Created bymario-alka.dePowered bygodcore.denoob2claw.detricoma.de
Contributed byMario AlkaQwen (Alibaba)

Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct

Performance benchmark · measured on 29.07.2026 08:10

Benchmark-IDrun-20260729-105336-32f876
Timebench 3 - Kombi (Prefill + Generation)MoE30BRuntime: llama.cppQuantisierung: Q4_K_M
Generation307,36tok/s
Prefill6.036,78tok/s
Time to First Token403,00ms
Total duration7,47s
Concurrency1parallel
Ranking in the field
45of 1559 systems

Performance benchmark · Primary metric: Generation-Speed (tok/s) · 1× concurrent

This run is better than 97 % of all comparable systems.
Generation 307,4 tok/s
+289 % vs Ø 79,0
Prefill 6.036,8 tok/s
+113 % vs Ø 2.834,3
Time to First Token 403 ms
-98 % vs Ø 26.805
Distribution in the field0 – 405 tok/s
Ø 79 Median Dieser Lauf

Wie schlägt sich dieser Benchmark mit anderen Modellen?

How does this benchmark compare on other GPUs?

Same model on different hardware · 1× concurrent · Generation (tok/s)

Hardware

GPU: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 · 32 GB VRAM
CPU: AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8-Core Processor
RAM: 126 GB
Mainboard: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ROG STRIX B550-A GAMING

Setup

Runtime: llama.cpp
Quantization: Q4_K_M
Model: Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct

Configuration

benchmark-konfiguration — run-20260729-105336-32f876
# LLM-Benchmark Konfiguration # Modell : Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct # Engine : llama.cpp # Run-ID : run-20260729-105336-32f876 # GPU : NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 # CPU : AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8-Core Processor # RAM : 126 GB bench@llm-benchmark:~$ /root/llama.cpp/build/bin/llama-server \ -m /root/.cache/huggingface/hub/models--noctrex--Huihui-Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct-abliterated-GGUF/snapshots/6f9740ab52d5cefac63d89b65de95c12b48d49a6/Huihui-Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct-abliterated-Q4_K_M.gguf \ --alias Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct \ --host 0.0.0.0 \ --port 8000 \ -ngl 999 \ -c 16384 \ -np 4 \ --jinja
Engine?Die Inferenz-Software, die das Modell ausliefert (z.B. vLLM oder llama.cpp). Sie bestimmt Geschwindigkeit, unterstuetzte Modellformate und welche Parameter ueberhaupt verfuegbar sind.llamacpp
Modellalias?Der Name, unter dem das Modell ueber die API angesprochen wird. Genau dieser Wert muss im Request-Feld 'model' stehen.Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
Kontextlaenge?Maximale Anzahl Tokens (Eingabe + erzeugte Ausgabe zusammen), die das Modell pro Anfrage verarbeiten kann.16384
Modellpfad?Pfad zur GGUF-Modelldatei, die geladen und ausgeliefert wird./root/.cache/huggingface/hub/models--noctrex--Huihui-Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct-abliterated-GGUF/snapshots/6f9740ab52d5cefac63d89b65de95c12b48d49a6/Huihui-Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct-abliterated-Q4_K_M.gguf
GPU-Layer?Anzahl der auf die GPU ausgelagerten Modell-Layer. Hoeher = mehr VRAM und schneller; der Rest laeuft auf der CPU. 999 = alles auf GPU.999
Kontext?Groesse des Kontextfensters in Token. 0 = der beim Training verwendete Kontext des Modells.16384
np4

All benchmarks of this model To leaderboard

Anzeige
Model comparison

Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct on various hardware

All published performance runs of this model – each bubble a variant: position = prefill (X) × generation (Y), bubble size = number of runs. Closer to the top right = faster. ★ Marked gold = this benchmark.

GPUby graphics card

2.1351.6011.0675340,006.96613.93220.898Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition - 1.639,0 tok/s Generation, 17.025 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 1.966 ms (6 Laufe)NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 B...NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition - 1.505,0 tok/s Generation, 12.905 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.350 ms (9 Laufe)NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 B...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti - 903,5 tok/s Generation, 5.934 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 5.817 ms (3 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 30...NVIDIA RTX A6000 - 763,5 tok/s Generation, 14.375 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 1.665 ms (36 Laufe)NVIDIA RTX A6000AMD Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot - 245,1 tok/s Generation, 4.091 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.139 ms (6 Laufe)AMD Radeon PRO W7900 ...AMD Radeon PRO W7800 48GB - 233,0 tok/s Generation, 3.940 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 2.809 ms (4 Laufe)AMD Radeon PRO W7800 ...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti - 154,0 tok/s Generation, 1.182 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 22.532 ms (6 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 50...AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 - 89,8 tok/s Generation, 3.530 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 44.809 ms (20 Laufe)AMD Radeon AI PRO R97...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 - 1.655,9 tok/s Generation, 9.318 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.329 ms (3 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 50...
★ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 1.655,9 tok/s this runNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition 1.639,0 tok/sNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition 1.505,0 tok/sNVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti 903,5 tok/sNVIDIA RTX A6000 763,5 tok/sAMD Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot 245,1 tok/sAMD Radeon PRO W7800 48GB 233,0 tok/sNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti 154,0 tok/sAMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 89,8 tok/s

CPUby processor

2.1041.5781.0525260,006.85913.71820.578Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-Core Processor - 1.639,0 tok/s Generation, 17.025 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 1.966 ms (6 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-...AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX 24-Cores - 1.505,0 tok/s Generation, 12.905 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.350 ms (9 Laufe)AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX with Radeon Graphics - 903,5 tok/s Generation, 5.934 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 5.817 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX wi...AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX 16-Cores - 763,5 tok/s Generation, 10.502 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 17.073 ms (56 Laufe)AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 32-Cores - 245,1 tok/s Generation, 2.962 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 10.329 ms (16 Laufe)AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8-Core Processor - 1.655,9 tok/s Generation, 9.318 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.329 ms (3 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8...
★ AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8-Core Processor 1.655,9 tok/s this runAMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-Core Processor 1.639,0 tok/sAMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX 24-Cores 1.505,0 tok/sAMD Ryzen 9 8945HX with Radeon Graphics 903,5 tok/sAMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX 16-Cores 763,5 tok/sAMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 32-Cores 245,1 tok/s

MBby mainboard

2.1041.5781.0525260,006.85913.71820.578Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ProArt X870E-CREATOR WIFI - 1.639,0 tok/s Generation, 17.025 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 1.966 ms (6 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX90E-SAGE SE - 1.505,0 tok/s Generation, 10.834 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 15.173 ms (65 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....Meigao Innovation Technology (Shen Zhen) Co., Ltd DRFXL (MotherBoard Series) - 903,5 tok/s Generation, 5.934 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 5.817 ms (3 Laufe)Meigao Innovation Tec...ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI - 245,1 tok/s Generation, 2.962 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 10.329 ms (16 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ROG STRIX B550-A GAMING - 1.655,9 tok/s Generation, 9.318 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.329 ms (3 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....
★ ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ROG STRIX B550-A GAMING 1.655,9 tok/s this runASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ProArt X870E-CREATOR WIFI 1.639,0 tok/sASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX90E-SAGE SE 1.505,0 tok/sMeigao Innovation Technology (Shen Zhen) Co., Ltd DRFXL (MotherBoard Series) 903,5 tok/sASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI 245,1 tok/s

ENGby engine

2.1351.6011.0675340,03.1657.91112.65717.403Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)vLLM - 1.028,5 tok/s Generation, 14.863 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 2.006 ms (31 Laufe)vLLMunbekannt - 89,8 tok/s Generation, 5.705 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 549 ms (7 Laufe)unbekanntllama.cpp - 1.655,9 tok/s Generation, 7.252 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 20.449 ms (55 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ llama.cpp
★ llama.cpp 1.655,9 tok/s this runvLLM 1.028,5 tok/sunbekannt 89,8 tok/s

DRVby driver

2.1351.6011.0675340,04.3336.6789.02311.367Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)unbekannt - 1.655,9 tok/s Generation, 9.995 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 13.801 ms (86 Laufe)unbekanntAMD 7.0.0-27-generic - 89,8 tok/s Generation, 5.705 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 549 ms (7 Laufe)AMD 7.0.0-27-generic
unbekannt 1.655,9 tok/sAMD 7.0.0-27-generic 89,8 tok/s
💰 Economics

Economics of this run

Operating cost, TCO and comparison with the next-best runs of the same model at identical concurrency (1× concurrent). Methodology →

⚙️ ConfigurationAll metrics and charts below follow these settings – based on a 24-month runtime.Save to URLReset
⚡ Electricity price EUR/kWh
⚙️ System utilization 100 %
🖥️ Acquisition EUR
🔌 Idle 72 W
⚡ TDP 622 W
☁️ External LLM (API)
Electricity0.30 EUR/kWh
Avg power (incl. idle)622 W estimated (TDP)GPU 575 + CPU 35 + Board 12 W full load
Avg cost / hourEUR 0.19
Electricity / 1M tokensEUR 0.17
Token / kWh1.78M
Acquisition (system)EUR 4,986 full priceGPU EUR 3,300 · CPU EUR 349 · Board EUR 149 · RAM EUR 1,008 · PSU EUR 180
Electricity (2 years)
TCO (2 years)EUR 8,253
Output tokens (2 years)19.39B
☁️ External LLM (API) – comparison
External LLM cost (2 years)
Savings vs. external (2 years)

All values above and the charts below take the configured system utilization into account: at X% the system generates only X% of the time, the rest it idles (72 W). Cost per hour drops (more idle), cost per token rises.

Cost over 2 years – electricity only

Cost over 2 years – incl. acquisition (TCO)

Speed vs. tokens per euro

Euro per 1M tokens

Comparison vs. API – economics per benchmark

Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-InstructNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-InstructNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation EditionQwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct3x NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation EditionQwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct3x NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition
Electricity cost (24 mo.)
Acquisition cost
Total cost (TCO)
Generated tokens (24 mo.)
Token price via API
Break-even point (days)
Result (savings / extra cost)

Comparison with up to 3 next-best runs of this model at the same concurrency (at least one on different hardware). Power = GPU TDP + CPU (idle + 15 %) + board (estimated), acquisition = full system (GPU + CPU + board + RAM + PSU), prices = stored market prices.

Contributed by

Mario Alka Administrator

@marioalka

Ich bin Unternehmer, Softwareentwickler und KI-Enthusiast. Seit vielen Jahren entwickle ich Unternehmenssoftware und beschäftige mich inzwischen fast täglich mit lokalen LLMs, KI-Agenten und leistungsfähiger KI-Hardware.

Mit LLM-Benchmark.de möchte ich eine Plattform schaffen, auf der Modelle, GPUs und Agenten objektiv und reproduzierbar miteinander verglichen werden.