Created bymario-alka.dePowered bygodcore.denoob2claw.detricoma.de
Contributed byMario AlkaMistral AI

Mistral-Small-3.1-24B-Instruct-2503

Performance benchmark · measured on 03.08.2026 14:20

Benchmark-IDrun-20260805-053402-6c4bd3
Timebench 3 - Kombi (Prefill + Generation)Dense24BRuntime: llama.cppQuantisierung: Q4_K
Generation210,99tok/s
Prefill5.228,03tok/s
Time to First Token44.651,50ms
Total duration293,58s
Concurrency10parallel
Ranking in the field
27of 123 systems

Performance benchmark · Primary metric: Generation-Speed (tok/s) · 10× concurrent

This run is better than 79 % of all comparable systems.
Generation 211,0 tok/s
+41 % vs Ø 149,3
Prefill 5.228,0 tok/s
+89 % vs Ø 2.767,7
Time to First Token 44.652 ms
-62 % vs Ø 117.654
Distribution in the field2 – 667 tok/s
Ø 148 Median Dieser Lauf

Wie schlägt sich dieser Benchmark mit anderen Modellen?

How does this benchmark compare on other GPUs?

Same model on different hardware · 10× concurrent · Generation (tok/s)

Hardware

GPU: 3x AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 · 32 GB VRAM
CPU: AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX 16-Cores
RAM: 184 GB
Mainboard: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX90E-SAGE SE

Setup

Runtime: llama.cpp
Quantization: Q4_K
Model: Mistral-Small-3.1-24B-Instruct-2503

Configuration

benchmark-konfiguration — run-20260805-053402-6c4bd3
# LLM-Benchmark Konfiguration # Modell : Mistral-Small-3.1-24B-Instruct-2503 # Engine : llama.cpp # Run-ID : run-20260805-053402-6c4bd3 # GPU : 3x AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 # CPU : AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX 16-Cores # RAM : 184 GB bench@llm-benchmark:~$ /home/godcore/llama.cpp/build/bin/llama-server \ -m /home/godcore/.cache/huggingface/hub/models--mrfakename--mistral-small-3.1-24b-instruct-2503-gguf/snapshots/72af174a032b5788b9c88b3c8907ab1363ef7f69/ggml-model-Q4_K.gguf \ --alias Mistral-Small-3.1-24B-Instruct-2503 \ --host 0.0.0.0 \ --port 8000 \ -ngl 999 \ -c 16384 \ -np 4 \ --jinja
Engine?Die Inferenz-Software, die das Modell ausliefert (z.B. vLLM oder llama.cpp). Sie bestimmt Geschwindigkeit, unterstuetzte Modellformate und welche Parameter ueberhaupt verfuegbar sind.llamacpp
Modellalias?Der Name, unter dem das Modell ueber die API angesprochen wird. Genau dieser Wert muss im Request-Feld 'model' stehen.Mistral-Small-3.1-24B-Instruct-2503
Kontextlaenge?Maximale Anzahl Tokens (Eingabe + erzeugte Ausgabe zusammen), die das Modell pro Anfrage verarbeiten kann.16384
Modellpfad?Pfad zur GGUF-Modelldatei, die geladen und ausgeliefert wird./home/godcore/.cache/huggingface/hub/models--mrfakename--mistral-small-3.1-24b-instruct-2503-gguf/snapshots/72af174a032b5788b9c88b3c8907ab1363ef7f69/ggml-model-Q4_K.gguf
GPU-Layer?Anzahl der auf die GPU ausgelagerten Modell-Layer. Hoeher = mehr VRAM und schneller; der Rest laeuft auf der CPU. 999 = alles auf GPU.999
Kontext?Groesse des Kontextfensters in Token. 0 = der beim Training verwendete Kontext des Modells.16384
np4

All benchmarks of this model To leaderboard

Anzeige
Model comparison

Mistral-Small-3.1-24B-Instruct-2503 on various hardware

All published performance runs of this model – each bubble a variant: position = prefill (X) × generation (Y), bubble size = number of runs. Closer to the top right = faster. ★ Marked gold = this benchmark.

GPUby graphics card

8946714472240,003.2406.4809.720Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition - 690,3 tok/s Generation, 7.818 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 4.068 ms (6 Laufe)NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 B...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 - 684,1 tok/s Generation, 5.919 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 6.904 ms (3 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 50...NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition - 594,0 tok/s Generation, 7.898 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 7.966 ms (9 Laufe)NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 B...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti - 337,4 tok/s Generation, 3.405 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 14.083 ms (3 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 30...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti - 117,6 tok/s Generation, 1.566 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 37.087 ms (3 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 50...AMD Radeon 8060S Graphics - 14,8 tok/s Generation, 410 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 5.067 ms (1 Lauf)AMD Radeon 8060S Grap...AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 - 216,1 tok/s Generation, 3.011 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 14.573 ms (14 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ AMD Radeon AI PRO R97...
NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition 690,3 tok/sNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 684,1 tok/sNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition 594,0 tok/sNVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti 337,4 tok/s★ AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 216,1 tok/s this runNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti 117,6 tok/sAMD Radeon 8060S Graphics 14,8 tok/s

CPUby processor

8946714472240,003.2406.4809.720Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-Core Processor - 690,3 tok/s Generation, 7.818 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 4.068 ms (6 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-...AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8-Core Processor - 684,1 tok/s Generation, 5.919 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 6.904 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8...AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX 24-Cores - 594,0 tok/s Generation, 7.898 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 7.966 ms (9 Laufe)AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX with Radeon Graphics - 337,4 tok/s Generation, 3.405 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 14.083 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX wi...AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 32-Cores - 117,6 tok/s Generation, 1.566 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 37.087 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...AMD RYZEN AI MAX+ 395 w/ Radeon 8060S - 14,8 tok/s Generation, 410 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 5.067 ms (1 Lauf)AMD RYZEN AI MAX+ 395...AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX 16-Cores - 216,1 tok/s Generation, 3.011 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 14.573 ms (14 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...
AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-Core Processor 690,3 tok/sAMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8-Core Processor 684,1 tok/sAMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX 24-Cores 594,0 tok/sAMD Ryzen 9 8945HX with Radeon Graphics 337,4 tok/s★ AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX 16-Cores 216,1 tok/s this runAMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 32-Cores 117,6 tok/sAMD RYZEN AI MAX+ 395 w/ Radeon 8060S 14,8 tok/s

MBby mainboard

8946714472240,003.2076.4149.620Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ProArt X870E-CREATOR WIFI - 690,3 tok/s Generation, 7.818 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 4.068 ms (6 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ROG STRIX B550-A GAMING - 684,1 tok/s Generation, 5.919 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 6.904 ms (3 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....Meigao Innovation Technology (Shen Zhen) Co., Ltd DRFXL (MotherBoard Series) - 337,4 tok/s Generation, 3.405 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 14.083 ms (3 Laufe)Meigao Innovation Tec...ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI - 117,6 tok/s Generation, 1.566 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 37.087 ms (3 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....Bosgame AXB35-02 (BeyondMax Series) - 14,8 tok/s Generation, 410 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 5.067 ms (1 Lauf)Bosgame AXB35-02 (Bey...ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX90E-SAGE SE - 594,0 tok/s Generation, 4.923 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 11.988 ms (23 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....
ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ProArt X870E-CREATOR WIFI 690,3 tok/sASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ROG STRIX B550-A GAMING 684,1 tok/s★ ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX90E-SAGE SE 594,0 tok/s this runMeigao Innovation Technology (Shen Zhen) Co., Ltd DRFXL (MotherBoard Series) 337,4 tok/sASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI 117,6 tok/sBosgame AXB35-02 (BeyondMax Series) 14,8 tok/s

ENGby engine

8806604402200,03.5115.5087.5069.504Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)vLLM - 88,3 tok/s Generation, 8.343 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 1.652 ms (3 Laufe)vLLMllama.cpp - 690,3 tok/s Generation, 4.672 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 13.179 ms (36 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ llama.cpp
★ llama.cpp 690,3 tok/s this runvLLM 88,3 tok/s

DRVby driver

7597256906566214.6574.8555.0535.252Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)unbekannt - 690,3 tok/s Generation, 4.954 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 12.293 ms (39 Laufe)unbekannt
unbekannt 690,3 tok/s
💰 Economics

Economics of this run

Operating cost, TCO and comparison with the next-best runs of the same model at identical concurrency (10× concurrent). Methodology →

⚙️ ConfigurationAll metrics and charts below follow these settings – based on a 24-month runtime.Save to URLReset
⚡ Electricity price EUR/kWh
⚙️ System utilization 100 %
🖥️ Acquisition EUR
🔌 Idle 125 W
⚡ TDP 971 W
☁️ External LLM (API)
Electricity0.30 EUR/kWh
Avg power (incl. idle)971 W estimated (TDP)GPU 900 + CPU 46 + Board 25 W full load
Avg cost / hourEUR 0.29
Electricity / 1M tokensEUR 0.38
Token / kWh782.25K
Acquisition (system)EUR 9,674 full priceGPU EUR 4,200 · CPU EUR 1,399 · Board EUR 1,299 · RAM EUR 2,576 · PSU EUR 200
Electricity (2 years)
TCO (2 years)EUR 14,778
Output tokens (2 years)13.31B
☁️ External LLM (API) – comparison
External LLM cost (2 years)
Savings vs. external (2 years)

All values above and the charts below take the configured system utilization into account: at X% the system generates only X% of the time, the rest it idles (125 W). Cost per hour drops (more idle), cost per token rises.

Cost over 2 years – electricity only

Cost over 2 years – incl. acquisition (TCO)

Speed vs. tokens per euro

Euro per 1M tokens

Comparison vs. API – economics per benchmark

Mistral-Small-3.1-24B-Instruct-25033x AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700Mistral-Small-3.1-24B-Instruct-2503NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation EditionMistral-Small-3.1-24B-Instruct-2503NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090Mistral-Small-3.1-24B-Instruct-25033x NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition
Electricity cost (24 mo.)
Acquisition cost
Total cost (TCO)
Generated tokens (24 mo.)
Token price via API
Break-even point (days)
Result (savings / extra cost)

Comparison with up to 3 next-best runs of this model at the same concurrency (at least one on different hardware). Power = GPU TDP + CPU (idle + 15 %) + board (estimated), acquisition = full system (GPU + CPU + board + RAM + PSU), prices = stored market prices.

Contributed by

Mario Alka Administrator

@marioalka

Ich bin Unternehmer, Softwareentwickler und KI-Enthusiast. Seit vielen Jahren entwickle ich Unternehmenssoftware und beschäftige mich inzwischen fast täglich mit lokalen LLMs, KI-Agenten und leistungsfähiger KI-Hardware.

Mit LLM-Benchmark.de möchte ich eine Plattform schaffen, auf der Modelle, GPUs und Agenten objektiv und reproduzierbar miteinander verglichen werden.