kWh321.12K
Acquisition (system)EUR 120 missingPSU EUR 120
Electricity (2 years)
TCO (2 years)EUR 1,434
Output tokens (2 years)1.41B
☁️ External LLM (API) – comparison
External LLM cost (2 years)
Savings vs. external (2 years)

All values above and the charts below take the configured system utilization into account: at X% the system generates only X% of the time, the rest it idles (0 W). Cost per hour drops (more idle), cost per token rises.

Cost over 2 years – electricity only

Cost over 2 years – incl. acquisition (TCO)

Speed vs. tokens per euro

Euro per 1M tokens

Comparison vs. API – economics per benchmark

gemma-4-12B-itNVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 16GBgemma-4-12B-itNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090gemma-4-12B-itNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Editiongemma-4-12B-it3x NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition
Electricity cost (24 mo.)
Acquisition cost
Total cost (TCO)
Generated tokens (24 mo.)
Token price via API
Break-even point (days)
Result (savings / extra cost)

Comparison with up to 3 next-best runs of this model at the same concurrency (at least one on different hardware). Power = GPU TDP + CPU (idle + 15 %) + board (estimated), acquisition = full system (GPU + CPU + board + RAM + PSU), prices = stored market prices.

Contributed by

Mario Alka Administrator

@marioalka

Ich bin Unternehmer, Softwareentwickler und KI-Enthusiast. Seit vielen Jahren entwickle ich Unternehmenssoftware und beschäftige mich inzwischen fast täglich mit lokalen LLMs, KI-Agenten und leistungsfähiger KI-Hardware.

Mit LLM-Benchmark.de möchte ich eine Plattform schaffen, auf der Modelle, GPUs und Agenten objektiv und reproduzierbar miteinander verglichen werden.