Created bymario-alka.dePowered bygodcore.denoob2claw.detricoma.de
Contributed byMario AlkaQwen (Alibaba)

Qwen2.5-32B-Instruct-AWQ

Performance benchmark · measured on 30.07.2026 13:35

Benchmark-IDrun-20260730-181638-0c6a41
Timebench 3 - Kombi (Prefill + Generation)Dense32BRuntime: llama.cppQuantisierung: AWQ
Generation253,96tok/s
Prefill5.304,23tok/s
Time to First Token6.595,50ms
Total duration78,95s
Concurrency5parallel
Ranking in the field
38of 53 systems

Performance benchmark · Primary metric: Generation-Speed (tok/s) · 5× concurrent

This run is better than 29 % of all comparable systems.
Generation 254,0 tok/s
-55 % vs Ø 561,3
Prefill 5.304,2 tok/s
-21 % vs Ø 6.735,4
Time to First Token 6.596 ms
-77 % vs Ø 28.081
Distribution in the field2 – 1.302 tok/s
Ø 561 Median Dieser Lauf

Wie schlägt sich dieser Benchmark mit anderen Modellen?

How does this benchmark compare on other GPUs?

Same model on different hardware · 5× concurrent · Generation (tok/s)

Hardware

GPU: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 · 32 GB VRAM
CPU: AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8-Core Processor
RAM: 126 GB
Mainboard: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ROG STRIX B550-A GAMING

Setup

Runtime: llama.cpp
Quantization: AWQ
Model: Qwen2.5-32B-Instruct-AWQ

Configuration

benchmark-konfiguration — run-20260730-181638-0c6a41
# LLM-Benchmark Konfiguration # Modell : Qwen2.5-32B-Instruct-AWQ # Engine : llama.cpp # Run-ID : run-20260730-181638-0c6a41 # GPU : NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 # CPU : AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8-Core Processor # RAM : 126 GB bench@llm-benchmark:~$ /root/llama.cpp/build/bin/llama-server \ -m /root/.cache/huggingface/hub/models--bartowski--Qwen2.5-32B-Instruct-GGUF/snapshots/2116cbb385b8ce3a4d28cf3bf1cd2039a55821a6/Qwen2.5-32B-Instruct-Q4_K_M.gguf \ --alias Qwen2.5-32B-Instruct-AWQ \ --host 0.0.0.0 \ --port 8000 \ -ngl 999 \ -c 16384 \ -np 4 \ --jinja
Engine?Die Inferenz-Software, die das Modell ausliefert (z.B. vLLM oder llama.cpp). Sie bestimmt Geschwindigkeit, unterstuetzte Modellformate und welche Parameter ueberhaupt verfuegbar sind.llamacpp
Modellalias?Der Name, unter dem das Modell ueber die API angesprochen wird. Genau dieser Wert muss im Request-Feld 'model' stehen.Qwen2.5-32B-Instruct-AWQ
Kontextlaenge?Maximale Anzahl Tokens (Eingabe + erzeugte Ausgabe zusammen), die das Modell pro Anfrage verarbeiten kann.16384
Modellpfad?Pfad zur GGUF-Modelldatei, die geladen und ausgeliefert wird./root/.cache/huggingface/hub/models--bartowski--Qwen2.5-32B-Instruct-GGUF/snapshots/2116cbb385b8ce3a4d28cf3bf1cd2039a55821a6/Qwen2.5-32B-Instruct-Q4_K_M.gguf
GPU-Layer?Anzahl der auf die GPU ausgelagerten Modell-Layer. Hoeher = mehr VRAM und schneller; der Rest laeuft auf der CPU. 999 = alles auf GPU.999
Kontext?Groesse des Kontextfensters in Token. 0 = der beim Training verwendete Kontext des Modells.16384
np4

All benchmarks of this model To leaderboard

Anzeige
Model comparison

Qwen2.5-32B-Instruct-AWQ on various hardware

All published performance runs of this model – each bubble a variant: position = prefill (X) × generation (Y), bubble size = number of runs. Closer to the top right = faster. ★ Marked gold = this benchmark.

GPUby graphics card

6594943291650,001.8573.7145.571Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition - 510,3 tok/s Generation, 4.510 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 5.988 ms (6 Laufe)NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 B...NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition - 412,6 tok/s Generation, 4.568 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 11.783 ms (9 Laufe)NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 B...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti - 223,8 tok/s Generation, 2.049 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 20.166 ms (3 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 30...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti - 45,0 tok/s Generation, 619 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 95.102 ms (3 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 50...AMD Radeon 8060S Graphics - 22,6 tok/s Generation, 517 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 24.115 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Radeon 8060S Grap...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 - 473,9 tok/s Generation, 4.532 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 9.919 ms (3 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 50...
NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition 510,3 tok/s★ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 473,9 tok/s this runNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition 412,6 tok/sNVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti 223,8 tok/sNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti 45,0 tok/sAMD Radeon 8060S Graphics 22,6 tok/s

CPUby processor

6594943291650,001.8573.7145.571Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-Core Processor - 510,3 tok/s Generation, 4.510 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 5.988 ms (6 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-...AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX 24-Cores - 412,6 tok/s Generation, 4.568 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 11.783 ms (9 Laufe)AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX with Radeon Graphics - 223,8 tok/s Generation, 2.049 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 20.166 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX wi...AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 32-Cores - 45,0 tok/s Generation, 619 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 95.102 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...AMD RYZEN AI MAX+ 395 w/ Radeon 8060S - 22,6 tok/s Generation, 517 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 24.115 ms (3 Laufe)AMD RYZEN AI MAX+ 395...AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8-Core Processor - 473,9 tok/s Generation, 4.532 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 9.919 ms (3 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8...
AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-Core Processor 510,3 tok/s★ AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8-Core Processor 473,9 tok/s this runAMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX 24-Cores 412,6 tok/sAMD Ryzen 9 8945HX with Radeon Graphics 223,8 tok/sAMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 32-Cores 45,0 tok/sAMD RYZEN AI MAX+ 395 w/ Radeon 8060S 22,6 tok/s

MBby mainboard

6594943291650,001.8573.7145.571Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ProArt X870E-CREATOR WIFI - 510,3 tok/s Generation, 4.510 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 5.988 ms (6 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX90E-SAGE SE - 412,6 tok/s Generation, 4.568 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 11.783 ms (9 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....Meigao Innovation Technology (Shen Zhen) Co., Ltd DRFXL (MotherBoard Series) - 223,8 tok/s Generation, 2.049 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 20.166 ms (3 Laufe)Meigao Innovation Tec...ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI - 45,0 tok/s Generation, 619 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 95.102 ms (3 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....Bosgame AXB35-02 (BeyondMax Series) - 22,6 tok/s Generation, 517 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 24.115 ms (3 Laufe)Bosgame AXB35-02 (Bey...ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ROG STRIX B550-A GAMING - 473,9 tok/s Generation, 4.532 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 9.919 ms (3 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....
ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ProArt X870E-CREATOR WIFI 510,3 tok/s★ ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ROG STRIX B550-A GAMING 473,9 tok/s this runASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX90E-SAGE SE 412,6 tok/sMeigao Innovation Technology (Shen Zhen) Co., Ltd DRFXL (MotherBoard Series) 223,8 tok/sASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI 45,0 tok/sBosgame AXB35-02 (BeyondMax Series) 22,6 tok/s

ENGby engine

5695304924544162.7653.4884.2124.935Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)vLLM - 510,3 tok/s Generation, 4.452 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 2.742 ms (3 Laufe)vLLMllama.cpp - 474,0 tok/s Generation, 3.249 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 24.236 ms (24 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ llama.cpp
vLLM 510,3 tok/s★ llama.cpp 474,0 tok/s this run

DRVby driver

5615365104854593.1793.3153.4503.585Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)unbekannt - 510,3 tok/s Generation, 3.382 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 21.848 ms (27 Laufe)unbekannt
unbekannt 510,3 tok/s
💰 Economics

Economics of this run

Operating cost, TCO and comparison with the next-best runs of the same model at identical concurrency (5× concurrent). Methodology →

⚙️ ConfigurationAll metrics and charts below follow these settings – based on a 24-month runtime.Save to URLReset
⚡ Electricity price EUR/kWh
⚙️ System utilization 100 %
🖥️ Acquisition EUR
🔌 Idle 72 W
⚡ TDP 622 W
☁️ External LLM (API)
Electricity0.30 EUR/kWh
Avg power (incl. idle)622 W estimated (TDP)GPU 575 + CPU 35 + Board 12 W full load
Avg cost / hourEUR 0.19
Electricity / 1M tokensEUR 0.20
Token / kWh1.47M
Acquisition (system)EUR 4,986 full priceGPU EUR 3,300 · CPU EUR 349 · Board EUR 149 · RAM EUR 1,008 · PSU EUR 180
Electricity (2 years)
TCO (2 years)EUR 8,253
Output tokens (2 years)16.02B
☁️ External LLM (API) – comparison
External LLM cost (2 years)
Savings vs. external (2 years)

All values above and the charts below take the configured system utilization into account: at X% the system generates only X% of the time, the rest it idles (72 W). Cost per hour drops (more idle), cost per token rises.

Cost over 2 years – electricity only

Cost over 2 years – incl. acquisition (TCO)

Speed vs. tokens per euro

Euro per 1M tokens

Comparison vs. API – economics per benchmark

Qwen2.5-32B-Instruct-AWQNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090Qwen2.5-32B-Instruct-AWQNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation EditionQwen2.5-32B-Instruct-AWQNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation EditionQwen2.5-32B-Instruct-AWQ3x NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition
Electricity cost (24 mo.)
Acquisition cost
Total cost (TCO)
Generated tokens (24 mo.)
Token price via API
Break-even point (days)
Result (savings / extra cost)

Comparison with up to 3 next-best runs of this model at the same concurrency (at least one on different hardware). Power = GPU TDP + CPU (idle + 15 %) + board (estimated), acquisition = full system (GPU + CPU + board + RAM + PSU), prices = stored market prices.

Contributed by

Mario Alka Administrator

@marioalka

Ich bin Unternehmer, Softwareentwickler und KI-Enthusiast. Seit vielen Jahren entwickle ich Unternehmenssoftware und beschäftige mich inzwischen fast täglich mit lokalen LLMs, KI-Agenten und leistungsfähiger KI-Hardware.

Mit LLM-Benchmark.de möchte ich eine Plattform schaffen, auf der Modelle, GPUs und Agenten objektiv und reproduzierbar miteinander verglichen werden.