# LLM-Benchmark Konfiguration # Modell : Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct # Engine : llama.cpp # Run-ID : run-20260817-133237-6a21e4 # GPU : AMD Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot # CPU : AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 32-Cores # RAM : 247 GB bench@llm-benchmark:~$ /home/godcore/llama.cpp/build_hip/bin/llama-server \ -m /home/godcore/.cache/huggingface/hub/models--unsloth--Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct-GGUF/snapshots/b17cb02dd882d5b6ab62fc777ad2995f19668350/Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct-Q4_K_M.gguf \ --alias Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct \ -ngl 999 \ -fa on \ -c 49152 \ -np 12 \ --jinja \ --host 0.0.0.0 \ --port 8000

Engine?Die Inferenz-Software, die das Modell ausliefert (z.B. vLLM oder llama.cpp). Sie bestimmt Geschwindigkeit, unterstuetzte Modellformate und welche Parameter ueberhaupt verfuegbar sind.	llamacpp
Modellalias?Der Name, unter dem das Modell ueber die API angesprochen wird. Genau dieser Wert muss im Request-Feld 'model' stehen.	Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
Kontextlaenge?Maximale Anzahl Tokens (Eingabe + erzeugte Ausgabe zusammen), die das Modell pro Anfrage verarbeiten kann.	49152
Modellpfad?Pfad zur GGUF-Modelldatei, die geladen und ausgeliefert wird.	/home/godcore/.cache/huggingface/hub/models--unsloth--Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct-GGUF/snapshots/b17cb02dd882d5b6ab62fc777ad2995f19668350/Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct-Q4_K_M.gguf
GPU-Layer?Anzahl der auf die GPU ausgelagerten Modell-Layer. Hoeher = mehr VRAM und schneller; der Rest laeuft auf der CPU. 999 = alles auf GPU.	999
fa	on
Kontext?Groesse des Kontextfensters in Token. 0 = der beim Training verwendete Kontext des Modells.	49152
np	12

All benchmarks of this model To leaderboard

Model comparison

Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct on various hardware

All published performance runs of this model – each bubble a variant: position = prefill (X) × generation (Y), bubble size = number of runs. Closer to the top right = faster. ★ Marked gold = this benchmark.

GPUby graphics card

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 1.716,6 tok/sNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition 1.690,0 tok/sNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition 1.545,3 tok/sNVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti 928,5 tok/s★ AMD Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot 277,0 tok/s this runNVIDIA GB10 (DGX Spark) 182,9 tok/sNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti 157,0 tok/sAMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 99,0 tok/sCPU-only 6,7 tok/s

CPUby processor

AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8-Core Processor 1.716,6 tok/sAMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-Core Processor 1.690,0 tok/sAMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX 24-Cores 1.545,3 tok/sAMD Ryzen 9 8945HX with Radeon Graphics 928,5 tok/s★ AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 32-Cores 277,0 tok/s this runNVIDIA Grace 182,9 tok/sAMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX 16-Cores 99,0 tok/sIntel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-4620 v2 @ 2.60GHz 6,7 tok/s

MBby mainboard

ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ROG STRIX B550-A GAMING 1.716,6 tok/sASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ProArt X870E-CREATOR WIFI 1.690,0 tok/sASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX90E-SAGE SE 1.545,3 tok/sMeigao Innovation Technology (Shen Zhen) Co., Ltd DRFXL (MotherBoard Series) 928,5 tok/s★ ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI 277,0 tok/s this runASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. GX10 182,9 tok/sDell Inc. PowerEdge R820 6,7 tok/s

ENGby engine

★ llama.cpp 1.716,6 tok/s this runvLLM 1.070,6 tok/sunbekannt 88,2 tok/s

DRVby driver

unbekannt 1.716,6 tok/sNVIDIA 590.48.01 / CUDA 13.1 182,9 tok/sAMD 7.0.0-27-generic 88,2 tok/s

💰 Economics

Economics of this run

Operating cost, TCO and comparison with the next-best runs of the same model at identical concurrency (10× concurrent). Methodology →

⚙️ ConfigurationAll metrics and charts below follow these settings – based on a 24-month runtime.Save to URL Reset

⚡ Electricity price EUR/kWh

⚙️ System utilization 100 %

🖥️ Acquisition EUR

🔌 Idle 10 W

⚡ TDP 305 W

☁️ External LLM (API) show

Input €/1M Output €/1M Input per output token

Electricity0.30 EUR/kWh

Avg power (incl. idle)305 W estimated (TDP)GPU 295 + Board 10 W full load

Avg cost / hourEUR 0.092

Electricity / 1M tokensEUR 0.099

Token / kWh3.04M

Acquisition (system)EUR 2,126 missingRAM EUR 1,976 · PSU EUR 150

Electricity (2 years)–

TCO (2 years)EUR 3,729

Output tokens (2 years)16.24B

☁️ External LLM (API) – comparison

External LLM cost (2 years)–

Savings vs. external (2 years)–

All values above and the charts below take the configured system utilization into account: at X% the system generates only X% of the time, the rest it idles (10 W). Cost per hour drops (more idle), cost per token rises.

Cost over 2 years – electricity only

Cost over 2 years – incl. acquisition (TCO)

Speed vs. tokens per euro

Euro per 1M tokens

Comparison vs. API – economics per benchmark

	Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-InstructAMD Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot	Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-InstructNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090	Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-InstructNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition	Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct3x NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition
Electricity cost (24 mo.)	–	–	–	–
Acquisition cost	–	–	–	–
Total cost (TCO)	–	–	–	–
Generated tokens (24 mo.)	–	–	–	–
Token price via API	–	–	–	–
Break-even point (days)	–	–	–	–
Result (savings / extra cost)	–	–	–	–

AMD Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot · this run 258 tok/s NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 1,717 tok/s NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition 1,690 tok/s 3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition 1,545 tok/s

Comparison with up to 3 next-best runs of this model at the same concurrency (at least one on different hardware). Power = GPU TDP + CPU (idle + 15 %) + board (estimated), acquisition = full system (GPU + CPU + board + RAM + PSU), prices = stored market prices.

Contributed by

Mario Alka Administrator

@marioalka

Ich bin Unternehmer, Softwareentwickler und KI-Enthusiast. Seit vielen Jahren entwickle ich Unternehmenssoftware und beschäftige mich inzwischen fast täglich mit lokalen LLMs, KI-Agenten und leistungsfähiger KI-Hardware.

Mit LLM-Benchmark.de möchte ich eine Plattform schaffen, auf der Modelle, GPUs und Agenten objektiv und reproduzierbar miteinander verglichen werden.