Created bymario-alka.dePowered bygodcore.denoob2claw.detricoma.de
Contributed byMario AlkaGoogle

gemma-4-E2B-it

Performance benchmark · measured on 20.08.2026 19:52

Benchmark-IDrun-20260820-202113-931ee2
Timebench 3 - Kombi (Prefill + Generation)Dense5BRuntime: llama.cppQuantisierung: Q8_0
Generation14,49tok/s
Prefill1.763,49tok/s
Time to First Token1.122,50ms
Total duration143,87s
Concurrency1parallel
Ranking in the field
848of 1161 systems

Performance benchmark · Primary metric: Generation-Speed (tok/s) · 1× concurrent

This run is better than 27 % of all comparable systems.
Generation 14,5 tok/s
-80 % vs Ø 74,3
Prefill 1.763,5 tok/s
-24 % vs Ø 2.324,7
Time to First Token 1.123 ms
-97 % vs Ø 35.657
Distribution in the field0 – 405 tok/s
Ø 74 Median Dieser Lauf

Wie schlägt sich dieser Benchmark mit anderen Modellen?

How does this benchmark compare on other GPUs?

Same model on different hardware · 1× concurrent · Generation (tok/s)

Hardware

GPU: 2x NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 · 6 GB VRAM
CPU: Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-7400 CPU @ 3.00GHz
RAM: 7 GB
Mainboard: ASRock H110 Pro BTC+

Setup

Runtime: llama.cpp
Quantization: Q8_0
Model: gemma-4-E2B-it

Configuration

benchmark-konfiguration — run-20260820-202113-931ee2
# LLM-Benchmark Konfiguration # Modell : gemma-4-E2B-it # Engine : llama.cpp # Run-ID : run-20260820-202113-931ee2 # GPU : 2x NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 # CPU : Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-7400 CPU @ 3.00GHz # RAM : 7 GB bench@llm-benchmark:~$ /home/godcore/llama.cpp/build/bin/llama-server \ -m gemma-4-E2B-it-Q8_0.gguf \ -ngl 999 \ -ts 1,1 \ -fa on \ -c 4800 \ -np 1
Engine?Die Inferenz-Software, die das Modell ausliefert (z.B. vLLM oder llama.cpp). Sie bestimmt Geschwindigkeit, unterstuetzte Modellformate und welche Parameter ueberhaupt verfuegbar sind.llamacpp
Kontextlaenge?Maximale Anzahl Tokens (Eingabe + erzeugte Ausgabe zusammen), die das Modell pro Anfrage verarbeiten kann.4800
Modellpfad?Pfad zur GGUF-Modelldatei, die geladen und ausgeliefert wird.gemma-4-E2B-it-Q8_0.gguf
GPU-Layer?Anzahl der auf die GPU ausgelagerten Modell-Layer. Hoeher = mehr VRAM und schneller; der Rest laeuft auf der CPU. 999 = alles auf GPU.999
Tensor-Split?Verhaeltnis, in dem die Modell-Layer auf mehrere GPUs verteilt werden, z.B. 3,1.1,1
faon
Kontext?Groesse des Kontextfensters in Token. 0 = der beim Training verwendete Kontext des Modells.4800
np1

All benchmarks of this model To leaderboard

Anzeige
Model comparison

gemma-4-E2B-it on various hardware

All published performance runs of this model – each bubble a variant: position = prefill (X) × generation (Y), bubble size = number of runs. Closer to the top right = faster. ★ Marked gold = this benchmark.

GPUby graphics card

3.2362.4271.6188090,006.65713.31519.972Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 - 2.491,2 tok/s Generation, 11.148 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 2.175 ms (3 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 50...NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition - 2.414,4 tok/s Generation, 16.315 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 1.871 ms (3 Laufe)NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 B...NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition - 2.143,6 tok/s Generation, 11.441 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 2.226 ms (3 Laufe)NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 B...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti - 1.744,0 tok/s Generation, 15.451 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 2.253 ms (8 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 50...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti - 1.492,8 tok/s Generation, 13.345 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 1.694 ms (8 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 30...NVIDIA GB10 (DGX Spark) - 903,3 tok/s Generation, 6.421 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 7.548 ms (4 Laufe)NVIDIA GB10 (DGX Spar...Intel Arc Pro B70 - 826,2 tok/s Generation, 2.623 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 7.541 ms (3 Laufe)Intel Arc Pro B70NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 - 15,3 tok/s Generation, 1.440 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 8.790 ms (6 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 20...
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 2.491,2 tok/sNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition 2.414,4 tok/sNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition 2.143,6 tok/sNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti 1.744,0 tok/sNVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti 1.492,8 tok/sNVIDIA GB10 (DGX Spark) 903,3 tok/sIntel Arc Pro B70 826,2 tok/s★ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 15,3 tok/s this run

CPUby processor

3.2362.4271.6188090,006.65713.31519.972Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8-Core Processor - 2.491,2 tok/s Generation, 11.148 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 2.175 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8...AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-Core Processor - 2.414,4 tok/s Generation, 16.315 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 1.871 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-...AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX 24-Cores - 2.143,6 tok/s Generation, 11.441 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 2.226 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 32-Cores - 1.744,0 tok/s Generation, 15.451 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 2.253 ms (8 Laufe)AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX with Radeon Graphics - 1.492,8 tok/s Generation, 9.978 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.182 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX wi...NVIDIA Grace - 903,3 tok/s Generation, 6.421 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 7.548 ms (4 Laufe)NVIDIA GraceAMD Ryzen 9 7945HX with Radeon Graphics - 826,2 tok/s Generation, 2.623 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 7.541 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX wi...AMD Ryzen 5 5600X 6-Core Processor - 451,1 tok/s Generation, 15.366 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 801 ms (5 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 5 5600X 6-C...Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-7400 CPU @ 3.00GHz - 15,3 tok/s Generation, 1.440 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 8.790 ms (6 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-...
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8-Core Processor 2.491,2 tok/sAMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-Core Processor 2.414,4 tok/sAMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX 24-Cores 2.143,6 tok/sAMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 32-Cores 1.744,0 tok/sAMD Ryzen 9 8945HX with Radeon Graphics 1.492,8 tok/sNVIDIA Grace 903,3 tok/sAMD Ryzen 9 7945HX with Radeon Graphics 826,2 tok/sAMD Ryzen 5 5600X 6-Core Processor 451,1 tok/s★ Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-7400 CPU @ 3.00GHz 15,3 tok/s this run

MBby mainboard

3.2362.4271.6188090,006.65713.31519.972Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ROG STRIX B550-A GAMING - 2.491,2 tok/s Generation, 11.148 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 2.175 ms (3 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ProArt X870E-CREATOR WIFI - 2.414,4 tok/s Generation, 16.315 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 1.871 ms (3 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX90E-SAGE SE - 2.143,6 tok/s Generation, 11.441 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 2.226 ms (3 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI - 1.744,0 tok/s Generation, 15.451 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 2.253 ms (8 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....Meigao Innovation Technology (Shen Zhen) Co., Ltd DRFXL (MotherBoard Series) - 1.492,8 tok/s Generation, 9.978 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.182 ms (3 Laufe)Meigao Innovation Tec...ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. GX10 - 903,3 tok/s Generation, 6.421 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 7.548 ms (4 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....Shenzhen Meigao Electronic Equipment Co.,Ltd DRFXI (MotherBoard Series) - 826,2 tok/s Generation, 2.623 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 7.541 ms (3 Laufe)Shenzhen Meigao Elect...ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. PRIME A520M-K - 451,1 tok/s Generation, 15.366 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 801 ms (5 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....ASRock H110 Pro BTC+ - 15,3 tok/s Generation, 1.440 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 8.790 ms (6 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ ASRock H110 Pro BTC+
ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ROG STRIX B550-A GAMING 2.491,2 tok/sASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ProArt X870E-CREATOR WIFI 2.414,4 tok/sASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX90E-SAGE SE 2.143,6 tok/sASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI 1.744,0 tok/sMeigao Innovation Technology (Shen Zhen) Co., Ltd DRFXL (MotherBoard Series) 1.492,8 tok/sASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. GX10 903,3 tok/sShenzhen Meigao Electronic Equipment Co.,Ltd DRFXI (MotherBoard Series) 826,2 tok/sASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. PRIME A520M-K 451,1 tok/s★ ASRock H110 Pro BTC+ 15,3 tok/s this run

ENGby engine

2.9172.4832.0501.6161.1835.40010.49315.58720.680Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)vLLM - 1.608,5 tok/s Generation, 17.869 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 785 ms (8 Laufe)vLLMllama.cpp - 2.491,2 tok/s Generation, 8.211 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 4.989 ms (30 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ llama.cpp
★ llama.cpp 2.491,2 tok/s this runvLLM 1.608,5 tok/s

DRVby driver

3.0732.3661.6599512443414.8139.28513.757Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)unbekannt - 2.491,2 tok/s Generation, 11.475 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.327 ms (31 Laufe)unbekanntNVIDIA 590.48.01 / CUDA 13.1 - 903,3 tok/s Generation, 6.421 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 7.548 ms (4 Laufe)NVIDIA 590.48.01 / CU...Intel 26.18.38308.4 - 826,2 tok/s Generation, 2.623 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 7.541 ms (3 Laufe)Intel 26.18.38308.4
unbekannt 2.491,2 tok/sNVIDIA 590.48.01 / CUDA 13.1 903,3 tok/sIntel 26.18.38308.4 826,2 tok/s
💰 Economics

Economics of this run

Operating cost, TCO and comparison with the next-best runs of the same model at identical concurrency (1× concurrent). Methodology →

⚙️ ConfigurationAll metrics and charts below follow these settings – based on a 24-month runtime.Save to URLReset
⚡ Electricity price EUR/kWh
⚙️ System utilization 100 %
🔌 Idle 0 W
⚡ TDP 10 W
☁️ External LLM (API)
Electricity0.30 EUR/kWh
Avg power (incl. idle)0 W missing
Avg cost / hour
Electricity / 1M tokens
Token / kWh
Acquisition (system) missing
Electricity (2 years)
TCO (2 years)
Output tokens (2 years)913.91M
☁️ External LLM (API) – comparison
External LLM cost (2 years)
Savings vs. external (2 years)
No power draw measured – values estimated from GPU TDP + CPU (idle + 15 %) + board.

All values above and the charts below take the configured system utilization into account: at X% the system generates only X% of the time, the rest it idles (0 W). Cost per hour drops (more idle), cost per token rises.

Cost over 2 years – electricity only

Cost over 2 years – incl. acquisition (TCO)

Speed vs. tokens per euro

Euro per 1M tokens

Comparison vs. API – economics per benchmark

gemma-4-E2B-it2x NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060gemma-4-E2B-itNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Editiongemma-4-E2B-itNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090gemma-4-E2B-it3x NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition
Electricity cost (24 mo.)
Acquisition cost
Total cost (TCO)
Generated tokens (24 mo.)
Token price via API
Break-even point (days)
Result (savings / extra cost)

Comparison with up to 3 next-best runs of this model at the same concurrency (at least one on different hardware). Power = GPU TDP + CPU (idle + 15 %) + board (estimated), acquisition = full system (GPU + CPU + board + RAM + PSU), prices = stored market prices.

Contributed by

Mario Alka Administrator

@marioalka

Ich bin Unternehmer, Softwareentwickler und KI-Enthusiast. Seit vielen Jahren entwickle ich Unternehmenssoftware und beschäftige mich inzwischen fast täglich mit lokalen LLMs, KI-Agenten und leistungsfähiger KI-Hardware.

Mit LLM-Benchmark.de möchte ich eine Plattform schaffen, auf der Modelle, GPUs und Agenten objektiv und reproduzierbar miteinander verglichen werden.