Created bymario-alka.dePowered bygodcore.denoob2claw.detricoma.de
Contributed byMario AlkaDeepReinforce

Ornith-1.0-35B

Performance benchmark · measured on 17.08.2026 13:21

Benchmark-IDrun-20260817-133237-270dfe
Timebench 3 - Kombi (Prefill + Generation)Dense35BRuntime: llama.cppQuantisierung: Q4_K_M
Generation91,41tok/s
Prefill1.697,67tok/s
Time to First Token1.136,50ms
Total duration24,68s
Concurrency1parallel
Ranking in the field
12of 81 systems

Performance benchmark · Primary metric: Generation-Speed (tok/s) · 1× concurrent

This run is better than 86 % of all comparable systems.
Generation 91,4 tok/s
+72 % vs Ø 53,3
Prefill 1.697,7 tok/s
+23 % vs Ø 1.382,6
Time to First Token 1.137 ms
-73 % vs Ø 4.232
Distribution in the field10 – 155 tok/s
Ø 53 Median Dieser Lauf

Wie schlägt sich dieser Benchmark mit anderen Modellen?

How does this benchmark compare on other GPUs?

Same model on different hardware · 1× concurrent · Generation (tok/s)

Hardware

GPU: AMD Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot · 48 GB VRAM
CPU: AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 32-Cores
RAM: 247 GB
Mainboard: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI

Setup

Runtime: llama.cpp
Quantization: Q4_K_M
Model: Ornith-1.0-35B

Configuration

benchmark-konfiguration — run-20260817-133237-270dfe
# LLM-Benchmark Konfiguration # Modell : Ornith-1.0-35B # Engine : llama.cpp # Run-ID : run-20260817-133237-270dfe # GPU : AMD Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot # CPU : AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 32-Cores # RAM : 247 GB bench@llm-benchmark:~$ /home/godcore/llama.cpp/build_hip/bin/llama-server \ -m /home/godcore/.cache/huggingface/hub/models--deepreinforce-ai--Ornith-1.0-35B-GGUF/snapshots/383064f72a1ef3087b779f268d3ca117eb989aac/ornith-1.0-35b-Q4_K_M.gguf \ --alias Ornith-1.0-35B \ -ngl 999 \ -fa on \ -c 49152 \ -np 12 \ --jinja \ --host 0.0.0.0 \ --port 8000
Engine?Die Inferenz-Software, die das Modell ausliefert (z.B. vLLM oder llama.cpp). Sie bestimmt Geschwindigkeit, unterstuetzte Modellformate und welche Parameter ueberhaupt verfuegbar sind.llamacpp
Modellalias?Der Name, unter dem das Modell ueber die API angesprochen wird. Genau dieser Wert muss im Request-Feld 'model' stehen.Ornith-1.0-35B
Kontextlaenge?Maximale Anzahl Tokens (Eingabe + erzeugte Ausgabe zusammen), die das Modell pro Anfrage verarbeiten kann.49152
Modellpfad?Pfad zur GGUF-Modelldatei, die geladen und ausgeliefert wird./home/godcore/.cache/huggingface/hub/models--deepreinforce-ai--Ornith-1.0-35B-GGUF/snapshots/383064f72a1ef3087b779f268d3ca117eb989aac/ornith-1.0-35b-Q4_K_M.gguf
GPU-Layer?Anzahl der auf die GPU ausgelagerten Modell-Layer. Hoeher = mehr VRAM und schneller; der Rest laeuft auf der CPU. 999 = alles auf GPU.999
faon
Kontext?Groesse des Kontextfensters in Token. 0 = der beim Training verwendete Kontext des Modells.49152
np12

All benchmarks of this model To leaderboard

Anzeige
Model comparison

Ornith-1.0-35B on various hardware

All published performance runs of this model – each bubble a variant: position = prefill (X) × generation (Y), bubble size = number of runs. Closer to the top right = faster. ★ Marked gold = this benchmark.

GPUby graphics card

2.2971.7231.1485740,002.6645.3297.993Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition - 1.799,4 tok/s Generation, 6.587 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.899 ms (9 Laufe)NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 B...NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition - 1.607,5 tok/s Generation, 6.349 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.508 ms (3 Laufe)NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 B...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 - 1.556,7 tok/s Generation, 5.085 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.918 ms (3 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 50...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti - 920,2 tok/s Generation, 3.340 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 6.459 ms (3 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 30...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti - 309,0 tok/s Generation, 972 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 20.166 ms (3 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 50...AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 - 216,9 tok/s Generation, 1.446 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 42.722 ms (15 Laufe)AMD Radeon AI PRO R97...AMD Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot - 211,5 tok/s Generation, 2.131 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 4.814 ms (3 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ AMD Radeon PRO W7900 ...
NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition 1.799,4 tok/sNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition 1.607,5 tok/sNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 1.556,7 tok/sNVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti 920,2 tok/sNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti 309,0 tok/sAMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 216,9 tok/s★ AMD Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot 211,5 tok/s this run

CPUby processor

2.2961.7221.1485740,01252.7195.3137.907Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX 24-Cores - 1.799,4 tok/s Generation, 6.587 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.899 ms (9 Laufe)AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-Core Processor - 1.607,5 tok/s Generation, 6.349 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.508 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-...AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8-Core Processor - 1.556,7 tok/s Generation, 5.085 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.918 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8...AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX with Radeon Graphics - 920,2 tok/s Generation, 3.340 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 6.459 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX wi...AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX 16-Cores - 216,9 tok/s Generation, 1.446 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 42.722 ms (15 Laufe)AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 32-Cores - 309,0 tok/s Generation, 1.551 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 12.490 ms (6 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX 24-Cores 1.799,4 tok/sAMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-Core Processor 1.607,5 tok/sAMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8-Core Processor 1.556,7 tok/sAMD Ryzen 9 8945HX with Radeon Graphics 920,2 tok/s★ AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 32-Cores 309,0 tok/s this runAMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX 16-Cores 216,9 tok/s

MBby mainboard

2.2771.7081.1395690,03072.7365.1657.594Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX90E-SAGE SE - 1.799,4 tok/s Generation, 3.374 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 28.163 ms (24 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ProArt X870E-CREATOR WIFI - 1.607,5 tok/s Generation, 6.349 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.508 ms (3 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ROG STRIX B550-A GAMING - 1.556,7 tok/s Generation, 5.085 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.918 ms (3 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....Meigao Innovation Technology (Shen Zhen) Co., Ltd DRFXL (MotherBoard Series) - 920,2 tok/s Generation, 3.340 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 6.459 ms (3 Laufe)Meigao Innovation Tec...ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI - 309,0 tok/s Generation, 1.551 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 12.490 ms (6 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....
ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX90E-SAGE SE 1.799,4 tok/sASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ProArt X870E-CREATOR WIFI 1.607,5 tok/sASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ROG STRIX B550-A GAMING 1.556,7 tok/sMeigao Innovation Technology (Shen Zhen) Co., Ltd DRFXL (MotherBoard Series) 920,2 tok/s★ ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI 309,0 tok/s this run

ENGby engine

1.9791.8891.7991.7091.6193.2443.3823.5203.658Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)llama.cpp - 1.799,4 tok/s Generation, 3.451 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 20.321 ms (39 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ llama.cpp
★ llama.cpp 1.799,4 tok/s this run

DRVby driver

1.9791.8891.7991.7091.6193.2443.3823.5203.658Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)unbekannt - 1.799,4 tok/s Generation, 3.451 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 20.321 ms (39 Laufe)unbekannt
unbekannt 1.799,4 tok/s
💰 Economics

Economics of this run

Operating cost, TCO and comparison with the next-best runs of the same model at identical concurrency (1× concurrent). Methodology →

⚙️ ConfigurationAll metrics and charts below follow these settings – based on a 24-month runtime.Save to URLReset
⚡ Electricity price EUR/kWh
⚙️ System utilization 100 %
🖥️ Acquisition EUR
🔌 Idle 10 W
⚡ TDP 305 W
☁️ External LLM (API)
Electricity0.30 EUR/kWh
Avg power (incl. idle)305 W estimated (TDP)GPU 295 + Board 10 W full load
Avg cost / hourEUR 0.092
Electricity / 1M tokensEUR 0.28
Token / kWh1.08M
Acquisition (system)EUR 2,126 missingRAM EUR 1,976 · PSU EUR 150
Electricity (2 years)
TCO (2 years)EUR 3,729
Output tokens (2 years)5.77B
☁️ External LLM (API) – comparison
External LLM cost (2 years)
Savings vs. external (2 years)

All values above and the charts below take the configured system utilization into account: at X% the system generates only X% of the time, the rest it idles (10 W). Cost per hour drops (more idle), cost per token rises.

Cost over 2 years – electricity only

Cost over 2 years – incl. acquisition (TCO)

Speed vs. tokens per euro

Euro per 1M tokens

Comparison vs. API – economics per benchmark

Ornith-1.0-35BAMD Radeon PRO W7900 Dual SlotOrnith-1.0-35BNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090Ornith-1.0-35BNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation EditionOrnith-1.0-35B3x NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition
Electricity cost (24 mo.)
Acquisition cost
Total cost (TCO)
Generated tokens (24 mo.)
Token price via API
Break-even point (days)
Result (savings / extra cost)

Comparison with up to 3 next-best runs of this model at the same concurrency (at least one on different hardware). Power = GPU TDP + CPU (idle + 15 %) + board (estimated), acquisition = full system (GPU + CPU + board + RAM + PSU), prices = stored market prices.

Contributed by

Mario Alka Administrator

@marioalka

Ich bin Unternehmer, Softwareentwickler und KI-Enthusiast. Seit vielen Jahren entwickle ich Unternehmenssoftware und beschäftige mich inzwischen fast täglich mit lokalen LLMs, KI-Agenten und leistungsfähiger KI-Hardware.

Mit LLM-Benchmark.de möchte ich eine Plattform schaffen, auf der Modelle, GPUs und Agenten objektiv und reproduzierbar miteinander verglichen werden.