Created bymario-alka.dePowered bygodcore.denoob2claw.detricoma.de
Contributed byMario AlkaQwen (Alibaba)

Qwen2.5-72B-Instruct

Performance benchmark · measured on 31.07.2026 00:30

Benchmark-IDrun-20260731-071559-01d13d
Timebench 3 - Kombi (Prefill + Generation)Dense72BRuntime: llama.cppQuantisierung: Q4_K_M
Generation86,86tok/s
Prefill1.630,59tok/s
Time to First Token19.862,00ms
Total duration230,14s
Concurrency5parallel
Ranking in the field
161of 179 systems

Performance benchmark · Primary metric: Generation-Speed (tok/s) · 5× concurrent

This run is better than 10 % of all comparable systems.
Generation 86,9 tok/s
-83 % vs Ø 508,7
Prefill 1.630,6 tok/s
-77 % vs Ø 6.960,0
Time to First Token 19.862 ms
+160 % vs Ø 7.638
Distribution in the field13 – 1.196 tok/s
Ø 509 Median Dieser Lauf

Wie schlägt sich dieser Benchmark mit anderen Modellen?

gemma-4-E2B-it3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260728-184456-4111a9
1.195,7 tok/s
NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-4B3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260728-194136-836a91
1.090,6 tok/s
NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-4B3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260727-181606-8b381e
1.077,4 tok/s
NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-4B3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260728-194136-b8a818
1.071,0 tok/s
NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-4B3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260728-194136-038e92
1.051,1 tok/s
gpt-oss-20b3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260729-032121-ffb18a
1.015,5 tok/s
gpt-oss-20b3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260728-034052-437388
989,7 tok/s
gpt-oss-20b3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260729-032120-8b6146
970,4 tok/s
gpt-oss-20b3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260729-032120-310458
946,5 tok/s
Nemotron-3-Nano-Omni-30B-A3B-Reasoning3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260729-105340-c65107
931,3 tok/s
NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-30B-A3B3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260729-105341-60b672
930,9 tok/s
NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-30B-A3B3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260729-105341-88bf57
929,1 tok/s
Nemotron-Cascade-2-30B-A3B3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260729-105340-86d336
928,5 tok/s
Nemotron-Cascade-2-30B-A3B3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260729-105340-9ec82f
927,0 tok/s
Qwen2.5-72B-Instruct this run3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260731-071559-01d13d
86,9 tok/s

How does this benchmark compare on other GPUs?

Same model on different hardware · 5× concurrent · Generation (tok/s)

Hardware

GPU: 3x NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · 96 GB VRAM
CPU: AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX 24-Cores
RAM: 125 GB
Mainboard: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX90E-SAGE SE

Setup

Runtime: llama.cpp
Quantization: Q4_K_M
Model: Qwen2.5-72B-Instruct

Configuration

benchmark-konfiguration — run-20260731-071559-01d13d
# LLM-Benchmark Konfiguration # Modell : Qwen2.5-72B-Instruct # Engine : llama.cpp # Run-ID : run-20260731-071559-01d13d # GPU : 3x NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition # CPU : AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX 24-Cores # RAM : 125 GB bench@llm-benchmark:~$ /home/godcore/llama.cpp/build/bin/llama-server \ -m /home/godcore/.cache/huggingface/hub/models--bartowski--Qwen2.5-72B-Instruct-GGUF/snapshots/d43fd973131bce821f41e2df3c78c6fe15c5627a/Qwen2.5-72B-Instruct-Q4_K_M.gguf \ --alias Qwen2.5-72B-Instruct \ --host 0.0.0.0 \ --port 8000 \ -ngl 999 \ -c 16384 \ -np 4 \ --jinja
Engine?Die Inferenz-Software, die das Modell ausliefert (z.B. vLLM oder llama.cpp). Sie bestimmt Geschwindigkeit, unterstuetzte Modellformate und welche Parameter ueberhaupt verfuegbar sind.llamacpp
Modellalias?Der Name, unter dem das Modell ueber die API angesprochen wird. Genau dieser Wert muss im Request-Feld 'model' stehen.Qwen2.5-72B-Instruct
Kontextlaenge?Maximale Anzahl Tokens (Eingabe + erzeugte Ausgabe zusammen), die das Modell pro Anfrage verarbeiten kann.16384
Modellpfad?Pfad zur GGUF-Modelldatei, die geladen und ausgeliefert wird./home/godcore/.cache/huggingface/hub/models--bartowski--Qwen2.5-72B-Instruct-GGUF/snapshots/d43fd973131bce821f41e2df3c78c6fe15c5627a/Qwen2.5-72B-Instruct-Q4_K_M.gguf
GPU-Layer?Anzahl der auf die GPU ausgelagerten Modell-Layer. Hoeher = mehr VRAM und schneller; der Rest laeuft auf der CPU. 999 = alles auf GPU.999
Kontext?Groesse des Kontextfensters in Token. 0 = der beim Training verwendete Kontext des Modells.16384
np4

All benchmarks of this model To leaderboard

Anzeige
Model comparison

Qwen2.5-72B-Instruct on various hardware

All published performance runs of this model – each bubble a variant: position = prefill (X) × generation (Y), bubble size = number of runs. Closer to the top right = faster. ★ Marked gold = this benchmark.

GPUby graphics card

31023315577,60,009321.8632.795Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition - 239,2 tok/s Generation, 2.275 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 19.196 ms (3 Laufe)NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 B...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti - 5,8 tok/s Generation, 159 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 42.383 ms (3 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 50...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti - 4,9 tok/s Generation, 209 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 31.676 ms (3 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 30...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 - 3,0 tok/s Generation, 147 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 42.799 ms (3 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 50...NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition - 203,8 tok/s Generation, 2.269 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 23.754 ms (9 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 B...
NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition 239,2 tok/s★ NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition 203,8 tok/s this runNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti 5,8 tok/sNVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti 4,9 tok/sNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 3,0 tok/s

CPUby processor

31023315577,60,009321.8632.795Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-Core Processor - 239,2 tok/s Generation, 2.275 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 19.196 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-...AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 32-Cores - 5,8 tok/s Generation, 159 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 42.383 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX with Radeon Graphics - 4,9 tok/s Generation, 209 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 31.676 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX wi...AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8-Core Processor - 3,0 tok/s Generation, 147 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 42.799 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8...AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX 24-Cores - 203,8 tok/s Generation, 2.269 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 23.754 ms (9 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...
AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-Core Processor 239,2 tok/s★ AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX 24-Cores 203,8 tok/s this runAMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 32-Cores 5,8 tok/sAMD Ryzen 9 8945HX with Radeon Graphics 4,9 tok/sAMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8-Core Processor 3,0 tok/s

MBby mainboard

31023315577,60,009321.8632.795Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ProArt X870E-CREATOR WIFI - 239,2 tok/s Generation, 2.275 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 19.196 ms (3 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI - 5,8 tok/s Generation, 159 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 42.383 ms (3 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....Meigao Innovation Technology (Shen Zhen) Co., Ltd DRFXL (MotherBoard Series) - 4,9 tok/s Generation, 209 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 31.676 ms (3 Laufe)Meigao Innovation Tec...ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ROG STRIX B550-A GAMING - 3,0 tok/s Generation, 147 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 42.799 ms (3 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX90E-SAGE SE - 203,8 tok/s Generation, 2.269 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 23.754 ms (9 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....
ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ProArt X870E-CREATOR WIFI 239,2 tok/s★ ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX90E-SAGE SE 203,8 tok/s this runASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI 5,8 tok/sMeigao Innovation Technology (Shen Zhen) Co., Ltd DRFXL (MotherBoard Series) 4,9 tok/sASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ROG STRIX B550-A GAMING 3,0 tok/s

ENGby engine

2632512392272151.2891.3441.3991.454Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)llama.cpp - 239,2 tok/s Generation, 1.371 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 29.617 ms (21 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ llama.cpp
★ llama.cpp 239,2 tok/s this run

DRVby driver

2632512392272151.2891.3441.3991.454Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)unbekannt - 239,2 tok/s Generation, 1.371 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 29.617 ms (21 Laufe)unbekannt
unbekannt 239,2 tok/s
💰 Economics

Economics of this run

Operating cost, TCO and comparison with the next-best runs of the same model at identical concurrency (5× concurrent). Methodology →

⚙️ ConfigurationAll metrics and charts below follow these settings – based on a 24-month runtime.Save to URLReset
⚡ Electricity price EUR/kWh
⚙️ System utilization 100 %
🖥️ Acquisition EUR
🔌 Idle 165 W
⚡ TDP 983 W
☁️ External LLM (API)
Electricity0.30 EUR/kWh
Avg power (incl. idle)983 W estimated (TDP)GPU 900 + CPU 57 + Board 25 W full load
Avg cost / hourEUR 0.29
Electricity / 1M tokensEUR 0.94
Token / kWh318.27K
Acquisition (system)EUR 45,748 full priceGPU EUR 39,000 · CPU EUR 3,499 · Board EUR 1,299 · RAM EUR 1,750 · PSU EUR 200
Electricity (2 years)
TCO (2 years)EUR 50,912
Output tokens (2 years)5.48B
☁️ External LLM (API) – comparison
External LLM cost (2 years)
Savings vs. external (2 years)

All values above and the charts below take the configured system utilization into account: at X% the system generates only X% of the time, the rest it idles (165 W). Cost per hour drops (more idle), cost per token rises.

Cost over 2 years – electricity only

Cost over 2 years – incl. acquisition (TCO)

Speed vs. tokens per euro

Euro per 1M tokens

Comparison vs. API – economics per benchmark

Qwen2.5-72B-Instruct3x NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation EditionQwen2.5-72B-InstructNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation EditionQwen2.5-72B-Instruct3x NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation EditionQwen2.5-72B-Instruct3x NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition
Electricity cost (24 mo.)
Acquisition cost
Total cost (TCO)
Generated tokens (24 mo.)
Token price via API
Break-even point (days)
Result (savings / extra cost)

Comparison with up to 3 next-best runs of this model at the same concurrency (at least one on different hardware). Power = GPU TDP + CPU (idle + 15 %) + board (estimated), acquisition = full system (GPU + CPU + board + RAM + PSU), prices = stored market prices.

Contributed by

Mario Alka Administrator

@marioalka

Ich bin Unternehmer, Softwareentwickler und KI-Enthusiast. Seit vielen Jahren entwickle ich Unternehmenssoftware und beschäftige mich inzwischen fast täglich mit lokalen LLMs, KI-Agenten und leistungsfähiger KI-Hardware.

Mit LLM-Benchmark.de möchte ich eine Plattform schaffen, auf der Modelle, GPUs und Agenten objektiv und reproduzierbar miteinander verglichen werden.