Created bymario-alka.dePowered bygodcore.denoob2claw.detricoma.de
Contributed byMario AlkaPoolside

Laguna-S-2.1-INT4

Performance benchmark · measured on 09.08.2026 22:29

Benchmark-IDrun-20260810-002617-144ffe
Timebench 3 - Kombi (Prefill + Generation)Runtime: llama.cppQuantisierung: INT4
Generation413,18tok/s
Prefill2.358,39tok/s
Time to First Token8.015,50ms
Total duration55,84s
Concurrency5parallel
Ranking in the field
95of 172 systems

Performance benchmark · Primary metric: Generation-Speed (tok/s) · 5× concurrent

This run is better than 45 % of all comparable systems.
Generation 413,2 tok/s
-22 % vs Ø 530,0
Prefill 2.358,4 tok/s
-66 % vs Ø 6.861,3
Time to First Token 8.016 ms
+23 % vs Ø 6.521
Distribution in the field32 – 1.196 tok/s
Ø 530 Median Dieser Lauf

Wie schlägt sich dieser Benchmark mit anderen Modellen?

gemma-4-E2B-it3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260728-184456-4111a9
1.195,7 tok/s
Nemotron-3-Nano-4B3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260728-194136-836a91
1.090,6 tok/s
Nemotron-3-Nano-4B3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260727-181606-8b381e
1.077,4 tok/s
Nemotron-3-Nano-4B3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260728-194136-b8a818
1.071,0 tok/s
Nemotron-3-Nano-4B3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260728-194136-038e92
1.051,1 tok/s
gpt-oss-20b3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260729-032121-ffb18a
1.015,5 tok/s
gpt-oss-20b3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260728-034052-437388
989,7 tok/s
gpt-oss-20b3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260729-032120-8b6146
970,4 tok/s
gpt-oss-20b3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260729-032120-310458
946,5 tok/s
Nemotron-3-Nano-Omni-30B-A3B-Reasoning3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260729-105340-c65107
931,3 tok/s
Nemotron-3-Nano-30B-A3B3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260729-105341-60b672
930,9 tok/s
Nemotron-3-Nano-30B-A3B3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260729-105341-88bf57
929,1 tok/s
Nemotron-Cascade-2-30B-A3B3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260729-105340-86d336
928,5 tok/s
Nemotron-Cascade-2-30B-A3B3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260729-105340-9ec82f
927,0 tok/s
Laguna-S-2.1-INT4 this run3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260810-002617-144ffe
413,2 tok/s

How does this benchmark compare on other GPUs?

Same model on different hardware · 5× concurrent · Generation (tok/s)

Hardware

GPU: 3x NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · 96 GB VRAM
CPU: AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX 24-Cores
RAM: 125 GB
Mainboard: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX90E-SAGE SE

Setup

Runtime: llama.cpp
Quantization: INT4
Model: Laguna-S-2.1-INT4

Configuration

benchmark-konfiguration — run-20260810-002617-144ffe
# LLM-Benchmark Konfiguration # Modell : Laguna-S-2.1-INT4 # Engine : llama.cpp # Run-ID : run-20260810-002617-144ffe # GPU : 3x NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition # CPU : AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX 24-Cores # RAM : 125 GB bench@llm-benchmark:~$ /home/godcore/llama.cpp/build/bin/llama-server \ -m /home/godcore/.cache/huggingface/hub/models--unsloth--Laguna-S-2.1-GGUF/snapshots/750f92f90cf54159c4d7a610cb7b3e74498e75c6/UD-Q4_K_M/Laguna-S-2.1-UD-Q4_K_M-00001-of-00003.gguf \ --alias Laguna-S-2.1-INT4 \ --host 0.0.0.0 \ --port 8000 \ -ngl 999 \ -c 16384 \ -np 4 \ --jinja
Engine?Die Inferenz-Software, die das Modell ausliefert (z.B. vLLM oder llama.cpp). Sie bestimmt Geschwindigkeit, unterstuetzte Modellformate und welche Parameter ueberhaupt verfuegbar sind.llamacpp
Modellalias?Der Name, unter dem das Modell ueber die API angesprochen wird. Genau dieser Wert muss im Request-Feld 'model' stehen.Laguna-S-2.1-INT4
Kontextlaenge?Maximale Anzahl Tokens (Eingabe + erzeugte Ausgabe zusammen), die das Modell pro Anfrage verarbeiten kann.16384
Modellpfad?Pfad zur GGUF-Modelldatei, die geladen und ausgeliefert wird./home/godcore/.cache/huggingface/hub/models--unsloth--Laguna-S-2.1-GGUF/snapshots/750f92f90cf54159c4d7a610cb7b3e74498e75c6/UD-Q4_K_M/Laguna-S-2.1-UD-Q4_K_M-00001-of-00003.gguf
GPU-Layer?Anzahl der auf die GPU ausgelagerten Modell-Layer. Hoeher = mehr VRAM und schneller; der Rest laeuft auf der CPU. 999 = alles auf GPU.999
Kontext?Groesse des Kontextfensters in Token. 0 = der beim Training verwendete Kontext des Modells.16384
np4

All benchmarks of this model To leaderboard

Anzeige
Model comparison

Laguna-S-2.1-INT4 on various hardware

All published performance runs of this model – each bubble a variant: position = prefill (X) × generation (Y), bubble size = number of runs. Closer to the top right = faster. ★ Marked gold = this benchmark.

GPUby graphics card

1.0838125422710,001.3292.6583.988Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition - 835,1 tok/s Generation, 3.224 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 9.299 ms (10 Laufe)NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 B...AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 - 70,5 tok/s Generation, 2.223 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 122.760 ms (13 Laufe)AMD Radeon AI PRO R97...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti - 42,3 tok/s Generation, 139 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 136.435 ms (3 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 50...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti - 32,8 tok/s Generation, 163 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 131.427 ms (6 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 30...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 - 13,3 tok/s Generation, 95 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 143.534 ms (3 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 50...NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition - 779,8 tok/s Generation, 3.230 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 9.207 ms (24 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 B...
NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition 835,1 tok/s★ NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition 779,8 tok/s this runAMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 70,5 tok/sNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti 42,3 tok/sNVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti 32,8 tok/sNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 13,3 tok/s

CPUby processor

1.0838125422710,001.3292.6583.988Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-Core Processor - 835,1 tok/s Generation, 3.224 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 9.299 ms (10 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-...AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX 16-Cores - 70,5 tok/s Generation, 2.223 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 122.760 ms (13 Laufe)AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 32-Cores - 42,3 tok/s Generation, 139 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 136.435 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX with Radeon Graphics - 32,8 tok/s Generation, 163 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 131.427 ms (6 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX wi...AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8-Core Processor - 13,3 tok/s Generation, 95 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 143.534 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8...AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX 24-Cores - 779,8 tok/s Generation, 3.230 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 9.207 ms (24 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...
AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-Core Processor 835,1 tok/s★ AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX 24-Cores 779,8 tok/s this runAMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX 16-Cores 70,5 tok/sAMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 32-Cores 42,3 tok/sAMD Ryzen 9 8945HX with Radeon Graphics 32,8 tok/sAMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8-Core Processor 13,3 tok/s

MBby mainboard

1.0838125422710,001.3272.6533.980Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ProArt X870E-CREATOR WIFI - 835,1 tok/s Generation, 3.224 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 9.299 ms (10 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI - 42,3 tok/s Generation, 139 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 136.435 ms (3 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....Meigao Innovation Technology (Shen Zhen) Co., Ltd DRFXL (MotherBoard Series) - 32,8 tok/s Generation, 163 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 131.427 ms (6 Laufe)Meigao Innovation Tec...ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ROG STRIX B550-A GAMING - 13,3 tok/s Generation, 95 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 143.534 ms (3 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX90E-SAGE SE - 779,8 tok/s Generation, 2.876 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 49.104 ms (37 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....
ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ProArt X870E-CREATOR WIFI 835,1 tok/s★ ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX90E-SAGE SE 779,8 tok/s this runASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI 42,3 tok/sMeigao Innovation Technology (Shen Zhen) Co., Ltd DRFXL (MotherBoard Series) 32,8 tok/sASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ROG STRIX B550-A GAMING 13,3 tok/s

ENGby engine

1.0838125412710,03363.6697.00110.333Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)vLLM - 70,5 tok/s Generation, 6.497 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.930 ms (3 Laufe)vLLMunbekannt - 13,4 tok/s Generation, 8.629 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 305 ms (1 Lauf)unbekanntllama.cpp - 835,1 tok/s Generation, 2.040 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 64.113 ms (55 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ llama.cpp
★ llama.cpp 835,1 tok/s this runvLLM 70,5 tok/sunbekannt 13,4 tok/s

DRVby driver

1.0838125412710,06083.8367.06410.292Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)unbekannt - 835,1 tok/s Generation, 2.271 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 61.000 ms (58 Laufe)unbekanntAMD 7.0.0-27-generic - 13,4 tok/s Generation, 8.629 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 305 ms (1 Lauf)AMD 7.0.0-27-generic
unbekannt 835,1 tok/sAMD 7.0.0-27-generic 13,4 tok/s
💰 Economics

Economics of this run

Operating cost, TCO and comparison with the next-best runs of the same model at identical concurrency (5× concurrent). Methodology →

⚙️ ConfigurationAll metrics and charts below follow these settings – based on a 24-month runtime.Save to URLReset
⚡ Electricity price EUR/kWh
⚙️ System utilization 100 %
🖥️ Acquisition EUR
🔌 Idle 165 W
⚡ TDP 983 W
☁️ External LLM (API)
Electricity0.30 EUR/kWh
Avg power (incl. idle)983 W estimated (TDP)GPU 900 + CPU 57 + Board 25 W full load
Avg cost / hourEUR 0.29
Electricity / 1M tokensEUR 0.20
Token / kWh1.51M
Acquisition (system)EUR 45,748 full priceGPU EUR 39,000 · CPU EUR 3,499 · Board EUR 1,299 · RAM EUR 1,750 · PSU EUR 200
Electricity (2 years)
TCO (2 years)EUR 50,912
Output tokens (2 years)26.06B
☁️ External LLM (API) – comparison
External LLM cost (2 years)
Savings vs. external (2 years)

All values above and the charts below take the configured system utilization into account: at X% the system generates only X% of the time, the rest it idles (165 W). Cost per hour drops (more idle), cost per token rises.

Cost over 2 years – electricity only

Cost over 2 years – incl. acquisition (TCO)

Speed vs. tokens per euro

Euro per 1M tokens

Comparison vs. API – economics per benchmark

Laguna-S-2.1-INT43x NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation EditionLaguna-S-2.1-INT4NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation EditionLaguna-S-2.1-INT4NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation EditionLaguna-S-2.1-INT4NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition
Electricity cost (24 mo.)
Acquisition cost
Total cost (TCO)
Generated tokens (24 mo.)
Token price via API
Break-even point (days)
Result (savings / extra cost)

Comparison with up to 3 next-best runs of this model at the same concurrency (at least one on different hardware). Power = GPU TDP + CPU (idle + 15 %) + board (estimated), acquisition = full system (GPU + CPU + board + RAM + PSU), prices = stored market prices.

Contributed by

Mario Alka Administrator

@marioalka

Ich bin Unternehmer, Softwareentwickler und KI-Enthusiast. Seit vielen Jahren entwickle ich Unternehmenssoftware und beschäftige mich inzwischen fast täglich mit lokalen LLMs, KI-Agenten und leistungsfähiger KI-Hardware.

Mit LLM-Benchmark.de möchte ich eine Plattform schaffen, auf der Modelle, GPUs und Agenten objektiv und reproduzierbar miteinander verglichen werden.