Created bymario-alka.dePowered bygodcore.denoob2claw.detricoma.de
Contributed byMario AlkaNVIDIA

NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-30B-A3B

Performance benchmark · measured on 06.08.2026 03:58

Benchmark-IDrun-20260806-094442-920af2
Timebench 3 - Kombi (Prefill + Generation)MoE30BRuntime: llama.cppQuantisierung: Q4_K_M
Generation32,16tok/s
Prefill179,74tok/s
Time to First Token11.985,00ms
Total duration87,65s
Concurrency1parallel
Ranking in the field
441of 782 systems

Performance benchmark · Primary metric: Generation-Speed (tok/s) · 1× concurrent

This run is better than 44 % of all comparable systems.
Generation 32,2 tok/s
-65 % vs Ø 91,4
Prefill 179,7 tok/s
-93 % vs Ø 2.461,2
Time to First Token 11.985 ms
-62 % vs Ø 31.663
Distribution in the field0 – 405 tok/s
Ø 91 Median Dieser Lauf

Wie schlägt sich dieser Benchmark mit anderen Modellen?

gpt-oss-20bNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 · run-20260724-004608-16af9b
404,6 tok/s
gpt-oss-20bNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition · run-20260730-035052-9f766a
395,2 tok/s
NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-4BNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 · run-20260728-194135-d456e7
393,5 tok/s
NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-4BNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition · run-20260727-181607-bffb11
393,5 tok/s
gpt-oss-20bNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 · run-20260724-004607-29bd16
388,9 tok/s
gpt-oss-20bNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 · run-20260729-032121-1c779f
388,2 tok/s
gemma-4-E2B-itNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition · run-20260727-181606-6ea089
378,6 tok/s
gemma-4-E2B-itNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 · run-20260728-184455-e8b129
377,6 tok/s
NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-4B3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260728-194136-ac388e
362,3 tok/s
NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-4B3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260728-194136-5e5085
361,4 tok/s
NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-30B-A3B same modelNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 · run-20260729-105335-653788
359,4 tok/s
Nemotron-3-Nano-Omni-30B-A3B-ReasoningNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 · run-20260729-105334-2c4905
359,3 tok/s
Nemotron-Cascade-2-30B-A3BNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 · run-20260729-105334-44d1e7
359,0 tok/s
Nemotron-3-Nano-Omni-30B-A3B-ReasoningNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition · run-20260729-032119-4852bf
357,1 tok/s
NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-30B-A3B this runAMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 · run-20260806-094442-920af2
32,2 tok/s

How does this benchmark compare on other GPUs?

Same model on different hardware · 1× concurrent · Generation (tok/s)

Hardware

GPU: AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 · 32 GB VRAM
CPU: AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX 16-Cores
RAM: 184 GB
Mainboard: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX90E-SAGE SE

Setup

Runtime: llama.cpp
Quantization: Q4_K_M
Model: NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-30B-A3B

Configuration

benchmark-konfiguration — run-20260806-094442-920af2
# LLM-Benchmark Konfiguration # Modell : NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-30B-A3B # Engine : llama.cpp # Run-ID : run-20260806-094442-920af2 # GPU : AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 # CPU : AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX 16-Cores # RAM : 184 GB bench@llm-benchmark:~$ /home/godcore/llama.cpp/build/bin/llama-server \ -m /home/godcore/.cache/huggingface/hub/models--DevQuasar--nvidia.NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-30B-A3B-BF16-GGUF/snapshots/3730de2284499e33be97bb6e63efe1ec183abba2/nvidia.NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-30B-A3B-BF16.Q4_K_M.gguf \ --alias NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-30B-A3B \ --host 0.0.0.0 \ --port 8000 \ -ngl 999 \ -c 16384 \ -np 4 \ --jinja
Engine?Die Inferenz-Software, die das Modell ausliefert (z.B. vLLM oder llama.cpp). Sie bestimmt Geschwindigkeit, unterstuetzte Modellformate und welche Parameter ueberhaupt verfuegbar sind.llamacpp
Modellalias?Der Name, unter dem das Modell ueber die API angesprochen wird. Genau dieser Wert muss im Request-Feld 'model' stehen.NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-30B-A3B
Kontextlaenge?Maximale Anzahl Tokens (Eingabe + erzeugte Ausgabe zusammen), die das Modell pro Anfrage verarbeiten kann.16384
Modellpfad?Pfad zur GGUF-Modelldatei, die geladen und ausgeliefert wird./home/godcore/.cache/huggingface/hub/models--DevQuasar--nvidia.NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-30B-A3B-BF16-GGUF/snapshots/3730de2284499e33be97bb6e63efe1ec183abba2/nvidia.NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-30B-A3B-BF16.Q4_K_M.gguf
GPU-Layer?Anzahl der auf die GPU ausgelagerten Modell-Layer. Hoeher = mehr VRAM und schneller; der Rest laeuft auf der CPU. 999 = alles auf GPU.999
Kontext?Groesse des Kontextfensters in Token. 0 = der beim Training verwendete Kontext des Modells.16384
np4

All benchmarks of this model To leaderboard

Anzeige
Videoreihe und Benchmarkauswertung zur AMD R9700
Model comparison

NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-30B-A3B on various hardware

All published performance runs of this model – each bubble a variant: position = prefill (X) × generation (Y), bubble size = number of runs. Closer to the top right = faster. ★ Marked gold = this benchmark.

GPUby graphics card

2.3041.7281.1525760,003.8617.72211.583Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition - 1.773,5 tok/s Generation, 9.352 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 2.935 ms (6 Laufe)NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 B...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 - 1.722,1 tok/s Generation, 5.965 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.591 ms (3 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 50...NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition - 1.654,6 tok/s Generation, 8.091 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.398 ms (9 Laufe)NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 B...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti - 897,5 tok/s Generation, 3.945 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 4.691 ms (6 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 30...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti - 263,3 tok/s Generation, 688 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 27.273 ms (3 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 50...AMD Radeon 8060S Graphics - 118,7 tok/s Generation, 1.158 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 9.116 ms (6 Laufe)AMD Radeon 8060S Grap...CPU-only - 6,6 tok/s Generation, 72 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 131.051 ms (3 Laufe)CPU-onlyAMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 - 274,0 tok/s Generation, 3.476 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 50.546 ms (13 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ AMD Radeon AI PRO R97...
NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition 1.773,5 tok/sNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 1.722,1 tok/sNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition 1.654,6 tok/sNVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti 897,5 tok/s★ AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 274,0 tok/s this runNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti 263,3 tok/sAMD Radeon 8060S Graphics 118,7 tok/sCPU-only 6,6 tok/s

CPUby processor

2.3041.7281.1525760,003.8617.72211.583Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-Core Processor - 1.773,5 tok/s Generation, 9.352 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 2.935 ms (6 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-...AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8-Core Processor - 1.722,1 tok/s Generation, 5.965 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.591 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8...AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX 24-Cores - 1.654,6 tok/s Generation, 8.091 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.398 ms (9 Laufe)AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX with Radeon Graphics - 897,5 tok/s Generation, 3.908 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 6.463 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX wi...AMD Ryzen 5 5600X 6-Core Processor - 404,7 tok/s Generation, 3.981 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 2.919 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 5 5600X 6-C...AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 32-Cores - 263,3 tok/s Generation, 688 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 27.273 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...AMD RYZEN AI MAX+ 395 w/ Radeon 8060S - 118,7 tok/s Generation, 1.158 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 9.116 ms (6 Laufe)AMD RYZEN AI MAX+ 395...Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-4620 v2 @ 2.60GHz - 6,6 tok/s Generation, 72 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 131.051 ms (3 Laufe)Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU ...AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX 16-Cores - 274,0 tok/s Generation, 3.476 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 50.546 ms (13 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...
AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-Core Processor 1.773,5 tok/sAMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8-Core Processor 1.722,1 tok/sAMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX 24-Cores 1.654,6 tok/sAMD Ryzen 9 8945HX with Radeon Graphics 897,5 tok/sAMD Ryzen 5 5600X 6-Core Processor 404,7 tok/s★ AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX 16-Cores 274,0 tok/s this runAMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 32-Cores 263,3 tok/sAMD RYZEN AI MAX+ 395 w/ Radeon 8060S 118,7 tok/sIntel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-4620 v2 @ 2.60GHz 6,6 tok/s

MBby mainboard

2.3041.7281.1525760,003.8617.72211.583Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ProArt X870E-CREATOR WIFI - 1.773,5 tok/s Generation, 9.352 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 2.935 ms (6 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ROG STRIX B550-A GAMING - 1.722,1 tok/s Generation, 5.965 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.591 ms (3 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....Meigao Innovation Technology (Shen Zhen) Co., Ltd DRFXL (MotherBoard Series) - 897,5 tok/s Generation, 3.908 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 6.463 ms (3 Laufe)Meigao Innovation Tec...ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. PRIME A520M-K - 404,7 tok/s Generation, 3.981 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 2.919 ms (3 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI - 263,3 tok/s Generation, 688 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 27.273 ms (3 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....Bosgame AXB35-02 (BeyondMax Series) - 118,7 tok/s Generation, 1.158 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 9.116 ms (6 Laufe)Bosgame AXB35-02 (Bey...Dell Inc. PowerEdge R820 - 6,6 tok/s Generation, 72 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 131.051 ms (3 Laufe)Dell Inc. PowerEdge R...ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX90E-SAGE SE - 1.654,6 tok/s Generation, 5.364 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 31.258 ms (22 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....
ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ProArt X870E-CREATOR WIFI 1.773,5 tok/sASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ROG STRIX B550-A GAMING 1.722,1 tok/s★ ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX90E-SAGE SE 1.654,6 tok/s this runMeigao Innovation Technology (Shen Zhen) Co., Ltd DRFXL (MotherBoard Series) 897,5 tok/sASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. PRIME A520M-K 404,7 tok/sASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI 263,3 tok/sBosgame AXB35-02 (BeyondMax Series) 118,7 tok/sDell Inc. PowerEdge R820 6,6 tok/s

ENGby engine

2.2251.6681.1125560,09026.01711.13216.247Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)vLLM - 533,5 tok/s Generation, 13.615 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 2.206 ms (5 Laufe)vLLMunbekannt - 404,7 tok/s Generation, 3.981 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 2.919 ms (3 Laufe)unbekanntllama.cpp - 1.773,5 tok/s Generation, 3.534 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 30.587 ms (41 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ llama.cpp
★ llama.cpp 1.773,5 tok/s this runvLLM 533,5 tok/sunbekannt 404,7 tok/s

DRVby driver

1.9511.8621.7741.6851.5964.3154.4984.6824.865Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)unbekannt - 1.773,5 tok/s Generation, 4.590 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 25.997 ms (49 Laufe)unbekannt
unbekannt 1.773,5 tok/s
💰 Economics

Economics of this run

Operating cost, TCO and comparison with the next-best runs of the same model at identical concurrency (1× concurrent). Methodology →

⚙️ ConfigurationAll metrics and charts below follow these settings – based on a 24-month runtime.Save to URLReset
⚡ Electricity price EUR/kWh
⚙️ System utilization 100 %
🖥️ Acquisition EUR
🔌 Idle 85 W
⚡ TDP 371 W
☁️ External LLM (API)
Electricity0.30 EUR/kWh
Avg power (incl. idle)371 W estimated (TDP)GPU 300 + CPU 46 + Board 25 W full load
Avg cost / hourEUR 0.11
Electricity / 1M tokensEUR 0.96
Token / kWh312.06K
Acquisition (system)EUR 6,824 full priceGPU EUR 1,400 · CPU EUR 1,399 · Board EUR 1,299 · RAM EUR 2,576 · PSU EUR 150
Electricity (2 years)
TCO (2 years)EUR 8,774
Output tokens (2 years)2.03B
☁️ External LLM (API) – comparison
External LLM cost (2 years)
Savings vs. external (2 years)

All values above and the charts below take the configured system utilization into account: at X% the system generates only X% of the time, the rest it idles (85 W). Cost per hour drops (more idle), cost per token rises.

Cost over 2 years – electricity only

Cost over 2 years – incl. acquisition (TCO)

Speed vs. tokens per euro

Euro per 1M tokens

Comparison vs. API – economics per benchmark

NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-30B-A3BAMD Radeon AI PRO R9700NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-30B-A3BNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-30B-A3BNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation EditionNVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-30B-A3B3x NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition
Electricity cost (24 mo.)
Acquisition cost
Total cost (TCO)
Generated tokens (24 mo.)
Token price via API
Break-even point (days)
Result (savings / extra cost)

Comparison with up to 3 next-best runs of this model at the same concurrency (at least one on different hardware). Power = GPU TDP + CPU (idle + 15 %) + board (estimated), acquisition = full system (GPU + CPU + board + RAM + PSU), prices = stored market prices.

Contributed by

Mario Alka Administrator

@marioalka

Ich bin Unternehmer, Softwareentwickler und KI-Enthusiast. Seit vielen Jahren entwickle ich Unternehmenssoftware und beschäftige mich inzwischen fast täglich mit lokalen LLMs, KI-Agenten und leistungsfähiger KI-Hardware.

Mit LLM-Benchmark.de möchte ich eine Plattform schaffen, auf der Modelle, GPUs und Agenten objektiv und reproduzierbar miteinander verglichen werden.