Contributed byMario AlkaQwen (Alibaba) Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
Performance benchmark · measured on 09.08.2026 18:37
run-20260809-184032-854135Performance benchmark · Primary metric: Generation-Speed (tok/s) · 10× concurrent
Wie schlägt sich dieser Benchmark mit anderen Modellen?
How does this benchmark compare on other GPUs?
Same model on different hardware · 10× concurrent · Generation (tok/s)
Hardware
GPU: 4x AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 · 32 GB VRAM
CPU: AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX 16-Cores
RAM: 184 GB
Mainboard: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX90E-SAGE SE
Setup
Runtime: llama.cpp batched-bench
Quantization: -
Model: Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
Anmerkung
llama-batched-bench, 4x AMD R9700, npl=10 (pp512/tg128), ngl=99 (voll GPU)
Qwen3.6-35B-A3B on various hardware
All published performance runs of this model – each bubble a variant: position = prefill (X) × generation (Y), bubble size = number of runs. Closer to the top right = faster. ★ Marked gold = this benchmark.
GPUby graphics card
CPUby processor
MBby mainboard
DRVby driver
Economics of this run
Operating cost, TCO and comparison with the next-best runs of the same model at identical concurrency (10× concurrent). Methodology →
All values above and the charts below take the configured system utilization into account: at X% the system generates only X% of the time, the rest it idles (85 W). Cost per hour drops (more idle), cost per token rises.
Cost over 2 years – electricity only
Cost over 2 years – incl. acquisition (TCO)
Speed vs. tokens per euro
Euro per 1M tokens
Comparison vs. API – economics per benchmark
| Qwen3.6-35B-A3BAMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 | Qwen3.6-35B-A3BNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition | Qwen3.6-35B-A3BNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 | Qwen3.6-35B-A3B3x NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Electricity cost (24 mo.) | – | – | – | – |
| Acquisition cost | – | – | – | – |
| Total cost (TCO) | – | – | – | – |
| Generated tokens (24 mo.) | – | – | – | – |
| Token price via API | – | – | – | – |
| Break-even point (days) | – | – | – | – |
| Result (savings / extra cost) | – | – | – | – |
Comparison with up to 3 next-best runs of this model at the same concurrency (at least one on different hardware). Power = GPU TDP + CPU (idle + 15 %) + board (estimated), acquisition = full system (GPU + CPU + board + RAM + PSU), prices = stored market prices.
Mario Alka Administrator
Ich bin Unternehmer, Softwareentwickler und KI-Enthusiast. Seit vielen Jahren entwickle ich Unternehmenssoftware und beschäftige mich inzwischen fast täglich mit lokalen LLMs, KI-Agenten und leistungsfähiger KI-Hardware.
Mit LLM-Benchmark.de möchte ich eine Plattform schaffen, auf der Modelle, GPUs und Agenten objektiv und reproduzierbar miteinander verglichen werden.