Created bymario-alka.dePowered bygodcore.denoob2claw.detricoma.de
Contributed byMario AlkaByteDance Seed

Seed-OSS-36B-Instruct

Performance benchmark · measured on 30.07.2026 21:54

Benchmark-IDrun-20260731-071556-658fd2
Timebench 3 - Kombi (Prefill + Generation)36BRuntime: llama.cppQuantisierung: Q4_K_M
Generation51,53tok/s
Prefill1.914,64tok/s
Time to First Token1.155,00ms
Total duration42,11s
Concurrency1parallel
Ranking in the field
146of 170 systems

Performance benchmark · Primary metric: Generation-Speed (tok/s) · 1× concurrent

This run is better than 14 % of all comparable systems.
Generation 51,5 tok/s
-69 % vs Ø 165,0
Prefill 1.914,6 tok/s
-56 % vs Ø 4.399,1
Time to First Token 1.155 ms
-45 % vs Ø 2.116
Distribution in the field1 – 362 tok/s
Ø 165 Median Dieser Lauf

Wie schlägt sich dieser Benchmark mit anderen Modellen?

NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-4B3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260728-194136-ac388e
362,3 tok/s
NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-4B3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260728-194136-5e5085
361,4 tok/s
NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-4B3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260727-181606-a2f36d
356,7 tok/s
NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-4B3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260728-194136-1be57b
355,6 tok/s
gpt-oss-20b3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260729-032120-b63d5d
350,7 tok/s
gpt-oss-20b3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260729-032121-74868e
350,0 tok/s
gpt-oss-20b3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260728-034052-120dc2
348,9 tok/s
gemma-4-E2B-it3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260728-184455-9cb45c
343,9 tok/s
Nemotron-3-Nano-Omni-30B-A3B-Reasoning3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260729-105339-e213a2
331,0 tok/s
NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-30B-A3B3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260729-105340-e34cf0
330,8 tok/s
Nemotron-Cascade-2-30B-A3B3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260729-105340-3ddb51
330,2 tok/s
Nemotron-3-Nano-Omni-30B-A3B-Reasoning3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260729-105339-133b6a
330,1 tok/s
NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-30B-A3B3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260729-105341-f734f1
330,0 tok/s
Nemotron-Cascade-2-30B-A3B3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260729-105340-508364
329,9 tok/s
Seed-OSS-36B-Instruct this run3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260731-071556-658fd2
51,5 tok/s

How does this benchmark compare on other GPUs?

Same model on different hardware · 1× concurrent · Generation (tok/s)

Hardware

GPU: 3x NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · 96 GB VRAM
CPU: AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX 24-Cores
RAM: 125 GB
Mainboard: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX90E-SAGE SE

Setup

Runtime: llama.cpp
Quantization: Q4_K_M
Model: Seed-OSS-36B-Instruct

Configuration

benchmark-konfiguration — run-20260731-071556-658fd2
# LLM-Benchmark Konfiguration # Modell : Seed-OSS-36B-Instruct # Engine : llama.cpp # Run-ID : run-20260731-071556-658fd2 # GPU : 3x NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition # CPU : AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX 24-Cores # RAM : 125 GB bench@llm-benchmark:~$ /home/godcore/llama.cpp/build/bin/llama-server \ -m /home/godcore/.cache/huggingface/hub/models--yarikdevcom--Seed-OSS-36B-Instruct-GGUF/snapshots/cced0086e699de401821cce4b6fa69d3c6e87011/Seed_OSS_36B_Instruct_Q4_K_M.gguf \ --alias Seed-OSS-36B-Instruct \ --host 0.0.0.0 \ --port 8000 \ -ngl 999 \ -c 16384 \ -np 4 \ --jinja
Engine?Die Inferenz-Software, die das Modell ausliefert (z.B. vLLM oder llama.cpp). Sie bestimmt Geschwindigkeit, unterstuetzte Modellformate und welche Parameter ueberhaupt verfuegbar sind.llamacpp
Modellalias?Der Name, unter dem das Modell ueber die API angesprochen wird. Genau dieser Wert muss im Request-Feld 'model' stehen.Seed-OSS-36B-Instruct
Kontextlaenge?Maximale Anzahl Tokens (Eingabe + erzeugte Ausgabe zusammen), die das Modell pro Anfrage verarbeiten kann.16384
Modellpfad?Pfad zur GGUF-Modelldatei, die geladen und ausgeliefert wird./home/godcore/.cache/huggingface/hub/models--yarikdevcom--Seed-OSS-36B-Instruct-GGUF/snapshots/cced0086e699de401821cce4b6fa69d3c6e87011/Seed_OSS_36B_Instruct_Q4_K_M.gguf
GPU-Layer?Anzahl der auf die GPU ausgelagerten Modell-Layer. Hoeher = mehr VRAM und schneller; der Rest laeuft auf der CPU. 999 = alles auf GPU.999
Kontext?Groesse des Kontextfensters in Token. 0 = der beim Training verwendete Kontext des Modells.16384
np4

All benchmarks of this model To leaderboard

Anzeige
Model comparison

Seed-OSS-36B-Instruct on various hardware

All published performance runs of this model – each bubble a variant: position = prefill (X) × generation (Y), bubble size = number of runs. Closer to the top right = faster. ★ Marked gold = this benchmark.

GPUby graphics card

1.0918195462730,001.3192.6393.958Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 - 839,7 tok/s Generation, 2.664 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 12.384 ms (3 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 50...NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition - 460,0 tok/s Generation, 3.141 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 10.624 ms (3 Laufe)NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 B...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti - 111,6 tok/s Generation, 992 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 41.392 ms (3 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 30...AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 - 78,4 tok/s Generation, 2.174 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 7.389 ms (2 Laufe)AMD Radeon AI PRO R97...AMD Radeon 8060S Graphics - 43,0 tok/s Generation, 343 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 30.694 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Radeon 8060S Grap...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti - 39,2 tok/s Generation, 423 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 95.542 ms (3 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 50...CPU-only - 1,0 tok/s Generation, 8 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 240.790 ms (1 Lauf)CPU-onlyNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition - 383,9 tok/s Generation, 3.193 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 13.087 ms (9 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 B...
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 839,7 tok/sNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition 460,0 tok/s★ NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition 383,9 tok/s this runNVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti 111,6 tok/sAMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 78,4 tok/sAMD Radeon 8060S Graphics 43,0 tok/sNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti 39,2 tok/sCPU-only 1,0 tok/s

CPUby processor

1.0918195462730,001.3192.6393.958Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8-Core Processor - 839,7 tok/s Generation, 2.664 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 12.384 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8...AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-Core Processor - 460,0 tok/s Generation, 3.141 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 10.624 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-...AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX with Radeon Graphics - 111,6 tok/s Generation, 992 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 41.392 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX wi...AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX 16-Cores - 78,4 tok/s Generation, 2.174 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 7.389 ms (2 Laufe)AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...AMD RYZEN AI MAX+ 395 w/ Radeon 8060S - 43,0 tok/s Generation, 343 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 30.694 ms (3 Laufe)AMD RYZEN AI MAX+ 395...AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 32-Cores - 39,2 tok/s Generation, 423 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 95.542 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-4620 v2 @ 2.60GHz - 1,0 tok/s Generation, 8 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 240.790 ms (1 Lauf)Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU ...AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX 24-Cores - 383,9 tok/s Generation, 3.193 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 13.087 ms (9 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8-Core Processor 839,7 tok/sAMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-Core Processor 460,0 tok/s★ AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX 24-Cores 383,9 tok/s this runAMD Ryzen 9 8945HX with Radeon Graphics 111,6 tok/sAMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX 16-Cores 78,4 tok/sAMD RYZEN AI MAX+ 395 w/ Radeon 8060S 43,0 tok/sAMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 32-Cores 39,2 tok/sIntel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-4620 v2 @ 2.60GHz 1,0 tok/s

MBby mainboard

1.0918195462730,001.2982.5953.893Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ROG STRIX B550-A GAMING - 839,7 tok/s Generation, 2.664 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 12.384 ms (3 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ProArt X870E-CREATOR WIFI - 460,0 tok/s Generation, 3.141 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 10.624 ms (3 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....Meigao Innovation Technology (Shen Zhen) Co., Ltd DRFXL (MotherBoard Series) - 111,6 tok/s Generation, 992 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 41.392 ms (3 Laufe)Meigao Innovation Tec...Bosgame AXB35-02 (BeyondMax Series) - 43,0 tok/s Generation, 343 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 30.694 ms (3 Laufe)Bosgame AXB35-02 (Bey...ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI - 39,2 tok/s Generation, 423 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 95.542 ms (3 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....Dell Inc. PowerEdge R820 - 1,0 tok/s Generation, 8 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 240.790 ms (1 Lauf)Dell Inc. PowerEdge R...ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX90E-SAGE SE - 383,9 tok/s Generation, 3.008 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 12.051 ms (11 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....
ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ROG STRIX B550-A GAMING 839,7 tok/sASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ProArt X870E-CREATOR WIFI 460,0 tok/s★ ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX90E-SAGE SE 383,9 tok/s this runMeigao Innovation Technology (Shen Zhen) Co., Ltd DRFXL (MotherBoard Series) 111,6 tok/sBosgame AXB35-02 (BeyondMax Series) 43,0 tok/sASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI 39,2 tok/sDell Inc. PowerEdge R820 1,0 tok/s

ENGby engine

9248828407987561.9422.0252.1072.190Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)llama.cpp - 839,7 tok/s Generation, 2.066 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 35.009 ms (27 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ llama.cpp
★ llama.cpp 839,7 tok/s this run

DRVby driver

9248828407987561.9422.0252.1072.190Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)unbekannt - 839,7 tok/s Generation, 2.066 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 35.009 ms (27 Laufe)unbekannt
unbekannt 839,7 tok/s
💰 Economics

Economics of this run

Operating cost, TCO and comparison with the next-best runs of the same model at identical concurrency (1× concurrent). Methodology →

⚙️ ConfigurationAll metrics and charts below follow these settings – based on a 24-month runtime.Save to URLReset
⚡ Electricity price EUR/kWh
⚙️ System utilization 100 %
🖥️ Acquisition EUR
🔌 Idle 165 W
⚡ TDP 983 W
☁️ External LLM (API)
Electricity0.30 EUR/kWh
Avg power (incl. idle)983 W estimated (TDP)GPU 900 + CPU 57 + Board 25 W full load
Avg cost / hourEUR 0.29
Electricity / 1M tokensEUR 1.59
Token / kWh188.81K
Acquisition (system)EUR 45,748 full priceGPU EUR 39,000 · CPU EUR 3,499 · Board EUR 1,299 · RAM EUR 1,750 · PSU EUR 200
Electricity (2 years)
TCO (2 years)EUR 50,912
Output tokens (2 years)3.25B
☁️ External LLM (API) – comparison
External LLM cost (2 years)
Savings vs. external (2 years)

All values above and the charts below take the configured system utilization into account: at X% the system generates only X% of the time, the rest it idles (165 W). Cost per hour drops (more idle), cost per token rises.

Cost over 2 years – electricity only

Cost over 2 years – incl. acquisition (TCO)

Speed vs. tokens per euro

Euro per 1M tokens

Comparison vs. API – economics per benchmark

Seed-OSS-36B-Instruct3x NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation EditionSeed-OSS-36B-InstructNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation EditionSeed-OSS-36B-InstructNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090Seed-OSS-36B-Instruct3x NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition
Electricity cost (24 mo.)
Acquisition cost
Total cost (TCO)
Generated tokens (24 mo.)
Token price via API
Break-even point (days)
Result (savings / extra cost)

Comparison with up to 3 next-best runs of this model at the same concurrency (at least one on different hardware). Power = GPU TDP + CPU (idle + 15 %) + board (estimated), acquisition = full system (GPU + CPU + board + RAM + PSU), prices = stored market prices.

Contributed by

Mario Alka Administrator

@marioalka

Ich bin Unternehmer, Softwareentwickler und KI-Enthusiast. Seit vielen Jahren entwickle ich Unternehmenssoftware und beschäftige mich inzwischen fast täglich mit lokalen LLMs, KI-Agenten und leistungsfähiger KI-Hardware.

Mit LLM-Benchmark.de möchte ich eine Plattform schaffen, auf der Modelle, GPUs und Agenten objektiv und reproduzierbar miteinander verglichen werden.