Created bymario-alka.dePowered bygodcore.denoob2claw.detricoma.de
Contributed byMario AlkaOpenAI

gpt-oss-20b

Performance benchmark · measured on 17.08.2026 12:33

Benchmark-IDrun-20260817-125906-3133a6
Timebench 3 - Kombi (Prefill + Generation)MoE20BRuntime: llama.cppQuantisierung: Q4_K_M
Generation343,93tok/s
Prefill2.543,99tok/s
Time to First Token7.918,50ms
Total duration75,68s
Concurrency10parallel
Ranking in the field
2of 80 systems

Performance benchmark · Primary metric: Generation-Speed (tok/s) · 10× concurrent

This run is better than 99 % of all comparable systems.
Generation 343,9 tok/s
+127 % vs Ø 151,4
Prefill 2.544,0 tok/s
+3 % vs Ø 2.479,5
Time to First Token 7.919 ms
-75 % vs Ø 32.211
Distribution in the field8 – 344 tok/s
Ø 151 Median Dieser Lauf

Wie schlägt sich dieser Benchmark mit anderen Modellen?

How does this benchmark compare on other GPUs?

Same model on different hardware · 10× concurrent · Generation (tok/s)

Hardware

GPU: AMD Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot · 48 GB VRAM
CPU: AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 32-Cores
RAM: 247 GB
Mainboard: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI

Setup

Runtime: llama.cpp
Quantization: Q4_K_M
Model: gpt-oss-20b

Configuration

benchmark-konfiguration — run-20260817-125906-3133a6
# LLM-Benchmark Konfiguration # Modell : gpt-oss-20b # Engine : llama.cpp # Run-ID : run-20260817-125906-3133a6 # GPU : AMD Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot # CPU : AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 32-Cores # RAM : 247 GB bench@llm-benchmark:~$ llama-server \ --model gpt-oss-20b
Engine?Die Inferenz-Software, die das Modell ausliefert (z.B. vLLM oder llama.cpp). Sie bestimmt Geschwindigkeit, unterstuetzte Modellformate und welche Parameter ueberhaupt verfuegbar sind.llamacpp
Modellalias?Der Name, unter dem das Modell ueber die API angesprochen wird. Genau dieser Wert muss im Request-Feld 'model' stehen.gpt-oss-20b

All benchmarks of this model To leaderboard

Anzeige
Model comparison

gpt-oss-20b on various hardware

All published performance runs of this model – each bubble a variant: position = prefill (X) × generation (Y), bubble size = number of runs. Closer to the top right = faster. ★ Marked gold = this benchmark.

GPUby graphics card

2.5911.9431.2966480,008.07916.15724.236Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition - 1.995,4 tok/s Generation, 19.558 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 1.895 ms (8 Laufe)NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 B...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 - 1.890,7 tok/s Generation, 11.034 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 4.372 ms (18 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 50...NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition - 1.835,7 tok/s Generation, 13.385 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 2.313 ms (15 Laufe)NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 B...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti - 1.210,3 tok/s Generation, 4.544 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 11.765 ms (6 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 50...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti - 1.113,5 tok/s Generation, 6.760 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.631 ms (22 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 30...NVIDIA GB10 (DGX Spark) - 202,1 tok/s Generation, 4.104 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 2.448 ms (3 Laufe)NVIDIA GB10 (DGX Spar...AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 - 163,6 tok/s Generation, 2.674 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 27.436 ms (21 Laufe)AMD Radeon AI PRO R97...NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 16GB - 111,1 tok/s Generation, 646 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 16.076 ms (3 Laufe)NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCI...AMD Radeon 8060S Graphics - 74,4 tok/s Generation, 1.168 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 12.711 ms (2 Laufe)AMD Radeon 8060S Grap...CPU-only - 14,5 tok/s Generation, 88 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 122.346 ms (3 Laufe)CPU-onlyAMD Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot - 344,1 tok/s Generation, 2.818 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.556 ms (9 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ AMD Radeon PRO W7900 ...
NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition 1.995,4 tok/sNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 1.890,7 tok/sNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition 1.835,7 tok/sNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti 1.210,3 tok/sNVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti 1.113,5 tok/s★ AMD Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot 344,1 tok/s this runNVIDIA GB10 (DGX Spark) 202,1 tok/sAMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 163,6 tok/sNVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 16GB 111,1 tok/sAMD Radeon 8060S Graphics 74,4 tok/sCPU-only 14,5 tok/s

CPUby processor

2.5911.9431.2966480,008.07916.15724.236Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-Core Processor - 1.995,4 tok/s Generation, 19.558 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 1.895 ms (8 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-...AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8-Core Processor - 1.890,7 tok/s Generation, 11.034 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 4.372 ms (18 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8...AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX 24-Cores - 1.835,7 tok/s Generation, 13.385 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 2.313 ms (15 Laufe)AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX with Radeon Graphics - 1.113,5 tok/s Generation, 6.303 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 4.194 ms (18 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX wi...AMD Ryzen 5 5600X 6-Core Processor - 572,1 tok/s Generation, 8.817 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 1.101 ms (4 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 5 5600X 6-C...NVIDIA Grace - 202,1 tok/s Generation, 4.104 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 2.448 ms (3 Laufe)NVIDIA GraceAMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX 16-Cores - 163,6 tok/s Generation, 2.674 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 27.436 ms (21 Laufe)AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX with Radeon Graphics - 111,1 tok/s Generation, 646 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 16.076 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX wi...AMD RYZEN AI MAX+ 395 w/ Radeon 8060S - 74,4 tok/s Generation, 1.168 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 12.711 ms (2 Laufe)AMD RYZEN AI MAX+ 395...Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-4620 v2 @ 2.60GHz - 14,5 tok/s Generation, 88 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 122.346 ms (3 Laufe)Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU ...AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 32-Cores - 1.210,3 tok/s Generation, 3.508 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 6.840 ms (15 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...
AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-Core Processor 1.995,4 tok/sAMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8-Core Processor 1.890,7 tok/sAMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX 24-Cores 1.835,7 tok/s★ AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 32-Cores 1.210,3 tok/s this runAMD Ryzen 9 8945HX with Radeon Graphics 1.113,5 tok/sAMD Ryzen 5 5600X 6-Core Processor 572,1 tok/sNVIDIA Grace 202,1 tok/sAMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX 16-Cores 163,6 tok/sAMD Ryzen 9 7945HX with Radeon Graphics 111,1 tok/sAMD RYZEN AI MAX+ 395 w/ Radeon 8060S 74,4 tok/sIntel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-4620 v2 @ 2.60GHz 14,5 tok/s

MBby mainboard

2.5911.9431.2966480,008.07916.15724.236Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ProArt X870E-CREATOR WIFI - 1.995,4 tok/s Generation, 19.558 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 1.895 ms (8 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ROG STRIX B550-A GAMING - 1.890,7 tok/s Generation, 11.034 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 4.372 ms (18 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX90E-SAGE SE - 1.835,7 tok/s Generation, 7.137 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 16.968 ms (36 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....Meigao Innovation Technology (Shen Zhen) Co., Ltd DRFXL (MotherBoard Series) - 1.113,5 tok/s Generation, 6.303 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 4.194 ms (18 Laufe)Meigao Innovation Tec...ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. PRIME A520M-K - 572,1 tok/s Generation, 8.817 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 1.101 ms (4 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. GX10 - 202,1 tok/s Generation, 4.104 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 2.448 ms (3 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....Shenzhen Meigao Electronic Equipment Co.,Ltd F1FXM (DeskMini Series) - 111,1 tok/s Generation, 646 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 16.076 ms (3 Laufe)Shenzhen Meigao Elect...Bosgame AXB35-02 (BeyondMax Series) - 74,4 tok/s Generation, 1.168 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 12.711 ms (2 Laufe)Bosgame AXB35-02 (Bey...Dell Inc. PowerEdge R820 - 14,5 tok/s Generation, 88 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 122.346 ms (3 Laufe)Dell Inc. PowerEdge R...ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI - 1.210,3 tok/s Generation, 3.508 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 6.840 ms (15 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....
ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ProArt X870E-CREATOR WIFI 1.995,4 tok/sASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ROG STRIX B550-A GAMING 1.890,7 tok/sASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX90E-SAGE SE 1.835,7 tok/s★ ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI 1.210,3 tok/s this runMeigao Innovation Technology (Shen Zhen) Co., Ltd DRFXL (MotherBoard Series) 1.113,5 tok/sASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. PRIME A520M-K 572,1 tok/sASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. GX10 202,1 tok/sShenzhen Meigao Electronic Equipment Co.,Ltd F1FXM (DeskMini Series) 111,1 tok/sBosgame AXB35-02 (BeyondMax Series) 74,4 tok/sDell Inc. PowerEdge R820 14,5 tok/s

ENGby engine

2.5641.9231.2826410,02.9585.7858.61211.440Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)vLLM - 1.443,9 tok/s Generation, 9.881 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 5.436 ms (34 Laufe)vLLMunbekannt - 147,8 tok/s Generation, 4.516 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 616 ms (6 Laufe)unbekanntllama.cpp - 1.995,4 tok/s Generation, 6.673 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 16.381 ms (70 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ llama.cpp
★ llama.cpp 1.995,4 tok/s this runvLLM 1.443,9 tok/sunbekannt 147,8 tok/s

DRVby driver

2.5641.9231.2826410,02.9644.9666.9688.970Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)unbekannt - 1.995,4 tok/s Generation, 7.829 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 13.111 ms (101 Laufe)unbekanntNVIDIA 590.48.01 / CUDA 13.1 - 202,1 tok/s Generation, 4.104 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 2.448 ms (3 Laufe)NVIDIA 590.48.01 / CU...AMD 7.0.0-27-generic - 147,8 tok/s Generation, 4.516 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 616 ms (6 Laufe)AMD 7.0.0-27-generic
unbekannt 1.995,4 tok/sNVIDIA 590.48.01 / CUDA 13.1 202,1 tok/sAMD 7.0.0-27-generic 147,8 tok/s
💰 Economics

Economics of this run

Operating cost, TCO and comparison with the next-best runs of the same model at identical concurrency (10× concurrent). Methodology →

⚙️ ConfigurationAll metrics and charts below follow these settings – based on a 24-month runtime.Save to URLReset
⚡ Electricity price EUR/kWh
⚙️ System utilization 100 %
🖥️ Acquisition EUR
🔌 Idle 10 W
⚡ TDP 305 W
☁️ External LLM (API)
Electricity0.30 EUR/kWh
Avg power (incl. idle)305 W estimated (TDP)GPU 295 + Board 10 W full load
Avg cost / hourEUR 0.092
Electricity / 1M tokensEUR 0.074
Token / kWh4.06M
Acquisition (system)EUR 2,126 missingRAM EUR 1,976 · PSU EUR 150
Electricity (2 years)
TCO (2 years)EUR 3,729
Output tokens (2 years)21.69B
☁️ External LLM (API) – comparison
External LLM cost (2 years)
Savings vs. external (2 years)

All values above and the charts below take the configured system utilization into account: at X% the system generates only X% of the time, the rest it idles (10 W). Cost per hour drops (more idle), cost per token rises.

Cost over 2 years – electricity only

Cost over 2 years – incl. acquisition (TCO)

Speed vs. tokens per euro

Euro per 1M tokens

Comparison vs. API – economics per benchmark

gpt-oss-20bAMD Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slotgpt-oss-20bNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Editiongpt-oss-20bNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Editiongpt-oss-20bNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090
Electricity cost (24 mo.)
Acquisition cost
Total cost (TCO)
Generated tokens (24 mo.)
Token price via API
Break-even point (days)
Result (savings / extra cost)

Comparison with up to 3 next-best runs of this model at the same concurrency (at least one on different hardware). Power = GPU TDP + CPU (idle + 15 %) + board (estimated), acquisition = full system (GPU + CPU + board + RAM + PSU), prices = stored market prices.

Contributed by

Mario Alka Administrator

@marioalka

Ich bin Unternehmer, Softwareentwickler und KI-Enthusiast. Seit vielen Jahren entwickle ich Unternehmenssoftware und beschäftige mich inzwischen fast täglich mit lokalen LLMs, KI-Agenten und leistungsfähiger KI-Hardware.

Mit LLM-Benchmark.de möchte ich eine Plattform schaffen, auf der Modelle, GPUs und Agenten objektiv und reproduzierbar miteinander verglichen werden.