Created bymario-alka.dePowered bygodcore.denoob2claw.detricoma.de
Contributed byMario AlkaNVIDIA

Nemotron-3-Nano-Omni-30B-A3B-Reasoning

Performance benchmark · measured on 29.07.2026 03:34

Benchmark-IDrun-20260729-035835-89abde
Timebench 3 - Kombi (Prefill + Generation)MoE30BRuntime: llama.cppQuantisierung: Q4_K_M
Generation221,81tok/s
Prefill3.230,06tok/s
Time to First Token666,00ms
Total duration10,57s
Concurrency1parallel
Ranking in the field
132of 1559 systems

Performance benchmark · Primary metric: Generation-Speed (tok/s) · 1× concurrent

This run is better than 92 % of all comparable systems.
Generation 221,8 tok/s
+181 % vs Ø 79,0
Prefill 3.230,1 tok/s
+14 % vs Ø 2.834,3
Time to First Token 666 ms
-98 % vs Ø 26.805
Distribution in the field0 – 405 tok/s
Ø 79 Median Dieser Lauf

Wie schlägt sich dieser Benchmark mit anderen Modellen?

gpt-oss-20bNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 · run-20260724-004608-16af9b
404,6 tok/s
gpt-oss-20bNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition · run-20260730-035052-9f766a
395,2 tok/s
Nemotron-3-Nano-4BNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 · run-20260728-194135-d456e7
393,5 tok/s
Nemotron-3-Nano-4BNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition · run-20260727-181607-bffb11
393,5 tok/s
gpt-oss-20bNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 · run-20260724-004607-29bd16
388,9 tok/s
gpt-oss-20bNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 · run-20260729-032121-1c779f
388,2 tok/s
gemma-4-E2B-itNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition · run-20260727-181606-6ea089
378,6 tok/s
gemma-4-E2B-itNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 · run-20260728-184455-e8b129
377,6 tok/s
Nemotron-3-Nano-4B3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260728-194136-ac388e
362,3 tok/s
Nemotron-3-Nano-4B3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260728-194136-5e5085
361,4 tok/s
Nemotron-3-Nano-30B-A3BNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 · run-20260729-105335-653788
359,4 tok/s
Nemotron-3-Nano-Omni-30B-A3B-Reasoning same modelNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 · run-20260729-105334-2c4905
359,3 tok/s
Nemotron-Cascade-2-30B-A3BNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 · run-20260729-105334-44d1e7
359,0 tok/s
Nemotron-3-Nano-Omni-30B-A3B-Reasoning same modelNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition · run-20260729-032119-4852bf
357,1 tok/s
Nemotron-3-Nano-Omni-30B-A3B-Reasoning this runNVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti · run-20260729-035835-89abde
221,8 tok/s

How does this benchmark compare on other GPUs?

Same model on different hardware · 1× concurrent · Generation (tok/s)

Configuration

benchmark-konfiguration — run-20260729-035835-89abde
# LLM-Benchmark Konfiguration # Modell : Nemotron-3-Nano-Omni-30B-A3B-Reasoning # Engine : llama.cpp # Run-ID : run-20260729-035835-89abde # GPU : NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti # CPU : AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX with Radeon Graphics # RAM : 92 GB bench@llm-benchmark:~$ /root/llama.cpp/build/bin/llama-server \ -m /root/.cache/huggingface/hub/models--DevQuasar--nvidia.Nemotron-3-Nano-Omni-30B-A3B-Reasoning-BF16-GGUF/snapshots/7131823f6f6ffda04b65763677f2f1dbe15eb3c5/nvidia.Nemotron-3-Nano-Omni-30B-A3B-Reasoning-BF16.f16.gguf.Q4_K_M.gguf \ --alias Nemotron-3-Nano-Omni-30B-A3B-Reasoning \ --host 0.0.0.0 \ --port 8000 \ -ngl 999 \ -c 16384 \ -np 4 \ --jinja
Engine?Die Inferenz-Software, die das Modell ausliefert (z.B. vLLM oder llama.cpp). Sie bestimmt Geschwindigkeit, unterstuetzte Modellformate und welche Parameter ueberhaupt verfuegbar sind.llamacpp
Modellalias?Der Name, unter dem das Modell ueber die API angesprochen wird. Genau dieser Wert muss im Request-Feld 'model' stehen.Nemotron-3-Nano-Omni-30B-A3B-Reasoning
Kontextlaenge?Maximale Anzahl Tokens (Eingabe + erzeugte Ausgabe zusammen), die das Modell pro Anfrage verarbeiten kann.16384
Modellpfad?Pfad zur GGUF-Modelldatei, die geladen und ausgeliefert wird./root/.cache/huggingface/hub/models--DevQuasar--nvidia.Nemotron-3-Nano-Omni-30B-A3B-Reasoning-BF16-GGUF/snapshots/7131823f6f6ffda04b65763677f2f1dbe15eb3c5/nvidia.Nemotron-3-Nano-Omni-30B-A3B-Reasoning-BF16.f16.gguf.Q4_K_M.gguf
GPU-Layer?Anzahl der auf die GPU ausgelagerten Modell-Layer. Hoeher = mehr VRAM und schneller; der Rest laeuft auf der CPU. 999 = alles auf GPU.999
Kontext?Groesse des Kontextfensters in Token. 0 = der beim Training verwendete Kontext des Modells.16384
np4

All benchmarks of this model To leaderboard

Anzeige
Model comparison

Nemotron-3-Nano-Omni-30B-A3B-Reasoning on various hardware

All published performance runs of this model – each bubble a variant: position = prefill (X) × generation (Y), bubble size = number of runs. Closer to the top right = faster. ★ Marked gold = this benchmark.

GPUby graphics card

2.3041.7281.1525760,003.3426.68410.026Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition - 1.791,5 tok/s Generation, 6.053 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.537 ms (3 Laufe)NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 B...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 - 1.706,7 tok/s Generation, 5.892 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.614 ms (3 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 50...NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition - 1.651,0 tok/s Generation, 8.080 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.410 ms (9 Laufe)NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 B...NVIDIA RTX A6000 - 527,0 tok/s Generation, 8.160 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 2.460 ms (30 Laufe)NVIDIA RTX A6000NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti - 262,5 tok/s Generation, 700 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 27.130 ms (3 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 50...AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 - 122,4 tok/s Generation, 510 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 64.956 ms (10 Laufe)AMD Radeon AI PRO R97...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti - 896,6 tok/s Generation, 3.860 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 6.490 ms (3 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 30...
NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition 1.791,5 tok/sNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 1.706,7 tok/sNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition 1.651,0 tok/s★ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti 896,6 tok/s this runNVIDIA RTX A6000 527,0 tok/sNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti 262,5 tok/sAMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 122,4 tok/s

CPUby processor

2.2761.7071.1385690,003.2986.5959.893Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-Core Processor - 1.791,5 tok/s Generation, 6.053 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.537 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-...AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8-Core Processor - 1.706,7 tok/s Generation, 5.892 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.614 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8...AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX 24-Cores - 1.651,0 tok/s Generation, 8.080 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.410 ms (9 Laufe)AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX 16-Cores - 527,0 tok/s Generation, 6.247 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 18.084 ms (40 Laufe)AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 32-Cores - 262,5 tok/s Generation, 700 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 27.130 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX with Radeon Graphics - 896,6 tok/s Generation, 3.860 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 6.490 ms (3 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX wi...
AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-Core Processor 1.791,5 tok/sAMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8-Core Processor 1.706,7 tok/sAMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX 24-Cores 1.651,0 tok/s★ AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX with Radeon Graphics 896,6 tok/s this runAMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX 16-Cores 527,0 tok/sAMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 32-Cores 262,5 tok/s

MBby mainboard

2.2761.7071.1385690,002.6795.3598.038Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ProArt X870E-CREATOR WIFI - 1.791,5 tok/s Generation, 6.053 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.537 ms (3 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ROG STRIX B550-A GAMING - 1.706,7 tok/s Generation, 5.892 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.614 ms (3 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX90E-SAGE SE - 1.651,0 tok/s Generation, 6.584 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 15.389 ms (49 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI - 262,5 tok/s Generation, 700 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 27.130 ms (3 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....Meigao Innovation Technology (Shen Zhen) Co., Ltd DRFXL (MotherBoard Series) - 896,6 tok/s Generation, 3.860 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 6.490 ms (3 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ Meigao Innovation Tec...
ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ProArt X870E-CREATOR WIFI 1.791,5 tok/sASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ROG STRIX B550-A GAMING 1.706,7 tok/sASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX90E-SAGE SE 1.651,0 tok/s★ Meigao Innovation Technology (Shen Zhen) Co., Ltd DRFXL (MotherBoard Series) 896,6 tok/s this runASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI 262,5 tok/s

ENGby engine

2.2241.6911.15962794,92.3666.45810.55114.644Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)vLLM - 527,0 tok/s Generation, 12.469 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 1.051 ms (12 Laufe)vLLMllama.cpp - 1.791,5 tok/s Generation, 4.541 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 17.628 ms (49 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ llama.cpp
★ llama.cpp 1.791,5 tok/s this runvLLM 527,0 tok/s

DRVby driver

1.9711.8811.7911.7021.6125.7345.9786.2226.466Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)unbekannt - 1.791,5 tok/s Generation, 6.100 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 14.367 ms (61 Laufe)unbekannt
unbekannt 1.791,5 tok/s
💰 Economics

Economics of this run

Operating cost, TCO and comparison with the next-best runs of the same model at identical concurrency (1× concurrent). Methodology →

⚙️ ConfigurationAll metrics and charts below follow these settings – based on a 24-month runtime.Save to URLReset
⚡ Electricity price EUR/kWh
⚙️ System utilization 100 %
🖥️ Acquisition EUR
🔌 Idle 50 W
⚡ TDP 477 W
☁️ External LLM (API)
Electricity0.30 EUR/kWh
Avg power (incl. idle)477 W estimated (TDP)GPU 450 + CPU 17 + Board 10 W full load
Avg cost / hourEUR 0.14
Electricity / 1M tokensEUR 0.18
Token / kWh1.67M
Acquisition (system)EUR 2,986 partial priceGPU EUR 999 · CPU EUR 549 · RAM EUR 1,288 · PSU EUR 150
Electricity (2 years)
TCO (2 years)EUR 5,494
Output tokens (2 years)13.99B
☁️ External LLM (API) – comparison
External LLM cost (2 years)
Savings vs. external (2 years)

All values above and the charts below take the configured system utilization into account: at X% the system generates only X% of the time, the rest it idles (50 W). Cost per hour drops (more idle), cost per token rises.

Cost over 2 years – electricity only

Cost over 2 years – incl. acquisition (TCO)

Speed vs. tokens per euro

Euro per 1M tokens

Comparison vs. API – economics per benchmark

Nemotron-3-Nano-Omni-30B-A3B-ReasoningNVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 TiNemotron-3-Nano-Omni-30B-A3B-ReasoningNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090Nemotron-3-Nano-Omni-30B-A3B-ReasoningNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation EditionNemotron-3-Nano-Omni-30B-A3B-Reasoning3x NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition
Electricity cost (24 mo.)
Acquisition cost
Total cost (TCO)
Generated tokens (24 mo.)
Token price via API
Break-even point (days)
Result (savings / extra cost)

Comparison with up to 3 next-best runs of this model at the same concurrency (at least one on different hardware). Power = GPU TDP + CPU (idle + 15 %) + board (estimated), acquisition = full system (GPU + CPU + board + RAM + PSU), prices = stored market prices.

Contributed by

Mario Alka Administrator

@marioalka

Ich bin Unternehmer, Softwareentwickler und KI-Enthusiast. Seit vielen Jahren entwickle ich Unternehmenssoftware und beschäftige mich inzwischen fast täglich mit lokalen LLMs, KI-Agenten und leistungsfähiger KI-Hardware.

Mit LLM-Benchmark.de möchte ich eine Plattform schaffen, auf der Modelle, GPUs und Agenten objektiv und reproduzierbar miteinander verglichen werden.