Created bymario-alka.dePowered bygodcore.denoob2claw.detricoma.de
Contributed byMario AlkaMeta

Meta-Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct

Performance benchmark · measured on 30.07.2026 12:35

Benchmark-IDrun-20260730-130613-00135d
Timebench 3 - Kombi (Prefill + Generation)Dense8BRuntime: llama.cppQuantisierung: Q4_K_M
Generation87,92tok/s
Prefill4.115,54tok/s
Time to First Token599,50ms
Total duration24,50s
Concurrency1parallel
Ranking in the field
236of 483 systems

Performance benchmark · Primary metric: Generation-Speed (tok/s) · 1× concurrent

This run is better than 51 % of all comparable systems.
Generation 87,9 tok/s
-28 % vs Ø 122,9
Prefill 4.115,5 tok/s
+26 % vs Ø 3.256,3
Time to First Token 600 ms
-95 % vs Ø 12.044
Distribution in the field0 – 405 tok/s
Ø 123 Median Dieser Lauf

Wie schlägt sich dieser Benchmark mit anderen Modellen?

gpt-oss-20bNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 · run-20260724-004608-16af9b
404,6 tok/s
gpt-oss-20bNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition · run-20260730-035052-9f766a
395,2 tok/s
NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-4BNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 · run-20260728-194135-d456e7
393,5 tok/s
NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-4BNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition · run-20260727-181607-bffb11
393,5 tok/s
gpt-oss-20bNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 · run-20260724-004607-29bd16
388,9 tok/s
gpt-oss-20bNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 · run-20260729-032121-1c779f
388,2 tok/s
gemma-4-E2B-itNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition · run-20260727-181606-6ea089
378,6 tok/s
gemma-4-E2B-itNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 · run-20260728-184455-e8b129
377,6 tok/s
NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-4B3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260728-194136-ac388e
362,3 tok/s
NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-4B3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260728-194136-5e5085
361,4 tok/s
NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-30B-A3BNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 · run-20260729-105335-653788
359,4 tok/s
Nemotron-3-Nano-Omni-30B-A3B-ReasoningNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 · run-20260729-105334-2c4905
359,3 tok/s
Nemotron-Cascade-2-30B-A3BNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 · run-20260729-105334-44d1e7
359,0 tok/s
Nemotron-3-Nano-Omni-30B-A3B-ReasoningNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition · run-20260729-032119-4852bf
357,1 tok/s
Meta-Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct this run3× AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 · run-20260730-130613-00135d
87,9 tok/s

How does this benchmark compare on other GPUs?

Same model on different hardware · 1× concurrent · Generation (tok/s)

Hardware

GPU: 3x AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 · 32 GB VRAM
CPU: AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX 16-Cores
RAM: 184 GB
Mainboard: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX90E-SAGE SE

Setup

Runtime: llama.cpp
Quantization: Q4_K_M
Model: Meta-Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct

Configuration

benchmark-konfiguration — run-20260730-130613-00135d
# LLM-Benchmark Konfiguration # Modell : Meta-Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct # Engine : llama.cpp # Run-ID : run-20260730-130613-00135d # GPU : 3x AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 # CPU : AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX 16-Cores # RAM : 184 GB bench@llm-benchmark:~$ /home/godcore/llama.cpp/build/bin/llama-server \ -m /home/godcore/.cache/huggingface/hub/models--bartowski--Meta-Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct-GGUF/snapshots/bf5b95e96dac0462e2a09145ec66cae9a3f12067/Meta-Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct-Q4_K_M.gguf \ --alias Meta-Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct \ --host 0.0.0.0 \ --port 8000 \ -ngl 999 \ -c 16384 \ -np 4 \ --jinja
Engine?Die Inferenz-Software, die das Modell ausliefert (z.B. vLLM oder llama.cpp). Sie bestimmt Geschwindigkeit, unterstuetzte Modellformate und welche Parameter ueberhaupt verfuegbar sind.llamacpp
Modellalias?Der Name, unter dem das Modell ueber die API angesprochen wird. Genau dieser Wert muss im Request-Feld 'model' stehen.Meta-Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct
Kontextlaenge?Maximale Anzahl Tokens (Eingabe + erzeugte Ausgabe zusammen), die das Modell pro Anfrage verarbeiten kann.16384
Modellpfad?Pfad zur GGUF-Modelldatei, die geladen und ausgeliefert wird./home/godcore/.cache/huggingface/hub/models--bartowski--Meta-Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct-GGUF/snapshots/bf5b95e96dac0462e2a09145ec66cae9a3f12067/Meta-Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct-Q4_K_M.gguf
GPU-Layer?Anzahl der auf die GPU ausgelagerten Modell-Layer. Hoeher = mehr VRAM und schneller; der Rest laeuft auf der CPU. 999 = alles auf GPU.999
Kontext?Groesse des Kontextfensters in Token. 0 = der beim Training verwendete Kontext des Modells.16384
np4

All benchmarks of this model To leaderboard

Anzeige
Model comparison

Meta-Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct on various hardware

All published performance runs of this model – each bubble a variant: position = prefill (X) × generation (Y), bubble size = number of runs. Closer to the top right = faster. ★ Marked gold = this benchmark.

GPUby graphics card

2.0701.5531.0355180,005.87311.74617.619Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 - 1.593,1 tok/s Generation, 11.858 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.236 ms (3 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 50...NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition - 1.533,0 tok/s Generation, 13.472 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 2.895 ms (3 Laufe)NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 B...NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition - 1.433,0 tok/s Generation, 14.214 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.334 ms (9 Laufe)NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 B...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti - 913,4 tok/s Generation, 6.511 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 5.168 ms (3 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 50...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti - 837,9 tok/s Generation, 8.047 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 5.721 ms (3 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 30...AMD Radeon 8060S Graphics - 83,4 tok/s Generation, 1.949 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 6.369 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Radeon 8060S Grap...CPU-only - 3,6 tok/s Generation, 36 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 59.044 ms (1 Lauf)CPU-onlyAMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 - 87,9 tok/s Generation, 4.116 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 600 ms (1 Lauf) | DIESER LAUF★ AMD Radeon AI PRO R97...
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 1.593,1 tok/sNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition 1.533,0 tok/sNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition 1.433,0 tok/sNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti 913,4 tok/sNVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti 837,9 tok/s★ AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 87,9 tok/s this runAMD Radeon 8060S Graphics 83,4 tok/sCPU-only 3,6 tok/s

CPUby processor

2.0701.5531.0355180,005.87311.74617.619Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8-Core Processor - 1.593,1 tok/s Generation, 11.858 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.236 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8...AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-Core Processor - 1.533,0 tok/s Generation, 13.472 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 2.895 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-...AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX 24-Cores - 1.433,0 tok/s Generation, 14.214 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.334 ms (9 Laufe)AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 32-Cores - 913,4 tok/s Generation, 6.511 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 5.168 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX with Radeon Graphics - 837,9 tok/s Generation, 8.047 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 5.721 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX wi...AMD RYZEN AI MAX+ 395 w/ Radeon 8060S - 83,4 tok/s Generation, 1.949 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 6.369 ms (3 Laufe)AMD RYZEN AI MAX+ 395...Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-4620 v2 @ 2.60GHz - 3,6 tok/s Generation, 36 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 59.044 ms (1 Lauf)Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU ...AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX 16-Cores - 87,9 tok/s Generation, 4.116 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 600 ms (1 Lauf) | DIESER LAUF★ AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8-Core Processor 1.593,1 tok/sAMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-Core Processor 1.533,0 tok/sAMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX 24-Cores 1.433,0 tok/sAMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 32-Cores 913,4 tok/sAMD Ryzen 9 8945HX with Radeon Graphics 837,9 tok/s★ AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX 16-Cores 87,9 tok/s this runAMD RYZEN AI MAX+ 395 w/ Radeon 8060S 83,4 tok/sIntel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-4620 v2 @ 2.60GHz 3,6 tok/s

MBby mainboard

2.0701.5531.0355180,005.56611.13216.698Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ROG STRIX B550-A GAMING - 1.593,1 tok/s Generation, 11.858 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.236 ms (3 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ProArt X870E-CREATOR WIFI - 1.533,0 tok/s Generation, 13.472 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 2.895 ms (3 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI - 913,4 tok/s Generation, 6.511 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 5.168 ms (3 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....Meigao Innovation Technology (Shen Zhen) Co., Ltd DRFXL (MotherBoard Series) - 837,9 tok/s Generation, 8.047 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 5.721 ms (3 Laufe)Meigao Innovation Tec...Bosgame AXB35-02 (BeyondMax Series) - 83,4 tok/s Generation, 1.949 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 6.369 ms (3 Laufe)Bosgame AXB35-02 (Bey...Dell Inc. PowerEdge R820 - 3,6 tok/s Generation, 36 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 59.044 ms (1 Lauf)Dell Inc. PowerEdge R...ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX90E-SAGE SE - 1.433,0 tok/s Generation, 13.205 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.060 ms (10 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....
ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ROG STRIX B550-A GAMING 1.593,1 tok/sASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ProArt X870E-CREATOR WIFI 1.533,0 tok/s★ ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX90E-SAGE SE 1.433,0 tok/s this runASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI 913,4 tok/sMeigao Innovation Technology (Shen Zhen) Co., Ltd DRFXL (MotherBoard Series) 837,9 tok/sBosgame AXB35-02 (BeyondMax Series) 83,4 tok/sDell Inc. PowerEdge R820 3,6 tok/s

ENGby engine

1.7521.6731.5931.5131.4349.3139.70910.10510.502Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)llama.cpp - 1.593,1 tok/s Generation, 9.907 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 6.147 ms (26 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ llama.cpp
★ llama.cpp 1.593,1 tok/s this run

DRVby driver

1.7521.6731.5931.5131.4349.3139.70910.10510.502Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)unbekannt - 1.593,1 tok/s Generation, 9.907 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 6.147 ms (26 Laufe)unbekannt
unbekannt 1.593,1 tok/s
💰 Economics

Economics of this run

Operating cost, TCO and comparison with the next-best runs of the same model at identical concurrency (1× concurrent). Methodology →

⚙️ ConfigurationAll metrics and charts below follow these settings – based on a 24-month runtime.Save to URLReset
⚡ Electricity price EUR/kWh
⚙️ System utilization 100 %
🖥️ Acquisition EUR
🔌 Idle 125 W
⚡ TDP 971 W
☁️ External LLM (API)
Electricity0.30 EUR/kWh
Avg power (incl. idle)971 W estimated (TDP)GPU 900 + CPU 46 + Board 25 W full load
Avg cost / hourEUR 0.29
Electricity / 1M tokensEUR 0.92
Token / kWh325.96K
Acquisition (system)EUR 9,674 full priceGPU EUR 4,200 · CPU EUR 1,399 · Board EUR 1,299 · RAM EUR 2,576 · PSU EUR 200
Electricity (2 years)
TCO (2 years)EUR 14,778
Output tokens (2 years)5.55B
☁️ External LLM (API) – comparison
External LLM cost (2 years)
Savings vs. external (2 years)

All values above and the charts below take the configured system utilization into account: at X% the system generates only X% of the time, the rest it idles (125 W). Cost per hour drops (more idle), cost per token rises.

Cost over 2 years – electricity only

Cost over 2 years – incl. acquisition (TCO)

Speed vs. tokens per euro

Euro per 1M tokens

Comparison vs. API – economics per benchmark

Meta-Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct3x AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700Meta-Llama-3.1-8B-InstructNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090Meta-Llama-3.1-8B-InstructNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation EditionMeta-Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct3x NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition
Electricity cost (24 mo.)
Acquisition cost
Total cost (TCO)
Generated tokens (24 mo.)
Token price via API
Break-even point (days)
Result (savings / extra cost)

Comparison with up to 3 next-best runs of this model at the same concurrency (at least one on different hardware). Power = GPU TDP + CPU (idle + 15 %) + board (estimated), acquisition = full system (GPU + CPU + board + RAM + PSU), prices = stored market prices.

Contributed by

Mario Alka Administrator

@marioalka

Ich bin Unternehmer, Softwareentwickler und KI-Enthusiast. Seit vielen Jahren entwickle ich Unternehmenssoftware und beschäftige mich inzwischen fast täglich mit lokalen LLMs, KI-Agenten und leistungsfähiger KI-Hardware.

Mit LLM-Benchmark.de möchte ich eine Plattform schaffen, auf der Modelle, GPUs und Agenten objektiv und reproduzierbar miteinander verglichen werden.