Created bymario-alka.dePowered bygodcore.denoob2claw.detricoma.de
Contributed byMario AlkaByteDance Seed

Seed-OSS-36B-Instruct

Performance benchmark · measured on 29.07.2026 05:35

Benchmark-IDrun-20260729-060804-4bfabe
Timebench 3 - Kombi (Prefill + Generation)36BRuntime: llama.cppQuantisierung: Q4_K_M
Generation7,49tok/s
Prefill408,69tok/s
Time to First Token5.395,50ms
Total duration284,09s
Concurrency1parallel
Ranking in the field
53of 70 systems

Performance benchmark · Primary metric: Generation-Speed (tok/s) · 1× concurrent

This run is better than 25 % of all comparable systems.
Generation 7,5 tok/s
-86 % vs Ø 53,2
Prefill 408,7 tok/s
-67 % vs Ø 1.253,3
Time to First Token 5.396 ms
-51 % vs Ø 11.017
Distribution in the field1 – 276 tok/s
Ø 53 Median Dieser Lauf

Wie schlägt sich dieser Benchmark mit anderen Modellen?

How does this benchmark compare on other GPUs?

Same model on different hardware · 1× concurrent · Generation (tok/s)

Hardware

GPU: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti · 16 GB VRAM
CPU: AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 32-Cores
RAM: 247 GB
Mainboard: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI

Setup

Runtime: llama.cpp
Quantization: Q4_K_M
Model: Seed-OSS-36B-Instruct

Configuration

benchmark-konfiguration — run-20260729-060804-4bfabe
# LLM-Benchmark Konfiguration # Modell : Seed-OSS-36B-Instruct # Engine : llama.cpp # Run-ID : run-20260729-060804-4bfabe # GPU : NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti # CPU : AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 32-Cores # RAM : 247 GB bench@llm-benchmark:~$ /home/godcore/llama.cpp/build/bin/llama-server \ -m /home/godcore/.cache/huggingface/hub/models--yarikdevcom--Seed-OSS-36B-Instruct-GGUF/snapshots/cced0086e699de401821cce4b6fa69d3c6e87011/Seed_OSS_36B_Instruct_Q4_K_M.gguf \ --alias Seed-OSS-36B-Instruct \ --host 0.0.0.0 \ --port 8000 \ -ngl 30 \ -c 16384 \ -np 4 \ --jinja
Engine?Die Inferenz-Software, die das Modell ausliefert (z.B. vLLM oder llama.cpp). Sie bestimmt Geschwindigkeit, unterstuetzte Modellformate und welche Parameter ueberhaupt verfuegbar sind.llamacpp
Modellalias?Der Name, unter dem das Modell ueber die API angesprochen wird. Genau dieser Wert muss im Request-Feld 'model' stehen.Seed-OSS-36B-Instruct
Kontextlaenge?Maximale Anzahl Tokens (Eingabe + erzeugte Ausgabe zusammen), die das Modell pro Anfrage verarbeiten kann.16384
Modellpfad?Pfad zur GGUF-Modelldatei, die geladen und ausgeliefert wird./home/godcore/.cache/huggingface/hub/models--yarikdevcom--Seed-OSS-36B-Instruct-GGUF/snapshots/cced0086e699de401821cce4b6fa69d3c6e87011/Seed_OSS_36B_Instruct_Q4_K_M.gguf
GPU-Layer?Anzahl der auf die GPU ausgelagerten Modell-Layer. Hoeher = mehr VRAM und schneller; der Rest laeuft auf der CPU. 999 = alles auf GPU.30
Kontext?Groesse des Kontextfensters in Token. 0 = der beim Training verwendete Kontext des Modells.16384
np4

All benchmarks of this model To leaderboard

Anzeige
Model comparison

Seed-OSS-36B-Instruct on various hardware

All published performance runs of this model – each bubble a variant: position = prefill (X) × generation (Y), bubble size = number of runs. Closer to the top right = faster. ★ Marked gold = this benchmark.

GPUby graphics card

1.0918195462730,001.3192.6393.958Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 - 839,7 tok/s Generation, 2.664 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 12.384 ms (3 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 50...NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition - 460,0 tok/s Generation, 3.141 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 10.624 ms (3 Laufe)NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 B...NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition - 383,9 tok/s Generation, 3.193 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 13.087 ms (9 Laufe)NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 B...NVIDIA RTX A6000 - 349,2 tok/s Generation, 2.724 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 10.630 ms (30 Laufe)NVIDIA RTX A6000NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti - 111,6 tok/s Generation, 992 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 41.392 ms (3 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 30...AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 - 107,3 tok/s Generation, 693 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 114.241 ms (16 Laufe)AMD Radeon AI PRO R97...AMD Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot - 88,6 tok/s Generation, 680 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 17.557 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Radeon PRO W7900 ...AMD Radeon PRO W7800 48GB - 57,7 tok/s Generation, 1.357 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 10.389 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Radeon PRO W7800 ...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 - 1,0 tok/s Generation, 8 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 240.790 ms (1 Lauf)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 20...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti - 39,2 tok/s Generation, 423 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 95.542 ms (3 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 50...
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 839,7 tok/sNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition 460,0 tok/sNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition 383,9 tok/sNVIDIA RTX A6000 349,2 tok/sNVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti 111,6 tok/sAMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 107,3 tok/sAMD Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot 88,6 tok/sAMD Radeon PRO W7800 48GB 57,7 tok/s★ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti 39,2 tok/s this runNVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 1,0 tok/s

CPUby processor

1.0918195462730,001.3192.6393.958Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8-Core Processor - 839,7 tok/s Generation, 2.664 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 12.384 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8...AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-Core Processor - 460,0 tok/s Generation, 3.141 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 10.624 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-...AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX 24-Cores - 383,9 tok/s Generation, 3.193 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 13.087 ms (9 Laufe)AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX 16-Cores - 349,2 tok/s Generation, 2.017 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 46.669 ms (46 Laufe)AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX with Radeon Graphics - 111,6 tok/s Generation, 992 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 41.392 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX wi...Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-4620 v2 @ 2.60GHz - 1,0 tok/s Generation, 8 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 240.790 ms (1 Lauf)Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU ...AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 32-Cores - 88,6 tok/s Generation, 820 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 41.163 ms (9 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8-Core Processor 839,7 tok/sAMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-Core Processor 460,0 tok/sAMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX 24-Cores 383,9 tok/sAMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX 16-Cores 349,2 tok/sAMD Ryzen 9 8945HX with Radeon Graphics 111,6 tok/s★ AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 32-Cores 88,6 tok/s this runIntel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-4620 v2 @ 2.60GHz 1,0 tok/s

MBby mainboard

1.0918195462730,001.2982.5953.893Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ROG STRIX B550-A GAMING - 839,7 tok/s Generation, 2.664 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 12.384 ms (3 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ProArt X870E-CREATOR WIFI - 460,0 tok/s Generation, 3.141 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 10.624 ms (3 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX90E-SAGE SE - 383,9 tok/s Generation, 2.210 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 41.174 ms (55 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....Meigao Innovation Technology (Shen Zhen) Co., Ltd DRFXL (MotherBoard Series) - 111,6 tok/s Generation, 992 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 41.392 ms (3 Laufe)Meigao Innovation Tec...Dell Inc. PowerEdge R820 - 1,0 tok/s Generation, 8 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 240.790 ms (1 Lauf)Dell Inc. PowerEdge R...ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI - 88,6 tok/s Generation, 820 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 41.163 ms (9 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....
ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ROG STRIX B550-A GAMING 839,7 tok/sASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ProArt X870E-CREATOR WIFI 460,0 tok/sASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX90E-SAGE SE 383,9 tok/sMeigao Innovation Technology (Shen Zhen) Co., Ltd DRFXL (MotherBoard Series) 111,6 tok/s★ ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI 88,6 tok/s this runDell Inc. PowerEdge R820 1,0 tok/s

ENGby engine

1.0228085943811678322.0113.1904.369Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)vLLM - 349,2 tok/s Generation, 3.736 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 4.697 ms (18 Laufe)vLLMllama.cpp - 839,7 tok/s Generation, 1.465 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 53.294 ms (56 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ llama.cpp
★ llama.cpp 839,7 tok/s this runvLLM 349,2 tok/s

DRVby driver

9248828407987561.8971.9772.0582.139Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)unbekannt - 839,7 tok/s Generation, 2.018 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 41.473 ms (74 Laufe)unbekannt
unbekannt 839,7 tok/s
💰 Economics

Economics of this run

Operating cost, TCO and comparison with the next-best runs of the same model at identical concurrency (1× concurrent). Methodology →

⚙️ ConfigurationAll metrics and charts below follow these settings – based on a 24-month runtime.Save to URLReset
⚡ Electricity price EUR/kWh
⚙️ System utilization 100 %
🖥️ Acquisition EUR
🔌 Idle 10 W
⚡ TDP 310 W
☁️ External LLM (API)
Electricity0.30 EUR/kWh
Avg power (incl. idle)310 W estimated (TDP)GPU 300 + Board 10 W full load
Avg cost / hourEUR 0.093
Electricity / 1M tokensEUR 3.45
Token / kWh86.98K
Acquisition (system)EUR 5,000 partial priceGPU EUR 994 · CPU EUR 1,880 · RAM EUR 1,976 · PSU EUR 150
Electricity (2 years)
TCO (2 years)EUR 6,629
Output tokens (2 years)472.41M
☁️ External LLM (API) – comparison
External LLM cost (2 years)
Savings vs. external (2 years)

All values above and the charts below take the configured system utilization into account: at X% the system generates only X% of the time, the rest it idles (10 W). Cost per hour drops (more idle), cost per token rises.

Cost over 2 years – electricity only

Cost over 2 years – incl. acquisition (TCO)

Speed vs. tokens per euro

Euro per 1M tokens

Comparison vs. API – economics per benchmark

Seed-OSS-36B-InstructNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 TiSeed-OSS-36B-InstructNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation EditionSeed-OSS-36B-InstructNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090Seed-OSS-36B-Instruct3x NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition
Electricity cost (24 mo.)
Acquisition cost
Total cost (TCO)
Generated tokens (24 mo.)
Token price via API
Break-even point (days)
Result (savings / extra cost)

Comparison with up to 3 next-best runs of this model at the same concurrency (at least one on different hardware). Power = GPU TDP + CPU (idle + 15 %) + board (estimated), acquisition = full system (GPU + CPU + board + RAM + PSU), prices = stored market prices.

Contributed by

Mario Alka Administrator

@marioalka

Ich bin Unternehmer, Softwareentwickler und KI-Enthusiast. Seit vielen Jahren entwickle ich Unternehmenssoftware und beschäftige mich inzwischen fast täglich mit lokalen LLMs, KI-Agenten und leistungsfähiger KI-Hardware.

Mit LLM-Benchmark.de möchte ich eine Plattform schaffen, auf der Modelle, GPUs und Agenten objektiv und reproduzierbar miteinander verglichen werden.