Created bymario-alka.dePowered bygodcore.denoob2claw.detricoma.de
Contributed byMario AlkaQwen (Alibaba)

Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct

Performance benchmark · measured on 20.08.2026 20:30

Benchmark-IDrun-20260820-205402-b9c794
Timebench 3 - Kombi (Prefill + Generation)MoE30BRuntime: llama.cppQuantisierung: Q4_K_M
For context: Diese Plattform nutzt Unified Memory – die "VRAM" ist gemeinsamer System-RAM (APU/Superchip); das Modell teilt sich den Speicher mit dem System.
Generation182,87tok/s
Prefill7.295,04tok/s
Time to First Token5.014,00ms
Total duration123,89s
Concurrency10parallel
Ranking in the field
434of 820 systems

Performance benchmark · Primary metric: Generation-Speed (tok/s) · 10× concurrent

This run is better than 47 % of all comparable systems.
Generation 182,9 tok/s
-62 % vs Ø 485,2
Prefill 7.295,0 tok/s
+56 % vs Ø 4.661,8
Time to First Token 5.014 ms
-92 % vs Ø 63.970
Distribution in the field0 – 2.491 tok/s
Ø 485 Median Dieser Lauf

Wie schlägt sich dieser Benchmark mit anderen Modellen?

gemma-4-E2B-itNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 · run-20260728-184455-e28775
2.491,2 tok/s
gemma-4-E2B-itNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition · run-20260727-181606-b37ed9
2.414,4 tok/s
Nemotron-3-Nano-4BNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition · run-20260727-181607-4cca42
2.182,7 tok/s
gemma-4-E2B-it3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260728-184456-d87c73
2.143,6 tok/s
gpt-oss-20bNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition · run-20260730-035052-9c966e
1.995,4 tok/s
gpt-oss-20bNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition · run-20260728-140954-8007c4
1.993,5 tok/s
Nemotron-3-Nano-4B3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260728-194136-0aed86
1.937,7 tok/s
Nemotron-3-Nano-4B3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260728-194136-8db0fa
1.911,6 tok/s
Nemotron-3-Nano-4B3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260727-181606-e0eafd
1.897,0 tok/s
gpt-oss-20bNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 · run-20260729-032121-7c961d
1.890,7 tok/s
Nemotron-3-Nano-4BNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 · run-20260728-194135-2ed9dd
1.878,7 tok/s
gpt-oss-20b3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260728-034052-26063b
1.835,7 tok/s
Nemotron-3-Nano-4B3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260728-194136-a77046
1.830,3 tok/s
gpt-oss-20b3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260729-032121-c6e7e0
1.819,5 tok/s
Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct this runNVIDIA GB10 · run-20260820-205402-b9c794
182,9 tok/s

How does this benchmark compare on other GPUs?

Same model on different hardware · 10× concurrent · Generation (tok/s)

Hardware

GPU: NVIDIA GB10 · 128 GB VRAM
CPU: NVIDIA Grace
RAM: 120 GB
Mainboard: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. GX10

Setup

Runtime: llama.cpp
Quantization: Q4_K_M
Driver: NVIDIA 590.48.01 / CUDA 13.1
Model: Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct

Configuration

benchmark-konfiguration — run-20260820-205402-b9c794
# LLM-Benchmark Konfiguration # Modell : Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct # Engine : llama.cpp # Run-ID : run-20260820-205402-b9c794 # GPU : NVIDIA GB10 # CPU : NVIDIA Grace # RAM : 120 GB bench@llm-benchmark:~$ /home/godcore/llama.cpp/build/bin/llama-server \ -m Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct-Q4_K_M.gguf \ -ngl 999 \ -fa on \ -c 49152 \ -np 12
Engine?Die Inferenz-Software, die das Modell ausliefert (z.B. vLLM oder llama.cpp). Sie bestimmt Geschwindigkeit, unterstuetzte Modellformate und welche Parameter ueberhaupt verfuegbar sind.llamacpp
Kontextlaenge?Maximale Anzahl Tokens (Eingabe + erzeugte Ausgabe zusammen), die das Modell pro Anfrage verarbeiten kann.49152
Modellpfad?Pfad zur GGUF-Modelldatei, die geladen und ausgeliefert wird.Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct-Q4_K_M.gguf
GPU-Layer?Anzahl der auf die GPU ausgelagerten Modell-Layer. Hoeher = mehr VRAM und schneller; der Rest laeuft auf der CPU. 999 = alles auf GPU.999
faon
Kontext?Groesse des Kontextfensters in Token. 0 = der beim Training verwendete Kontext des Modells.49152
np12

All benchmarks of this model To leaderboard

Anzeige
Model comparison

Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct on various hardware

All published performance runs of this model – each bubble a variant: position = prefill (X) × generation (Y), bubble size = number of runs. Closer to the top right = faster. ★ Marked gold = this benchmark.

GPUby graphics card

2.2301.6731.1155580,006.87513.75020.625Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 - 1.716,6 tok/s Generation, 15.919 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 2.829 ms (4 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 50...NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition - 1.690,0 tok/s Generation, 16.648 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 1.846 ms (6 Laufe)NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 B...NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition - 1.545,3 tok/s Generation, 13.495 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.236 ms (9 Laufe)NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 B...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti - 928,5 tok/s Generation, 9.749 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.637 ms (6 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 30...AMD Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot - 277,0 tok/s Generation, 4.441 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.159 ms (9 Laufe)AMD Radeon PRO W7900 ...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti - 157,0 tok/s Generation, 1.323 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 32.375 ms (3 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 50...AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 - 99,0 tok/s Generation, 3.105 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 32.955 ms (27 Laufe)AMD Radeon AI PRO R97...CPU-only - 6,7 tok/s Generation, 103 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 107.342 ms (3 Laufe)CPU-onlyNVIDIA GB10 (DGX Spark) - 182,9 tok/s Generation, 4.998 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 2.913 ms (3 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ NVIDIA GB10 (DGX Spar...
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 1.716,6 tok/sNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition 1.690,0 tok/sNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition 1.545,3 tok/sNVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti 928,5 tok/sAMD Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot 277,0 tok/s★ NVIDIA GB10 (DGX Spark) 182,9 tok/s this runNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti 157,0 tok/sAMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 99,0 tok/sCPU-only 6,7 tok/s

CPUby processor

2.2301.6731.1155580,006.87513.75020.625Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8-Core Processor - 1.716,6 tok/s Generation, 15.919 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 2.829 ms (4 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8...AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-Core Processor - 1.690,0 tok/s Generation, 16.648 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 1.846 ms (6 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-...AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX 24-Cores - 1.545,3 tok/s Generation, 13.495 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.236 ms (9 Laufe)AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX with Radeon Graphics - 928,5 tok/s Generation, 9.749 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.637 ms (6 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX wi...AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 32-Cores - 277,0 tok/s Generation, 3.661 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 10.463 ms (12 Laufe)AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX 16-Cores - 99,0 tok/s Generation, 3.105 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 32.955 ms (27 Laufe)AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-4620 v2 @ 2.60GHz - 6,7 tok/s Generation, 103 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 107.342 ms (3 Laufe)Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU ...NVIDIA Grace - 182,9 tok/s Generation, 4.998 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 2.913 ms (3 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ NVIDIA Grace
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8-Core Processor 1.716,6 tok/sAMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-Core Processor 1.690,0 tok/sAMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX 24-Cores 1.545,3 tok/sAMD Ryzen 9 8945HX with Radeon Graphics 928,5 tok/sAMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 32-Cores 277,0 tok/s★ NVIDIA Grace 182,9 tok/s this runAMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX 16-Cores 99,0 tok/sIntel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-4620 v2 @ 2.60GHz 6,7 tok/s

MBby mainboard

2.2301.6731.1155580,006.87513.75020.625Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ROG STRIX B550-A GAMING - 1.716,6 tok/s Generation, 15.919 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 2.829 ms (4 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ProArt X870E-CREATOR WIFI - 1.690,0 tok/s Generation, 16.648 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 1.846 ms (6 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX90E-SAGE SE - 1.545,3 tok/s Generation, 5.702 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 25.525 ms (36 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....Meigao Innovation Technology (Shen Zhen) Co., Ltd DRFXL (MotherBoard Series) - 928,5 tok/s Generation, 9.749 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.637 ms (6 Laufe)Meigao Innovation Tec...ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI - 277,0 tok/s Generation, 3.661 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 10.463 ms (12 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....Dell Inc. PowerEdge R820 - 6,7 tok/s Generation, 103 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 107.342 ms (3 Laufe)Dell Inc. PowerEdge R...ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. GX10 - 182,9 tok/s Generation, 4.998 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 2.913 ms (3 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....
ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ROG STRIX B550-A GAMING 1.716,6 tok/sASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ProArt X870E-CREATOR WIFI 1.690,0 tok/sASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX90E-SAGE SE 1.545,3 tok/sMeigao Innovation Technology (Shen Zhen) Co., Ltd DRFXL (MotherBoard Series) 928,5 tok/sASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI 277,0 tok/s★ ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. GX10 182,9 tok/s this runDell Inc. PowerEdge R820 6,7 tok/s

ENGby engine

2.2141.6601.1075530,01.9266.69211.45816.225Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)vLLM - 1.070,6 tok/s Generation, 13.727 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 988 ms (12 Laufe)vLLMunbekannt - 88,2 tok/s Generation, 4.424 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 938 ms (9 Laufe)unbekanntllama.cpp - 1.716,6 tok/s Generation, 5.756 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 28.554 ms (49 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ llama.cpp
★ llama.cpp 1.716,6 tok/s this runvLLM 1.070,6 tok/sunbekannt 88,2 tok/s

DRVby driver

2.2141.6601.1075530,03.4335.1006.7678.435Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)unbekannt - 1.716,6 tok/s Generation, 7.444 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 24.177 ms (58 Laufe)unbekanntAMD 7.0.0-27-generic - 88,2 tok/s Generation, 4.424 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 938 ms (9 Laufe)AMD 7.0.0-27-genericNVIDIA 590.48.01 / CUDA 13.1 - 182,9 tok/s Generation, 4.998 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 2.913 ms (3 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ NVIDIA 590.48.01 / CU...
unbekannt 1.716,6 tok/s★ NVIDIA 590.48.01 / CUDA 13.1 182,9 tok/s this runAMD 7.0.0-27-generic 88,2 tok/s
💰 Economics

Economics of this run

Operating cost, TCO and comparison with the next-best runs of the same model at identical concurrency (10× concurrent). Methodology →

⚙️ ConfigurationAll metrics and charts below follow these settings – based on a 24-month runtime.Save to URLReset
⚡ Electricity price EUR/kWh
⚙️ System utilization 100 %
🖥️ Acquisition EUR
🔌 Idle 15 W
⚡ TDP 140 W
☁️ External LLM (API)
Electricity0.30 EUR/kWh
Avg power (incl. idle)140 W estimated (TDP)GPU 140 W full load
Avg cost / hourEUR 0.042
Electricity / 1M tokensEUR 0.064
Token / kWh4.70M
Acquisition (system)EUR 5,800 partial priceGPU EUR 4,000 · RAM EUR 1,680 · PSU EUR 120
Electricity (2 years)
TCO (2 years)EUR 6,536
Output tokens (2 years)11.53B
☁️ External LLM (API) – comparison
External LLM cost (2 years)
Savings vs. external (2 years)

All values above and the charts below take the configured system utilization into account: at X% the system generates only X% of the time, the rest it idles (15 W). Cost per hour drops (more idle), cost per token rises.

Cost over 2 years – electricity only

Cost over 2 years – incl. acquisition (TCO)

Speed vs. tokens per euro

Euro per 1M tokens

Comparison vs. API – economics per benchmark

Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-InstructNVIDIA GB10 (DGX Spark)Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-InstructNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-InstructNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation EditionQwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct3x NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition
Electricity cost (24 mo.)
Acquisition cost
Total cost (TCO)
Generated tokens (24 mo.)
Token price via API
Break-even point (days)
Result (savings / extra cost)

Comparison with up to 3 next-best runs of this model at the same concurrency (at least one on different hardware). Power = GPU TDP + CPU (idle + 15 %) + board (estimated), acquisition = full system (GPU + CPU + board + RAM + PSU), prices = stored market prices.

Contributed by

Mario Alka Administrator

@marioalka

Ich bin Unternehmer, Softwareentwickler und KI-Enthusiast. Seit vielen Jahren entwickle ich Unternehmenssoftware und beschäftige mich inzwischen fast täglich mit lokalen LLMs, KI-Agenten und leistungsfähiger KI-Hardware.

Mit LLM-Benchmark.de möchte ich eine Plattform schaffen, auf der Modelle, GPUs und Agenten objektiv und reproduzierbar miteinander verglichen werden.