Created bymario-alka.dePowered bygodcore.denoob2claw.detricoma.de
Contributed byMario AlkaQwen (Alibaba)

Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B

Performance benchmark · measured on 29.07.2026 08:06

Benchmark-IDrun-20260729-105336-45c777
Timebench 3 - Kombi (Prefill + Generation)MoE35BRuntime: llama.cppQuantisierung: UD-Q4_K_M
Generation849,15tok/s
Prefill3.912,87tok/s
Time to First Token14.486,00ms
Total duration80,77s
Concurrency10parallel
Ranking in the field
168of 425 systems

Performance benchmark · Primary metric: Generation-Speed (tok/s) · 10× concurrent

This run is better than 61 % of all comparable systems.
Generation 849,2 tok/s
+20 % vs Ø 709,7
Prefill 3.912,9 tok/s
-43 % vs Ø 6.837,0
Time to First Token 14.486 ms
-64 % vs Ø 40.485
Distribution in the field0 – 2.491 tok/s
Ø 710 Median Dieser Lauf

Wie schlägt sich dieser Benchmark mit anderen Modellen?

gemma-4-E2B-itNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 · run-20260728-184455-e28775
2.491,2 tok/s
gemma-4-E2B-itNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition · run-20260727-181606-b37ed9
2.414,4 tok/s
NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-4BNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition · run-20260727-181607-4cca42
2.182,7 tok/s
gemma-4-E2B-it3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260728-184456-d87c73
2.143,6 tok/s
gpt-oss-20bNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition · run-20260728-140954-8007c4
1.993,5 tok/s
NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-4B3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260728-194136-0aed86
1.937,7 tok/s
NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-4B3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260728-194136-8db0fa
1.911,6 tok/s
NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-4B3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260727-181606-e0eafd
1.897,0 tok/s
gpt-oss-20bNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 · run-20260729-032121-7c961d
1.890,7 tok/s
NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-4BNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 · run-20260728-194135-2ed9dd
1.878,7 tok/s
gpt-oss-20b3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260728-034052-26063b
1.835,7 tok/s
NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-4B3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260728-194136-a77046
1.830,3 tok/s
gpt-oss-20b3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260729-032121-c6e7e0
1.819,5 tok/s
gpt-oss-20b3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260729-032121-2b99aa
1.802,0 tok/s
Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B this runNVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti · run-20260729-105336-45c777
849,2 tok/s

How does this benchmark compare on other GPUs?

Same model on different hardware · 10× concurrent · Generation (tok/s)

Configuration

benchmark-konfiguration — run-20260729-105336-45c777
# LLM-Benchmark Konfiguration # Modell : Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B # Engine : llama.cpp # Run-ID : run-20260729-105336-45c777 # GPU : NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti # CPU : AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX with Radeon Graphics # RAM : 92 GB bench@llm-benchmark:~$ /root/llama.cpp/build/bin/llama-server \ -m /root/.cache/huggingface/hub/models--unsloth--Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B-GGUF/snapshots/3a305abf5cfd119ee999dfe929c433746edd8d63/Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B-UD-Q4_K_M.gguf \ --alias Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B \ --host 0.0.0.0 \ --port 8000 \ -ngl 999 \ -c 16384 \ -np 4 \ --jinja
Engine?Die Inferenz-Software, die das Modell ausliefert (z.B. vLLM oder llama.cpp). Sie bestimmt Geschwindigkeit, unterstuetzte Modellformate und welche Parameter ueberhaupt verfuegbar sind.llamacpp
Modellalias?Der Name, unter dem das Modell ueber die API angesprochen wird. Genau dieser Wert muss im Request-Feld 'model' stehen.Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
Kontextlaenge?Maximale Anzahl Tokens (Eingabe + erzeugte Ausgabe zusammen), die das Modell pro Anfrage verarbeiten kann.16384
Modellpfad?Pfad zur GGUF-Modelldatei, die geladen und ausgeliefert wird./root/.cache/huggingface/hub/models--unsloth--Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B-GGUF/snapshots/3a305abf5cfd119ee999dfe929c433746edd8d63/Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B-UD-Q4_K_M.gguf
GPU-Layer?Anzahl der auf die GPU ausgelagerten Modell-Layer. Hoeher = mehr VRAM und schneller; der Rest laeuft auf der CPU. 999 = alles auf GPU.999
Kontext?Groesse des Kontextfensters in Token. 0 = der beim Training verwendete Kontext des Modells.16384
np4

All benchmarks of this model To leaderboard

Anzeige
Model comparison

Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B on various hardware

All published performance runs of this model – each bubble a variant: position = prefill (X) × generation (Y), bubble size = number of runs. Closer to the top right = faster. ★ Marked gold = this benchmark.

GPUby graphics card

1.8981.4239494740,002.8165.6328.447Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition - 1.481,2 tok/s Generation, 6.880 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.627 ms (3 Laufe)NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 B...AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 - 206,1 tok/s Generation, 3.156 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 4.980 ms (2 Laufe)AMD Radeon AI PRO R97...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti - 140,1 tok/s Generation, 468 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 43.146 ms (3 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 50...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti - 849,2 tok/s Generation, 3.458 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 6.729 ms (3 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 30...
NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition 1.481,2 tok/s★ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti 849,2 tok/s this runAMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 206,1 tok/sNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti 140,1 tok/s

CPUby processor

1.8981.4239494740,002.8165.6328.447Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-Core Processor - 1.481,2 tok/s Generation, 6.880 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.627 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-...AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX 16-Cores - 206,1 tok/s Generation, 3.156 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 4.980 ms (2 Laufe)AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 32-Cores - 140,1 tok/s Generation, 468 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 43.146 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX with Radeon Graphics - 849,2 tok/s Generation, 3.458 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 6.729 ms (3 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX wi...
AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-Core Processor 1.481,2 tok/s★ AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX with Radeon Graphics 849,2 tok/s this runAMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX 16-Cores 206,1 tok/sAMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 32-Cores 140,1 tok/s

MBby mainboard

1.8981.4239494740,002.8165.6328.447Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ProArt X870E-CREATOR WIFI - 1.481,2 tok/s Generation, 6.880 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.627 ms (3 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX90E-SAGE SE - 206,1 tok/s Generation, 3.156 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 4.980 ms (2 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI - 140,1 tok/s Generation, 468 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 43.146 ms (3 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....Meigao Innovation Technology (Shen Zhen) Co., Ltd DRFXL (MotherBoard Series) - 849,2 tok/s Generation, 3.458 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 6.729 ms (3 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ Meigao Innovation Tec...
ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ProArt X870E-CREATOR WIFI 1.481,2 tok/s★ Meigao Innovation Technology (Shen Zhen) Co., Ltd DRFXL (MotherBoard Series) 849,2 tok/s this runASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX90E-SAGE SE 206,1 tok/sASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI 140,1 tok/s

ENGby engine

1.6291.5551.4811.4071.3333.3103.4513.5923.732Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)llama.cpp - 1.481,2 tok/s Generation, 3.521 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 15.497 ms (11 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ llama.cpp
★ llama.cpp 1.481,2 tok/s this run

DRVby driver

1.6291.5551.4811.4071.3333.3103.4513.5923.732Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)unbekannt - 1.481,2 tok/s Generation, 3.521 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 15.497 ms (11 Laufe)unbekannt
unbekannt 1.481,2 tok/s
💰 Economics

Economics of this run

Operating cost, TCO and comparison with the next-best runs of the same model at identical concurrency (10× concurrent). Methodology →

⚙️ ConfigurationAll metrics and charts below follow these settings – based on a 24-month runtime.Save to URLReset
⚡ Electricity price EUR/kWh
⚙️ System utilization 100 %
🖥️ Acquisition EUR
🔌 Idle 50 W
⚡ TDP 477 W
☁️ External LLM (API)
Electricity0.30 EUR/kWh
Avg power (incl. idle)477 W estimated (TDP)GPU 450 + CPU 17 + Board 10 W full load
Avg cost / hourEUR 0.14
Electricity / 1M tokensEUR 0.047
Token / kWh6.41M
Acquisition (system)EUR 2,986 partial priceGPU EUR 999 · CPU EUR 549 · RAM EUR 1,288 · PSU EUR 150
Electricity (2 years)
TCO (2 years)EUR 5,494
Output tokens (2 years)53.56B
☁️ External LLM (API) – comparison
External LLM cost (2 years)
Savings vs. external (2 years)

All values above and the charts below take the configured system utilization into account: at X% the system generates only X% of the time, the rest it idles (50 W). Cost per hour drops (more idle), cost per token rises.

Cost over 2 years – electricity only

Cost over 2 years – incl. acquisition (TCO)

Speed vs. tokens per euro

Euro per 1M tokens

Comparison vs. API – economics per benchmark

Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3BNVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 TiQwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3BNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation EditionQwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B3x AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3BNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti
Electricity cost (24 mo.)
Acquisition cost
Total cost (TCO)
Generated tokens (24 mo.)
Token price via API
Break-even point (days)
Result (savings / extra cost)

Comparison with up to 3 next-best runs of this model at the same concurrency (at least one on different hardware). Power = GPU TDP + CPU (idle + 15 %) + board (estimated), acquisition = full system (GPU + CPU + board + RAM + PSU), prices = stored market prices.

Contributed by

Mario Alka Administrator

@marioalka

Ich bin Unternehmer, Softwareentwickler und KI-Enthusiast. Seit vielen Jahren entwickle ich Unternehmenssoftware und beschäftige mich inzwischen fast täglich mit lokalen LLMs, KI-Agenten und leistungsfähiger KI-Hardware.

Mit LLM-Benchmark.de möchte ich eine Plattform schaffen, auf der Modelle, GPUs und Agenten objektiv und reproduzierbar miteinander verglichen werden.