Created bymario-alka.dePowered bygodcore.denoob2claw.detricoma.de
Contributed byMario AlkaMistral AI

Mamba-Codestral-7B-v0.1

Performance benchmark · measured on 29.07.2026 04:42

Benchmark-IDrun-20260729-060802-bea1f6
Timebench 3 - Kombi (Prefill + Generation)Dense7BRuntime: llama.cppQuantisierung: Q4_K_M
Generation1.570,95tok/s
Prefill15.709,76tok/s
Time to First Token6.706,00ms
Total duration43,97s
Concurrency10parallel
Ranking in the field
47of 346 systems

Performance benchmark · Primary metric: Generation-Speed (tok/s) · 10× concurrent

This run is better than 87 % of all comparable systems.
Generation 1.571,0 tok/s
+141 % vs Ø 651,3
Prefill 15.709,8 tok/s
+137 % vs Ø 6.626,4
Time to First Token 6.706 ms
-84 % vs Ø 41.299
Distribution in the field0 – 2.491 tok/s
Ø 651 Median Dieser Lauf

Wie schlägt sich dieser Benchmark mit anderen Modellen?

gemma-4-E2B-itNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 · run-20260728-184455-e28775
2.491,2 tok/s
gemma-4-E2B-itNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition · run-20260727-181606-b37ed9
2.414,4 tok/s
NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-4BNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition · run-20260727-181607-4cca42
2.182,7 tok/s
gemma-4-E2B-it3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260728-184456-d87c73
2.143,6 tok/s
gpt-oss-20bNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition · run-20260728-140954-8007c4
1.993,5 tok/s
NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-4B3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260728-194136-0aed86
1.937,7 tok/s
NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-4B3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260728-194136-8db0fa
1.911,6 tok/s
NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-4B3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260727-181606-e0eafd
1.897,0 tok/s
gpt-oss-20bNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 · run-20260729-032121-7c961d
1.890,7 tok/s
NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-4BNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 · run-20260728-194135-2ed9dd
1.878,7 tok/s
gpt-oss-20b3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260728-034052-26063b
1.835,7 tok/s
NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-4B3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260728-194136-a77046
1.830,3 tok/s
gpt-oss-20b3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260729-032121-c6e7e0
1.819,5 tok/s
gpt-oss-20b3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260729-032121-2b99aa
1.802,0 tok/s
Mamba-Codestral-7B-v0.1 this runNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 · run-20260729-060802-bea1f6
1.571,0 tok/s

How does this benchmark compare on other GPUs?

Same model on different hardware · 10× concurrent · Generation (tok/s)

Hardware

GPU: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 · 32 GB VRAM
CPU: AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8-Core Processor
RAM: 126 GB
Mainboard: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ROG STRIX B550-A GAMING

Setup

Runtime: llama.cpp
Quantization: Q4_K_M
Model: Mamba-Codestral-7B-v0.1

Configuration

benchmark-konfiguration — run-20260729-060802-bea1f6
# LLM-Benchmark Konfiguration # Modell : Mamba-Codestral-7B-v0.1 # Engine : llama.cpp # Run-ID : run-20260729-060802-bea1f6 # GPU : NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 # CPU : AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8-Core Processor # RAM : 126 GB bench@llm-benchmark:~$ /root/llama.cpp/build/bin/llama-server \ -m /root/.cache/huggingface/hub/models--Agnuxo--Mamba-Codestral-7B-v0.1-instruct-python_coding_assistant-GGUF_4bit/snapshots/bff85ef20c6077b229e92fcc4eb7cb15e619e9f6/unsloth.Q4_K_M.gguf \ --alias Mamba-Codestral-7B-v0.1 \ --host 0.0.0.0 \ --port 8000 \ -ngl 999 \ -c 16384 \ -np 4 \ --jinja
Engine?Die Inferenz-Software, die das Modell ausliefert (z.B. vLLM oder llama.cpp). Sie bestimmt Geschwindigkeit, unterstuetzte Modellformate und welche Parameter ueberhaupt verfuegbar sind.llamacpp
Modellalias?Der Name, unter dem das Modell ueber die API angesprochen wird. Genau dieser Wert muss im Request-Feld 'model' stehen.Mamba-Codestral-7B-v0.1
Kontextlaenge?Maximale Anzahl Tokens (Eingabe + erzeugte Ausgabe zusammen), die das Modell pro Anfrage verarbeiten kann.16384
Modellpfad?Pfad zur GGUF-Modelldatei, die geladen und ausgeliefert wird./root/.cache/huggingface/hub/models--Agnuxo--Mamba-Codestral-7B-v0.1-instruct-python_coding_assistant-GGUF_4bit/snapshots/bff85ef20c6077b229e92fcc4eb7cb15e619e9f6/unsloth.Q4_K_M.gguf
GPU-Layer?Anzahl der auf die GPU ausgelagerten Modell-Layer. Hoeher = mehr VRAM und schneller; der Rest laeuft auf der CPU. 999 = alles auf GPU.999
Kontext?Groesse des Kontextfensters in Token. 0 = der beim Training verwendete Kontext des Modells.16384
np4

All benchmarks of this model To leaderboard

Anzeige
Model comparison

Mamba-Codestral-7B-v0.1 on various hardware

All published performance runs of this model – each bubble a variant: position = prefill (X) × generation (Y), bubble size = number of runs. Closer to the top right = faster. ★ Marked gold = this benchmark.

GPUby graphics card

2.0521.6721.2919115304.4119.50114.59119.682Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition - 1.712,6 tok/s Generation, 16.914 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 2.748 ms (3 Laufe)NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 B...NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition - 1.512,6 tok/s Generation, 13.647 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.313 ms (9 Laufe)NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 B...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti - 968,5 tok/s Generation, 7.178 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 5.296 ms (3 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 50...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti - 869,9 tok/s Generation, 8.455 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 5.683 ms (3 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 30...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 - 1.571,0 tok/s Generation, 13.229 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.023 ms (3 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 50...
NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition 1.712,6 tok/s★ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 1.571,0 tok/s this runNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition 1.512,6 tok/sNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti 968,5 tok/sNVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti 869,9 tok/s

CPUby processor

2.0521.6721.2919115304.4119.50114.59119.682Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-Core Processor - 1.712,6 tok/s Generation, 16.914 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 2.748 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-...AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX 24-Cores - 1.512,6 tok/s Generation, 13.647 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.313 ms (9 Laufe)AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 32-Cores - 968,5 tok/s Generation, 7.178 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 5.296 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX with Radeon Graphics - 869,9 tok/s Generation, 8.455 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 5.683 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX wi...AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8-Core Processor - 1.571,0 tok/s Generation, 13.229 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.023 ms (3 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8...
AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-Core Processor 1.712,6 tok/s★ AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8-Core Processor 1.571,0 tok/s this runAMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX 24-Cores 1.512,6 tok/sAMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 32-Cores 968,5 tok/sAMD Ryzen 9 8945HX with Radeon Graphics 869,9 tok/s

MBby mainboard

2.0521.6721.2919115304.4119.50114.59119.682Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ProArt X870E-CREATOR WIFI - 1.712,6 tok/s Generation, 16.914 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 2.748 ms (3 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX90E-SAGE SE - 1.512,6 tok/s Generation, 13.647 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.313 ms (9 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI - 968,5 tok/s Generation, 7.178 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 5.296 ms (3 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....Meigao Innovation Technology (Shen Zhen) Co., Ltd DRFXL (MotherBoard Series) - 869,9 tok/s Generation, 8.455 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 5.683 ms (3 Laufe)Meigao Innovation Tec...ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ROG STRIX B550-A GAMING - 1.571,0 tok/s Generation, 13.229 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.023 ms (3 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....
ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ProArt X870E-CREATOR WIFI 1.712,6 tok/s★ ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ROG STRIX B550-A GAMING 1.571,0 tok/s this runASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX90E-SAGE SE 1.512,6 tok/sASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI 968,5 tok/sMeigao Innovation Technology (Shen Zhen) Co., Ltd DRFXL (MotherBoard Series) 869,9 tok/s

ENGby engine

1.8841.7981.7131.6271.54111.64512.14112.63613.132Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)llama.cpp - 1.712,6 tok/s Generation, 12.388 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.813 ms (21 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ llama.cpp
★ llama.cpp 1.712,6 tok/s this run

DRVby driver

1.8841.7981.7131.6271.54111.64512.14112.63613.132Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)unbekannt - 1.712,6 tok/s Generation, 12.388 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.813 ms (21 Laufe)unbekannt
unbekannt 1.712,6 tok/s
💰 Economics

Economics of this run

Operating cost, TCO and comparison with the next-best runs of the same model at identical concurrency (10× concurrent). Methodology →

⚙️ ConfigurationAll metrics and charts below follow these settings – based on a 24-month runtime.Save to URLReset
⚡ Electricity price EUR/kWh
⚙️ System utilization 100 %
🖥️ Acquisition EUR
🔌 Idle 72 W
⚡ TDP 622 W
☁️ External LLM (API)
Electricity0.30 EUR/kWh
Avg power (incl. idle)622 W estimated (TDP)GPU 575 + CPU 35 + Board 12 W full load
Avg cost / hourEUR 0.19
Electricity / 1M tokensEUR 0.033
Token / kWh9.10M
Acquisition (system)EUR 4,986 full priceGPU EUR 3,300 · CPU EUR 349 · Board EUR 149 · RAM EUR 1,008 · PSU EUR 180
Electricity (2 years)
TCO (2 years)EUR 8,253
Output tokens (2 years)99.08B
☁️ External LLM (API) – comparison
External LLM cost (2 years)
Savings vs. external (2 years)

All values above and the charts below take the configured system utilization into account: at X% the system generates only X% of the time, the rest it idles (72 W). Cost per hour drops (more idle), cost per token rises.

Cost over 2 years – electricity only

Cost over 2 years – incl. acquisition (TCO)

Speed vs. tokens per euro

Euro per 1M tokens

Comparison vs. API – economics per benchmark

Mamba-Codestral-7B-v0.1NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090Mamba-Codestral-7B-v0.1NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation EditionMamba-Codestral-7B-v0.13x NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation EditionMamba-Codestral-7B-v0.13x NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition
Electricity cost (24 mo.)
Acquisition cost
Total cost (TCO)
Generated tokens (24 mo.)
Token price via API
Break-even point (days)
Result (savings / extra cost)

Comparison with up to 3 next-best runs of this model at the same concurrency (at least one on different hardware). Power = GPU TDP + CPU (idle + 15 %) + board (estimated), acquisition = full system (GPU + CPU + board + RAM + PSU), prices = stored market prices.

Contributed by

Mario Alka Administrator

@marioalka

Ich bin Unternehmer, Softwareentwickler und KI-Enthusiast. Seit vielen Jahren entwickle ich Unternehmenssoftware und beschäftige mich inzwischen fast täglich mit lokalen LLMs, KI-Agenten und leistungsfähiger KI-Hardware.

Mit LLM-Benchmark.de möchte ich eine Plattform schaffen, auf der Modelle, GPUs und Agenten objektiv und reproduzierbar miteinander verglichen werden.